Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to W K Hoots.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Haemophilia and inherited bleeding disorders in newborns and their carrier mothers pose unique challenges. The pattern of bleeding and the causes and risk factors for bleeding are decidedly different than an older child or an adult with haemophilia/inherited bleeding disorder. This document outlines the needs for further research and education, summarizes the state of the art background information and provides guidance regarding research, education and access to care issues in this population.
Participants in an international conference on the management of haemophilia patients with inhibitors developed a jointly authored summary of the findings and conclusions of the conference. Current knowledge of the genetic and immunologic mechanisms underlying inhibitor development was briefly summarized. Concerning the purported treatment-related risk factors, conference participants commented on the limitations of the available evidence and the need for more rigorous prospective research in a fully genotyped population. Other clinical considerations discussed included the unproved utility of routine surveillance, the need for assay standardization, the management of acute bleeding and approaches to joint disease prophylaxis and immune tolerance induction (ITI). A number of issues were identified as needing further investigation in larger prospective studies, ideally through international cooperation. Such studies should enroll cohorts that have been scrupulously defined in terms of mutation status and treatment exposure. Finally, conference participants urged their colleagues to participate in the currently ongoing international trials of ITI.
The costs of haemophilia-related care and the impact of unusually expensive, or outlier, patients on these costs have been explored in numerous European, American and Canadian studies during the last decade. In particular, antibodies that neutralize infused factor VIII or IX (high-responding inhibitors) make treatment responses, and thereby costs, much less predictable. There is little debate that the health care costs of haemophilic patients with high-responding inhibitors are routinely higher and more variable than those of non-inhibitor patients. However, the extent to which this is attributable to the few outlier inhibitor patients whose expenditures tend to skew the data is not as clear. To compare the variation and range in health care expenditures among patients with inhibitors and those without, we reviewed data originally gathered during a 24-month period in 1995-1997 from a prospectively created cohort as part of a broader cost and utilization study conducted at a large haemophilia treatment centre. We conclude that although the use of outpatient factor replacement products was not significantly greater or more expensive among inhibitor patients, their hospital-related costs greatly increased overall expenditures. Among our study population, the overall costs associated with inhibitor patients are not only higher in absolute monetary terms, but also in terms of the degree of variation. This variation was demonstrated by: (i) the extremely wide range of costs over an extended timeframe among individual inhibitor patients when compared with those without inhibitors, and (ii) the much larger year-to-year variation in costs among the inhibitor group.
Although up to 80% of high-responding inhibitors in patients with severe factor VIII deficiency can be eliminated using heterogeneous regimens for immune tolerance induction, the residual morbidity in this population of haemophilic patients is far from trivial. There is an exigent need for focussed basic, translational and clinical research to extend our understanding of the pathogenesis of haemophilic inhibitor development. In this article, we identify four key research needs, including (i) whether presently available clotting factor concentrates (CFCs) have differential antigenicity, giving rise to clinically relevant immunogenicity; (ii) the interplay of quantitative and qualitative (e.g. age at first exposure) influences of CFCs as well as host-environmental factors (e.g. vaccination effects) on inhibitor development; (iii) the therapeutic role (if any) that concurrent immune tolerance with suppressive or immune-competitive therapeutic strategies play in inhibitor eradication and (iv) pending any major therapeutic advances, alternative or enhanced strategies for treating acute haemorrhage and for preventing chronic haemorrhagic events in these patients.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Venous access is essential for delivery of haemophilia factor concentrate. Wherever possible, peripheral veins remain the route of choice, and the use of central venous access devices (CVADs) should be limited to cases of clear need in patients with caregivers able to exercise diligence in CVAD care and should continue no longer than necessary. CVADs are of recognized value for repeated administration of coagulation factors in haemophilia, particularly for prophylaxis and immune tolerance therapy and in young children. Evidence to guide best practices has been fragmentary, and standardized methods for CVAD usage have yet to be established. We have developed management recommendations based upon available published evidence as well as extensive clinical experience. These recommendations address patient and CVAD