PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

W Otto Friesen

Publications and source records attributed to W Otto Friesen.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Characterization of central axon terminals of putative stretch receptors in leeches.

Sensory feedback from stretch receptors, neurons that detect position or tension, is crucial for generating normal, robust locomotion. Among the eight pairs of putative stretch receptors associated with longitudinal muscles in midbody segments of medicinal leeches, only the ventral stretch receptor has been characterized in detail. To achieve the identification of all such receptors, we penetrated large axons in the nerve roots of nerve cords from adult leeches with dye-filled (Alexa Fluor hydrazide) electrodes. We identified the terminal arborizations of two additional putative stretch receptors with axons in anterior nerve roots and four more such receptors with axons in posterior roots of midbody ganglia. The axons are nonspiking and are individually identifiable by their entry point into the CNS; their projections within the neuropile; the pattern, extent, and orientation of their terminal branches; and the characteristics of small "spike-like" events. At least two of these axons undergo membrane potential oscillations that are phase locked to the swimming rhythm expressed in nerve cord-body wall preparations and, at a different phase angle, also in isolated nerve cords. Thus the membrane potentials of at least two axons are phasically modulated by the periphery and hence could provide cycle-by-cycle sensory input to coordinate swimming activity. One of these neurons has a soma associated with the dorsal body wall and hence is a putative stretch receptor in dorsal longitudinal muscle. Thus the traveling body wave expressed by swimming leeches may be regulated by sensory feedback from both ventral and dorsal longitudinal muscles.

Action Potentials↗

Neuronal control of leech behavior.

The medicinal leech has served as an important experimental preparation for neuroscience research since the late 19th century. Initial anatomical and developmental studies dating back more than 100 years ago were followed by behavioral and electrophysiological investigations in the first half of the 20th century. More recently, intense studies of the neuronal mechanisms underlying leech movements have resulted in detailed descriptions of six behaviors described in this review; namely, heartbeat, local bending, shortening, swimming, crawling, and feeding. Neuroethological studies in leeches are particularly tractable because the CNS is distributed and metameric, with only 400 identifiable, mostly paired neurons in segmental ganglia. An interesting, yet limited, set of discrete movements allows students of leech behavior not only to describe the underlying neuronal circuits, but also interactions among circuits and behaviors. This review provides descriptions of six behaviors including their origins within neuronal circuits, their modification by feedback loops and neuromodulators, and interactions between circuits underlying with these behaviors.

Animals↗

A dye mixture (Neurobiotin and Alexa 488) reveals extensive dye-coupling among neurons in leeches; physiology confirms the connections.

Although the neuronal circuits that generate leech movements have been studied for over 30 years, the list of interneurons (INs) in these circuits remains incomplete. Previous studies showed that some motor neurons (MNs) are electrically coupled to swim-related INs, e.g., rectifying junctions connect IN 28 to MN DI-1 (dorsal inhibitor), so we searched for additional neurons in these behavioral circuits by co-injecting Neurobiotin and Alexa Fluor 488 into segmental MNs DI-1, VI-2, DE-3 and VE-4. The high molecular weight Alexa dye is confined to the injected cell, whereas the smaller Neurobiotin molecules diffuse through gap junctions to reveal electrical coupling. We found that MNs were each dye-coupled to approximately 25 neurons, about half of which are likely to be INs. We also found that (1) dye-coupling was reliably correlated with physiologically confirmed electrical connections, (2) dye-coupling is unidirectional between MNs that are linked by rectifying connections, and (3) there are novel electrical connections between excitatory and inhibitory MNs, e.g. between excitatory MN VE-4 and inhibitory MN DI-1. The INs found in this study provide a pool of novel candidate neurons for future studies of behavioral circuits, including those underlying swimming, crawling, shortening, and bending movements.

Animals↗

Entrainment of leech swimming activity by the ventral stretch receptor.

