PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

W J Judd

Publications and source records attributed to W J Judd.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Molecular defects underlying the Kell null phenotype.

Expression of the Kell blood group system is dependent on two proteins, Kell and XK, that are linked by a single disulfide bond. Kell, a type II membrane glycoprotein, is a zinc endopeptidase, while XK, which has 10 transmembrane domains, is a putative membrane transporter. A rare phenotype termed Kell null (Ko) is characterized by the absence of Kell protein and Kell antigens from the red cell membrane and diminished amounts of XK protein. We determined the molecular basis of eight unrelated persons with Ko phenotypes by sequencing the coding and the intron-exon splice regions of KEL and, in some cases, analysis of mRNA transcripts and expression of mutants on the cell surface of transfected cells. Six subjects were homozygous: four with premature stop codons, one with a 5' splice site mutation, G to A, in intron 3, and one with an amino acid substitution (S676N) in exon 18. Two Ko persons with premature stop codons had identical mutations in exon 4 (R128Stop), another had a different mutation in exon 4 (C83Stop), and the fourth had a stop codon in exon 9 (Q348Stop). Two Ko persons were heterozygous for two mutations. One had a 5' splice site mutation (G to A) in intron 3 of one allele that caused aberrant splicing and exon skipping, and the other allele had an amino acid substitution in exon 10 (S363N). The other heterozygote had the same amino acid substitution in exon 10 (S363N) in one allele and a premature stop codon in exon 6 (R192Stop) in the other allele. The S363N and S676N mutants, expressed in 293T cells, were retained in a pre-Golgi compartment and were not transported to the cell surface, indicating that these mutations inhibit trafficking. We conclude that several different molecular defects cause the Kell null phenotype.

Adult↗

The first example of a paraben-dependent antibody to an Rh protein.

BACKGROUND: Parabens are added to a commercial LISS (C-LISS) to retard microbial growth. Paraben-dependent anti-Jk(a) has been detected by the use of C-LISS. CASE REPORT: Serum from a D+ woman reacted in antiglobulin tests with RBCs stored (2-4 hours, 22-25 degrees C) in C-LISS (Löw and Messeter formulation, Immucor). Freshly prepared C-LISS-suspended RBCs did not react; nor did RBCs stored in LISS-additive reagents, PEG, saline, or homemade LISS. RESULTS: Studies using C-LISS-stored RBCs revealed an antibody that reacted with D+ and rrV+ RBCs, but not with r'r, r"r, or rrV-VS- RBCs. All partial D RBC phenotypes tested reacted, as did D+LW-, rGr, r"Gr, r(y)r, r'(s)rV+VS+, and r'(s)rV-VS+ RBCs. The active ingredient in C-LISS was propylparaben. Other LISS ingredients were not required; saline solutions of propylparaben, ethylparaben, methyl salicylate, 2-phenoxyethanol, and butylparaben were active. Methylparaben and methyl-m-hydroxybenzoate were inactive. Reactivity to C-LISS-stored RBCs could not be inhibited by propylparaben. Reactivity with D+V- and D-V+VS+ RBCs was not separable by adsorption-elution. CONCLUSIONS: This antibody likely detects a neoantigen formed between active compounds and RBC membranes. Review of the structure of active compounds suggests that proximity between methyl and hydroxyl groups is important for binding with RBC membranes. The role of RhD is unclear; no single portion of RhD protein appears to be implicated.

Adult↗

Revisiting the issue: can the reading for serologic reactivity following 37 degrees C incubation be omitted?

BACKGROUND: Omitting the 37 degrees C reading from screening tests for unexpected antibodies results in failure to detect some Rh, K, and Jk agglutinins of potential significance (wanted positives). However, this measure avoids unwanted positive tests due to cold agglutinins. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Using data from prior publications, actual risk calculations (ARCs) were made to predict the risk of eliminating the 37 degrees C reading, pretransfusion direct antiglobulin test (DAT), and routine indirect antiglobulin crossmatch (IAT-XM). ARCs used the equation: wanted positives missed x 0.34 (or 0.80) x 5 x percent antigen-positive, where 0.34 = percent of patients transfused (ARCs for 37 degrees C reading and DAT); 0.80 = percent of crossmatched patients transfused (ARCs for IAT-XM); 5 = average number of units transfused. Following elimination of the 37 degrees C reading, the impact of this change on patient care was monitored. Antibody detection and identification data and transfusion reaction reports for 6 months after the change were reviewed. Recently transfused patients with new antibodies were evaluated for immune hemolysis by review of clinical and laboratory data. The findings were compared with those from the same dates of the preceding year. RESULTS: The risk of transfusing incompatible blood by eliminating the DAT, IAT-XM, and 37 degrees C reading is approximately 1:13,000, 1:2,000, and 1:2,400 units transfused, respectively. The cumulative risk from eliminating all three tests is approximately. 1 :1,000 units. With respect to the 37 degrees C reading, there were no differences between the pre-change and post-change study periods in the incidence of reported transfusion reactions or cases of immune hemolysis associated with newly formed antibodies. However, unwanted positive tests decreased from 162 to 61 following elimination of the 37 degrees C reading. This represents a decrease of 20 percent in the number of samples requiring antibody identification annually. CONCLUSIONS: Eliminating the 37 degrees C reading from pretransfusion antibody screening tests imposes less risk than omitting the routine IAT-XM, and it avoids the time and costs of evaluating unwanted positive tests, thus reducing expenditures and delays in patient care.

