PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

W L Boren

Publications and source records attributed to W L Boren.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Computer use and education in radiology residency programs.

Computers play an increasingly important role in radiology education and research. We surveyed all U.S. residency programs to assess computer availability, education, and use by residents. Out of 210 questionnaires sent, 132 were returned (63% response). Areas of inquiry included computer equipment and software as well as resident use of facilities. Opinions were also solicited concerning the importance of computer literacy and education. Sixty-nine percent of the respondents have computer facilities (61% within the department). Predominant uses include scientific papers, slides/audiovisual presentations and resume preparation. Popular software includes word processing, spreadsheets, databases and graphics. Of those training programs with computers, 85% provided computer education, and most (70%) felt computer training was very important. Forty-seven percent expected their residents to have at least passing acquaintance with computers. However, in 60% of programs with computers, the computers are used by less than half the residents. Of those programs without a computer, 61% provided no computer training, and only 44% felt computer education was very important. A sizable minority of radiology residency programs are still without computer facilities. Those programs that have computers tend to place a greater emphasis on computer education and literacy for radiology residents. However, even in programs that have computers, it seems they are often underutilized by residents.

Computer User Training↗

Comparison of breast consistency at palpation with breast density at mammography.

Palpable breast consistency on physical examination was compared with the breast density on mammography for 909 consecutive patients. One of two experienced nurse practitioners palpated each patient's breasts and assigned a consistency value of 1 (little palpable breast consistency) to 4 (maximal palpable breast consistency). Seven mammographers rated the breast density on mammography as either fatty, mild, moderate, or marked parenchymal density for each breast. A low statistical correlation between the two parameters was shown. Thirty-seven percent of markedly dense breasts on mammography was rated only 1 or 2 on palpation. Thus, breast consistency judged by palpation cannot be directly correlated with the density shown on mammography and cannot be used to predict optimal radiographic technique.

Adult↗