PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

W H Ehrenstein

Publications and source records attributed to W H Ehrenstein.

12 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1991

Selective directional sensitivity in visual motion perception.

We present two experiments demonstrating that: (i) the latency of perception of the position of a small visual target moving towards the fovea is shorter than that of the same target moving away from the fovea; (ii) the reaction time (RT) to onset of motion of the same type of target is also shorter when it moves towards the fovea; and (iii) the RT to onset of motion away from the fovea may be shorter when larger, textured stimuli are employed. The relation of the findings to the existence of two systems for visual motion information processing and to recent neurophysiological findings is discussed.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Perceptual constancy during ocular pursuit: a quantitative estimation procedure.

Perceptual constancy of visual motion is usually described as the degree of correspondence between physical and perceived characteristics of motion in the external world. To study it, one has to assess the relationship between physical motion, its retinal image, and its perception. We describe a quantitative estimation procedure for a measure K denoting the degree of perceptual constancy of background target motions noncollinear to the eye movements during ocular pursuit. The calculation of K is based on three vectors describing the target motion (1) as it is physically, (2) as it is mapped to the retina, and (3) as it is perceived, but only the direction of the perceptual motion vector has to be determined experimentally. K allows for quantitative comparison between experiments with a variety of parameters in visual motion displays.

Eye Movements↗
PubMed1990

Visual localization and estimation of extent of target motion during ocular pursuit: a common mechanism?

The ability to localize a visual target and to estimate the distance through which it moves was studied during ocular pursuit. In the first experiment observers had to localize the position of a visually tracked moving target when they heard an acoustic signal. The signal was sounded near the beginning or near the end of the motion. The distance between the perceived positions was shorter than the distance between the corresponding physical positions of the target. The 'shortening' became more pronounced with higher tracking velocity. In another condition the observers estimated the length of the motion path between two successive sound signals, one presented near the beginning and one near the end of the motion. The length of path travelled was underestimated, the effect being stronger with higher tracking velocity. In the second experiment this effect of velocity on the underestimation of distance was shown to exist only during ocular pursuit and not during steady fixation. The hypothesis that localization and estimation of distance during ocular pursuit share a common mechanism is discussed.

Acceleration↗
PubMed1989

Spatial S-R compatibility with orthogonal stimulus-response relationship.

Spatial stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility with unimanual two-finger choice reactions was investigated under conditions in which the spatial orientation of response keys was either parallel to or perpendicular to the orientation of the stimuli. Subjects responded to green or red lights in the left or right visual field (irrelevant stimulus location). The response keys were oriented horizontally on the left or right side of the body midline parallel to the stimuli, and were pressed with the palms facing down (Condition A), or were oriented orthogonally to the stimuli in the midsaggital plane, either horizontally and pressed with palms facing down (B) or facing up (C), or vertically and pressed with palms facing the body (D). The results for Condition A demonstrate the usual spatial S-R compatibility effect between field of stimulation and spatial position of responding finger. For Conditions B and D, a strong reaction time advantage still obtained for those stimulus-finger pairings that are compatible under Condition A. Condition C revealed an RT advantage for the opposite pairings. This shift of the compatibility effect from Condition B to Condition C indicates that the left/right distinction of fingers does not follow a simple, fixed spatio-anatomical mapping rule. The results are discussed within the framework of a hierarchical model of spatial S-R compatibility, with spatial coding and spatio-anatomical mapping as factors.

Adult↗
PubMed1985

Foveal interocular time thresholds and latency differences in multiple sclerosis.

Nineteen patients with suspected multiple sclerosis (MS) and 28 control subjects were foveally stimulated by a small cross formed by rectangular red-light-emitting diodes. By means of crossed polarizers one eye was exposed only to the horizontal bar of the cross, the other to the vertical. Stimulus onset asynchrony ranged from 0 to +/- 300 ms (the horizontal bar preceding or following the vertical). The task was to indicate whether the horizontal or vertical bar had appeared first. Compared with normal subjects, MS patients exhibited much higher time thresholds (ranging from -150 to +130 ms) and had considerable interocular latency differences (up to 29 ms), indicating unilateral or asymmetrical impairment of the visual pathways. The psychophysical latency differences of the patients were compared to monocular latencies and interocular latency differences of the visually evoked cortical potential (VEP) obtained by foveal stimulation. Under the stimulus conditions chosen in this study, the diagnostic value of the psychophysical measurements was equal to or, for McAlpine's classes I and II of definite and probable MS patients, better than that based on VEP recordings.

Adult↗
PubMed1977

Geometry in visual space-some method-dependent (arti)facts.

The measure of scalar curvature K varies with the method used to determine it. Overconstancy is found only with simultaneous comparison, nearly perfect constancy results from successive judgement, while absolute judgement produces underconstancy.

Female↗