PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

W J S Kerr

Publications and source records attributed to W J S Kerr.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Maxillary retention: is longer better?

Two different maxillary retention regimes were compared to ascertain if differences in posttreatment relapse existed. The patient pool was derived from subjects being treated at two orthodontic departments in the west of Scotland. Group 1 (20 patients) followed a 6 month regime using removable upper Hawley retainers for a period of 3 months full time and 3 months nights only. Group 2 (18 patients) followed a 1 year regime of 6 months full time and 6 months nights only. The results revealed that maxillary incisor alignment, as determined by Little's irregularity index, had relapsed by an average of 50 per cent of the end of retention value 3 months out of retention in Group 1 but only 23 per cent in Group 2. Although the actual mean values for relapse were 0.77 and 0.23 mm, respectively, seven subjects in Group 1 showed relapse of more than 3 mm as compared with only one in Group 2. This suggests that retaining a case for 1 year rather than 6 months is clinically beneficial.

Adolescent↗

A clinical trial of light cure acrylic resin for orthodontic use.

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain whether or not the less porous surface associated with visible light cure appliances and the absence of free monomer had any measurable affect upon mucosal erythema, and to assess the durability of such appliances in a clinical context. DESIGN: A prospective randomized trial of visible light cure (Triad VLC) and autopolymerizing (Orthoresin) acrylic resin used as orthodontic base plate materials. SETTING: University Dental Hospital and School. SUBJECTS: Fifty subjects from a consecutively enrolled sample of 69 (19 drop outs) for removable appliance therapy (23 VLC, 27 AP). OUTCOME MEASURES: Erythema meter scores and appliance breakages. RESULTS: No statistical difference in mucosal erythema between the two materials was found. Fifty-two per cent of VLC appliances broke during a 6-month period, as opposed to 7 per cent of AP appliances. CONCLUSIONS: VLC appears to have no clinically beneficial effect on the oral mucosa compared with AP. VLC appliances are currently not sufficiently durable to make them a viable alternative to AP appliances.

Acrylic Resins↗