PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

W J Loos

Publications and source records attributed to W J Loos.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Influence of the cisplatin hydration schedule on topotecan pharmacokinetics.

The study described here was designed to investigate the influence of the hydration schedule of cisplatin on the pharmacokinetics of topotecan. To test this hypothesis, 13 adult cancer patients were treated with intravenous (i.v.) cisplatin followed by i.v. topotecan for 5 days every 3 weeks using a short hydration schedule (SHS) for cisplatin in the first course and a hyper-hydration schedule (HHS) in the second course or vice versa. Topotecan pharmacokinetic analysis was performed in plasma, whole blood and red blood cells in both courses on days 1, 2 and 5. 11 patients received both courses and were pharmacokinetically evaluable. No significant differences between the two studied schedules were noted in the clearances of topotecan on day 1 in the different matrices. However, in both hydration schedules, on average, slightly lower topotecan clearances were observed on both days 2 and 5 compared with day 1 in all of the matrices, while no differences were noted between days 2 and 5. This alteration was independent of the schedule used and was less pronounced than that which has been initially reported for SHS and, overall, will not have clinical consequences.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Irinotecan pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics: the clinical relevance of prolonged exposure to SN-38.

We have shown previously that the terminal disposition half-life of SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan, is much longer than earlier thought. Currently, it is not known whether this prolonged exposure has any relevance toward SN-38-induced toxicity. Here, we found that SN-38 concentrations present in human plasma for up to 3 weeks after a single irinotecan infusion induce significant cytotoxicity in vitro. Using pharmacokinetic data from 26 patients, with sampling up to 500 h, relationships were evaluated between systemic exposure (AUC) to SN-38 and the per cent decrease in absolute neutrophil count (ANC) at nadir, or by taking the entire time course of ANC into account (AOC). The time course of SN-38 concentrations (AUC(500 h)) was significantly related to this AOC (P<0.001). Based on these findings, a new limited-sampling model was developed for SN-38 AUC(500 h) using only two timed samples: AUC(500 h)=(6.588 x C(2.5 h))+(146.4 x C(49.5 h))+15.53, where C(2.5 h) and C(49.5 h) are plasma concentrations at 2.5 and 49.5 h after start of infusion, respectively. The use of this limited-sampling model may open up historic databases to retrospectively obtain information about SN-38-induced toxicity in patients treated with irinotecan.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Modulation of cisplatin pharmacodynamics by Cremophor EL: experimental and clinical studies.

The paclitaxel vehicle Cremophor EL (CrEL) has been shown to selectively inhibit the accumulation of cisplatin in peripheral blood leucocytes, but not in tumour cells in vitro, and we hypothesised that this phenomenon is responsible for the improvement of the therapeutic index of cisplatin observed in combination studies with paclitaxel. Here, we report on studies assessing the interaction between CrEL and cisplatin in a murine model, and involving the potential clinical applicability of CrEL as a protector for cisplatin-associated haematological side-effects. In mice, CrEL (0.17 ml/kg, intravenous (i.v.)) given in combination with cisplatin (10 mg/kg, intraperitoneal (i.p.)) did not change the pharmacokinetics of cisplatin. Cisplatin-induced haematological toxicity, expressed as white blood cells (WBC) at nadir, was significantly reduced by CrEL from 5.05+/-0.95 to 6.50+/-1.31 x 10(9)/l (P=0.0009). Data obtained from cancer patients treated with cisplatin (70 mg/m(2), 3-h i.v.) and topotecan (0.45 or 0.60 mg/m(2)/day x 2) preceded by CrEL (12 ml, 3-h i.v.) (n=6) or without CrEL (n=10) similarly indicated significant differences in the percent decrease in WBC between the groups (46.5+/-18.7 versus 67.2+/-15.0%; P=0.029). Likewise, the percent decrease in platelet count was significantly greater in the absence of CrEL (23.9+/-5.38 versus 73.3+/-15.5%; P=0.0003). Pharmacokinetic parameters of unbound and total cisplatin and of topotecan lactone and total drug were not significantly different from historic control values (P>or=0.245). Overall, this study provides further evidence on the important role of CrEL in the pharmacological and toxicological profile of cisplatin, and implies that reformulation of cisplatin with CrEL for systemic treatment might achieve an improvement of its therapeutic index, particularly in the setting of a weekly dose-dense concept.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Phase I pharmacokinetic and sequence finding study of the combination of docetaxel and methotrexate in patients with solid tumours.

