PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

W Goldsmith

Publications and source records attributed to W Goldsmith.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Biomechanics and neuropathology of adult and paediatric head injury.

The objective of this study was to understand the biomechanics in age-related primary traumatic brain injuries (TBI) causing initial severity and secondary progressive damage and to develop strategy reducing TBI outcome variability using biomechanical reconstruction to identify types of causal mechanisms prior to clinical trials of neuro-protective treatment. The methods included the explanation of TBI biomechanics and physiopathological mechanisms from dual perspectives of neurosurgery and biomechanical engineering. Scaling of tolerances for skull failure and brain injuries in infants, children and adults are developed. Diagnostic assumptions without biomechanical considerations are critiqued. Methods for retrospective TBI reconstruction for prevention are summarized. Mechanisms of TBI are based on the differences between the mechanical properties of the head and neck related to age. Skull fracture levels correlate with increasing cranial bone thickness and in the development of the cranial sutures in infants and in adults. Head injury tolerance levels at three age categories for cerebral concussion, skull fracture and three grades of diffuse axonal injuries (DAI) are presented. Brain mass correlates inversely for TBI caused by angular head motions and locations of injurious stresses are predictable by centripetal theory. Improved quantitative diagnosis of TBI type and severity levels depend primarily on age and biomechanical mechanisms. Reconstruction of the biomechanics is feasible and enables quantitative stratification of TBI severity. Experimental treatment has succeeded in preventing progressive damage in animal TBI models. In humans this has failed, because the animal model received biomechanically controlled TBI and humans did not. Clinical similarities of human TBI patients do not necessarily predict equivalent biomechanics because such trauma can be produced in various ways. We recommend 'reverse engineering' for in-depth reconstruction of the TBI injury mechanism for qualitative diagnoses and reduction of outcome variability.

Accidental Falls↗

The state of head injury biomechanics: past, present, and future: part 1.

This article is the first of two parts of a comprehensive survey of the biomechanics of head injury since its inception in 1939 in the United States, the separation being made for temporal and spatial reasons. The second portion of this material will be published at a later time in this journal. The discussion will be almost exclusively limited to nonpenetrating events. The topics presented in the following sections include an introduction that discusses the magnitude of the problem, the basic tools of biomechanics, and significant major reference sources covering this subject. This is succeeded by a brief description of the components of the head, classification of head injuries, early experimental investigations and human tolerance considerations, measurement techniques of kinetic parameters, and head motion and head injury investigations prior to 1966. A Head Injury Conference sponsored by the National Institutes of Neurological Diseases and Stroke in 1966 changed the landscape of investigations in this area. While informal collaboration between neurosurgeons and engineers had existed prior to this time, the conference established a permanent mechanism of synergism between these disciplines, produced the first zero-order realistic model of biomechanical head injury investigation, and established a 4-year program of federally funded research into the mechanical properties of the tissues of the cranium. While a recession precluded a continuation of the national sponsorship of such work, this 4-year period of intensive research resulted in a nationwide individual effort to develop further knowledge in this area. The current presentation, then, covers the mechanical and structural properties of solid and fluid tissues of the head, emphasizing progress during the past 3 decades; fetal cranial properties; analytical and numerical head injury models; experimental cranial loads applied to human volunteers and cadaver heads, dynamic loading of surrogate heads; and, finally, head injury mechanisms. The future publication will encompass experimental, analytical, and some numerical and regulatory information and that will be divided into the following sections: 1. head injury experimentation involving translatory and rotational motion: equipment, subjects and mechanical and physiological consequences 2. diffuse axonal injury: production and traumatic effects; mechanical properties at the axonal and neuronal level 3. vehicular crash investigation and simulation: reconstruction methodologies, staging, surrogate validation, and occupant protection, including vehicular design 4. injury thresholds and tolerances, including skull and vessel failure and brain and brainstem damage, including consideration of loading directions 5. criteria for head injury: governmental and industry regulations, including effects of combined motion- and tissue-level loading 6. further discussions of cranial component properties and injury mechanisms 7. sports head injury considerations: boxing, baseball, softball, football, ice hockey, and skiing activities; protective head devices for these activities 8. vehicular protective devices: design, efficacy, standards, and limitations; models for helmets and experimental validation. This presentation is based on my nearly 4 decades of head injury research, continuous collaboration and discussions with prominent members of the neurosurgical and orthopedic community, and an exhaustive, 2-year search of the literature. While every effort has been made to include all relevant information, it is inevitable that some important research has not come to my attention, and I apologize for any such omissions. It is hoped that this survey will serve as a resource for researchers and practitioners in the area of traumatic head injury and provide a roadmap for further investigations that are urgently needed. For example, this could include a determination of the rate of absorption of blood emitted from broken vessels, and, hopefully, some correlation between mechanical failure and physiological dysfunction of the various relevant tissues of the head. Although a good beginning has been initiated, additional information at the neuronal and axonal level concerning the effect of loading on function as well as age-related changes in geometry and tissue properties is also needed.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗

Reaction of a human head/neck/torso system to shock.

The purpose of this study is to predict human response to, and potential damage from, impact loading by using numerical and physical models to monitor the head and thoracic reactions, intervertebral disk pressures, muscle elongations, and some internal organ pressures. The numerical model consists of a three-dimensional lumped-parameter system of ten rigid bodies connected by nine intervertebral joints and 28 muscle pairs. The masses represent the head; cervical vertebrae C1-C2, C3-C4, C5-C6, C7-T1 (the first thoracic vertebra); the entire thorax; lumbar vertebrae L1-L2, L3, L4-L5; and the pelvis. The physical model consists of: a water-filled cadaver skull, held in position by attached ligaments; plastic skeletal components involving vertebrae, sternum, ribs and pelvis; silicon rubber intervertebral disks; fabric muscles and ligaments; and water-filled containers replicating the liver, spleen and kidneys. The pelvis of the model is affixed to a plate mounted on a sled that runs on a track. Loading is applied by deceleration from a given velocity that occurs due to the impact of the sled with a fixed aluminum block. Results from the numerical model are compared with corresponding experimental information from the physical structure. Good correlation was obtained in these comparisons up to about 200-250 ms after impact. The results indicate that the head, cervical muscles and disks in the lumbar region are subjected to the greatest force changes and thus are most likely to be injured.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗

Response of a replicated human heart system to dynamic loading.

The response of the human heart and attached major vasculature to rapid acceleration loading was studied by means of a non-pulsatile replica consisting of leotard fabric components. The system was designed to prevent leakage of water intended to simulate the blood present. This model was emplaced inside a rigid thorax and mounted on a moving cart, with sudden arrest produced by barrier impact. Large displacements of the ventricles and other attached vessels and pressures in the heart compartments were measured. Twelve impacts to the front, side, rear and at oblique incidence for a condition corresponding to the end of diastole were executed. The tests indicated that the strains in the right ventricle and the interchamber pressure were significant. Strains in the inferior vena cava were relatively high with lower values for the superior vena cava. Significant extensions were also observed in the brachiocephalic, left common carotid and left subclavian arteries. These findings qualitatively substantiate clinical experience for humans subjected to rapid non-invasive loading. A simple spring-mass system was used to model the dynamic response of the replicated heart unit. Predicted values were found to be in fair agreement with test data.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗

Response of a human head/neck/upper-torso replica to dynamic loading--I. Physical model.

A human head/neck/upper-torso replica was constructed and instrumented and its response to impact and dynamic loading was studied. The model consists of a water-filled cadaver skull; plastic vertebrae, sternum and ribs; silicon rubber disks and ligaments; and fabric muscles. The static behavior of the system under sagittal plane and lateral loading was adjusted so as to correspond to that of cadaver behavior under similar loading. The structure was loaded impulsively by the sudden arrest of a supporting sled running on a track and by direct head impact with a suspended steel ball. The measured response included the head acceleration, the disk pressures, the muscle strains, the intracranial pressures and the skull strains; the sled motion was also monitored. These data were recorded with a microcomputer and oscilloscopes; the overall system deformation was observed by high-speed cameras. The muscle contraction effects were determined with the aid of microcomputer-controlled devices including a vacuum system, solenoid valves and plastic syringes.

