PubMed1998
As part of the National Study of Primary Hip Replacement Outcome, 402 consultant orthopaedic surgeons from three regions were contacted by postal questionnaire which covered all aspects of total hip replacement (THR). There was a 70% response rate of which 71 did not perform hip surgery, a further 33 refused to take part, leaving 181 valid responses. Preoperative assessment clinics were used by 89% of surgeons, but anaesthetists and rehabilitation services were rarely involved at this stage. Of respondents, 99% used routine thromboprophylaxis, with 79% using a combination of mechanical and chemical methods. Of surgeons, 84% routinely used stockings, whereas 95.5% used chemical prophylaxis, 63% employed low molecular weight heparins. Theatre facilities were shared with other surgical specialties by 6% of surgeons and 18% regularly used body exhaust suits for THR. Antibiotic loaded cement was used by 69% of surgeons, the majority (65%) used a single brand of normal viscosity cement with 9% using reduced viscosity formulations. Modern cementing techniques were commonly used at least in part, 87% used a cement gun and 94% a cement restrictor for femoral cementing. On the acetabulum, 47% pressurised the cement. In all, 36 different femoral stems and 35 acetabular cups were in routine use, but the majority of surgeons (55%) used Charnley type prostheses. Of the surgeons, 57% performed only cemented THR, while 3% exclusively used uncemented THR. Of consultants, 21% followed up their patients to 5 years, the majority discharge patients within the first year. Of concern is a large proportion of surgeons using low molecular weight heparins despite a lack of evidence with regard to reducing fatal pulmonary embolism, and also the small number of surgeons using prostheses of unproven value. Third generation cementing techniques have yet to be fully adopted. The introduction of a national hip register could help to resolve some of these issues.
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip↗