This phase I study was performed to assess the feasibility and possible enhanced antitumour activity of the sequential administration of methotrexate (MTX) and docetaxel (D) in patients with solid tumours. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed to investigate the pharmacokinetic interaction of the two agents. A total of 22 patients were enrolled, a total of six dose levels were investigated. MTX (days 1+15) 30, 40 and 50 mg/m(2)+D (day 2 or day 1) 75 and 85 mg/m(2) with supportive care measures. Both haematological and non-haematological toxicities were significant, preventing dose escalation above MTX 40 mg/m(2)+D 75 mg/m(2). Four partial responses were documented, three in patients with breast cancer, one in a patient with urothelial cell cancer. Pharmacokinetic data did not give an explanation for the significant toxicity as they revealed no interaction of D and MTX kinetics. Methotrexate and 7-OH MTX kinetics seemed to be independent of the administration of D and the moment of D administration appeared not to influence MTX kinetics. The sequential administration of MTX and D results in significant toxicity without any evidence of a clinical benefit.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Population pharmacokinetic and dynamic analysis of the topoisomerase I inhibitor lurtotecan in phase II studies.

Population pharmacokinetic-dynamic analysis was prospectively integrated in a broad phase II program of lurtotecan (GI147211), a novel camptothecin derived topoisomerase I inhibitor, to determine the population pharmacokinetic profile in a larger population, to estimate individual pharmacokinetic parameters and to investigate relationships with clinical outcome. A sparse sampling method was applied during course one, which involved two sampling time-points. A Bayesian algorithm was used to estimate individual pharmacokinetic parameters, in particular total plasma clearance (CL) and volume of distribution. In total, samples were collected of 109 (63%) of 173 patients. Pharmacokinetic-dynamic evaluation could be carried out successfully in 85 (78%) of the sampled patients. CL of lurtotecan showed substantial variability (mean 87 +/- 28 L/h) and was of the same magnitude as in the phase I studies where full pharmacokinetic curves were used. Residual variability in the population estimate of CL was 9.9%. No significant relationships were observed between exposure parameters and toxicity nor likelihood of tumor response, however the latter relationship may well have been obscured by the heterogeneity of the studied population. Prospective implementation of large scale population pharmacokinetic-dynamic analysis is feasible and important to establish whether interpatient variability in drug exposure is a major determinant of toxicity or activity.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Elongated multiple electronic cascade and cyclization spacer systems in activatible anticancer prodrugs for enhanced drug release.

The design and synthesis of several novel elongated self-elimination spacer systems for application in prodrugs is described. These elongated spacer systems can be incorporated between a cleavable specifier and the parent drug. Naphthalene- and biphenyl-containing spacers were synthesized but did not eliminate. Prodrugs of the anticancer agents doxorubicin and paclitaxel are reported that contain two or three electronic cascade spacers. A novel catalytic application of HOBt was found for the synthesis of N-aryl carbamates through reacting a 4-nitrophenyl carbonate with an aniline derivative, to connect the 1,6-elimination spacers via a carbamate linkage. In addition, a double spacer-containing paclitaxel prodrug was synthesized, comprising a 1,6-elimination spacer and a bis-amine linker connected to paclitaxel via a 2'-carbamate linkage. Prodrugs in which the novel spacer systems were incorporated between a specific tripeptide specifier and the parent drug doxorubicin or paclitaxel proved to be significantly faster activated by plasmin in comparison with prodrugs containing conventional spacer systems. It is expected that the generally applicable novel spacer systems reported herein will contribute to future development of improved enzymatically activated prodrugs.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2001

Dose and schedule-finding study of oral topotecan and weekly cisplatin in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.

