Violent brain injuries by gunshot in Duval County, Florida, 1989-1991.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to W F Fallon.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The role of colostomy in the treatment of abdominal trauma has changed over the past several decades. Primarily as a result of its successful use in military settings, colostomy initially was the mainstay of treatment for penetrating injury to the colon, rectal injury, and some forms of blunt trauma. Subsequent civilian experience with the techniques of primary repair of penetrating colon injury resulted in a decrease in the number of colostomies performed. Coupled with this experience, early data on adverse outcome from colostomy closure tended to support the trend of the ever-diminishing place of colostomy for trauma. Colostomy has always been used for two purposes in trauma care: prevention or arrest of fecal contamination of the peritoneal cavity and diversion of the fecal stream. Despite the decreased need for colostomy in some forms of penetrating colon injury, there are several conditions that still utilize colostomy to accomplish one or both of these purposes. Indications for colostomy can now be regarded as absolute or relative depending upon the need for diversion or the requirement to prevent contamination. There are relatively few contraindications to colostomy use. Present results of colostomy closure do not represent excessive risk to the patient and should not impact negatively on the decision to perform a colostomy for trauma.
Since 1977, six clinical trials have been performed on the subject of routine antibiotic prophylaxis in patients requiring tube thoracostomy for trauma. No definitive conclusions have been reached regarding the efficacy of antibiotic use in this setting. The results of these clinical trials were pooled to generate an unbiased estimate of the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis for tube thoracostomy using the technique of meta-analysis. Meta-analysis is a statistical method for synthesizing results from separate but similar experiments, grouping them, and comparing each to the null hypothesis. Meta-analysis allows synthesis of all of the available data on antibiotic prophylaxis for tube thoracostomy to resolve the controversy surrounding this issue generated by different but similar clinical studies with conflicting results. Despite different conclusions of value when taken individually, the combined analysis does not support the null hypothesis (no effect of antibiotics). The statistical method is highly significant despite different mechanisms of injury, pathologic findings, and antibiotics employed.
The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of an antibiotic regimen on the incidence of empyema in patients admitted with isolated chest trauma (ISS 9/10) and hemopneumothorax requiring tube thoracostomy. All patients with isolated chest trauma and hemopneumothorax (estimated ISS 9 or 10) seen in our trauma center were considered eligible for this study. Patients were excluded for the following reasons: age less than 18 years, presence of shock at the time of initial resuscitation, ongoing antibiotic therapy for unrelated disease, documented pre-existing infection or documented abnormal immune status. Ninety patients were randomized to two treatment limbs: antibiotics and tube thoracostomy or tube thoracostomy alone. All patients had the procedure performed in the trauma center in a standard fashion. Wound care and tube care were identical. Antibiotic therapy consisted of a first-generation cephalosporin (cefazolin), one dose given just before the procedure and then q 6 h into the tube removal. Injury Severity Scores were established as described by Schwab after the manner of Baker. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher's exact test of binary outcome. In this study, antibiotics were able to reduce the incidence of empyema in patients with isolated chest trauma and for such patients antibiotic treatment appears justified. Further work is required to determine the effect on patients with more severe injury and multisystem involvement.
While clear-cut evidence exists documenting the extensive tissue destruction from blast and cavitation in high-velocity projectile injury and that wounds from projectiles of all velocities can be contaminated by bacteria potentially leading to infection, less is known about the tissue effects of lower-velocity projectile injury from gunshot wounds seen in the civilian sector. Despite this, traditional recommendations have supported debridement, admission, and aggressive wound care in these patients. This study will determine the effect of two methods of wound care on the outcome of soft-tissue gunshot wounds. Patients who had suffered a gunshot wound and were transported to the Trauma Center at the University of Florida Health Science Center postinjury were considered eligible for this study. All patients with torso injury, skeletal injury, neurovascular injury, or vascular proximity were excluded. Patients were then randomized to two treatment regimens based on a previously determined scheme. All wound care, follow-up, and healing evaluations were performed by the same individual. A total of 163 patients met the study criteria and they were randomized to the two treatment regimens: 89 patients, debridement and wound care; 74 patients, wound care alone. Each group was similar in age, sex, time to treatment, and caliber/velocity. Patients available for follow-up were similar in each group. Four patients in the wound-debridement group and two patients in the conservative wound-care group developed superficial infections. All infections responded to prompt local therapy. This study supports the conservative treatment of soft-tissue injury from low-velocity gunshot wounds.
