PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

W H Matthai

Publications and source records attributed to W H Matthai.

15 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

Predictors of clinical outcome following percutaneous intervention for in-stent restenosis.

Percutaneous intervention for the first episode of in-stent restenosis was performed in 177 patients 5.4 +/- 0.3 months after native coronary stent implantation. Medical records were reviewed and patients contacted 13.3 +/- 1.2 months after in-stent intervention to ascertain the subsequent clinical course. The effects of demographic, procedural, and angiographic variables on clinical outcomes were determined. At 2 years, Kaplan-Meier estimated survival was 93 +/- 3% and freedom from death, myocardial infarction, and a third target artery revascularization (TAR) was 67 +/- 4%. The actuarial frequency of a third TAR was 26 +/- 4% at 1 year. Stratification of outcomes according to timing of in-stent intervention revealed an approximate twofold higher frequency of adverse events among patients with early (</=3 months) in-stent restenosis. Advanced age (p = 0.019), prior coronary bypass (p = 0. 017), and early in-stent intervention (p = 0.006) independently predicted increased mortality at follow-up. Systemic hypertension (p = 0.004), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.044), and early in-stent intervention (p <0.0001) independently predicted a third TAR. These variables (p = 0.007, p = 0.027, and p <0.0001, respectively) also independently predicted a composite end point consisting of death, myocardial infarction, and a third TAR. No angiographic variable predicted outcome after in-stent intervention. Thus, long-term outcome following in-stent intervention was favorable. Early in-stent intervention, advanced age, hypertension, and diabetes predicted adverse outcomes.

Actuarial Analysis↗
PubMed2000

Catheter-induced spasm of the left main coronary artery.

Catheter-induced spasm of the left main coronary artery is rare during catheterization. We present several cases in which the occurrence of both ostial left main and right coronary spasm suggests that multiple sites of spasm may be a clue to this important diagnosis.

Cardiac Catheterization↗
PubMed1999

Antithrombin activity during the period of percutaneous coronary revascularization: relation to heparin use, thrombotic complications and restenosis.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated changes in antithrombin (AT) activity around the time of percutaneous transluminal coronary revascularization (PTCR) with unfractionated heparin anticoagulation and the effects these changes had on major thrombotic complications of PTCR. BACKGROUND: Heparin is used during PTCR to prevent thrombosis. However, heparin, a cofactor for AT, causes AT activity to fall. AT activity <70% is associated with thrombosis. There is a prothrombotic state after heparin discontinuation that has not been well explained. METHODS: Antithrombin activity was sampled at the start and end of PTCR and the next two mornings in 250 consecutive patients. We recorded occurrence of major thrombotic events, defined as 1) major thrombotic complications of PTCR; 2) major in-lab thrombus formation; or 3) subacute occlusion. Discriminant analysis was employed to evaluate the relationship of AT activity to these events. Change in AT activity and its relationship to heparin was evaluated. Evidence of restenosis at six months was obtained. RESULTS: There were 14 major thrombotic events. Antithrombin activity <70% was strongly (p = 0.006) associated with these events. The AT activity fell significantly through the morning after PTCR when 21% of patients had AT activity <70%; AT activity did not normalize until >20 h after heparin discontinuation. Pre-PTCR use of heparin led to lower AT activity in proportion to duration of heparin use. There was no relationship between AT activity and restenosis. CONCLUSIONS: Low AT activity may contribute to major thrombotic complications of PTCR. The way heparin is used before and after PTCR is important to development of low AT activity.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed1999