Both weekly cisplatin chemotherapy and single agent topotecan have proven to be effective in recurrent ovarian cancer. Preclinical data show synergism between cisplatin and topotecan. Side effects for this combination are drug sequence dependent and predominantly haematologic. Since preclinical data suggest that Cremophor EL (CrEL), the formulation vehicle of paclitaxel, has a protective effect on haematological toxicity of cisplatin, CrEL was added to the combination cisplatin and topotecan. In this phase I study, escalating doses of oral topotecan administered on day 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 29, 30, 36, 37, 43, 44 were combined with weekly cisplatin 70 mg m(-2) d(-1) on day 1, 8, 15, 29, 36, 43 (scheme A) or with the presumably less myelotoxic sequence weekly cisplatin day 2, 9, 16, 30, 37, 44 (scheme B). In scheme C, CrEL 12 ml was administered prior to cisplatin in the sequence of Scheme A. 18 patients have received a total of 85 courses. In scheme A 4/10 patients, all treated with topotecan 0.45 mg m(-2) d(-1), experienced DLT: 1 patient had vomiting grade 4, 1 patient had grade 4 neutropenia >5 days, 1 patient had >2 weeks delay due to thrombocytopenia and 1 patient due to neutropenia. Both patients in scheme B (topotecan 0.45 mg m(-2) d(-1)) had DLT due to a delay > 2 weeks because of prolonged haematological toxicity. No DLT was observed in the first 3 patients in scheme C (topotecan 0.45 mg m(-2) d(-1)). However, 2 out of 3 patients treated at dose level topotecan 0.60 mg m(-2)d(-1) in scheme C experienced DLT due to >2 weeks delay because of persistent thrombocytopenia or neutropenia. We conclude that there is a modest clinical effect of CrEL on haematological toxicity for this cisplatin-based combination regimen, which seems to reduce these side effects but does not really enable an increase of the oral topotecan dose.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2001

Body-surface area-based dosing does not increase accuracy of predicting cisplatin exposure.

PURPOSE: Most anticancer drugs are dosed based on body-surface area (BSA) to reduce interindividual variability of drug effects. We evaluated the relevance of this concept for cisplatin by analyzing cisplatin pharmacokinetics obtained in prospective studies in a large patient population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were obtained from 268 adult patients (163 males/105 females; median age, 54 years [range, 21 to 74 years]) with advanced solid tumors treated in phase I/II trials with cisplatin monotherapy or combination chemotherapy with etoposide, irinotecan, topotecan, or docetaxel. Cisplatin was administered either weekly (n = 93) or once every 3 weeks (n = 175) at dose levels of 50 to 100 mg/m(2) (3-hour infusion). Analysis of 485 complete courses was based on measurement of total and non-protein-bound cisplatin in plasma by atomic absorption spectrometry. RESULTS: No pharmacokinetic interaction was found between cisplatin and the anticancer drugs used in combination therapies. A linear correlation was observed between area under the curves of unbound and total cisplatin (r = 0.63). The mean plasma clearance of unbound cisplatin (CL(free)) was 57.1 +/- 14.7 L/h (range, 31.0 to 116 L/h), with an interpatient variability of 25.6%. BSA varied between 1.43 and 2.40 m(2) (mean, 1.86 +/- 0.19 m(2)), with an interpatient variability of 10.4%. When CL(free) was corrected for BSA, interindividual variability remained in the same order (23.6 v 25.6%). Only a weak correlation was found between CL(free) and BSA (r = 0.42). Intrapatient variability in CL(free), calculated from 90 patients was 12.1% +/- 7.8% (range, 0.30% to 32.7%). CONCLUSION: In view of the high interpatient variability in CL(free) relative to variation in observed BSA, no rationale for continuing BSA-based dosing was found. We recommend fixed-dosing regimens for cisplatin.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

The (ir)relevance of plasma protein binding of anticancer drugs.

