Activated protein C levels in patients with severe sepsis: rebuttal.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Humans↗
Biomedical subjects
W L Macias
Publications and source records attributed to W L Macias.
The development of drotrecogin alfa (activated) for the treatment of severe sepsis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Anti-Infective Agents↗
Site-directed mutagenesis of predicted active site residues in glutamate carboxypeptidase II.
Glutamate carboxypeptidase II (GCP II) catalyzes the extracellular hydrolysis of the neuromodulator N-acetyl-aspartylglutamate to N-acetyl-aspartate and glutamate. GCP II also hydrolyzes gamma-glutamyl bonds in folylpolyglutamate. The predicted amino acid sequence of GCP II displays similarities to aminopeptidases from Streptomyces griseus and Vibrio proteolyticus, whose crystal structures have been determined. These aminopeptidases are cocatalytic zinc metallopeptidases belonging to the peptidase family M28. Specific zinc and substrate ligands have been proposed in GCP II based on the amino acid sequence alignment to these M28 family members. In the present study, site-directed mutagenesis has been used to test the assignment of these putative ligands in human GCP II. Substitutions to the five putative zinc ligands resulted in severely reduced enzyme activity, although mutant protein was expressed as demonstrated by immunoblot analysis. In addition, substitutions of amino acids near the putative zinc ligands have identified other specific residues important for enzyme structure and/or function. Substitutions to putative substrate ligands were less perturbing, and increases in Km were observed for substitutions that introduced a large charge perturbation (e.g., Lys to Glu). The results from substitutions at the proposed zinc and substrate ligands are consistent with the assignment of these residues and suggest that GCP II has a three-dimensional structure similar to other members of the peptidase family M28.
Antigens, Surface↗
Quantification of creatinine kinetic parameters in patients with acute renal failure.
BACKGROUND: Urea kinetic modeling (UKM) and creatinine (Cr) kinetic modeling (CKM) are used in the nutritional evaluation of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Both the UKM-derived normalized protein catabolic rate (nPCR) and the CKM-derived estimate of lean body mass (LBM) may also provide important information in critically ill acute renal failure (ARF) patients. Estimation of LBM may be particularly useful as previous data demonstrate that malnutrition adversely influences outcome in ARF patients. METHODS: Eleven critically ill ARF patients (age 52 +/- 21 years; mean +/- SD) treated with continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) were the study group. They were analyzed at steady state with a single-pool variable-volume model that determined the creatinine generation rate (GCr) by a methodology that we have previously described. RESULTS: The CVVH ultrafiltrate production rate was 913 +/- 49 ml/hr, yielding a blood Cr clearance of 15.2 +/- 0.9 ml/min and a steady state serum Cr of 3.4 +/- 1.7 mg/dl. Daily creatinine generation normalized to body wt (creatinine index: CI) was 6.3 +/- 0.8 and 10.6 +/- 3.0 mg/kg/day for females (N = 4) and males (N = 7), respectively (P < 0.05). Estimated mean LBM was 30.0 +/- 2.0 and 41.2 +/- 7.0 kg in females and males, respectively (P < 0.05), while the same parameter normalized to body wt was 0.50 +/- 0.05 and 0.52 +/- 0.10, respectively. These values are substantially lower than those previously reported for both normal and ESRD patients. Regression analysis demonstrated both GCr (r2 = 0.96; P < 0.001) and LBM (r2 = 0.96; P < 0.001) were significantly correlated with steady state serum Cr in a linear manner. However, no significant correlation (r2 = 0.06; P = 0.24) between nPCR and CI was observed. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest critically ill ARF patients have severe somatic protein depletion. This malnourished state is likely due to deficits established prior to the development of ARF, such as those secondary to underlying chronic illnesses or prolonged hospitalization, and deficits related to acute hypercatabolism. Quantitative assessment of malnutrition in ARF patients with this CKM-based methodology may permit a better understanding of predisposing factors and, consequently, facilitate the development of interventions designed to prevent malnutrition in these patients.
Acute Kidney Injury↗
Renal replacement therapy quantification in acute renal failure.
Recent results suggest that RRT delivery affects outcome in critically ill ARF patients. These data have generated interest in the use of RRT quantification methods, originally developed for ESRD patients, in ARF. However, the fundamental differences between ARF and ESRD, with respect to both patient and therapy characteristics, must be fully appreciated before making this extrapolation. These differences may render many of the simplified ESRD quantification formulae of little use in ARF. As is the case in ESRD, the use of clearance-based methods to compare disparate therapies is problematic in ARF. Although the optimal technique for RRT quantification in ARF remains to be defined, dialysate-side quantification may be the most rational approach for the future, as has been suggested for ESRD patients [43].