Actuarial Analysis↗

Requirements for the electronic crossmatch.

With the integration of laboratory information systems into transfusion services, it is now possible to develop standard operating procedures (SOPs) for an electronic crossmatch (EXM) to replace the immediate-spin crossmatch for detecting ABO incompatibility between the blood sample submitted for pre-transfusion testing and the donor unit selected for transfusion. Essential to the safety of an EXM are requirements that: 1) the computer contains logic to prevent assignment and release of ABO incompatible blood; 2) no clinically significant antibodies are detected in the recipient's serum/plasma and there is no record of previous detection of such antibodies; 3) there are concordant results of at least two determinations of the recipient's ABO type on record, one of which is from a current sample; 4) critical elements of the system have been validated on-site; and, 5) there are mechanisms to verify the correct entry of data prior to release of blood. EXM procedures are in use in at least 10 North American facilities, Scandinavia, Hong Kong and Australia. Some provide blood at remote sites lacking laboratory services. Experience has shown that a combination of properly programmed computer software and carefully developed SOPs can provide a safe and efficient means of detecting ABO incompatibility without performing a serological crossmatch.

Algorithms↗

Electronic verification of donor-recipient compatibility: the computer crossmatch.

BACKGROUND: This article describes standard operating procedures (SOPs) for a computer crossmatch to replace the immediate-spin crossmatch for ABO incompatibility between patient blood samples submitted for pretransfusion testing and the blood component selected for transfusion. These SOPs were developed following recent changes to the Standards for Blood Banks and Transfusion Services of the American Association of Blood Banks (AABB). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: SOPs were developed, utilizing currently available software, for pretransfusion testing. The SOP for donor unit processing entails bar code entry of the unit number, component name, and ABO/Rh type; computer entry and interpretation of serologic reactions; warning of discrepancies between bar code-entered blood type and result interpretation; and quarantine of the donor unit in such instances. The SOP for patient sample testing requires bar code entry of specimen accession number, which accesses patient demographics; computer entry and interpretation of ABO/Rh tests; repeat blood typing at the time of crossmatch if only one patient blood type is on record; and warning if there are nonconcordant current and historical blood types. The computer crossmatch SOP requires bar code entry of specimen accession and donor unit numbers; release of group O red cells pending resolution of discrepancies; and immediate-spin crossmatch during computer downtime. Tables validated on-site prompt warning messages and prevent both computer crossmatch and release if blood components of the wrong ABO type are selected. RESULTS: These SOPs meet the requirements of the 15th edition of the AABB Standards. Projected annual time savings at this institution are > 100,000 workload recording units. Further benefits include reduced patient sample volume requirements, less handling of biohazardous material, and elimination of unwanted positive or negative reactions associated with the immediate-spin crossmatch. Release of incompatible blood components when the wrong patient blood type is on record is addressed by requiring the use of group O red cells in the absence of two concordant blood types, one of which must be from a current sample. CONCLUSION: A combination of existing computer programs and carefully developed SOPs can provide a safe and efficient means of detecting donor-recipient incompatibility without performance of serologic crossmatch.

ABO Blood-Group System↗

Molecular genetic analysis of the ABO blood group system: 1. Weak subgroups: A3 and B3 alleles.

We have determined the nucleotide sequences of the coding region in the last two coding exons of ABO genes (which occupy 91% of the soluble form of A1 transferase) from 7 individuals with weak subgroup phenotypes. Four of the individuals had an A3 phenotype and 3 individuals had a B3 phenotype. We determined the nucleotide sequences based on PCR followed by subcloning and DNA sequencing of the amplified fragments. Two cases of the A3 allele and 1 case of the B3 allele were found to contain a single-base substitution which resulted in an amino acid substitution. However, no other cases of A3 and B3 alleles were found to contain differences in this region. This finding demonstrates for the first time heterogeneity among these weak subgroups at the nucleotide level.

ABO Blood-Group System↗