Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to W Jacqueline Kwong.
Consider using the Headache Assessment Quiz, which 76% of providers in this study said enabled patients to adequately convey headache severity/symptoms, compared with just 20% of providers at baseline who thought patients communicated clearly. Use the quiz also to better understand the impact of migraine on a patient's life, and to help determine which patients need migraine-specific therapy.
OBJECTIVE: Impaired performance, which can considerably impact employee output, occurs when employees attempt to continue work with inadequate treatment while experiencing a migraine episode. This analysis examined productivity loss as a result of migraine after treatment with sumatriptan tablets and patients' usual non-triptan therapy when pain was mild (early intervention) versus when pain was moderate/severe. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of data on 6803 migraine days reported by 251 subjects who participated in a clinical trial. RESULTS: Although early intervention significantly reduced productivity loss compared with treatment when pain was moderate/severe for both sumatriptan and non-triptan therapy, productivity loss was consistently lower for sumatriptan than non-triptan therapy for all predose pain intensity levels. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the pharmaco-economic benefits of early intervention with sumatriptan tablets, like the clinical benefits, exceed those of delayed intervention.
BACKGROUND: A new oral form of sumatriptan has been developed to facilitate tablet disintegration and drug dispersion and to mitigate the effects of gastric stasis that can accompany migraine. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects on functional ability of the new fast disintegrating/rapid release formulation of sumatriptan. METHODS: Sumatriptan 50 mg (n = 137), 100 mg (n = 142), or placebo (n = 153) was administered early when pain was mild for the acute treatment of a single migraine attack in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled clinical trial. For this report, main health-outcomes endpoints (which were secondary endpoints for this clinical trial that was primarily designed to assess pain-free efficacy) included functional ability measured through 2 h postdose on a 5-point scale and lost time equivalents, a composite measure of migraine-associated time missed from activities, and reduced effectiveness at activities through 24 h postdose. RESULTS: Normal functional ability was restored in a significantly (p < 0.05) greater percentage of patients treated with sumatriptan than placebo beginning 45 min postdose for sumatriptan 100 mg and 1 h postdose for sumatriptan 50 mg. During the 24 h after initial dosing, the median (range) lost time equivalents for the combination of paid work activities and activities outside of paid work were significantly lower in the groups treated with sumatriptan (1.1 [0-10] sumatriptan 100 mg; 0.8 [0-36] sumatriptan 50 mg) compared with placebo (2.9 [0-24]) (p < or = 0.01 each sumatriptan group versus placebo). The corresponding mean +/- SD values for lost time equivalents were 1.9 +/- 2.3 and 2.5 +/- 4.7 for sumatriptan 100 mg and 50 mg, respectively, compared with 3.5 +/- 4.3 for placebo. CONCLUSION: A new oral sumatriptan formulation confers rapid, sustained restoration of functional ability in the acute treatment of migraine so that patients can return rapidly to normal functioning at work and outside of work.
The effects of monotherapy with lamotrigine on health-related quality of life were compared with those of valproate monotherapy in a randomized, double-blind trial designed to evaluate treatment-emergent weight changes in patients with epilepsy. At the end of 8 months of treatment, significantly more patients using lamotrigine compared with valproate experienced quality-of-life improvements on the Health Perceptions (42% vs 15%), Energy/Fatigue (47% vs 28%), and Social Isolation (35% vs 16%) subscales of the Quality of Life in Epilepsy-89 (QOLIE-89) questionnaire (P<0.05). Compared with valproate-treated patients, lamotrigine-treated patients were four times more likely to experience improvement in Health Perceptions, 2.3 times more likely to experience improvement in Energy/Fatigue, and 2.8 times more likely to experience improvement in Social Isolation (P<0.05). These quality-of-life improvements are consistent with the improvements in mood measured with the Beck Depression Inventory, the Cornell Dysthymia Rating Scale, and the Profile of Mood States among patients receiving lamotrigine. These data show that lamotrigine monotherapy provides benefits over valproate monotherapy in improving several aspects of health-related quality of life in patients with epilepsy. The observation that quality-of-life improvements during lamotrigine monotherapy occurred concurrently with improvements in mood suggests that the quality-of-life and mood changes may be causally related.