Acute Kidney Injury↗
The role of renal replacement therapy quantification in acute renal failure.
The recognition that both morbidity and mortality are inversely related to delivered hemodialysis (HD) dose in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients has substantially changed clinical practices in the United States. A number of quantification techniques, which differ greatly in complexity and sophistication, are now used in ESRD patients. Investigators recently have attempted to extrapolate some of these ESRD quantification methods to the acute renal failure (ARF) setting. This review focuses on these recent attempts. Both patient-related and renal replacement therapy (RRT)-related differences in ESRD and ARF are discussed. In addition, the potential pitfalls of extrapolating certain ESRD quantification methods to RRT in ARF are discussed. Prescription considerations for both intermittent HD (IHD) and continuous RRT (CRRT) are presented. The optimal technique for RRT quantification in ARF remains to be determined.
Humans↗
Extracorporeal therapy requirements for patients with acute renal failure.
Renal replacement therapy (RRT) requirements for critically ill patients with acute renal failure (ARF) depend on numerous factors, including the degree of hypercatabolism, patient size, and desired level of metabolic control. However, the current practice at many institutions is to prescribe generally similar amounts of RRT to ARF patients essentially without regard for the above factors. In this study, a computer-based model designed to permit individualized RRT prescription to ARF patients was developed. The critical input parameter is the desired level of metabolic control, which is the time-averaged BUN (BUNa) or steady-state BUN (BUNs) for intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) or continuous RRT (CRRT), respectively. The basis for the model was a group of 20 patients who received uninterrupted CRRT for at least 5 days. In these patients, the normalized protein catabolic rate (nPCR) increased linearly (r = 0.974) from 1.55 +/- 0.14 g/kg per day (mean +/- SEM) on day 1 to 1.95 +/- 0.15 g/kg per day on day 6. The daily urea generation rate (G), determined from the above linear relationship, was utilized to produce BUN versus time curves by the direct quantification method for simulated patients of varying dry weights (50 to 100 kg) who received variable CRRT urea clearances (500 to 2000 ml/h). Steady-state BUN versus time profiles for the same simulated patient population treated with IHD regimens (K = 180 ml/min, T = 4 h) of variable frequency were generated by use of a variable-volume, single-pool kinetic model. From these profiles, regression lines of required IHD frequency (per week) versus patient weight for desired BUNa values of 60, 80, and 100 mg/dl were obtained. Regression lines of required CRRT urea K (ml/h) versus patient weight for desired BUNs values of 60, 80, and 100 mg/dl were also generated. For the attainment of intensive IHD metabolic control (BUNa = 60 mg/dl) at steady state, a required treatment frequency of 4.4 dialyses per week is predicted for a 50-kg patient. However, the model predicts that the same degree of metabolic control cannot be achieved even with daily IHD therapy in patients > or = 90 kg. On the other hand, for the attainment of intensive CRRT metabolic control (BUNs = 60 mg/dl), required urea clearance rates of approximately 900 ml/h and 1900 ml/h are predicted for 50- and 100-kg patients, respectively. This model suggests that, for many patients, rigorous azotemia control equivalent to that readily attainable with most CRRT can only be achieved with intensive IHD regimens. Following prospective clinical validation, this methodology may be a useful RRT prescription tool for critically ill ARF patients.
Acute Kidney Injury↗
Dialysis prescription and kinetics in acute renal failure.
The recognition that both morbidity and mortality are inversely related to delivered hemodialysis (HD) dose in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients has substantially changed clinical practices in the United States. A number of quantification techniques, which differ greatly in complexity and sophistication, are now used in ESRD patients. Investigators recently have attempted to extrapolate some of these ESRD quantification methods to the acute renal failure (ARF) setting. This review focuses on these recent attempts. Both patient-related and renal replacement therapy (RRT)-related differences in ESRD and ARF are discussed. In addition, the potential pitfalls of extrapolating certain ESRD quantification methods to RRT in ARF are discussed. Prescription considerations for both intermittent HD (IHD) and continuous RRT (CRRT) are presented. Finally, recent data suggesting survival in critically ill ARF patients is directly correlated with delivered therapy dose are reviewed. The optimal technique for RRT quantification in ARF remains to be determined.
Acute Kidney Injury↗
Plasma protein adsorption to highly permeable hemodialysis membranes.
