Biomedical subjects

W J Curran

Publications and source records attributed to W J Curran.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1992

A randomized trial of accelerated hyperfractionated radiation therapy and bis-chloroethyl nitrosourea for malignant glioma. A preliminary report of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 83-02.

BACKGROUND: The third and final randomization of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 83-02 was performed to identify the maximal tolerated dose and potential efficacy of accelerated hyperfractionated radiation therapy (AHRT) in 1.6 Gy twice-daily fractions for adult malignant glioma. METHODS: From December 1987 to July 1989, 304 patients with malignant glioma were stratified by age, performance status, and histologic findings and randomized to receive total AHRT doses of 48.0 or 54.4 Gy, with 80 mg/m2 of bis-chloroethyl nitrosourea (BCNU) for 3 days every 8 weeks. Distribution of other prognostic factors, including neurologic function, extent of surgery, tumor size, and sex, was comparable in each treatment arm. RESULTS: One Grade 5 radiation therapy (RT)-related toxic effect was reported (in the 54.4-Gy treatment arm), and the incidence of late Grade 3-5 RT-related toxic effects at 18 months was 1% at 48.0 Gy and 4% at 54.4 Gy. The median survival times (MST) for the 48.0 Gy and 54.4 Gy treatment arms were 11.7 and 10.8 months, respectively, comparable to the MST in prior RTOG trials with a similar proportion of patients with glioblastoma multiforme (79%). For the 123 patients who were 60 years of age or older, the MST for the 48.0 Gy and 54.4 Gy treatment arms were 8.9 and 10.4 months, respectively, and compare favorably with the MST of 6.0 months reported with standard RT and BCNU treatment used for 101 patients who were 60 years of age or older in two prior RTOG malignant glioma trials (74-01 and 79-18). Although these results differ significantly (P = 0.0015), this contrast is not significant when adjusted by performance status. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum tolerated dose of AHRT has yet to be identified, and pursuit of this information may most benefit patients with malignant glioma who are 60 years of age or older.

Carmustine↗

PubMed1992

Comparison of prognostic factors and survival among black patients and white patients treated with irradiation for non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Many studies have reported differences in cancer incidence and survival between populations of Blacks and Whites. A 45% higher death rate from lung cancer for Black men and a survival duration for Black patients with lung cancer that is generally shorter than that for White patients have also been reported. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether race affects known prognostic factors for non-small-cell lung cancer in Black versus White patients. This analysis attempts to determine which prognostic factors may contribute to the reported differences in disease outcome. METHODS: We used data from 1565 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated in four randomized prospective trials conducted by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG). The data were pooled for a retrospective analysis of survival and prognostic factors by race. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed significant differences between Blacks and Whites with regard to sex, weight loss, histology, and RTOG T stage (P < .05), but the only clinically significant difference (P < or = .01) was weight loss. Despite these findings, overall survival for Blacks and Whites did not differ significantly (P = .67). Median survival for Blacks and Whites with a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) of 90 or more was 12.1 and 11.3 months, respectively (P = .45). Survival for Blacks and Whites with a KPS of less than 90 was 7.8 and 6.8 months, respectively. Cause of death did not differ between the two races. For both races, KPS, age, sex, weight loss, and RTOG T and N stages were significant prognostic factors for survival (P < .01), but race was not a significant prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: Further studies of the differential in cancer survival for Blacks and Whites may be indicated, but greater impact may be achieved by addressing socioeconomic factors, lifestyle and occupational risk factors, health education, and access to adequate health care.

Black People↗

PubMed1992

Clinical stage II non-small cell lung cancer treated with radiation therapy alone. The significance of clinically staged ipsilateral hilar adenopathy (N1 disease).

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with clinically staged hilar nodal involvement (Stage N1) or clinical Stage II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, Stage T1-2N1M0) treated with radiation therapy (RT) alone is not well established. METHODS: Records of 758 patients with clinical Stage I-III NSCLC treated with RT were reviewed. Sixty-two patients were identified with clinical Stage II NSCLC, and 126 patients had Stage N1 disease. RESULTS: The median survival time (MST) of the 62 patients with clinical Stage II disease was 17.9 months, with 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall actuarial survival rates of 70%, 33%, 20%, and 12%, respectively. The survival of patients with clinical Stage II disease was significantly better than that of 389 patients with clinical Stage IIIA disease (MST, 11.3 months; P < 0.008) and 267 patients with clinical Stage IIIB disease (MST, 9.8 months; P = 0.0003), but it was similar to that of 40 patients with clinical Stage I lesions (MST, 15.0 months). Patients with performance statuses of 0-1 lived longer than those with a status of 2 or more (MST, 22.8 versus 6.1 months; P < 0.0001). The median survival for patients with N0, N1, N2, and N3 disease was 13.7, 12.6, 10.9, and 9.1 months, respectively. Patients with Stage N0-1 disease (MST, 13.2 months) had significantly improved MST compared with those with Stage N2-3 disease (MST, 10.3 months). CONCLUSIONS: The survival of patients with clinical Stage II NSCLC treated with RT alone was significantly better than that of those with clinical Stage IIIA or IIIB disease. It was comparable to that of patients with clinical Stage I lesions. The clinical staging of nodal involvement limited to the ipsilateral hilum does not necessarily portend a worse prognosis than that of patients with clinical Stage N0 disease. The absence of clinically evident Stage N2-3 disease is of significant predictive value for patients with NSCLC treated with RT.

