PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

W J Mandell

Publications and source records attributed to W J Mandell.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

An approach to the impaired physician.

The 1988 California Administrative Code requiring all acute care medical staffs to provide assistance to impaired physicians has not resulted in an increase in the annual census in the Medical Board of California Diversion Program. In part, this lack of an increase is due to the failure of some hospitals to form physician aid committees and to the poor functioning of such committees in other hospitals. The common reasons for these deficiencies are that the medical staff leadership does not think there are any impaired physicians on staff and that they don't know what the committee would do if it were formed. This attitude demonstrates a lack of appreciation for the prevalence of impaired physicians and the tremendous amount of work required (establishing policies and procedures) to identify and help them. This article discusses the prevalence of the impaired physician, the types of impaired physicians, a "cookbook" approach to managing these physicians, and the success of intervention.

Alcoholism↗

A physician's exposure to defamation.

The article defines defamation, discusses how to avoid a defamation action, and suggests defenses against a defamation action. Several examples are given that demonstrate common situations where liability exists and how a physician should respond. The article explains that at times we have a duty to speak and differentiates between our legal, moral, and ethical duty. Defamation should not be a concern for those involved in the peer review process, as long as they are truthful or act in a good faith belief that what they are saying is true. The article should enhance peer review by encouraging physicians to participate without fear of a retaliatory law suit.

California↗

Sometimes we're our own worst enemies.

There is a sense of frustration among physicians involved in the decision and policy making processes within health care institutions. Because the endpoint is reached at glacial speed, too much time, money, and opportunity is lost. The decision making process can be repetitious and tedious because of unnecessary steps. By eliminating certain tactics and strategies employed by upper-level management in many health care institutions, the decision making process becomes more effective. This article focuses on the medical staff's role in the decision making process; explains why tactics to involve the medical staff are ineffective and why eliminating the medical staff from certain aspects of the process does not jeopardize the institution; and concludes that the hospital board and its delegates should be autonomous in the decision making process.

Decision Making, Organizational↗