Although membrane adsorption of plasma proteins is one of several factors determining the biocompatibility and mass transfer characteristics of a hemodialyzer, this process has not been evaluated rigorously. We performed an equilibrium and kinetic analysis of the binding of proteins of differing molecular weight to highly permeable membranes of differing hydrophobicity and surface change. Hydrophobic, anionic polyacrylonitrile (PAN) and hydrophilic, uncharged cellulose triacetate (CT) membrane fragments were incubated in buffer containing radioiodinated beta 2-microglobulin (beta 2m) or bovine serum albumin (BSA). From an initial solution concentration of 50 mg/liter, both membranes adsorbed significantly more beta 2m than BSA at equilibrium (PAN, 352 +/- 30 vs. 32.1 +/- 2.4 ng; CT, 87.0 +/- 0.6 vs. 30.8 +/- 1.7 ng). These results were consistent with membrane pore exclusion of BSA. Comparison of the slopes of the equilibrium isotherm lines (concentration range, 0 to 220 mg/liter) showed the PAN binding affinity for beta 2m and BSA was 28 and 1.4 times that of CT, respectively. In kinetic studies, the approach to equilibrium versus (time)1/2 was assessed. For all protein-membrane combinations, this relationship was linear, consistent with a diffusion-controlled process. This latter characteristic permitted the determination of beta 2m membrane diffusivity values for both PAN and CT, which were found to be 0.30 and 3.25 x 10(-7) cm2/sec, respectively. These data suggest membrane hydrophobicity more significantly influences the binding of low-molecular weight proteins than that of pore-excluded proteins. In addition, these results demonstrate electrostatic membrane-protein interactions may influence the kinetics of both the adsorption and transmembrane mass transfer of plasma proteins.
Adsorption↗
Azotemia control by extracorporeal therapy in patients with acute renal failure.
The mortality rate for patients with acute renal failure (ARF) requiring renal replacement therapy remains unacceptably high. The cause of death in these patients has been thought to relate primarily to the nature of the condition that precipitated renal failure. However, recent investigations challenge that notion and suggest that the characteristics of the renal replacement procedure itself may influence outcome. The major considerations for the clinician prescribing renal replacement therapy to the patient with ARF are the therapy mode, the type of membrane used, and the dose of delivered therapy. The first two considerations have been discussed extensively in the medical literature and are reviewed elsewhere in this issue. However, the determination of the amount of delivered therapy, although standard practice in patients with end-stage renal disease, has not been assessed routinely in patients with ARF. Furthermore, the influence on patient outcome of the level of azotemia control achieved by the delivered therapy is unknown. The purpose of this review is to provide some insight into quantifying the amount of renal replacement therapy delivered to patients with ARF treated with either continuous or intermittent therapies. The expected level of azotemia control that can be achieved with each of these therapies is discussed. We suggest that quantification of the amount of delivered therapy and the level of azotemia control are important variables to be obtained and evaluated in future investigations seeking to understand the high mortality rate of patients with ARF.
Acute Kidney Injury↗
Membrane adsorption of beta 2-microglobulin: equilibrium and kinetic characterization.
Enhanced extracorporeal removal of beta 2-microglobulin (beta 2m) may prevent the development of dialysis-related amyloidosis (DRA). One mechanism of beta 2m removal is membrane adsorption. Therefore, we fundamentally characterized beta 2m adsorption to the highly permeable polyacrylonitrile (PAN) membrane. Porous and nonporous PAN fragments were incubated in buffer containing 125I-beta 2m. Over a concentration range of 8 to 60 mg/liter, the equilibrium adsorption isotherm was linear (r = 0.99) for porous PAN while the isotherm for nonporous PAN suggested either multilayer binding or adsorption of proteins with differing orientations. In kinetic analyses, the approach to equilibrium versus (time)1/2 was evaluated. For both porous and nonporous PAN, this relationship was linear (r = 0.99), consistent with a diffusion-controlled process. Adsorption reversibility was assessed by comparing the amount bound at varying residence times (0 to 4 hr) to the amount remaining adsorbed after a subsequent incubation in buffer. The fractions remaining bound at 60, 120, and 240 minutes (0.34 +/- 0.02, 0.36 +/- 0.06, and 0.44 +/- 0.03; mean +/- SEM) were significantly greater (P < 0.05) than the value at five minutes (0.23 +/- 0.01). This suggests membrane-induced conformational changes in adsorbed beta 2m. This investigation permits the comparison of beta 2m adsorptive properties of PAN to those of other membrane-based and nonmembrane-based therapies designed to prevent DRA.