The major purpose of therapeutic drug monitoring is to enable drug dosage individualization for differences among patients in rates of drug metabolism and/or excretion. The standard analytical methods for measuring concentrations of drugs in plasma determine drug bound to plasma proteins as well as free drug dissolved in plasma water. For this reason, the relationship between total drug concentration in plasma and treatment outcome (i.e. toxicity and efficacy) will only be good if the degree of plasma protein binding of the agent is constant, or if so little drug is protein bound that changes in binding make insignificant changes in unbound concentration. A review of available literature data indicates that, in general, protein binding of anticancer drugs is not of principal clinical relevance. However, there are several instances, in which monitoring of unbound concentrations might be useful: (i) agents demonstrating protein-concentration-dependent binding, (ii) agents that bind irreversible or near covalently, (iii) when formulation excipients modulate unbound drug levels, and (iv) metabolically interconvertible agents. While available evidence suggests that for these agents unbound drug levels correlate better with clinical effects than total plasma concentrations, there are insufficient data to justify the recommendation of the routine use of unbound drug concentration monitoring for any of these agents at present.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2001

Modulation of camptothecin analogs in the treatment of cancer: a review.

The topoisomerase I inhibitors reviewed in this paper are all semisynthetic analogs of camptothecin (CPT). Modulation of this intranuclear enzyme translates clinically in to antitumor activity against a broad spectrum of tumors and is therefore the subject of numerous investigations. We present preclinical and clinical data on CPT analogs that are already being used in clinical practice [i.e. topotecan and irinotecan (CPT-11)] or are currently in clinical development (e.g. 9-aminocamptothecin, 9-nitrocamptotecin, lurtotecan, DX 8951f and BN 80915), as well as drugs that are still only developed in a preclinical setting (silatecans, polymer-bound derivates). A variety of different strategies is being used to modulate the systemic delivery of this class of agents, frequently in order to increase antitumor activity and/or reduce experienced side effects. Three principal approaches are discussed, including: (i) pharmaceutical modulation of formulation vehicles, structural alterations and the search for more water-soluble prodrugs, (ii) modulation of routes of administration and considerations on infusion duration, and (iii) both pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic biomodulation.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Population pharmacokinetics and dynamics in phase II studies of the novel bioreductive alkylating cytotoxic indoloquinone EO9.

Population pharmacokinetic-dynamic analysis was prospectively integrated in the clinical phase II programme of EO9 to determine the population pharmacokinetic profile in a larger population of patients, to estimate individual patient pharmacokinetic parameters, and to investigate relationships between drug exposure and clinical outcome. A sparse sampling method was developed, which involved three sampling times, and was implemented during course 1. A Bayesian algorithm was used to estimate individual pharmacokinetic parameters, in particular total plasma clearance (CL) of EO9 and area under the curve (AUC). In total, samples were collected of 85 (65%) of the patients. Pharmacokinetic evaluation was successful in 61 (72%) of the sampled patients. CL of EO9 showed substantial variability (median 5.08 l/min; range 2.67-6.42) and was of the same magnitude as in the phase I study where full pharmacokinetic profiles were used. No significant relationships were noticed between exposure parameters and safety, but overall limited toxicity was observed. No tumor responses were documented. Prospective implementation of large-scale population pharmacokinetic-dynamic analysis is feasible and may generate important findings, in particular when tumor responses and relevant toxicity are observed.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Clinical pharmacokinetics and metabolism of irinotecan (CPT-11).

CPT-11 belongs to the class of topoisomerase I inhibitors, and it acts as a prodrug of SN-38, which is approximately 100-1000-fold more cytotoxic than the parent drug. CPT-11 has shown a broad spectrum of antitumor activity in preclinical models as well as clinically, with responses observed in various disease types including colorectal, lung, cervical, and ovarian cancer. The pharmacokinetics and metabolism of CPT-11 are extremely complex and have been the subject of intensive investigation in recent years. Both CPT-11 and SN-38 are known in an active lactone form and an inactive carboxylate form, between which an equilibrium exists that depends on the pH and the presence of binding proteins. CPT-11 is subject to extensive metabolic conversion by various enzyme systems, including esterases to form SN-38, UGT1A1 mediating glucuronidation of SN-38, as well as CYP3A4, which forms several pharmacologically inactive oxidation products. Elimination routes of CPT-11 also depend on the presence of drug-transporting proteins, notably P-glycoprotein and canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter, present on the bile canalicular membrane. The various processes mediating drug elimination, either through metabolic breakdown or excretion, likely impact substantially on interindividual variability in drug handling. Strategies to individualize CPT-11 administration schedules based on patient differences in enzyme or protein expression or by coadministration of specific agents modulating side effects are under way and may ultimately lead to more selective chemotherapeutic use of this agent.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗
PubMed2000

