PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

W Furlong

Publications and source records attributed to W Furlong.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

Health-related quality of life in survivors of Wilms' tumor and advanced neuroblastoma: aA cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: In pediatric oncology, Wilms' tumor and advanced neuroblastoma represent opposite ends of the spectra of survival probability and therapeutic intensity. Consequently, it was envisaged that survivors of Wilms' tumor would enjoy better health status and health-related quality of life (HRQL) than survivors of advanced neuroblastoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Health status questionnaires were sent to the parents of all eligible children and to the children themselves if they were > or = 8 years of age. Responses were received from 84% of 93 eligible families. Responses were converted by established algorithms into levels of two multiattribute health status classification systems known as Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3. These systems are linked to measures of preference, in the form of multiattribute utility functions, which provide scores of morbidity for single-attribute levels and of global HRQL for comprehensive health states. RESULTS: A greater burden of morbidity was identified in the survivors of advanced neuroblastoma than in survivors of Wilms' tumor based on the assessments of the parents of these children. In particular, survivors of advanced neuroblastoma exhibited deficits in hearing and speech. It is possible that this morbidity burden reflects the prevalent use of platinum compounds (causing ototoxicity) in this group. Within parent-child dyads there was a high level of percentage agreement on responses in all attributes except cognition. CONCLUSION: Extension of this study to a larger sample size of patients will provide clarification of these observations.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

German cross-cultural adaptation of the Health Utilities Index and its application to a sample of childhood cancer survivors.

UNLABELLED: Steady progress in developing effective treatments for childhood cancer and other severe pediatric diseases has established the need to consider the nature and frequency of late physical and psychological effects. The Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI2/3) systems were developed by Feeny, Furlong, Torrance et al. in Canada. These systems are generic multi-attribute measures of a person's health status and health-related quality of life. The first German version of the Canadian HUI2/3 questionnaire was created in our clinic, following recommended guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures. The usefulness of the resultant version was investigated using a sample of 142 patients who presented to our oncological outpatients' department for a routine health care visit after completion of treatment. The 15 items of the HUI2/3-questionnaire were answered independently by three groups of assessors--nurses, physicians, and parents or patients. Two additional questions covered ratings of the severity of treatment effects and the specification of these effects. The questionnaire was both easy to use and acceptable to the assessors. Percentage agreement between observers about levels for individual attributes ranged from 56% to 100%, with the lowest agreement on the subjective attributes of emotion, pain and cognition. These results are in accordance with previous studies using the original instrument. HUI2 global utility scores were significantly related to ratings of treatment sequelae, giving support to the discriminant validity of the measure. CONCLUSION: The German version of HUI2/3 is a useful instrument with generally high inter-observer agreement and good suitability for outcome measurement in childhood cancer patients. Further research is needed to assess the usefulness of the instrument in other clinical populations and its sensitivity in longitudinal studies.

Child↗
PubMed2000

Health Utilities Index Mark 3: evidence of construct validity for stroke and arthritis in a population health survey.

BACKGROUND: The Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) is a comprehensive, compact health status classification and health state preference system. The HUI3 system has been included in 4 Canadian population health surveys and numerous clinical trials. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the construct validity of the HUI3 for the measurement of health-related quality of life (HRQL) and attribute-specific morbidity in respondents to the 1990 Ontario Health Survey reported to have arthritis or stroke. The authors assessed (1) whether those with stroke, arthritis, and both conditions had lower HRQL scores than those with neither condition and (2) whether HUI3 detects morbidity in specific health attributes affected by arthritis and stroke. Stroke (but not arthritis) were expected to affect speech and cognition; arthritis (but not stroke) to affect pain; both to affect mobility, dexterity, and emotion; and neither to affect vision and hearing. RESEARCH DESIGN: Linear regression models of HRQL and attribute-specific utilities were estimated as a function of 3 indicator variables of health problem (stroke only, arthritis only, both) and variables included to reduce confounding. RESULTS: Subjects with stroke, arthritis, and both conditions had substantially lower HRQL than those with neither condition. Stroke subjects had greater morbidity in speech and cognition than arthritis subjects; somewhat surprisingly, pain morbidity was only slightly higher among arthritis subjects; neither condition affected vision or hearing. These associations were robust to various model specifications. CONCLUSIONS: The HUI3 system appears valid for measuring health status and HRQL for stroke and arthritis in the context of a noninstitutionalized population health survey.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2000