Acrylic Resins↗
A comparison of metabolic control by continuous and intermittent therapies in acute renal failure.
Azotemia control provided by blood pump-assisted continuous hemofiltration has not been rigorously compared with that provided by intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) for critically ill patients with acute renal failure (ARF). The metabolic control achieved by continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) and IHD was compared. In ARF patients treated with CVVH (N = 11), the normalized daily dose of therapy was 0.59 +/- 0.23 (mean +/- SD) and the normalized protein catabolic rate was 1.82 +/- 0.95 g/kg per day. The serum urea nitrogen concentration (SUN) declined with CVVH from an initial value of 114 +/- 32 to 79 +/- 17 mg/dL at steady state (SUNs). The initial analysis was a theoretical comparison between CVVH azotemia control and the control that would have been provided by IHD. Simulated IHD data were generated by conventional urea kinetic methods. The peak concentration hypothesis was invoked to compare CVVH SUNs and the peak IHD SUN (SUNp). A simulated IHD frequency of five times or more weekly was required to achieve a SUNp that did not differ from the CVVH SUNs. A similar comparison between the CVVH group and a separate group of ARF patients (N = 11) who received IHD was also performed. In the latter group, the normalized protein catabolic rate and the normalized daily dose of therapy were similar to those of the CVVH group. The SUNp (101 +/- 12 mg/dL) in the IHD group was significantly higher than the mean CVVH SUNs (P < 0.05). These data suggest that intensive hemodialysis is required to provide azotemia control similar to that provided by CVVH.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Acute Kidney Injury↗
Comparison of imipenem pharmacokinetics in patients with acute or chronic renal failure treated with continuous hemofiltration.
The total clearance of imipenem, a carbapenem antibiotic, is reduced from approximately 230 mL/min in patients with normal renal function to approximately 50 mL/min in patients with chronic renal failure. This decline in clearance results not only from the loss of renal clearance, but also from a reduction in the nonrenal clearance from 130 to 50 mL/min. Current dosing recommendations for the administration of imipenem to patients with acute or chronic renal failure are based on this reduced clearance rate. We investigated the pharmacokinetics of imipenem in critically ill patients with acute or chronic renal failure to determine whether published dosing guidelines were applicable to both patient populations. Imipenem pharmacokinetic parameters were determined in 10 anuric patients with renal failure managed by continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH). Seven patients had acute renal failure, while the other three had preexisting chronic renal failure. Imipenem serum concentration data were incorporated into a first-order, single-compartment pharmacokinetic model. Determinations of the area under the serum concentration-time curve were made by the trapezoidal rule. Dosing regimens were calculated from clearance data to achieve a mid-dose imipenem serum concentration of 12 mg/L. The total clearance of imipenem in patients with acute renal failure (108.3 +/- 13.8 mL/min; mean +/- SD) was significantly greater than the total clearance measured in patients with chronic renal failure (64.4 +/- 10.5 mL/min; P < 0.02). This increased clearance resulted from a greater nonrenal clearance of the drug in patients with acute renal failure (95.0 +/- 13.8 v 51.1 +/- 10.5 mL/min; P < 0.02).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Acute Kidney Injury↗
Comment: vancomycin and tobramycin continuous hemofiltration clearance methodologies.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Hemofiltration↗
NaCl transport by Madin Darby canine kidney cyst epithelial cells.
The mechanism of NaCl transport across the epithelium of intact MDCK cysts grown in a collagen gel matrix was investigated. Double-barreled microelectrodes were used to measure basolateral membrane PD (Vbl), transepithelial PD (Vt), and intracellular (Cli) and intralumenal (Clcy) Cl- activities in cysts under different conditions. In a control Ringer's solution (RS), Cli (60 +/- 1 mM) and Clcy (107 +/- 2 mM) exceeded the values corresponding to electrochemical equilibrium across the basolateral membrane and epithelium, respectively. Cli was reduced by superfusing the cysts with a low Cl- RS (Cli, 20 +/- 3 mM), a low Na+ RS (Cli, 40 +/- 4 mM), or by adding amiloride to the control RS (Cli, 46 +/- 1 mM). Cli was unaffected by removal of either K+ or HCO3- from the RS or by adding furosemide or SITS to the control RS. Vbl in the control RS was -50 +/- 2 mV and was affected only by removal from the RS of K+ (Vbl, -31 +/- 3 mV) or HCO3- (Vbl, -29 +/- 4 mV) or by the addition of SITS to the control RS (Vbl, -59 +/- 5 mV). Vt in control RS was -2 +/- 0.2 mV (lumen negative), and was increased by reducing bath Na+ (Vt, -37 +/- 2 mV) but not by reducing bath Cl-. These data indicate that Cl- is secreted in a basolateral to apical direction by the cyst epithelium. Basolateral Cl- transport probably occurs mainly by an electroneutral Cl-/HCO3- exchanger. Transepithelial Na+ transport seems to occur via a paracellular route which appears to be cation selective. These experiments also support the existence, in the basolateral membrane, of a Na+/K+ ATPase, a Na+/H+ exchanger, and possibly a Na+/HCO3-/CO3(2-) transporter.
Animals↗
Lidocaine in continuous venovenous hemofiltration.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Aged↗
Continuous venovenous hemofiltration: an alternative to continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration and hemodiafiltration in acute renal failure.
Continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) has been used as an alternative to continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration (CAVH) and hemodiafiltration (CAVHD) in the management of critically ill patients with acute renal failure. This report describes our experience with the first 25 patients treated with CVVH at our institution. Vascular access was obtained through a single dual-lumen venous catheter. A blood pump was used to provide ultrafiltration pressure. An ultrafiltrate pump was incorporated to ensure predictable ultrafiltrate production rates. Safety features in the extracorporeal circuit included a venous drip chamber with bubble detector and an in-line pressure monitor. CVVH was initiated by a nephrologist and dialysis nurse and was maintained by the intensive care unit (ICU) nursing staff. Fifteen females and 10 males received CVVH therapy for a total of 193.5 days (average, 7.7 +/- 10.3 days; range, 0.5 to 48 days). Four of the 25 patients (16%) survived and were discharged from the hospital. Four additional patients (16%) survived the acute phase of their illness, but died from complications of their primary disease before discharge from the hospital. The mean weight change during CVVH was -7.9 +/- 7.0 kg (range, -26.5 to +2.9 kg). Metabolic waste products and electrolytes were adequately controlled by CVVH in all but one hypercatabolic patient. The mean heparin dose required was 6.5 +/- 4.2 U/kg/h and was adjusted to prevent filter clotting rather than to achieve a predetermined activated partial thromboplastin time (PTT). The median PTT was 35.8 seconds (range, 22.0 to 100; control, 19.5 to 29.5 seconds). Four episodes of volume-responsive hypotension occurred during the 193.5 treatment days. Only one patient experienced a hemorrhagic complication during CVVH. No patient experienced a complication related to vascular access. Twelve of 111 total hemofilters were changed because of clot formation. CVVH was well tolerated by patients and managed efficiently by the ICU nursing staff.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Acute Kidney Injury↗
Vancomycin pharmacokinetics in acute renal failure: preservation of nonrenal clearance.
INTRODUCTION: The normal nonrenal clearance of vancomycin is reduced in patients with chronic renal failure (40 versus 6 ml/min). The nonrenal clearance of vancomycin in patients with acute renal failure has not been characterized extensively. PURPOSE: To prospectively determine the pharmacokinetic profile of vancomycin in anuric patients with acute renal failure who are receiving continuous venovenous hemofiltration. METHODS: Vancomycin serum samples were obtained in 10 patients immediately before and 1 and 12 hours after a 1-hour infusion. Thirteen sets of data were obtained. Vancomycin concentration data were incorporated into a first-order, single-compartment model. Determinations for the area under the serum concentration-time curve were made by the trapezoidal rule. RESULTS: Total vancomycin clearance was 28.5 +/- 6.4 ml/min (range, 17.1 to 36.6 ml/min. Hemofilter clearance was either 6.7 or 13.3 ml/min, depending on ultrafiltrate production rate (assuming a sieving coefficient of 0.8). Nonrenal clearance, calculated as total clearance minus hemofilter clearance was 16.2 +/- 7.0 ml/min (range, 3.8 to 23.3 ml/min). Total clearance did not correlate with hemofilter clearance (r = 0.1; p greater than 0.25) but correlated strongly with nonrenal clearance (r = 0.94; p less than 0.0005). Nonrenal clearance decreased significantly as the days on continuous venovenous hemofiltration increased (range, 2 to 14 days; r = 0.68; p less than 0.025). CONCLUSION: Early in the course of acute renal failure there is a substantial preservation of the normal nonrenal clearance of vancomycin. This nonrenal clearance appears to decrease with the duration of renal failure, eventually approaching the clearance observed in patients with chronic failure.
Acute Kidney Injury↗