Rhythmic animal movements originate in CNS oscillator circuits; however, sensory inputs play an important role in shaping motor output. Our recent studies demonstrated that leeches with severed nerve cords swim with excellent coordination between the two ends, indicating that sensory inputs are sufficient for maintaining intersegmental coordination. In this study, we examined the neuronal substrates that underlie intersegmental coordination via sensory mechanisms. Among the identified sensory neurons in the leech, we found the ventral stretch receptor (VSR) to be the best candidate for our study because of its sensitivity to tension in longitudinal muscle. Our experiments demonstrate that (1) the membrane potential of the VSR is depolarized during swimming and oscillates with an amplitude of 1.5-5.0 mV, (2) rhythmic currents injected into the VSR can entrain ongoing swimming over a large frequency range (0.9-1.8 Hz), and (3) large current pulses injected into the VSR shift the phase of the swimming rhythm. These results suggest that VSRs play an important role in generating and modulating the swim rhythm. We propose that coordinated swimming in leech preparations with severed nerve cords results from mutual entrainment between the two ends of the leech mediated by stretch receptors.

Action Potentials↗

Analysis of the optimal channel density of the squid giant axon using a reparameterized Hodgkin-Huxley model.

A reparameterized Hodgkin-Huxley-type model is developed that improves the 1952 model's fit to the biological action potential. In addition to altering Na(+) inactivation and K(+) activation kinetics, a voltage-dependent gating-current mechanism has been added to the model. The resulting improved model fits the experimental trace nearly exactly over the rising phase, and it has a propagation velocity that is within 3% of the experimentally measured value of 21.2 m/s (at 18.5 degrees C). Having eliminated most inaccuracies associated with the velocity-dependent rising phase of the action potential, the model is used to test Hodgkin's maximum velocity hypothesis, which asserts that channel density has evolved to maximize conduction velocity. In fact the predicted optimal channel density is more than twice as high as the actual squid channel density. When the available capacitance is reduced to approximate more modern serial Na(+)-channel models, the optimal channel density is 4 times the actual value. We suggest that, although Hodgkin's maximum velocity hypothesis is acceptable as a first approximation, the microscopic optimization perspective of natural selection will not explain the channel density of the squid unless other constraints are taken into account, for example, the metabolic costs of velocity.

Animals↗

Model for intersegmental coordination of leech swimming: central and sensory mechanisms.

Sensory feedback as well as the coupling signals within the CNS are essential for leeches to produce intersegmental phase relationships in body movements appropriate for swimming behavior. To study the interactions between the central pattern generator (CPG) and peripheral feedback in controlling intersegmental coordination, we have constructed a computational model for the leech swimming system with physiologically realistic parameters. First, the leech swimming CPG is simulated by a chain of phase oscillators coupled by three channels of coordinating signals. The activity phase, the projection direction, and the phase response curve (PRC) of each channel are based on the identified intersegmental interneuron network. Output of this largely constrained model produces stable coordination in the simulated CPG with average phase lags of 8-10 degrees/segment in the period range from 0.5 to 1.5 s, similar to those observed in isolated nerve cords. The model also replicates the experimental finding that shorter chains of leech nerve cords have larger phase lags per segment. Sensory inputs, represented by stretch receptors, were subsequently incorporated into the CPG model. Each stretch receptor with its associated PRC, which was defined to mimic the experimental results of phase-dependent phase shifts of the central oscillator by the ventral stretch receptor, can alter the phase of the local central oscillator. Finally, mechanical interactions between the muscles from neighboring segments were simulated by PRCs linking adjacent stretch receptors. This model shows that interactions between neighboring muscles could globally increase the phase lags to the larger value required for the one-wavelength body form observed in freely swimming leeches. The full model also replicates the experimental observation that leeches with severed nerve cords have larger intersegmental phase lags than intact animals. The similarities between physiological and simulation results demonstrate that we have established a realistic model for the central and peripheral control of intersegmental coordination of leech swimming.

Animals↗

A model for "splitting" of running-wheel activity in hamsters.

Splitting of locomotor activity rhythm in hamsters occurs when the animals are exposed for several weeks to constant light. The authors propose a mathematical model that explains splitting in terms of a switch in the sign of coupling of two oscillators, from positive to negative, due to long-term exposure to constant light. The model assumes that the two oscillators are not identical and that the negative coupling strengths achieved by each individual animal are variable. With these assumptions, the model provides a unified picture of all different splitting patterns presented by the hamsters, provides an explanation for why the two activity components cross each other during many patterns, and explains why the phase difference achieved by the split components is often near 180 degrees.

Algorithms↗