Parental perspectives of the health status and health-related quality of life of teen-aged children who were extremely low birth weight and term controls.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the health status and health-related quality of life of teen-aged children who were extremely low birth weight (ELBW) with matched controls from the perspective of their parents. STUDY DESIGN: Geographically defined cohort; longitudinal follow-up; cross-sectional interviews. PARTICIPANTS: parents of 149/169 (88%) ELBW children between 12 and 16 years of age (including 41 children with neurosensory impairments) and 126/145 (87%) parents of term controls. Health status of the teenagers was classified according to the 6 attributes of the Health Utilities Index Mark 2, based on information obtained during parent interviews. Parents were asked to imagine themselves living in their own child's health state and 4 preselected hypothetical health states when providing directly measured standard gamble utility scores. RESULTS: Parents of ELBW children reported a higher frequency and more complex functional limitations than parents of controls for their own children's health status. Also, the mean utilities were lower (ELBW =.91 vs controls =. 97) and the variability in their scores was greater. There were no differences in the valuation of the hypothetical health states provided by parents of ELBW and control children. CONCLUSIONS: ELBW children were reported to have a greater burden of disability than were control children based on parental descriptions. Nonetheless, parents of ELBW children, on average, rated the health-related quality of life of their children fairly high. Thus, differences in reported functional status are not necessarily associated with lower utility scores.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2000

Chronic pain in a family of 6 in the context of litigation.

We describe a family of 6 (2 parents and 4 children), evaluated 6 and 8 years after a minor car accident for chronic pain. A near identical complex of multiple physical, constitutional, and psychological symptoms were shared by all family members, all of whom bore the diagnosis of fibromyalgia. The case was brought to court after nearly a decade of symptomatology and extensive use of the health care system. The minor compensation awarded was consumed ultimately by legal fees. Psychosocial/personality issues and iatrogenic and medico-legal contributions in the evolution and resolution of the legal claim are discussed.

Accidents, Traffic↗
PubMed1999

Differences in preferences for neonatal outcomes among health care professionals, parents, and adolescents.

CONTEXT: In neonatal intensive care, parents make important clinical management decisions in conjunction with health care professionals. Yet little information is available on whether preferences of health care professionals and parents for the resulting health outcomes differ. OBJECTIVE: To measure and compare preferences for selected health states from the perspectives of health care professionals (ie, neonatologists and neonatal nurses), parents of extremely low-birth-weight (ELBW) or normal birth-weight infants, and adolescents who were either ELBW or normal birth-weight infants. DESIGN: Cross-sectional cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 742 participants were recruited and interviewed between 1993 and 1995, including 100 neonatologists from hospitals throughout Canada; 103 neonatal nurses from 3 regional neonatal intensive care units; 264 adolescents (aged 12-16 years), including 140 who were ELBW infants and 124 sociodemographically matched term controls; and 275 parents of the recruited adolescents. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Preferences (utilities) for 4 to 5 hypothetical health states of children were obtained by direct interviews using the standard gamble method. RESULTS: Overall, neonatologists and nurses had similar preferences for the 5 health states, and a similar proportion rated some health states as worse than death (59% of neonatologists and 68% of nurses; P=.20). Health care professionals rated the health states lower than did parents of ELBW and term infants (P<.001). Overall, 64% of health care professionals and 45% of parents rated 1 or more health states to be worse than death (P<.001). Differences in mean utility scores between health care professionals and parents and adolescent respondents were most pronounced for the 2 most severely disabled health states (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: When asked to rate the health-related quality of life for the hypothetical conditions of children, health care professionals tend to provide lower utility scores than do adolescents and their parents. These findings have implications for decision making in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Health-related quality of life in survivors of tumours of the central nervous system in childhood--a preference-based approach to measurement in a cross-sectional study.