The prevalence of seizure disorder diagnosis in the general population is between 0.5% and 2.0%. Seizures may be manifested by abnormal motor activity, loss of muscle tone, and changes in mental status. Seizure may increase an individual's risk for traumatic injury by adversely influencing performance in a particular situation. We identified 30 patients admitted to our trauma service over a three-year period with injury related to seizure; 16 were male and 14 were female, with a mean age of 34.8 years. Twenty-eight patients (93%) had a history of seizure activity, with the mean duration of seizure activity of 16.5 years (range, three to 40 years). Both seizure diagnosis and etiology were multifactorial. Multiple drug therapy predominated, phenytoin (Dilantin) being the most frequently used medication. Overall compliance was poor (53%). Only blunt injury occurred in these patients, 50% suffering injury from falls. Injuries from motor vehicle accidents (40%) were the next most frequent (auto crash in seven cases, motorcycle crash in four, and bicycle crash in one case). The remainder of the injuries were burns (10%). Nine patients (30%) required operation. Skeletal injuries predominated (67%). Patients with a history of seizure will be frequently encountered by physicians of all specialties. The patients likely to be at increased risk for injury are noncompliant, have breakthrough seizures (ie, despite therapy), or have the metabolism of their seizure medication altered by alcohol or other drugs. To prevent potentially serious injury, these patients should be identified and counseled.
It is unusual for all anterior abdominal wall muscles to be disrupted in blunt trauma. We have described such a case, which necessitated reevaluation of the recommendations for treatment of traumatic hernia. We have proposed a method of classification of the different types of traumatic hernias so that treatment can be tailored.
Penetrating trauma to the buttock is an injury with potential impact on multiple body systems. The purpose of this study was to review our experience with penetrating trauma to the buttock, to establish the frequency of system injury and related morbidity and mortality, and to make recommendations for the evaluation and management of these injuries. Among the 56 system injuries, soft tissue injuries predominated. Of the 25 operative procedures done, eight were for wound care and debridement and seven for rectal injuries; three were orthopedic, two vascular, three genitourinary, and one neurosurgical. One patient had examination under anesthesia, and one had laparotomy for missile trajectory. There were no deaths in this series. Morbidity consisted of nerve injury/defect in three patients, stroke in one patient, and impotence in one. An understanding of the systems at risk in penetrating buttock trauma is necessary for prompt multisystem work-up.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Paraduodenal hernia is an unusual cause of intestinal obstruction, but one with which all surgeons should be familiar. We reviewed the anatomy, pathophysiology, initial symptoms, radiographic criteria for diagnosis, and subsequent therapy of five patients treated for paraduodenal hernia at Walter Reed Army Medical Center. Contrast radiography of the small intestine remains the mainstay of preoperative diagnosis. Essential components of treatment include bowel reduction and obliteration of the hernia defect by simple closure or by wide opening of the sac. Further recommendations include sparing the inferior mesenteric vessels during the repair of left paraduodenal hernias and transpositioning the right colon to the left side of the abdomen for repair of right paraduodenal hernias.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The purpose of this study was to determine objectively the optimal value or positivity criterion for red blood cell counts in diagnostic peritoneal lavage in stab wounds to the anterior abdomen. Our study group consisted of 91 consecutive adults with abdominal stab wounds who underwent peritoneal lavage. We excluded those patients who met criteria for immediate laparotomy and those with negative stab wound exploration. We divided the patients into two groups based on outcome. Group 1 consisted of those who had undergone laparotomy and had findings that required surgical intervention. Group 2 patients had either undergone laparotomy but had no injury requiring surgical intervention or had no surgery and a benign hospital course and follow-up. Receiver operator characteristic analysis was done on the diagnostic peritoneal lavage RBC counts for both groups. The overlap between the groups was minimal, with 75% of patients in Group 1 having > 120,000 RBC/mm3 and 75% of patients in Group 2 having < 486 RBC/mm3 in the lavage effluent. Using the observed probability of 23.1% of patients with abdominal stab wounds requiring surgery, a RBC count of 50,000/mm3 discriminated best those patients who required surgery from those who did not.
PURPOSE: Appropriateness of helicopter transport for trauma patient transfer is under closer scrutiny with the development of regionalized trauma systems and managed care. This study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of the 14 Association of Air Medical Services (AAMS) guidelines in triaging trauma patients. METHODS: The application of the trauma transport guidelines for 511 patients flown to our trauma center with hospital stays of fewer than 3 days were analyzed to ensure high sensitivity to overtriage. Injury severity score (ISS), revised trauma score (RTS), Glasgow coma scale (GCS), and mortality rates associated with each of the guidelines were analyzed. RESULTS: Each guideline was associated with mortality greater than or equal to 20%, except motor vehicle, falls, amputation, and degloving. All guidelines had significant ISS (> 14), RTS (< 10), and GCS (< 12), except falls (ISS-6.7, RTS-11, GCS-13.3) and amputations (ISS-6.3, RTS-11, GCS-13.5). Degloving, motor vehicle, spinal cord, airway, and extrication also had a significantly higher RTS (> 12). CONCLUSION: The AAMS transport guidelines for trauma patients accurately predict the potential for serious or life-threatening injury, with the exception of falls and amputations. The rapid access to highly skilled reimplantation teams required by patients with amputations justifies helicopter transport. However, falls greater than 20 feet do not appear to identify potential for life-threatening injury.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.