Biomedical subjects

W R De Gersem

Publications and source records attributed to W R De Gersem.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2000

Radiotherapy of prostate cancer with or without intensity modulated beams: a planning comparison.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) by static segmented beams allows the dose to the main portion of the prostate target to escalate while keeping the maximal dose at the anterior rectal wall at 72 Gy. The value of such IMRT plans was analyzed by comparison with non-IMRT plans using the same beam incidences. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We performed a planning study on the CT data of 32 consecutive patients with localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Three fields in the transverse plane with gantry angles of 0 degrees, 116 degrees, and 244 degrees were isocentered at the center of gravity of the target volume (prostate and seminal vesicles). The geometry of the beams was determined by beam's eye view autocontouring of the target volume with a margin of 1.5 cm. In study 1, the beam weights were determined by a human planner (3D-man) or by computer optimization using a biological objective function with (3D-optim-lim) or without (3D-optim-unlim) a physical term to limit target dose inhomogeneity. In study 2, the 3 beam incidences mentioned above were used and in-field uniform segments were added to allow IMRT. Plans with (IMRT-lim) or without (IMRT-unlim) constraints on target dose inhomogeneity were compared. In the IMRT-lim plan, target dose inhomogeneity was constrained between 15% and 20%. After optimization, plans in both studies were normalized to a maximal rectal dose of 72 Gy. Biological (tumor control probability [TCP], normal tissue complication probability [NTCP]) and physical indices for tumor control and normal tissue complication probabilities were computed, as well as the probability of the uncomplicated local control (P+). RESULTS: The IMRT-lim plan was superior to all other plans concerning TCP (p < 0.0001). The IMRT-unlim plan had the worst TCP. Within the 3D plans, the 3D-optim-unlim had the best TCP, which was significantly different from the 3D-optim-lim plan (p = 0.0003). For rectal NTCP, both IMRT plans were superior to all other plans (p < 0.0001). The IMRT-unlim plan was significantly better than the IMRT-lim plan (p < 0.0001). Again, 3D-optim-unlim was superior to the other 3D plans (p < 0. 0007). Physical endpoints for target showed the mean minimal target dose to be the lowest in the IMRT-unlim plan, caused by a large target dose inhomogeneity (TDI). Medial target dose, 90th percentile, and maximal target dose were significantly higher in both IMRT plans. Physical endpoints for the rectum showed the IMRT-unlim plan to be superior compared to all other plans. There was a strong correlation between the 65th percentile (Rp65) and rectal NTCP (correlation coefficient > or =89%). For bladder, maximal bladder dose was significantly higher in the IMRT-unlim plan compared to all other plans (p < or = 0.0001).P+ was significantly higher in both IMRT-plans than in all other plans. The 3D-optim-unlim plan was significantly better than the two other 3D plans (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: IMRT significantly increases the ratio of TCP over NTCP of the rectum in the treatment of prostate cancer. However, constraints for TDI are needed, because a high degree of TDI reduced minimal target dose. IMRT improved uncomplicated local control probability. In our department, IMRT by static segmented beams is planned and delivered in a cost-effective way. IMRT-lim has replaced non-modulated conformal radiotherapy as the standard treatment for prostate cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2000

Optimization of beam weights in conformal radiotherapy planning of stage III non-small cell lung cancer: effects on therapeutic ratio.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of beam weight optimization for 3D conformal radiotherapy plans, with or without beam intensity modulation, in Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ten patients with Stage III NSCLC were planned using a conventional 3D technique and a technique involving noncoplanar beam intensity modulation (BIM). Two planning target volumes (PTVs) were defined: PTV1 included macroscopic tumor volume and PTV2 included macroscopic and microscopic tumor volume. Virtual simulation defined the beam shapes and incidences as well as the wedge orientations (3D) and segment outlines (BIM). Weights of wedged beams, unwedged beams, and segments were determined by human trial and error for the 3D-plans (3D-manual), by a standard weight table (SWT) for the BIM-plans (BIM-SWT) and by optimization (3D-optimized and BIM-optimized) using an objective function with a biological and a physical component. The resulting non-optimized and optimized dose distributions were compared, using physical endpoints, after normalizing the median dose of PTV1 to 80 Gy. RESULTS: Optimization improved dose homogeneity at the target for 3D- and BIM-plans and the minimum dose at PTV1. The minimum dose at PTV2 was decreased by optimization especially in 3D-plans. After optimization, the dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of lung and heart were shifted to lower doses for 80-90% of the organ volume. Since lung is the dose-limiting organ in Stage III NSCLC, an increased minimum dose at PTV1 together with a decreased dose at the main lung volume suggests an improved therapeutic ratio. Optimization allows 10% dose escalation for 3D-plans and 20% for BIM-plans at isotoxicity levels of lung and spinal cord. Upon dose escalation, esophagus may become the dose-limiting structure when PTV1 extends close to the esophagus. CONCLUSIONS: Optimization using a biophysical objective function allowed an increase of the therapeutic ratio of radiotherapy planning for Stage III NSCLC.

