Determination of prostate volume with transrectal US for cancer screening.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to W F Dähnert.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Four fine-needle aspiration biopsy needles with different tip configurations were used in 133 patients with abdominal lesions. The 20-gauge needles were used in random sequence by several physicians. The specimen from each of the 522 needle passes was evaluated by two cytopathologists for adequacy to render a diagnosis and for the presence of cell block material. The Franseen needle produced a 16% and 9% better yield for diagnostic material than did the cut biopsy and spinal needles (P less than .05), respectively. The Westcott needle was better than the cut biopsy needle by 13%, and the spinal needle produced an 11% better yield than did the cut biopsy needle. Differences did not exist in liver biopsies but were present in pancreatic biopsies. The spinal needle was the least successful in yielding cell block material. Use of the cut biopsy needle resulted in the largest proportion of inadequate specimens, except its yield in cell blocks in the liver was 25% higher than that of the Westcott needle. The authors conclude that not all unusual designs for 20-gauge needle tips render results superior to those of the simple spinal needle.
Fifty-two patients with clinical stage A and B carcinomas of the prostate were imaged by ultrasound (US) transrectally with a 5-MHz linear array transducer and transabdominally with a 3-MHz sector scanner prior to radical prostatectomy. The fresh specimens of 44 prostate glands were scanned in a water bath with a 5-MHz linear array transducer in multiple planes. In all cases, histopathologic correlation was obtained. Prostatic carcinoma presented as an echopenic lesion in 54% of the specimens, as a slightly hypoechoic area in 22%, and could not be identified in 24% because of its isoechoic characteristics. In contrast to many previous reports, no instance of echogenic cancer was observed.
The sonograms of 42 patients scanned before and after radical prostatectomy were reviewed, giving specific attention to echogenic foci. All patients had clinical stage A or B adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Comparison of the scans with xeroradiographic and histopathologic studies showed all echogenic foci, with or without acoustic shadowing, to represent prostatic calcifications. Calcifications were located in the central portion of the gland exclusively, either immediately adjacent to the urethra or at the margins of the "internal gland", separate from the peripheral location of small tumors. With carcinomatous spread toward the urethra, calculi were found surrounded by tumor. This was considered a result of secondary involvement rather than dystrophic tumor calcification. Prostatic calcifications seem unrelated to the development of adenocarcinoma but must be recognized to prevent erroneous interpretation.