Liposomal lurtotecan (NX211): determination of total drug levels in human plasma and urine by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography.

Lurtotecan (GI147211; LRT) is a semisynthetic and water-soluble analogue of the topoisomerase I inhibitor camptothecin. To determine whether the therapeutic efficacy of LRT in patients could be improved, the drug was encapsulated in liposomes (NX211; Gilead Sciences). In order to allow accurate description of the pharmacokinetic behavior of NX211 in cancer patients, we have developed sensitive RP-HPLC assays with fluorescence detection (lambdaex=378 nm; lambdaem=420 nm) for the determination of total LRT levels in human plasma and urine. Sample pretreatment involved deproteinization with 10% (w/v) aqueous perchloric acid-acetonitrile (2:1, v/v), and chromatographic separations were achieved on an Inertsil-ODS 80A analytical column. The lower limit of quantitation (LLQ) was established at 1.00 ng/ml in plasma (200-microl sample) and at 100 ng/ml in urine (200 microl of 40-fold diluted sample). The within-run and between-run precisions were <7.5%. LRT concentrations in urine of <100 ng/ml were determined by a modified procedure comprising a single solvent extraction with n-butanol-diethyl ether (3:4, v/v). In this assay, the fluorescence signal of LRT was increased 14-fold prior to detection by post-column exposure to UV light (254 nm) in a photochemical reaction unit. The LLQ of this assay was 0.500 ng/ml (150-microl sample) and the within-run and between-run precisions were <10%.

Acetonitriles↗
PubMed2000

Determination of camptothecin analogs in biological matrices by high-performance liquid chromatography.

Several analogs of the topoisomerase I inhibitor camptothecin (CPT) have been introduced in clinical practice in the last decade. All CPT analogs are sensitive to a pH-dependent reversible conversion between a pharmacologically active lactone form and its inactive, lactone ring-opened, carboxylate form. The reversible conversion is also dependent on the, sometimes species-dependent, protein binding properties of the two forms, resulting in different lactone to carboxylate plasma ratios for the various analogs. Pharmacokinetic analysis of the CPT analogs is helpful in understanding the pharmacodynamic outcome of drug treatment, in clinical as well preclinical studies. Measurement of these analogs is habitually complicated by the chemical instability of the lactone moiety and necessitates a rapid centrifugation of the blood sample, preferably at the bedside of the patient, to collect the plasma supernatant. Since the lactone forms of these drugs are able to diffuse across cell membranes, including those of the red blood cells, rapid collection and processing is even necessary in the case where only the total concentrations of the CPT analogs are to be measured. Sample pretreatment procedures of the CPT analogs topotecan, irinotecan, 9-aminocamptothecin and lurtotecan are summarized and discussed in this review.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗
PubMed2000

Inter-relationships of paclitaxel disposition, infusion duration and cremophor EL kinetics in cancer patients.