Acceleration↗

Response of a human head/neck/upper-torso replica to dynamic loading--II. Analytical/numerical model.

A three-dimensional lumped-parameter model of the human head/neck/upper-torso was developed to predict its motion for any specified initial conditions and that could also be used to compare with the results of other investigators. This model consists of ten rigid bodies representing the head, cervical vertebrae C1-C7, T1 and T2 combined with the rest of the torso. These rigid bodies were connected by intervertebral joints described by a stiffness matrix relating the force (moment) and translation (rotation). Fifteen pairs of muscles were incorporated in the model, represented by three-point linear elements with nonlinear constitutive relationships obtained from cadaver test results. The calculated response compared favorably with human volunteer data for both flexion and lateral whiplash. However, tests on an inanimate replica of a human indicated greater flexibility than predicted by the corresponding numerical model. The difference is believed to be due to insufficient mass of the muscles incorporated in the structure.

Acceleration↗

Three-dimensional response of a lumped parameter head-neck model due to impact and impulsive loading.

A numerical procedure developed previously for predicting sagittal-plane motion of the human head-neck system due to impact and impulsive loading has been extended to three dimensions. In both situations, a lumped parameter approach is employed, but the current model lumps the mechanical response of each intervertebral joint into a single force-deformation relation evaluated from mechanical properties assembled by various investigators. Computations were performed to obtain the response of the model to a two-dimensional case of flexion whiplash, to one three-dimensional case of side impact to the skull and to another involving base acceleration normal to the sagittal plane. Agreement of the kinematic variables with the results of both the previous two-dimensional analysis and experimental data from a volunteer run is satisfactory, but somewhat poorer correspondence was found for the three-dimensional predictions upon comparison with data obtained from a physical model and from a volunteer when subjected to the prescribed loading. The differences in response are attributed to higher stiffness of facet separation of the model relative both to the structure and the volunteer, to insufficient damping, as well as to substantial differences in the mechanical deformation characteristic of the components of the prototypes and the numerical model.

Atlanto-Axial Joint↗

Response of a human head-neck model to transient saggital plane loading.

A reproducible, synthetic replica of the human head and neck system utilizing a water-filled cadaver skull mounted on fiberglass-reinforced resin vertebrae and supported by passive silicone rubber muscle and ligament elements has been constructed. Contact force, head accelerations, disk pressures and intracranial pressure responses to conditions of transient saggital plane pendulum loading have been ascertained. Front and rear head impacts as well as excitation of the entire system through its rigid base were effected. Input energies ranging from 0.0089 N m to 4.63 N m were employed resulting in head accelerations up to 180 g.

Acceleration↗

Impact resistance of variously mounted ophthalmic lenses.

An experimental investigation was conducted to determine the frangibility of ophthalmic glass lenses loaded by the impact of steel spheres with diameters ranging from 6.35 to 28.6 mm when dropped from heights up to 1.905 m. These lenses were supported either simply, by a ring similar to that used in U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drop tests, or while inserted in three different commercially used frame configurations placed on a head form. Strains up to 4000 mu strain were recorded by gauges cemented to the lenses, and impact forces on the glass up to 10.2 kN were determined, with many lenses surviving. Plano lenses tested according to FDA standards experienced peak values of 2300 mu strain. The maximum force transmitted to the head form at the nose piece was found to be 91 N as determined by embedded crystal transducers. A series of special tests on circular plano lenses inserted in specially constructed rings and a circular eyewire indicated that eyewire tension is not a significant factor in impact resistance of lenses under both static and dynamic loading.

Eyeglasses↗

In-vitro head and neck response to impact.

Two unembalmed and one embalmed human cadaveric head-neck systems were instrumented and subjected to central forehead impact of ballistically suspended 3.07-kg aluminum shell at velocities ranging from 50 to 345 cm/s. Occipital skull accelerations and disk pressures were measured by transducers, while the deformation of the system was determined by framing camera data. The results were found to be in accord with those from corresponding tests in artificial head-neck replica. Initial and terminal X-ray examination of the structure revealed no evidence of either skull or vertebral fractures.

Acceleration↗