Use of argatroban during percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Percutaneous coronary revascularization (PTCR) procedures require intense anticoagulation during the procedure to reduce the risk of a thrombotic complication. This anticoagulation is almost always performed with unfractionated heparin. Heparin, however, is far from the ideal anticoagulant for use in PTCR, and its use is contraindicated in patients with known or suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) or the heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis syndrome (HITTS). The incidence of HIT/HITTS in the population undergoing PTCR may be increased due to the widespread use of heparin in cardiovascular patients. Direct thrombin inhibitors such as argatroban do not interact with the antibody that causes HIT/HITTS, and so these agents can be used to provide anticoagulation in patients with this dangerous condition. Argatroban was used in a trial of 50 patients with known or suspected HIT or HITTS who required PTCR. Adequate anticoagulation was achieved in 98% and there was procedural success in 98% with only 1 major bleeding event. These preliminary data suggest that argatroban can be used safely and effectively as an anticoagulant during PTCR in patients with known or suspected HIT or HITTS.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed1997

Expected hemoglobin decrease following percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

To establish expected changes in hemoglobin during and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), we measured hemoglobin before, at the end of, and on the 2 mornings after PTCA in 177 consecutive patients without obvious out-of-laboratory blood loss. From these data, we calculated confidence intervals that can be used to compare group data, possibly to identify excessive blood loss with new devices or antithrombotic agents, and prediction intervals to identify unexpected blood loss in an individual patient.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Complications of cardiac angiography using low- or high-osmolality contrast agents in patients with left main coronary stenosis.

Recently published guidelines suggest that, in view of cost concerns, low-osmolal contrast should be selectively used in patients at increased risk of experiencing a contrast-related complication during cardiac angiography. The suggested criteria include the presence of left main coronary disease. However, the presence of left main disease is not usually known prior to angiography. Contrast-related complications of cardiac angiography were therefore analyzed in a group of 111 clinically stable patients found to have left main coronary stenosis, to determine if use of low-osmolality contrast had any beneficial effect when compared to standard contrast. Data were gathered prospectively as part of a randomized controlled trial, and the subgroup of patients with left main disease was analyzed retrospectively. Complications were divided into minor, intermediate, and major categories. In the 58 patients who received high-osmolar contrast, there were 4 contrast-related minor reactions, 8 intermediate events requiring treatment, and 1 major adverse event. Among the 53 patients who received low-osmolar contrast, there were no minor reactions, 7 intermediate events requiring treatment, and no major adverse events. The only difference of borderline significance was in the incidence of minor reactions requiring no treatment (P = 0.05). Although small and therefore not definitive, this study suggests that 1) universal use of low-osmolar contrast agents would not be expected to eliminate the risk of contrast-related reactions to cardiac angiography; 2) the well-documented clinical differences between high- and low-osmolar contrast primarily involve mild reactions; and 3) standard high-osmolar contrast is reasonably safe in clinically stable patients with left main coronary stenosis. The results therefore are consistent with the notion that selective use of low-osmolar contrast only in unstable patients is safe and appropriate.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

Internal mammary arteriography without selective cannulation using a new balloon occlusion catheter.

Internal mammary artery (IMA) angiography can be difficult and time-consuming. We evaluated a custom designed balloon-tipped catheter, a Berman catheter (Arrow International, Reading, PA) modified by creating an end-hole to allow passage of a wire through the central lumen, for imaging the IMA without selective cannulation. We compared ease of use, procedure time, and image quality of the new catheter with the standard selective catheter technique. Thirty-six patients with IMA grafts were randomly assigned to imaging with either the study catheter or a standard catheter. Image quality, graded from poor to excellent, time to catheter placement in the subclavian artery (TIME 1), time to initial IMA angiography (TIME 2), and the difference between these two (TIME 3) were recorded. TIME 3 defined the time required to find and seat the catheter at the IMA site. The image quality was good or excellent in all but one patient. This one patient, randomized to the standard catheter technique, had poor image quality with the selective catheter. However, exchange for the study catheter resulted in excellent image quality. There was no difference in TIME 1 (P = 0.57) or TIME 2 (P = 0.55) between the two techniques. There was a significant difference in TIME 3 (P = 0.05) favoring the study catheter. There were no complication using either technique and the total contrast volume used was not significantly different between the two techniques (P = 0.32). We conclude that a new catheter technique for imaging the IMA without selective cannulation is safe, fast, easy to use, and may offer particular advantage in patients whose internal mammary artery is difficult to access.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Initial experience with an intracoronary flow support device providing localized drug infusion: the Scimed Dispatch catheter.

