PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

W Petz

Publications and source records attributed to W Petz.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

Randomized trial of basiliximab induction versus steroid therapy in pediatric liver allograft recipients under tacrolimus immunosuppression.

Avoidance of corticosteroids could be beneficial after pediatric liver transplantation (LTx). To test this hypothesis, we performed a randomized prospective study to compare immunosuppression with tacrolimus (TAC) and steroids versus TAC and basiliximab (BAS) after pediatric LTx. Seventy-two patients were recruited, 36 receiving TAC and steroids and 36 TAC and BAS. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of the first rejection episode. Secondary endpoints were the cumulative incidence and severity of rejection, patient and graft survival, and incidence of adverse events. Overall 1-year patient and graft survival rates were 91.4% and 85.5% in the steroid group, and 88.6% and 80% in the BAS group (p = NS). Patients free from rejection were 87.7% in the BAS group and 67.7% in the steroid group (p = 0.036). The use of BAS was associated with a 63.6% reduction in incidence of acute rejection episodes. Overall incidence of infection was 72.3% in the steroid group and 50% in the BAS group (p = 0.035). We conclude that the combination of TAC with BAS is an alternative to TAC and steroid immunosuppression in pediatric LTx, which allows for a significant reduction in the incidence of acute rejection and infectious complications.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗

Rejection and tacrolimus conversion therapy in paediatric liver transplantation.

Rejection and efficacy of rescue therapy with tacrolimus were evaluated in 50 children who underwent primary, ABO-compatible, liver transplantation. Six patients who died within the first week and one child who underwent retransplantation from an ABO-incompatible donor were excluded from the study. No patient or graft were lost due to rejection. We observed 48 episodes of rejection in 33 patients. Fourteen patients required conversion to tacrolimus for steroid-resistant rejection with resolution of rejection. One of these children developed PTLD. Other indications for conversion were neurotoxicity and hirsutism. One patient developed blindness of unknown origin after the conversion. Other side effects of tacrolimus were minor and resolved by lowering the dose. Five patients developed rejection after conversion; all achieved resolution with either steroid therapy or increase of tacrolimus dose. In conclusion, our study confirms that tacrolimus is an effective rescue therapy for paediatric liver transplantation.

ABO Blood-Group System↗

Extensive use of split liver for pediatric liver transplantation: a single-center experience.

The results of the extensive use of in situ liver splitting in a pediatric liver transplant program are presented. All referred donors were considered for split liver, and when the donor-recipient body weight ratio (DRWR) was greater than 2, the grafts were split. A modified split-liver technique was adopted when the DRWR was 2 or less. Eighty liver procurements were attempted and 72 (90%) were performed, enabling 65 children to receive 42 split, 22 whole, and 8 reduced-size livers. The right portions of the grafts were transplanted by other centers into adults. Median patient waiting time was 22 days, with no mortality on the waiting list. After a median follow-up of 14 months, overall patient and graft survival rates were 85% and 81%, respectively. Fifty-eight children received a single allograft, whereas 7 children required retransplantation. Two-year actuarial survival rates were 85% for split-liver recipients, 84% for whole-liver recipients, and 67% for reduced-size liver recipients. Vascular complications developed in 18% of the patients, with no difference among the 3 groups with different technique. Biliary complications developed in 25% of the children, mainly in reduced-size and split-liver recipients. Patient and graft survival rates for right split-liver grafts were 84% and 79%, respectively. Adopting a liberal policy of liver splitting provides allografts of optimal quality for pediatric transplantation, allowing a dramatic decrease in the waiting list time. The in situ split-liver technique should be considered the method of choice for expanding the cadaveric liver donor pool.

Adolescent↗