PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

W M Padberg

Publications and source records attributed to W M Padberg.

23 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Two phenotypically distinct populations of T cells have suppressor capabilities simultaneously in the maintenance phase of immunologic enhancement.

The events leading to immunologic enhancement in LEW rats immunized actively with Brown Norway (BN) rat spleen cells and passively with LEW anti-BN hyperimmune serum 11 and 10 days before receiving (LEW X BN)F1 cardiac allografts, respectively, have been studied. Cellular suppressor mechanisms developing during the induction phase of this phenomenon have recently been shown to be mediated by W3/25+ T cells in an antigen-specific manner. The present study suggests that the late maintenance phase of immunologic enhancement is mediated in vivo by simultaneously present separate donor-specific T cell subpopulations of W3/25+ and OX8+ phenotypes. Splenocyte subsets from grafted recipients greater than 100 days after transplantation were adoptively transferred into unmodified syngeneic LEW rats that received a specific test allograft 24 hr later, or into B recipients bearing indefinitely surviving heart grafts. Test graft survival was prolonged significantly in the first group and not altered in the second. Indeed, nonoverlapping W3/25+ and OX8+ cell fractions were separately responsible for suppression. However, when suppressor activity was tested in vitro in a three-component coculture mixed lymphocyte reaction, no suppression by T cells was obtained; this lack of correlation between in vivo and in vitro results has also been noted by other investigators in different systems. Thus, in the maintenance phase of actively and passively induced immunologic enhancement, interplay between two phenotypically distinct T cells with suppressor characteristics, but not putative cell-surface blocking factors, seems to prevent development of an alloreactive response and mediate host unresponsiveness.

Animals↗

W3/25+ T cells mediate the induction of immunologic unresponsiveness in enhanced rat recipients of cardiac allografts.

Cellular suppressor mechanisms developing during the induction of immunologic enhancement were studied in LEW rats immunized actively with BN spleen cells and passively with LEW anti-BN hyperimmune serum 11 and 10 days before receiving a (LEW X BN)F1 cardiac allograft, respectively. With this regimen, graft survival is prolonged from 7.4 +/- 0.5 days in unmodified, acutely rejecting hosts to 25 +/- 12 days in enhanced recipients, with one-third of the grafts surviving indefinitely. To test for suppressor capacities, 60 X 10(6) splenic T helper/inducer (W3/25+) and T suppressor/cytotoxic (OX8+) cells were adoptively transferred 7 and 14 days after transplantation either into unmodified syngeneic LEW animals that received (LEW X BN)F1 test grafts 24 hr later or into T cell-deprived B rats with indefinitely functioning heart transplants that were reconstituted with sensitized lymph node cells (100 X 10(6). W3/25+ T cells harvested on days 7 and 14 from enhanced recipients prolonged test graft survival in unmodified hosts (13.1 +/- 2.3 and 13.3 +/- 1.3 days, respectively, p less than 0.001) and delayed rejection in reconstituted B rats from 6.7 +/- 0.5 to 18.2 +/- 6.5 and 23.3 +/- 5.8 days, respectively (p less than 0.001). OX8+ and B lymphocytes had no suppressor activity. However, enzymatic stripping of the surfaces of W3/25+ cells abrogated suppressor function. Similarly, after i.p. treatment with cyclophosphamide, W3/25+ T cells lost their suppressor properties. Lack of donor specific but not third party alloaggressiveness was demonstrated by the profoundly diminished ability of W3/25+ lymphocytes from enhanced hosts to recreate rejection in nonreconstituted B rats, even when exogenous interleukin 2 was administered. After pronase treatment, however, W3/25+ T cells were capable of inducing immunoresponsiveness at a tempo similar to naive T helper cells (31.5 +/- 12.5 vs 32.8 +/- 7.9). Thus, the present studies provide evidence for the development of a specific W3/25+ suppressor cell in the induction of active and passive enhancement. Coincident abrogation of specific T effector alloaggressiveness is apparently mediated by surface-blocking factors.

Animals↗