Cremophor EL (CrEL) is a castor oil surfactant used as a vehicle for formulation of a variety of poorly water-soluble agents, including paclitaxel. Recently, we found that CrEL can influence the in vitro blood distribution of paclitaxel by reducing the free drug fraction, thereby altering drug accumulation in erythrocytes. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical pharmacokinetics of CrEL, and to examine inter-relationships of paclitaxel disposition, infusion duration and CrEL kinetics. The CrEL plasma clearance, studied in 17 patients for a total of 28 courses, was time dependent and increased significantly with prolongation of the infusion duration from 1 to 3 to 24 h (p<0.03). An indirect response model, applied based on use of a Hill function for CrEL concentration-dependent alteration of in vivo blood distribution of paclitaxel, was used to fit experimental data of the 3 h infusion (r2=0.733; p=0.00001). Simulations for 1 and 24 h infusions using predicted parameters and CrEL kinetic data revealed that both short and prolonged administration schedules induce a low relative net change in paclitaxel blood distribution. Our pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model demonstrates that CrEL causes disproportional accumulation of paclitaxel in plasma in a 3 h schedule, but is unlikely to affect drug pharmacokinetics in this manner with alternative infusion durations.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗
PubMed2000

Gender-dependent pharmacokinetics of topotecan in adult patients.

Gender-dependent differences in the clinical pharmacokinetic behavior of various drugs have been documented previously. Most commonly, these differences are associated with differences in body composition, renal elimination, drug absorption or hepatic metabolism. Gender-dependent differences in the pharmacokinetics of topotecan (Hycamtin) have not yet been described. In this report, pharmacokinetic data of the lactone and carboxylate forms of topotecan were derived from clinical studies in which topotecan was administered either orally or i.v. to a total of 55 males and 37 females. A significant difference (p=0.0082) of 38% was found between the apparent clearance of topotecan lactone after oral administration in males (237+/-105 l/h) and females (163+/-62.5 l/h). When adjusted for body surface area, this difference remained significant (p=0.031). Similarly, differences were noted in the percentage of topotecan in the lactone form (37.1+/-5.32 versus 41.7+/-6.51%, p=0.0076). Statistical analysis revealed that individual hematocrit values, which were consistently lower in females (p<0.023), were a significant predictor of the apparent topotecan lactone clearance. This was confirmed experimentally in in vitro incubation studies in whole blood using artificially altered hematocrit values and in blood samples from both male and female volunteers. Topotecan is thus subject to significant gender-dependent differences in pharmacokinetics that arise as a result of a physiological difference in hematocrit values between males and females. This finding may have significant implications for the interpretation of the relationships between pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic outcome of topotecan treatment, and may provide a basis for the development and refinement of future clinical protocols.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2000

Phase I pharmacologic study of oral topotecan and intravenous cisplatin: sequence-dependent hematologic side effects.

PURPOSE: In in vitro studies, synergism and sequence-dependent effects were reported for the combination of topotecan and cisplatin. Recently, an oral formulation of topotecan became available. This phase I study was performed to assess the feasibility of the combination of oral topotecan and cisplatin, the pharmacokinetic interaction, and sequence-dependent effects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Topotecan was administered orally (PO) daily for 5 days in escalating doses and cisplatin was given intravenously (IV) at a fixed dose of 75 mg/m(2) either before topotecan administration on day 1 (sequence CT) or after topotecan administration on day 5 (sequence TC) once every 3 weeks. Patients were treated in a randomized cross-over design. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were entered onto the study; one patient was not eligible. Sequence CT induced significantly more severe myelosuppression than did sequence TC, and the maximum-tolerated dosage of topotecan in sequence CT was 1.25 mg/m(2)/d x 5. In sequence TC, the maximum-tolerated dosage of topotecan was 2.0 mg/m(2)/d x 5. Dose-limiting toxicity consisted of myelosuppression and diarrhea. Pharmacokinetics of topotecan and cisplatin were linear over the dose range studied; no sequence-dependent effects were observed. In addition, topotecan did not influence the protein binding of cisplatin or the platinum-DNA adduct formation in peripheral leukocytes in either sequence. CONCLUSION: The recommended dosages for phase II studies involving patients like the patients in our study are topotecan 1.25 mg/m(2)/d PO x 5 preceded by cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) IV day 1 once every 3 weeks, and topotecan 2.0 mg/m(2)/d PO followed by cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) IV day 5. No pharmacokinetic interaction could be discerned in our study. The antitumor efficacy of both schedules should be evaluated in a randomized phase II study.

Adult↗