OBJECTIVE: To review the evidence regarding antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction and address implications for treatment strategy and health plan coverage policies for antidepressant medications. DATA SOURCES: Primary articles were identified by a MEDLINE and HealthSTAR search to identify English-language studies published between January 1986 and July 2000. Search terms included sexual dysfunction or sexual function and antidepressants, fluoxetine, sertraline, paroxetine, fluvoxamine, citalopram, venlafaxine, nefazodone, bupropion, and mirtazapine. A cross-check of references cited in 10 published reviews yielded additional in-scope articles. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Approximately 200 articles were identified, including 8 randomized controlled trials and numerous open-label studies, case series, and case reports. Of the randomized controlled trials, only 5 were designed to evaluate the incidence of sexual dysfunction associated with antidepressant treatment. Three additional randomized controlled trials included a structured assessment of sexual dysfunction within an efficacy trial. Data extraction excluded case reports, letters, and other limited study designs. A panel survey augmented published reports. DATA SYNTHESIS: Sexual dysfunction is a relatively common adverse effect of many of the antidepressants in common use today. Rates of sexual dysfunction observed in clinical practice may be higher than those reported in the product information for several agents. Selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) appear to be the class of antidepressants most likely to cause sexual dysfunction. Published studies suggest that between 30% and 60% of SSRI-treated patients may experience some form of treatment-induced sexual dysfunction. Bupropion and nefazodone appear to be much less likely to cause sexual dysfunction (<or=10% of patients). Mirtazapine also appears to be associated with a low rate of sexual adverse effects. Panel results largely reflect the consensus of the literature. CONCLUSIONS: Sexual dysfunction is a common adverse effect of antidepressant treatment. Physicians should monitor their patients for antidepressant-induced sexual adverse effects, as these may affect compliance with therapy and ultimate treatment success. In addition to the consequences for patient health and well-being, managed-care organizations should be concerned with sexually related adverse effects of antidepressants, insofar as additional healthcare resources may be required to treat depressed patients in whom these adverse effects arise.
BACKGROUND: This open-label portion of a 2-phase study assessed the effects of the antidepressant bupropion sustained release (SR) on health-related quality of life (QOL) and workplace productivity in patients with major depression. METHOD: Patients (N = 816) with DSM-IV major depression were treated with bupropion SR, 300 mg/day, for 8 weeks. The Clinical Global Impressions scale for Improvement of Illness (CGI-I) was completed at weekly clinic visits. At baseline and week 8, QOL and productivity were assessed. QOL was assessed using the Quality of Life in Depression Scale (QLDS). RESULTS: QOL and productivity were significantly improved from baseline after 8 weeks of treatment with bupropion SR. Mean QLDS scores were 18.98 and 10.36 at baseline and week 8, respectively (mean change = 8.62; p <.001). At week 8 compared with baseline, patients working at a paid job reported missing 1.58 fewer hours of work because of depression during the past 7 days, being 14.6% more effective on the job, working at reduced effectiveness less often, and incurring 6.37 fewer hours of overall lost productivity (p <.001 each variable). Improvements in QOL and productivity were significantly (p <.001) greater in bupropion SR responders (i.e., those with CGI-I scores of "very much improved" or "much improved" during the last 3 weeks of open-label therapy) than in nonresponders. CONCLUSION: Effective treatment of major depression with bupropion SR for 8 weeks is associated with improvements in QOL and reductions in lost workplace productivity. Patients who responded clinically to bupropion SR showed significantly greater improvements in these variables than those who did not respond.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact on costs and outcomes of early migraine treatment with sumatriptan while pain is mild versus sumatriptan treatment of moderate to severe pain. BACKGROUND: Migraines result in substantial pain, impairment, and costs. Recent clinical studies have shown that early treatment with sumatriptan when migraine pain is mild is more effective than sumatriptan treatment when pain is moderate to severe. DESIGN/METHODS: We developed a decision analytical model to assess the costs and outcomes per treated migraine attack, comparing early treatment while pain is mild versus delayed treatment when pain may become moderate/severe using 50 and 100 mg of sumatriptan. Parameters for the model were derived from published literature and analysis of migraine patient diary data. For each patient group the model determined the duration of mild and moderate/severe migraine pain, the proportion of patients pain free at 4 hours after initial therapy with no recurrence, medical care costs, and work loss costs (from migraine-related absenteeism and decreased productivity) during a 24-hour period. Total costs were calculated as the sum of medical care costs plus work loss costs. RESULTS: Early treatment with sumatriptan when migraine pain is mild resulted in substantially decreased total costs per treated attack as compared with treatment when pain is moderate/severe. Early treatment also resulted in decreased time with headache pain, an increased proportion of patients pain free at 4 hours without recurrence, and decreased physician and emergency department visits. Treatment with 100 mg sumatriptan resulted in better outcomes than did treatment with 50 mg sumatriptan, but outcomes with either dose for early treatment of mild pain were superior to those for either dose in delayed treatment when pain may be moderate/severe. CONCLUSIONS: Model-based results indicate that on a treated attack basis, early treatment of migraine with sumatriptan while pain is mild leads to decreased costs and improved outcomes compared to delayed sumatriptan treatment.