There is an evident need to measure the comprehensive burden of morbidity experienced by survivors of brain tumours in childhood. To this end, a questionnaire based on the Health Utilities Index mark 2 (HUI2) and mark 3 (HUI3) systems was completed independently for a cohort of such children by their parents, by a nurse, by physicians and by a selected group of the children themselves. Each of the HUI2 and HUI3 systems consists of a multi-attribute health status classification scheme linked to a preference function which provides utility scores for levels within single attributes (domains of health) and for global health states. All eligible families (n = 44) participated. Even cognitively impaired children of at least 9.5 years of age could complete the questionnaire. The greatest burden of morbidity, occurring in two-thirds of children, was in the attribute of cognition. Surprisingly, almost one-third of children experienced pain. Global health status was lowest in children who underwent radiotherapy before the age of 5 years and the corresponding utility scores were related inversely to the volume irradiated. Children with demonstrable disease had lower scores than those in whom disease was not evident. There was a high level of agreement (intraclass correlation coefficients > 0.5) on formal assessment of inter-rater reliability for global health-related quality of life utility scores. The usefulness of measures of health status and health-related quality of life, in children surviving brain tumours, has been demonstrated by this study.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Applicability of the Health Utilities Index to a population of childhood survivors of central nervous system tumours in the U.K.

This paper describes the application of a multi-attribute, preference-linked health status and health-related quality of life measurement system--the Health Utilities Index (developed in Canada)--to a group of subjects in the U.K. Children who had survived tumours of the central nervous system (n = 30, age 6-16 years) formed the study group. Respondents (children, parents, physicians and physiotherapists) found the activity (completion of a 15-item questionnaire) to be acceptable and not burdensome (it was accomplished easily by all children > or = 10 years of age). Instrumental reliability was established by acceptable intra- and interobserver agreement and construct validity was supported by strong similarities between the results obtained in this study and those reported from a similar group of children in Canada. The greatest burden of morbidity was reported for the attributes of emotion and cognition (each affected in > 50% of the children). Pain was surprisingly prevalent (affected in approximately one-third of children). The finding of a large number of unique health states emphasises the complex morbidity burden experienced by these children who self-reported poorer overall health (as reflected in utility scores) than did the proxy respondents. The information obtained from this study is readily interpretable and clinically useful. The results of this study also illustrate that extreme caution must be exercised in undertaking linguistic modifications to established instruments for, in this instance, these resulted in a loss of the ability to detect the most severe emotional morbidity and reduced the comparability of results between studies. With this provision, the Health Utilities Index is evidently applicable in the U.K. and the original version has been recommended for use in brain tumour studies by the U.K. CCSG (the U.K. Children's Cancer Study Group).

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Preface

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1999

Assessment of health status and health-related quality of life in survivors of Hodgkin's disease in childhood.

Although the great majority of children with Hodgkin's disease survive with modern treatment strategies, the list of late sequelae is long, yet there is no published information on the comprehensive health status and health-related quality of life (HRQL) in this population. In the experience of a single institution, survivors of Hodgkin's disease in childhood were invited to self-report on their health status using a 15-item questionnaire connected to the Health Utilities Index, a series of multi-attribute health status classification systems that, in turn, are linked to preference functions which provide single-attribute and global utility scores for HRQL. The mean global utility score was 0.85 (on a 0 = dead to 1. 0 = perfect health scale), a figure less than that in survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) but comparable to that in survivors of brain tumors (0.84) or extremely low birthweight (ELBW 0.82). The burden of morbidity is emphasized by the ratio of the numbers of health states per patient:0.67 for survivors of Hodgkin's disease, 0.66 for survivors of brain tumors, 0.39 for survivors of ELBW, 0.47 for survivors of high-risk ALL and 0.28 for survivors of standard-risk ALL. In Hodgkin's disease survivors, the attributes affected most commonly and severely were pain, cognition and emotion. This experience demands exploration of the health status and HRQL in a much larger cohort of such survivors, perhaps in the context of co-operative group studies.

Child↗
PubMed1997

Self-reported comprehensive health status of adult brain tumor patients using the Health Utilities Index.