selection; CVAD placement, care and removal; caregiver/patient guidance; and complications, including infection and thrombosis. In the absence of inhibitors, ports are recommended, primarily because of fewer associated infections than with external catheters. For patients with inhibitors, ports also appear to be associated with fewer infections. Infection is the most frequent complication, and recommendations to prevent and treat infections are supported by extensive clinical data and experience. Strict adherence to handwashing and aseptic technique are essential elements of catheter care. Evidence-based data regarding the detection and treatment of CVAD-related thrombotic complications are limited. Caregiver education is an integral part of CVAD use and the procedural practices of users should be regularly re-assessed. These recommendations provide a basis for sound current CVAD practice and are expected to undergo further refinements as new evidence is compiled and clinical experience is gained.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
This prospective, multicentre, open-label study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a plasma-derived factor IX concentrate [Mononine, Coagulation Factor IX (Human) Monoclonal Antibody Purified] administered by continuous intravenous (CIV) infusion to patients with haemophilia B. Admission criteria included documented diagnosis of haemophilia B (mild, moderate, or severe). Twenty-eight patients (25 surgery, two trauma, one severe spontaneous haemorrhage) were enrolled to receive a therapeutic bolus dose followed by CIV infusion of factor IX (FIX) to maintain FIX:C plasma levels of 0.4-1.0 IU mL(-1) (i.e. 40-100%). A median intravenous bolus dose of 54.2 IU kg(-1) FIX was administered to a subset of 13 non-emergency patients 7-21 days prior to CIV infusion to determine pharmacokinetic parameters in order to guide the dosing for CIV. For treatment, a bolus injection (median FIX dose; 89.6 IU kg(-1)) (range, 12.4-108.3), followed by a median total CIV infusion dose of 396.4 IU kg(-1) (range, 44.9-785.5) was administered at a median rate of 3.84 IU kg(-1) h(-1) (range, 1.74-7.33) for 107.17 h (range, 31.75-144). Twenty-four patients completed 72-120 h of FIX CIV infusion. Overall, 'excellent' (i.e. achievement of normal haemostasis) efficacy was reported in 23 of 24 (96%) evaluable patients, and 'good' (i.e. slight oozing) efficacy was reported in one (4%) patient. Median FIX:C was 72-86% for all patients receiving FIX by CIV on all days. Nine patients reported 13 adverse events that were possibly related to study medication but were not deemed serious by the investigator and were mainly because of local irritation at the infusion site. FIX CIV infusion therapy is safe and effective in the treatment of haemophilia B patients undergoing surgery, exposed to trauma, or experiencing severe spontaneous haemorrhage.
Coinfection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and HIV-1 is common in patients with hemophilia and in intravenous drug users. Little, however, is known about the relation between HIV-1 and HCV coinfection and the effects on HCV clearance and pathogenesis. We examined data from 207 HIV-1-infected and 126 HIV-1-uninfected patients with hemophilia enrolled in the multicenter Hemophilia Growth and Development Study. Participants were observed during prospective follow-up for approximately 7 years with annual measurements of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), CD4+ cells, and HCV and HIV-1 RNA levels. Clearance of HCV was more likely to occur in those uninfected with HIV-1 (14.3 versus 2.5%; odds ratio [OR] 4.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.63-14.08, p =.005) and was more common with decreasing age (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.04-1.47; p =.017). HCV RNA levels were higher throughout the 7 years of follow-up in those HIV-1-infected (p <.001). In the HIV-1-infected participants, baseline CD4+ cells were inversely related to HCV RNA with every 100-cell increase associated with a 0.19 log10 copy/ml decrease in HCV RNA (p =.002), and HIV-1 and HCV RNA levels were directly related (p =.008). Increasing HCV RNA levels were also associated with significantly higher ALT levels regardless of HIV-1 infection status. These results demonstrate that HIV-1/HCV co-infection is associated with a reduced likelihood of HCV clearance and that higher levels of HCV RNA are associated with increased hepatic inflammation.
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) coinfection is common in hemophiliacs and injection drug users. To assess the interaction between HCV load and HIV-1 disease progression, we examined 207 HIV-1/HCV-coinfected patients. Patients were followed prospectively for approximately 7 years, and annual measurements of CD4(+) cell counts and HCV and HIV-1 loads were obtained. Survival analysis was used to define the independent effects of HCV load on HIV-1 progression. After controlling for CD4(+) cell count and HIV-1 RNA level, every 10-fold increase in baseline HCV RNA was associated with a relative risk (RR) for clinical progression to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) of 1.66 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-2.51; P=.016) and an RR for AIDS-related mortality of 1.54 (95% CI, 1.03-2.30; P=.036). These findings emphasize the need for further research regarding the use of HIV-1- and HCV-specific therapy in coinfected individuals.