Aged↗

PubMed1992

Comparison of outcome between clinically staged, unresected superior sulcus tumors and other stage III non-small cell lung carcinomas treated with radiation therapy alone.

Several studies suggest that patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) of the superior sulcus fare better after radiation therapy than those patients with comparable tumors at other thoracic sites. There is limited data on stage-by-stage comparisons between patients with superior sulcus tumors (SST) and non-SST (NSST). Thirty patients had SST among 656 patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer clinically staged IIIA (n = 389) and IIB (n = 267) primary NSCLC who received definitive once-daily radiation therapy. The median patient age, sex ratio, histologic findings, grade, weight loss, and performance status were similar for SST and NSST. Minimum follow-up was 24 months, with 88% of patients followed until death. The survival of patients with SST (median, 10.3 months) was similar to that of patients with tumors at other pulmonary sites (median, 10.8 months; P = 0.39). Survival for favorable patients with performance status 0 to 1 and weight loss of 5% or less was comparable between patients with SST (median, 15.0 months) and NSST were similar for patients with SST and NSST (P = 0.48). The brain was the site of first failure in 20% of patients with SST and 10% of patients with NSCLC at other sites (P = 0.10). The lack of apparent difference in outcome of comparably staged patients with SST and NSST treated with radiation alone may have significant therapeutic implications.

Adult↗

PubMed1992

Should patients with post-resection locoregional recurrence of lung cancer receive aggressive therapy?

The outcome of thirty-seven patients with a post-resection locoregional recurrence of non-small cell lung cancer treated with radiation therapy alone between 1979 and 1989 was compared to that of 759 patients with unresected non-small cell lung cancer also treated with standard radiation during the same period. Each patient's locoregional recurrence was staged using the current American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. Comparison of pretreatment characteristics between the two groups, including age, sex, extent of weight loss, performance status, stage, and histologic subtype revealed fewer patients with greater than 5% weight loss (35 vs. 47%, p = 0.04) and more cases with squamous histology (54 vs. 28%, p = 0.01) among the patients with locoregional recurrences than those with newly diagnosed lesions. Over 80% of both groups had clinical stage III lesions. The median radiation doses were 56 and 59 Gy for recurrent and newly diagnosed cases (p = NS). For the patients with locoregional recurrences, the median time from resection to recurrence was 13 months (range: 3-118 months), and the recurrences were predominantly nodal in 25 cases, chest wall/pleural in four and at the bronchial stump in eight. When measured from the date of documented recurrence, the median survival time and 2-year actuarial survival rate of the patients with recurrent lesions were 12 months and 22%, as compared to 12 months and 26% for the newly diagnosed patients (p = NS). Freedom from documented locoregional tumor progression at 2 years was 30% for both groups. Patients with bronchial stump lesions had superior survival to those with nodal or chest wall recurrences, with a median survival time of 36 versus 9 months. A therapeutic approach to selected patients with post-resection locoregional recurrence of non-small cell lung cancer equally aggressive to that for newly diagnosed lung cancer patients is justified by these results, especially for patients with bronchial stump recurrences.

Adult↗

PubMed1992

Adverse influence of younger age on outcome in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) treated with radiation therapy (RT) alone.

Treatment outcome of 63 patients younger than 50 years of age initiated on a course of once-daily definitive radiation therapy without concurrent or preirradiation chemotherapy for clinical Stages I-III unresected non-small cell lung carcinoma from 1978 to 1988 was compared to the outcome of 695 patients over the age of 50. Follow-up ranged from 24-110 months with follow-up until death in 88% of patients. The actuarial overall survival rate for all patients was 22% at 2 years with a median survival time of 11.5 months. Patients less than 50 and greater than or equal to 50 years old were similar in male:female ratio, distribution of histologic subtype, performance status, and extent of weight loss. Poorly differentiated histologic grade was more prevalent among the younger patients (59% vs 41%, p = .005). Ninety-four percent of younger patients and 86% of older patients had clinical stage III disease (p = NS). Survival was significantly worse for patients who were younger than 50 years old (p = .05), with a median survival time of 7.8 months. Median survival time for those patients 50 years of age or older was 12.4 months. Poorer survival outcome among young patients was most pronounced among patients with unfavorable characteristics of poor performance status (greater than or equal to 2) or weight loss (greater than 5%) (p = .002). Distant failure (p = .029) and brain failure (p = .003) as initial site of relapse was more common among younger patients. Among young patients, poor histologic grade was associated with both distant failure (p = .003) and brain metastasis (p = .002). The difference in distribution of histologic grade, incidence of distant failure, particularly in the brain, and poorer survival outcome among patients less than 50 may be indicative of more aggressive tumor behavior in the younger patients. These results indicate that patients less than 50 may require alternate treatment strategies. Age should be considered a stratification variable in non-operative randomized trials of non-small cell lung carcinoma which include patients with non-favorable characteristics.

Adult↗

PubMed1979