BACKGROUND: The comprehensive health status of adult survivors of brain tumors is largely unexplored. METHODS: Using a multiattribute approach embodied in a 15-item self-assessment questionnaire, the overall burden of morbidity was measured in 50 brain tumor patients who were attending a neurooncology outpatient clinic. The comprehensive health status was accorded utility scores, and comparisons were made with health status measurements of the general population. RESULTS: The questionnaire was completed with ease by 90% of the respondents. Among the respondents, only 10% of the patients did not report some form of morbidity, and 80% reported multiple impairments. The most prevalent impairments occurred in the attributes of sensation, emotion, and cognition (in this predominantly ambulant group); each of these elements was limited in the majority of patients. A surprising finding was the self-report of pain by nearly 50% of the respondents. CONCLUSIONS: In this group of patients, the burden of morbidity and its complexity greatly exceeded that reported for the general population and were inadequately revealed by Karnofsky performance scores. The use of multiattribute health status measurement tools offers numerous advantages and should be employed in the routine clinical management of cancer patients.

Brain Neoplasms↗
PubMed1997

Does it matter whom and how you ask? inter- and intra-rater agreement in the Ontario Health Survey.

A large amount of information in the 1990 Ontario Health Survey (OHS) was collected from proxy respondents using questions administered in face-to-face interviews. Can this type of information represent candid self-reported measures of health status? Inter-rater agreement was assessed using Cohen's kappa statistic for responses to questions that were answered both by individuals about themselves and by proxies on their behalf. Intra-rater agreement, assessing the effect of mode of survey administration (in-person interviews versus self-completed written questionnaires) on the responses, was also investigated using the kappa statistic. We conclude that: (1) proxy responses in the OHS for impairments of emotion and pain are not reliable indicators of self-response (kappa < 0.32) because proxy respondents consistently under-report the burden of morbidity; (2) levels of morbidity reported by subjects to interviewer-administered questionnaires may underestimate morbidity, relative to morbidity reported by subjects using self-administered questionnaires completed in privacy. We also hypothesize that the relative magnitudes of inaccuracy introduced by interviewer administration relative to proxy reporting depends on the phenomenon being measured. When assessing pain, mode of administration is quantitatively a more important source of disagreement than type of respondent.

Health Status↗
PubMed1996

Self-perceived health status and health-related quality of life of extremely low-birth-weight infants at adolescence.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate and to compare the self-assessed health status and health-related quality of life of extremely low-birth-weight (ELBW) and control infants during adolescence. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study of an inception cohort with a concurrent control group. SETTING: Geographically defined region in central-west Ontario. PARTICIPANTS: We interviewed 141 (83 percent) of 169 ELBW survivors born between 1977 and 1982 and 124 (86 percent) of 145 controls aged between 12 and 16 years. In addition, proxy responses obtained from parents were used for 9 severely impaired teenagers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Assessments of health status (6 attributes), measured with the Health Utilities Index Mark 2 classification system, and health-related quality of life (utilities), quantified with 2 preference measurement techniques, were used to quantify each participants self-reported, subjectively defined health state and 4 preselected hypothetical health states. RESULTS: Adolescents who were ELBW infants reported a higher number of attributes affected, as well as more complex and severe limitations in cognition, sensation, self-care, and pain, compared with controls. Statistically significant differences for the teenagers' health-related quality of life were noted between ELBW and control teenagers in the mean utility scores (0.87 +/- 0.26 vs 0.93 +/- 0.11; P=.02 on a conventional scale where O=dead and 1.00=perfect health). However, a similar percentage of ELBW and control teenagers (71 percent vs 73 percent) gave utility ratings of more than 0.95 for their health status. CONCLUSIONS: Direct measures of self-reported health status and utility scores indicated that, as a cohort, adolescents who were ELBW infants suffer from a greater burden of morbidity and rate their health-related quality of life as significantly lower than control teenagers. Nevertheless, the vast majority of ELBW respondents view their health-related quality of life as quite satisfactory and are difficult to distinguish from controls.

Adolescent↗