PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

W Lucke

Publications and source records attributed to W Lucke.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Basal and pentagastrin stimulated acid secretion in duodenal ulcer subjects before and after Helicobacter pylori eradication: a 12-month follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: The effect of infection by Helicobacter pylori on gastric physiology in duodenal ulcer subjects is controversial. There is evidence that the infection is associated with abnormalities in gastrin homeostasis. Consistent changes in pentagastrin-stimulated acid secretory status have proved difficult to establish. This may be because patients have been studied too soon after Helicobacter pylori eradication. AIMS: To study the immediate and longer term effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on basal and pentagastrin-stimulated acid secretion in duodenal ulcer subjects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with active duodenal ulcer disease were studied. Ulcers were healed with sucralfate 2 g bd or ranitidine 300 mg nocte. Helicobacter pylori eradication was attempted with bismuth-based "Triple Therapy", and the nine patients in whom the organism was successfully eradicated were followed and studied over the 12-month period. Acid secretion was studied at entry (prior to the initiation of therapy), following healing, following eradication and 12 months later. Basal, low dose (0.1 microgram/kg) and high dose (6 micrograms/kg) pentagastrin-stimulated acid secretion was determined. RESULTS: Whilst there was a tendency for basal and low dose-stimulated acid secretion to fall following eradication, in this study only the reduction in high dose-stimulated acid secretion achieved significance following eradication (entry mean = 59.6, post eradication mean = 49.6, p < 0.03). This effect of eradication on high dose pentagastrin-stimulated acid secretion was also seen at the 12-month study (mean = 48.9, p < 0.02 versus entry). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggests that maximally stimulated acid secretion is modestly, albeit significantly, reduced following Helicobacter pylori eradication and that this effect persists.

Adult↗

Helicobacter pylori eradication in the African setting, with special reference to reinfection and duodenal ulcer recurrence.

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on the natural history of duodenal ulcer disease, and to determine the incidence of reinfection in adult patients where H pylori had been eradicated in a community with a high prevalence of the infection. An investigator blinded study, with 24 month endoscopic follow up, in subjects where H pylori had been eradicated, and similarly treated subjects where it had not been eradicated was conducted at a tertiary referral hospital. The patients consisted of a volunteer sample of 48 patients with endoscopically proved active duodenal ulcer disease. Duodenal ulcers were healed with omeprazole, 20 mg/day. After endoscopically confirmed healing, patients were treated with either one (17 patients) or two weeks (31 patients) of 'triple therapy'. H pylori status (urease reaction, histological tests, and culture of antral biopsy specimens) was determined at entry, four weeks after the finish of triple therapy and six, 12, and 24 months after this, or whenever an endoscopically proved recurrent duodenal ulcer was found. The main outcome measures were the recurrence of duodenal ulceration, over 24 months in the eradicated and non-eradicated groups and the incidence of reinfection by H pylori in the eradicated group during this follow up period. Five patients in the eradicated group experienced a duodenal ulcer relapse, of which only three were unexplained (1 = reinfected, 1 = gastrinoma). Fifteen of 21 patients in the non-eradicated group relapsed over the same period (p < 0.001). Only two of 27 patients in the eradicated group were reinfected during the 24 month follow up period. It is concluded that H pylori eradication is an effective treatment strategy for the longterm treatment of duodenal ulcer disease, even in the high prevalence, African setting. Reinfection is uncommon.

Adult↗

Effect of sucralfate on Helicobacter pylori and severity of gastritis in patients with duodenal ulcer.

BACKGROUND: Duodenal ulcer relapse rates have been reported to be lower following healing with sucralfate. The question arises whether this is related to an effect on Helicobacter pylori. METHODS: In order to investigate this possibility, 43 patients with active duodenal ulcer were entered into a study. Endoscopy was performed at entry, following 6 weeks' treatment with sucralfate 1 g q.i.d., and at 4 and 12 weeks of post-documented healing. Antral and gastric corpus biopsies were taken for assessment of H. pylori status (CLOtest), density of infection, and severity of gastritis. In addition, 14C urea breath tests (UBT) were performed. RESULTS: Sucralfate therapy induced a significant decrease in the density of H. pylori infection, with a trend to improvement of the gastritis in the antrum, but not in the corpus. However, all patients remained CLOtest positive, and the overall gastric urease activity was unchanged following therapy. These effects did not appear to influence either initial duodenal ulcer healing or subsequent relapse rates. CONCLUSION: Sucralfate has a suppressive effect on H. pylori infection in the gastric antrum but the clinical relevance of this is uncertain.

Adolescent↗

Helicobacter pylori prevalence in non-ulcer dyspepsia--ethnic and socio-economic differences.

Helicobacter pylori is an important cause of gastritis and a number of therapeutic trials suggest that it may be important in the genesis of duodenal ulcer recurrence. The reported prevalence of gastric colonisation by the organism varies considerably. The aim of this cross-sectional survey was to determine its prevalence in non-ulcer dyspeptics and to determine whether this is influenced by age, race, sex, socio-economic status, educational level and the number of persons sharing accommodation. One hundred and sixty-nine patients underwent endoscopy; biopsy specimens were taken from the antrum and H. pylori status was determined histologically. Gastric colonisation was found in 106 patients (63%). The prevalence showed a marked ethnic difference: 40% in whites and 71% in coloureds (P < 0.001). The ethnic groups were characterised by significant differences in socio-economic status (P < 10(-6)), educational level (P < 10(-6)), number of persons sharing accommodation (P < 10(-6)) and age (P < 0.001). These same differences were found when comparing the H. pylori-positive and negative groups, but were less marked and could be attributed to the marked differences between ethnic groups. We conclude that H. pylori prevalence differs between the ethnic groups studied. This may be because of varying degrees of exposure risk.

Adult↗

Triple therapy with sucralfate is as effective as triple therapy containing bismuth in eradicating Helicobacter pylori and reducing duodenal ulcer relapse rates.

Duodenal ulcer relapse rates after therapy with sucralfate or bismuth are lower than those after H2-receptor antagonist therapy. This may be mediated by an antibacterial effect of these drugs on Helicobacter pylori. Bismuth has become an integral part of 'triple therapy' because of its documented anti-H. pylori effect. In vitro and clinical data suggest that sucralfate may also have an anti-H. pylori effect. The aim of this randomized, prospective therapeutic trial was to compare the efficacy of triple therapy containing bismuth with that containing sucralfate and to determine the effect of therapy with these combinations on duodenal ulcer relapse. Forty H. pylori-positive duodenal ulcer patients were healed with omeprazole and randomized to receive either 1 g sucralfate four times daily or 120 mg bismuth compound four times daily. All patients received 400 mg metronidazole three times daily and either 250 or 500 mg tetracycline four times daily for 7-14 days. Thirty-five patients could be analysed. Overall eradication rates did not differ in the treatment groups (10 of 17 eradicated with sucralfate and 11 of 18 with bismuth). Relapse rates were significantly lower in the eradicated group (1 of 21 compared with 8 of 14 in the non-eradicated group) and did not differ between treatment groups in those patients not eradicated. A triple therapy regimen utilizing sucralfate appears to be as effective as the bismuth-containing regimen.

Bismuth↗

A maintenance regimen of sucralfate 2 g at night for reduced relapse rate in duodenal ulcer disease. A one-year follow-up study.

One hundred seventeen patients with recently healed duodenal ulcers were entered into a one-year maintenance study. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with sucralfate 2 g at night, cimetidine 400 mg, or placebo. The sucralfate versus placebo leg of the study was double-blind, whereas the cimetidine leg was single-blind. Endoscopy was repeated on clinical relapse and routinely at six and 12 months. Ninety-six of the 117 patients were followed up for one year or to an endoscopically proven recurrence. The remaining 21 patients were excluded from analysis because of default or protocol violation. The one-year analysis showed by endoscopy that ulcers had recurred in 17 of the 31 sucralfate-treated patients, 19 of the 32 cimetidine-treated patients, and in 28 of the 33 placebo-treated patients. These data included asymptomatic recurrences in four, four, and three patients, respectively. The relapse rate at 24 weeks was greater in patients healed initially with a histamine (H2)-blocker alone than in those healed initially with sucralfate alone, a combination of sucralfate with a H2-blocker or an antacid alone.

Adult↗

Nocturnal dosage regimen of sucralfate in maintenance treatment of gastric ulcer.

Sixty-six patients with recently healed gastric ulcers were entered into a double-blind, placebo-controlled, six-month maintenance trial to determine whether sucralfate 2 g at night reduces the liability to recurrent ulceration. Thirty-three patients were randomly assigned to treatment with sucralfate and 33 were assigned to placebo. Endoscopy was performed at the time of entry into the study and at 24 weeks, or earlier if clinical relapse occurred during this period. Of the patients available for analysis, endoscopic recurrences were found in eight of the 29 patients (28 percent) randomly assigned to sucralfate and in 15 of the 27 patients (56 percent) assigned to placebo. Eight of the recurrences noted at 24 weeks were asymptomatic and, of these, five were in the placebo-treated group. The cumulative relapse rate at 24 weeks was significantly lower in the sucralfate-treated group (p less than 0.05), and the Cox-Mantel text showed a significant difference between the cumulative relapse curves of the two treatment groups over the 24-week period (p less than 0.05). The results indicate that a single maintenance dose of sucralfate 2 g at night reduces the relapse rate in patients with recently healed gastric ulceration.

Antacids↗

Comparison of pirenzepine with cimetidine in duodenal ulcer disease. A short-term and maintenance study.

Sixty-seven patients with endoscopically proven duodenal ulceration were entered into a double-blind study and randomized to treatment with pirenzepine (PZ) (Gastrozepin; Boehringer Ingelheim) 50 mg twice daily or cimetidine (CM) (Tagamet; Smith Kline & French Laboratories) 400 mg twice daily, given 30 minutes before breakfast and supper. Patients underwent endoscopic examination before entry, at 4 weeks, and at 8 weeks if unhealed at 4 weeks. Once healing was achieved, 43 patients were entered into a single-blind maintenance study with either PZ 50 mg at night or CM 400 mg at night according to their original randomization. CM had a slight, but not significant, advantage over PZ after 4 weeks, but the 8-week data showed identical healing rates. The relapse rate appeared to be higher in the PZ-treated group, but this difference was also not significant. It is suggested that the evening dose of PZ be amended to 50 or perhaps 100 mg before bed in the short-term treatment of duodenal ulcer, and that a dose of 100 mg at night be considered for maintenance therapy in certain high-risk populations.

Adult↗

Peptic ulcer. A follow-up study.

One hundred and ten patients who had been entered into an ulcer healing study 2 to 4 years previously were recalled during an 8-week period for clinical assessment and endoscopy. Fifty-five gastric ulcer patients were followed-up after an average period of 21.2 months. Nine of these had undergone gastric surgery; of the remaining 46 patients, recurrent ulceration was found in 16 (35%). Fifty-five patients with duodenal ulcer disease were also followed-up after an average of 35.6 months. Five of these patients had undergone surgery and of the remaining 50, 25 (50%) had a recurrent duodenal ulcer. About one-third of both gastric and duodenal ulcer recurrences were asymptomatic. Smoking had no effect on recurrence rates.

Duodenal Ulcer↗

A comparison of sucralfate dosage schedule in duodenal ulcer healing. Two grams twice a day versus one gram four times a day.

The conventional dosage schedule for sucralfate is 1 g 4 i.d., but a dose of 2 g 2 i.d. may be equally effective in duodenal ulcer healing. We compared the efficacy of these two regimens in duodenal ulcer healing. Seventy-seven patients with endoscopically proven duodenal ulceration were entered into a double-blind, controlled study and randomized to treatment with sucralfate 2 g 2 i.d. (on waking and at bedtime) or 1 g 4 i.d. (1/2 h before meals and at bedtime). The patients were endoscoped before entry into the study, after 4 weeks, and after 8 weeks if unhealed at 4 weeks. Of the patients considered suitable for analysis at 4 weeks, 79% (26/33) of those taking 2 g 2 i.d. had healed ulcers in comparison to 72% (23/32) of those taking 1 g 4 i.d. After 8 weeks, cumulative healing rates were 85% (28/33) and 80% (24/30), respectively. The results suggest that the more convenient dosage schedule of 2 g 2 i.d. is as effective as the 1 g 4 i.d. regimen in the short-term treatment of duodenal ulcer.

Adult↗

Maintenance therapy with sucralfate reduces rate of gastric ulcer recurrence.

Seventy-two patients with recently healed gastric ulcers were entered into a double-blind, placebo-controlled, six-month maintenance trial to assess whether sucralfate, 1 g in the morning and 2 g at night, reduces the propensity for recurrent ulceration. Patients were assessed clinically at 0, 6, 12, 18, and 24 weeks. Endoscopy was performed at the time of entry into the study and at 24 weeks, or earlier if clinical relapse occurred during this period. Eleven patients were excluded from the study because they defaulted or for other protocol violations. The other 61 patients were followed for six months or until evidence of ulcer relapse. Endoscopic recurrence was found in five of 31 patients (16 percent) randomly assigned to receive sucralfate and in 21 of 30 patients (70 percent) assigned to receive placebo. Most recurrences occurred during the first 12 weeks, with relapse rates of 10 percent and 53 percent, respectively for the sucralfate- and the placebo-treated groups. Three of the recurrences noted at 24 weeks were asymptomatic; two of these were in the sucralfate-treated group. The results indicate that a 3 g per day maintenance dose of sucralfate offers meaningful protection against recurrent gastric ulceration.

Adult↗

Recurrence of duodenal ulceration in patients on maintenance ranitidine.

Fifty-seven patients with recently healed duodenal ulcers were entered into a 1-year trial of maintenance therapy with ranitidine ( Zantac ; Glaxo) 150 mg at night to assess the safety and efficacy of the drug. Twenty-two of the patients were withdrawn because they violated the trial protocol. No serious side-effects were noted, but only 19 of the 35 patients who met the requirements of the study were free of endoscopic evidence of ulcer recurrence at the end of the trial period. The relapse rate of 46% in the present study was of the same order as those found in two previous South African studies of maintenance therapy with cimetidine given in a dose of 400 mg at night. These findings leave the question whether routine maintenance therapy is warranted in our patients unanswered.

Adult↗

Effect of the H2-receptor antagonist ranitidine on depression and anxiety in duodenal ulcer patients.

Depression and anxiety were measured during the course of a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the histamine H2-receptor antagonist, ranitidine (150 mg twice daily), in patients suffering from duodenal ulcer but free of systemic disease. There were 25 patients in the ranitidine group (mean age: 33.2 years) and 28 in the placebo group (mean age: 37.2 years). In both groups there was a highly significant and progressive decrease in depression and anxiety scores over the 4 weeks of treatment. There were no instances of mental confusion. In our group of otherwise physically healthy patients, ranitidine appeared to be free of neuropsychiatric complications.

Adult↗

Relapse rates following initial ulcer healing with sucralfate and cimetidine.

The relapse rate following successful short-term therapy with sucralfate or cimetidine was studied in a group of 86 patients with recently healed duodenal or gastric ulcer. The patients were endoscoped on clinical relapse or, routinely, at 6 weeks, 6 months and one year. Patients whose ulcers had healed on cimetidine relapsed earlier than did those whose ulcers had healed on sucralfate (p less than 0.05 at 12 weeks), but the cumulative relapse rate by the end of one year was of the order of 70% in both treatment groups. The mean duration of remission in patients who developed a recurrence was significantly greater in patients treated initially with sucralfate than in those treated initially with cimetidine - 7.3 and 4.6 months, respectively (p less than 0.01).

Aluminum↗

Ranitidine heals duodenal ulcers.

A double-blind placebo-controlled study of ranitidine 150 mg given twice daily for 4 weeks was carried out in 80 ambulant patients with endoscopically proven duodenal ulceration. Fifteen patients were withdrawn because of poor compliance or default. Of the remaining 65 patients, endoscopic healing (with or without residual erosion) was noted in 28 of the 34 ranitidine-treated patients (82%) and in 14 of the 31 placebo-treated patients (45%) (P less than 0.005). Twenty-three patients whose ulcers were unhealed after 4 weeks of ranitidine therapy or placebo were then given ranitidine for a further 4-week period. Four of these patients were withdrawn, but ulcer healing was achieved in 16 of the remaining 19 patients (4 out of 5 (80%) initially treated with ranitidine and 12 of 14 (86%) initially treated with placebo). No significant clinical, biochemical or haematological adverse reactions were noted in either treatment group. It is concluded that ranitidine is a safe and effective therapy in patients with duodenal ulceration and that initial unsuccessful treatment with placebo does not appear to influence the subsequent response to ranitidine.

Adult↗

Ranitidine in the treatment of gastric ulceration.

Seventy-two patients with endoscopically proven gastric ulcers were entered into a prospective controlled trial to assess the efficacy of ranitidine and cimetidine in ulcer healing. All patients were biopsied on entry and at subsequent endoscopies. After exclusion of 7 patients during the first month of treatment, the remaining 65 patients, 47 males and 18 females, mean age 48.2 +/-1.5 years, at 1 month had a healing rate of 47% and 52% respectively. The non-healers continued their treatment for a further 4 weeks. This increased the healing rate to 77% and 76% respectively. If the defaulters and poor compliers are withdrawn the healing rate rises to 58% and 57% at 4 weeks and to 91% and 79% at 8 weeks respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups as regarded initial ulcer size and severity of dyspepsia. Antacid tablet consumption during the study was comparable. The initial size of the ulcers which failed to heal after 4 weeks of treatment tended to be larger than those which healed (P less than 0.05), but smoking did not appear to influence ulcer healing. No obvious side-effects or evidence of dysplasia were found. The study shows that ranitidine is at least as effective as cimetidine in gastric ulcer healing.

Aged↗

Relapse rates after initial ulcer healing with sucralfate and cimetidine.

The relapse rate after successful short-term therapy with sucralfate (Sc) or cimetidine (Cm) was studied in a group of 86 patients with recently healed duodenal or gastric ulcers. The patients were endoscoped on clinical relapse or, routinely, at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year. Patients whose ulcers had healed with Cm relapsed earlier than did those whose ulcers had healed with Sc (p less than 0.05 at 12 weeks), but the cumulative relapse rate by the end of 1 year was of the order of 70% in both treatment groups. The mean duration of remission in patients who developed a recurrence was significantly greater in patients treated initially with Sc than in those treated initially with Cm--7.3 and 4.6 months, respectively (p less than 0.01).

Aluminum↗