Two cases are presented illustrating the use of a new intracoronary infusion catheter providing flow support using a unique spiral coil design. Good clinical outcomes were obtained employing 4-hr inflations with localized infusion of urokinase at the site of dissection and extensive clot formation, respectively. This low-profile catheter-mounted device may provide an alternative to stent placement in cases of acute dissection complicated by thrombus formation.

Aortic Dissection↗
PubMed1995

Adverse effects of calcium binding contrast agents in diagnostic cardiac angiography. A comparison between formulations with and without calcium binding additives.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The authors compared complications and hemodynamic and electrophysiologic effects of two formulations of diatrizoate, one with additives that bind calcium and one without, in diagnostic cardiac angiography. METHODS: Two hundred twenty-three consecutive low-risk patients alternately received Hypaque 76 (group 1, little calcium binding effect), and MD 76 (group 2, significant calcium binding). Electrocardiographic and hemodynamic changes related to coronary angiography and left ventriculography were measured, and complications requiring treatment were recorded. RESULTS: There were more complications in patients in group 2 than in group 1 (18 versus 8, P = 0.04). Arterial pressure fell more, the QT interval increased more, and the heart rate fell more in group 2 after coronary angiography. CONCLUSIONS: Formulations of diatrizoate that minimize calcium binding are advocated for cardiac angiography when using high osmolality contrast media. The more detrimental effects that calcium binding has on myocardial function and cardiac conduction may lead to the higher incidence of complications.

Angina Pectoris↗
PubMed1994

A comparison of low- with high-osmolality contrast agents in cardiac angiography. Identification of criteria for selective use.

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists as to whether low-osmolality radiographic contrast agents, which have less detrimental pharmacological effects but are considerably more expensive than high-osmolality agents, should be used universally or only for selected high-risk patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: A randomized, double-blind study was used to compare the frequency and severity of adverse events in 2245 consecutive patients undergoing diagnostic cardiac angiography. Two thousand one hundred sixty-six patients were successfully randomized to either iohexol, a low-osmolality contrast agent, or diatrizoate (as Hypaque 76), a high-osmolality agent. The end point event included clinically important adverse events (which jeopardized the patient or required aggressive treatment), contrast agent-related procedure abbreviations, and conversion to open-label contrast agent. Clinically important end point events were associated with increased age, New York Heart Association functional class, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, arteriovenous oxygen difference, severity of coronary artery disease, and history of a previous reaction to contrast agent. End point events were less frequent in patients receiving iohexol (2.6% versus 4.6%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.97-2.60; P = .07). The difference in event frequency between iohexol and diatrizoate was confined to the highest-risk quartile of the patient population. An algorithm was developed to classify patients as being at high or low risk for an event based on patient age, New York Heart Association class, history of a prior contrast reaction, and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure. Application of this algorithm for selective use of low-osmolality agents only for high-risk patients to a theoretical population of 1000 patients reduced contrast agent costs 66% without increasing the frequency of contrast agent-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The advantages of low-osmolality contrast agents are clinically important in patients with severe heart disease but are not in less ill patients. Universal use of low-osmolality agents for cardiac angiography in an unselected population is not necessary. Appropriately guided selective use of low-osmolality contrast agents is feasible and has the potential to reduce cost substantially without compromising safety or effectiveness.

Algorithms↗
PubMed1994

Clinical and economic factors in the selection of low-osmolality contrast media.

Both high- and low-osmolality contrast media are available for most radiographic procedures requiring iodinated contrast material. Newer low-osmolality contrast media cost much more than conventional high-osmolality formulations but cause fewer adverse reactions. However, most of these reactions are mild and easily treated, and do not affect the outcome of the procedure. Whether these additional clinical benefits justify the added cost is a crucial question which has not been answered. This review introduces some of the economic and clinical issues on which the choice of contrast media should be based. Low-osmolality contrast agents are not cost effective considering current pricing strategies and current inability to select patients at increased risk of an adverse event. Therefore, a better understanding of these adverse events and their mechanism takes on added importance.

Contrast Media↗
PubMed1993

Right ventricular-vascular interaction in congestive heart failure. Importance of low-frequency impedance.

BACKGROUND: Vasodilator agents are widely used in congestive heart failure. These agents may have important effects on the pulsatile aspects of right ventricular hydraulic load. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifteen patients with severe congestive heart failure were studied during cardiac catheterization by use of high-fidelity pressure transducers and a catheter-mounted flow velocity probe. Three graded doses of nitroprusside were infused as pulmonary artery (PA) pressure and flow were continuously recorded. From Fourier transforms of signal-averaged waves, PA impedance, hydraulic power, and wave reflection indices were derived. At the highest dose of nitroprusside (66 +/- 41 micrograms/min), cardiac output was significantly improved, whereas PA mean and wedge pressure, resistance, impedance at the first harmonic, characteristic impedance, and wave reflection amplitude were all reduced. At the dose (32 +/- 20 micrograms/min) at which cardiac output first showed improvement, only PA mean pressure and first-harmonic impedance were significantly reduced. Hydraulic power cost per unit of forward flow was also lowered at this dose, despite lack of significant change in pulmonary vascular resistance. At the lowest dose of nitroprusside (11 +/- 4 micrograms/min), six patients experienced a decrease in stroke volume, whereas the other nine were either unchanged (n = 1) or showed an increase (n = 8). Multiple regression revealed that only the change in first-harmonic impedance correlated with this effect, increasing when stroke volume decreased and decreasing when stroke volume increased (P = .02). The change in first-harmonic impedance at this dose appeared to be caused by alterations in the amplitude of PA wave reflections. At higher doses, changes in mean PA pressure (but not in pulmonary vascular resistance) correlated with changes in stroke volume. CONCLUSIONS: Nitroprusside vasodilation at low doses alters PA hemodynamics in congestive heart failure primarily through changes in low-frequency impedance. In some patients, this effect is associated with decreased stroke output. At higher doses, favorable alterations in resistance, low- and high-frequency impedance, and wave reflections all contribute to increased forward flow and decreased power requirement per unit forward flow. These findings show that ventricular-vascular interaction is importantly affected by pulmonary vasodilation and that appreciation of pulsatile properties is required to understand the effects of pulmonary vasodilation on cardiac output.

Blood Flow Velocity↗
PubMed1992

Failure of endocardial biopsy from the internal jugular vein due to endocardial scar: a new indication for the femoral venous approach.

Following cardiac transplantation, patients undergo serial endomyocardial biopsies to evaluate rejection, usually by the internal jugular approach. A case report and data are presented that demonstrate that this approach becomes less efficient and occasionally impossible in the third year after transplant (53% success rate per biopsy attempt) as compared to the first year after transplant (80%) probably due to the development of endocardial scar in the area sampled by the bioptome. Alternatively, one can change to the femoral venous approach which continues to have a high success rate in the third year after transplant (83%) because a different area of the interventricular septum is sampled when this approach is used.

Biopsy↗
PubMed1991

Choice of contrast agents for cardiac angiography: review and recommendations based on clinically important distinctions.

Low osmolal contrast agents (LOCA) are measurably superior to high osmolal contrast agents (HOCA) in a number of properties. However, LOCA are substantially more expensive than HOCA, and universal use of LOCA for cardiac angiography would strain the health care budget. Therefore, the choice to use LOCA in place of HOCA should be based on clinically important differences. Review of available published data suggests that HOCA can be used safely and effectively for cardiac angiography in patients with mild or moderately severe heart disease. When HOCA are used, those that do not bind calcium should be chosen as they cause fewer clinically important adverse reactions than those that do bind calcium. Use of LOCA may offer added safety in high risk patients, although to date, this conclusion has not been proved with clinical experience. Nonionic LOCA may be safer to use than ionic LOCA.

Angiocardiography↗