The effect of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection on response to measles, mumps, and rubella revaccination in children and adolescents with hemophilia was evaluated. Antibody levels of measles, mumps, and rubella were assayed at baseline and two annual examinations in 207 HIV-positive and 126 HIV-negative hemophiliacs participating in the Hemophilia Growth and Development Study (HGDS). Response to revaccination was analyzed for participants whose antibody levels were below the cut-off at the start of a year-long observation period. Among HIV-positive participants, antibody levels were below cut-off in 52 subjects for measles, in 71 for mumps, and in 96 for rubella. Among HIV-negative participants, antibody levels were low in 23 subjects for measles, in 23 for mumps, and in 31 for rubella. For measles and mumps antigens, revaccination was associated with a significant increase in redraw antibody levels for HIV-negative participants. Although there was an increase in the mean measles titers for revaccinated HIV-positive participants, it was not significant. Revaccination was associated with an increase in rubella antibodies in HIV-positive and HIV-negative participants. Revaccination with measles and mumps was associated with an increase in antibody levels in HIV-negative participants but not in HIV-positive participants. Both HIV-positive and HIV-negative participants responded to rubella revaccination with an increase in antibody levels.
In developed countries, preferred treatments for both haemophilia A and B have moved toward recombinant clotting factor concentrates, while plasma-derived replacement therapies are still required by many patients. Great improvements have been made in producing relatively pathogen-free clotting factor replacements from pooled plasma. The fluidity and complexity of the worldwide plasma product market are discussed in the context of the 'yin and yang' of plasma therapeutics, showing how multiple issues can influence the safety and availability of clotting factor concentrates. Use of plasma-derived products will likely continue for the next decade for patients with inhibitors, patients with von Willebrand disease, those requiring bypassing agents, in immune tolerance induction, and for treatment of rare inherited deficiencies of procoagulant or anticoagulant proteins. Furthermore, in developing countries many of the most advanced therapies are not available for the majority of haemophilia patients, and thus plasma-derived replacement concentrates will continue to be used even for noninhibitor patients.
Viral reduction techniques help assure the highest level of plasma-product safety that is possible using today's technology. However, worldwide travel and changing demographics could bring new pathogens into focus and thus require plasma-product manufacturers to be continually vigilant in their efforts to refine current reduction techniques and develop and apply new methods. This review focuses on all the currently used viral reduction techniques, why viral reduction continues to be important (even with the use of polymerase chain reaction techniques to improve plasma screening), and possible future directions for viral reduction. When exploring current approaches, including heat treatment (especially pasteurization), solvent/detergent, pH changes, and ultrafiltration, this review also includes (where applicable) the negative impact of these techniques on product integrity and/or viruses not destroyed. Other techniques (eg, chromatography) and the fractionation steps relevant in the production of selected plasma products may also impart viral reduction and are briefly assessed. Relying on an extensive review of current online and printed literature, this article also discusses the current US and European guidelines and regulations that impact viral reduction techniques. This information includes emphasis on the recommendation to use at least 2 reduction techniques (each with a different mode of action) for each plasma product so as to substantially reduce both enveloped and nonenveloped viruses. The approach to validation studies and results from specific studies are reviewed, and future approaches for viral reduction are described.
The evolution of transfusion or infusion therapies for diseases requiring specific protein replacements (e.g., hemophilia A and B and severe combined immunodeficiency syndrome) was dramatic over the second half of the 20th century. Unfortunately, it was accompanied by extreme manifestations of transfusion-transmitted diseases, such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B, and hepatitis C. The milestones of both the replacement therapies and the associated diseases are discussed in this presentation, which focuses on the technologic advances that resulted in even more "pure" replacement therapies for plasma-protein diseases. From donor screening to the development of viral attenuation techniques, every facet of production for these products was impacted by the exigent push for viral safety created by HIV and hepatitis. Almost invariably, this negatively affects total product yield. At the beginning of the 21st century, success in making plasma products safe from recognized and potential pathogens has dramatically increased societal pressures to produce a zero-risk, plasma-derived protein therapy. However, past improvements and low theoretic risks for future pathogen contamination have increased product cost. This is associated with a possible decrease in the overall supply of these plasma proteins because of the reduced numbers of acceptable donors and the loss of protein from expanded attenuation technology. These impacts and the role of dynamic societal and scientific pressures on these decision processes are discussed.
Clotting factor concentrates (CFCs) have evolved substantially toward both safety from pathogens and overall final purity of the products. The array of product types for both factor VIII and factor IX CFCs ranges from so-called intermediate purity (containing multiple plasma proteins), very high purity (containing chiefly the respective purified clotting protein plus an albumin stabilizer), and recombinant CFCs (with or without albumin stabilizers). Each is discussed in the context of theoretic safety, other possible effects on the host (eg, immunogenicity), and the niche that each occupies in the armamentarium for hemophilia therapy. The difficulty in applying a cost-efficacy model for making societal choices about appropriate product selection is discussed in the context of potential or emerging threats to CFC safety (e.g., variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease).