PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

W M Feinberg

Publications and source records attributed to W M Feinberg.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Relationship between prothrombin activation fragment F1.2 and international normalized ratio in patients with atrial fibrillation. Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Investigators.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The prothrombin time (expressed as the international normalized ratio [INR]) is the standard method of monitoring warfarin therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation. Prothrombin activation fragment F1.2 provides an index of in vivo thrombin generation and might provide a better index of the effective intensity of anticoagulation. We examined the relationship between F1.2 and INR in patients with atrial fibrillation. METHODS: We measured INR and F1.2 levels in 846 patients with atrial fibrillation participating in the Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation III study. Two hundred nineteen (26%) were taking aspirin alone, 326 (39%) were taking adjusted-dose warfarin, and 301 (36%) were taking a low fixed dose of warfarin (1 to 3 mg) plus aspirin (combination therapy). F1.2 levels were measured with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: Patients receiving adjusted-dose warfarin or combination therapy had significantly higher INR and significantly lower F1.2 values than those on aspirin alone (P < or = .0001 for each of the four comparisons). F1.2 values (nanomolar) were inversely correlated with INR (F1.2 = -0.1 + 2.3[1/INR]; R2 = .37; P < .0001; simple linear regression). However, significant variability remained. Among patients receiving warfarin, older patients had higher F1.2 values than younger patients after adjustment for INR intensity (P < .001) in the model. There was no difference in the relationship between F1.2 and INR between men and women. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing intensity of anticoagulation, as measured by the INR, is associated with decreasing thrombin generation as measured by the F1.2 level, but significant variability exists in this relationship. Older anticoagulated patients have higher F1.2 values than younger patients at equivalent INR values. The clinical significance of these differences is not clear. F1.2 measurement might provide information regarding anticoagulation intensity in addition to that reflected by the INR.

Aged

Comparison of centralized versus "site-based" measurement of angiographic stenosis for eligibility in the asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis study.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The authors determine the reliability of centralized versus noncentralized (site-based) measurement of angiographic stenosis of patients enrolled into the multicenter, prospective, Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study by angiographic studies. METHODS: Percent agreements and correlations of 244 masked and prospectively interpreted angiograms were calculated for comparison of centralized and noncentralized readers measuring the percent carotid stenosis from the same angiographic studies. Univariate summary statistics for differences in percent stenoses were calculated for these readings. RESULTS: Agreement between readings were 88.5% and 91.8% with kappa statistics of 0.77 and 0.73 for > or = 60% and > or = 80% stenosis, respectively, for comparison of 33 centers to the designated central reader. Comparison between the designated central reader and a second central reader derived percent agreements of 85.0% and 86.5% with kappa statistics of 0.69 and 0.41 for > or = 60% and > or = 80% stenoses, respectively, for arteries selected from the original group. Hence, agreement was slightly better between the enrolling centers and the designated central reader than between the two central readers. CONCLUSIONS: Both centralized and noncentralized (site-based) methods of angiographic measurement of stenosis are equally reliable for large, prospective, masked, multicenter trials when quality control measures are instituted to ensure uniform application of eligibility criteria.

Angiography

Primary and secondary stroke prevention.

Recent clinical trials have demonstrated that we can prevent stroke with appropriate medical and surgical therapy. Treatment of stroke risk factors, antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulant therapy, and carotid endarterectomy have all proven to be effective if applied in appropriate clinical circumstances. This review will highlight the areas in which we have clinical trial evidence to guide us, and will point out those circumstances in which uncertainty remains.

Anticoagulants

Hemostatic markers in acute ischemic stroke. Association with stroke type, severity, and outcome.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Hemostatic markers can identify activation of the coagulation system in stroke patients. We evaluated whether the levels of these markers at the time of stroke are correlated with stroke severity, type, or mortality. METHODS: We measured fibrinopeptide A, cross-linked D-dimer, and beta-thromboglobulin in 70 patients within 1 week of stroke. We examined the association between the level of each of these markers and survival. We adjusted for the possible confounding effect of age, stroke type, or stroke severity using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 1.22 years. Fourteen patients died during follow-up. Univariate survival analysis identified age (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00 to 1.12), stroke type (hazard ratio, 4.44; 95% CI, 1.29 to 15.23), initial Toronto Stroke Scale score (hazard ratio, 5.05; 95% CI, 2.08 to 12.27), cross-linked D-dimer (hazard ratio, 6.43; 95% CI, 2.83 to 14.62), fibrinopeptide A (hazard ratio, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.26 to 3.63), and beta-thromboglobulin (hazard ratio, 7.63; 95% CI, 2.22 to 26.28) as significantly associated with mortality. In a multivariate model, initial stroke severity and each of the hemostatic markers were independently associated with subsequent mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated hemostatic markers after acute ischemic stroke identify patients with increased risk for mortality. This association appears to be independent of stroke severity or stroke type.

Aged

Differential effect of aspirin versus warfarin on clinical stroke types in patients with atrial fibrillation. Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Investigators.

The Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation II study compared the efficacy and safety of aspirin and warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. Three neurologists, blinded to patient therapy, categorized the pathophysiology of ischemic strokes that occurred in the trial based on predetermined clinical criteria. Upon analyzing the patients being treated with these two drugs, warfarin proved significantly more effective than aspirin in preventing cardioembolic strokes (p = 0.005) and strokes of uncertain pathophysiology (p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in the efficacy for prevention of noncardioembolic strokes.

Aged

Prevalence, age distribution, and gender of patients with atrial fibrillation. Analysis and implications.

The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is related to age. Anticoagulation is highly effective in preventing stroke in patients with AF, but the risk of hemorrhage may be increased in older patients. We reviewed the available epidemiologic data to define the age and sex distribution of people with AF. From four large recent population-based surveys, we estimated the overall age- and gender-specific prevalence of AF. These estimates were applied to the recent US census data to calculate the number of men and women with AF in each age group. There are an estimated 2.2 million people in the United States with AF, with a median age of about 75 years. The prevalence of AF is 2.3% in people older than 40 years and 5.9% in those older than 65 years. Approximately 70% of individuals with AF are between 65 and 85 years of age. The absolute number of men and women with AF is about equal. After age 75 years, about 60% of the people with AF are women. In contrast to people with AF in the general population, patients with AF in recent anticoagulation trials had a mean age of 69 years, and only 20% were older than 75 years. The risks and benefits of antithrombotic therapy in older individuals are important considerations in stroke prevention in AF.

Adult

What's new in stroke?

More than 30,000 strokes occur each year in Texas, even though most strokes can be prevented by currently available and well-tolerated therapies. Antiplatelet therapy with aspirin or ticlopidine reduces stroke by about 25% in many patients with transient ischemic attack or initial stroke. Warfarin should not be used routinely for primary cerebrovascular disease but is useful to prevent cardioembolic stroke. Carotid endarterectomy is highly beneficial for patients with symptomatic, high-grade carotid stenosis, but its value for lesser degrees of symptomatic carotid plaque and for asymptomatic stenosis is less clear. Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation have a substantial risk for stroke; most should be treated with warfarin. Risk-factor management (eg, control of hypertension, cessation of smoking, and treatment of hyperlipidemia) is as important as antithrombotic or surgical therapies for most patients with threatened stroke. Treating isolated systolic hypertension in elderly patients reduces stroke risk. Determining the cause of threatened stroke strongly influences preventive management. The tools are at hand to prevent most strokes; the challenge remains to apply them optimally.

Acute Disease

Carotid stenosis in patients with atrial fibrillation. Prevalence, risk factors, and relationship to stroke in the Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Study.

BACKGROUND: Several mechanisms contribute to the increased stroke rate of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We assessed the frequency of carotid artery stenosis in patients with AF and its relationship to stroke during aspirin or warfarin therapy. METHODS: Carotid ultrasonography was done in 676 patients with AF enrolled in the Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Study to detect cervical carotid stenosis of 50% or more of the luminal diameter. The presence of carotid stenosis was correlated with patient features and subsequent stroke during a mean of 2.6 years of follow-up. RESULTS: In patients with AF who were older than 70 years, the frequency of carotid stenosis was 12% in men and 11% in women. Carotid stenosis was independently associated with systolic hypertension (relative risk, 2.4; P = .002), diabetes (relative risk, 1.8; P = .04), and tobacco use (relative risk, 1.8; P = .02). Carotid stenosis did not add significantly to prediction of stroke when analyzed with other clinical risk factors for stroke in patients with AF (relative risk, 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.5 to 3.6; P = .55). CONCLUSIONS: Carotid artery stenosis of 50% or more occurs in about 12% of elderly patients with AF, reflecting the substantial prevalence of hypertension and diabetes in these patients. Carotid stenosis was not usefully predictive of stroke in patients with AF who were given aspirin or warfarin. Routine ultrasonography to detect carotid stenosis does not appear warranted in patients with AF without previous symptoms of brain ischemia.

Aged

Effect of oral nimodipine on platelet function.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Nimodipine, a calcium antagonist, has been reported to have beneficial effects in acute ischemic infarction. Some calcium channel antagonists have antiplatelet effects. We investigated the effect of oral nimodipine on platelet function in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Twelve healthy volunteers (6 men and 6 women, mean age 32.9 +/- 5.6 years) took 30 mg nimodipine every 6 hours for 24 hours, followed by a week with no medication, followed by 60 mg every 6 hours for 24 hours. Ex vivo platelet function was measured at baseline, 1 hour after the first dose at each dosage strength, and 1 hour after the last dose at each dosage. Platelet studies included aggregation and adenosine triphosphate release in response to collagen, epinephrine, and adenosine diphosphate; maximal rate of primary aggregation; threshold adenosine diphosphate concentration for second-phase aggregation; and thromboxane B2 release at threshold aggregation. The bleeding time was measured at baseline and after the last 60-mg dose of nimodipine. RESULTS: No change in any platelet function study was seen with 30 mg nimodipine every 6 hours. Platelet function studies were also unchanged after 60 mg every 6 hours, except for a slight decrease in aggregation and adenosine triphosphate release in response to suprathreshold (10 microM) adenosine diphosphate (p = 0.001, Student's paired t test). There was no significant change in bleeding times. CONCLUSIONS: Oral nimodipine has minimal antiplatelet activity in young, healthy subjects.

Adenosine Triphosphate

Ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: effect of aspirin according to stroke mechanism. Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Investigators.

Ischemic strokes occurring in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation are due to a variety of mechanisms, not exclusively to cardiogenic embolism. Without knowledge of antithrombotic therapy assignment, we categorized strokes in the Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Study as presumed cardioembolic or noncardioembolic. We then compared patient clinical and echocardiographic variables, as well as the efficacy of aspirin prophylaxis, for each stroke type. Of 71 ischemic strokes, we categorized 46 (65%) as cardioembolic, 13 (18%) as noncardioembolic, and 12 (17%) as of uncertain cause. Patients developing noncardioembolic strokes, relative to cardioembolic strokes, were more commonly men (p = 0.005) and were more likely to have left ventricular wall motion abnormalities by two-dimensional echocardiography (p = 0.002). Aspirin reduced the occurrence of strokes categorized as noncardioembolic significantly more than it did those categorized as cardioembolic (p = 0.01). These results emphasize the value of considering stroke mechanisms in therapeutic trials of antithrombotic agents and suggest a differential effect of aspirin according to mechanism.

Aged