Algorithms↗

PubMed1999

Inhomogeneous target-dose distributions: a dimension more for optimization?

PURPOSE: To evaluate if the use of inhomogeneous target-dose distributions, obtained by 3D conformal radiotherapy plans with or without beam intensity modulation, offers the possibility to decrease indices of toxicity to normal tissues and/or increase indices of tumor control stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ten patients with stage III NSCLC were planned using a conventional 3D technique and a technique involving noncoplanar beam intensity modulation (BIM). Two planning target volumes (PTVs) were defined: PTV1 included macroscopic tumor volume and PTV2 included macroscopic and microscopic tumor volume. Virtual simulation defined the beam shapes and incidences as well as the wedge orientations (3D) and segment outlines (BIM). Weights of wedged beams, unwedged beams, and segments were determined by optimization using an objective function with a biological and a physical component. The biological component included tumor control probability (TCP) for PTV1 (TCP1), PTV2 (TCP2), and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for lung, spinal cord, and heart. The physical component included the maximum and minimum dose as well as the standard deviation of the dose at PTV1. The most inhomogeneous target-dose distributions were obtained by using only the biological component of the objective function (biological optimization). By enabling the physical component in addition to the biological component, PTV1 inhomogeneity was reduced (biophysical optimization). As indices for toxicity to normal tissues, NTCP-values as well as maximum doses or dose levels to relevant fractions of the organ's volume were used. As indices for tumor control, TCP-values as well as minimum doses to the PTVs were used. RESULTS: When optimization was performed with the biophysical as compared to the biological objective function, the PTV1 inhomogeneity decreased from 13 (8-23)% to 4 (2-9)% for the 3D-(p = 0.00009) and from 44 (33-56)% to 20 (9-34)% for the BIM plans (p < 0. 00001). Minimum PTV1 doses (expressed as the lowest voxel-dose) were similar for both objective functions. The mean and maximum target doses were significantly higher with biological optimization for 3D as well as for BIM (all p values < 0.001). Tumor control probability (estimated by TCP1 x TCP2) was 4.7% (3D) and 6.2% (BIM) higher for biological optimization (p = 0.01 and p = 0.00002 respectively). NTCP(lung) as well as the percentage of lung volume exceeding 20 Gy was higher with the use of the biophysical objective function. NTCP(heart) was also higher with the use of the biophysical objective function. The percentage of heart volume exceeding 40 Gy tended to be higher but the difference was not significant. For spinal cord, the maximum dose as well as NTCP(cord) were similar for 3D plans (D(max): p = 0.04; NTCP: p = 0.2) but were significantly lower for BIM (D(max): p = 0.002; NTCP: p = 0.008) if the biophysical objective function was used. CONCLUSIONS: When using conventional 3D techniques, inhomogeneous dose distributions offer the potential to further increase the probability of uncomplicated local control. When using techniques as BIM that would lead to large escalation of the median and maximum target doses, it seems indicated to limit target-dose inhomogeneity to avoid dose levels that are so high that the safety becomes questionable.

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung↗

PubMed1998

Conformal radiotherapy of Stage III non-small cell lung cancer: a class solution involving non-coplanar intensity-modulated beams.

PURPOSE: We developed a semiautomatic class solution to irradiate centrally located Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), involving a beam intensity modulation technique and optimization using a biophysical cost function. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Treatment for 10 patients with Stage III NSCLC was planned, using a conventional three- or four-beam three-dimensional (3D) technique and two techniques involving, respectively, seven (BIM1) and five (BIM2) noncoplanar beam incidences with intensity modulation. Two planning target volumes were defined: PTV1 included macroscopic tumor volume and PTV2 included macroscopic and microscopic disease. Beams were divided into beam parts (segments) and their outlines were defined during virtual simulation. Optimization using a biophysical cost function determined beam weights, segment weights, and wedge angles. Biological end points included tumor control probability of both target volumes (TCP1 and TCP2) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of heart, lung, and spinal cord. The resulting uncomplicated local control probability (UCLP) was calculated. Physical end points included dose at PTV1 expressed as a dose minimum and dose maximum. Target-dose inhomogeneity was constrained in all plans. RESULTS: Concerning tumor evaluation, TCP1 was 74% (range 54-89%) for the 3D plan, 78.0% (range 62-94%) for BIM1, and 86.0% (range 59-93%) for BIM2. TCP1*TCP2 was, respectively, 67.0% (range 39-81%), 73.0% (range 56-94%), and 81.0% (range 54-93%). Minimum doses to PTV1 were 85, 80, and 88 Gy with the three respective techniques, while dose maxima were 89, 101, and 100 Gy. NTCPs of lung were 45.0% (range 11-75%) for 3D, 19.5% (range 8-59%) for BIM1, and 24.5% (range 3-61%) for BIM2. NTCPs of heart and spinal cord were comparable for all techniques. ULCPs were 37.0% (range 9-73%), 52.5% (range 22-86%), and 60.0% (range 20-85%), respectively. Applying physical limits to ensure clinical safety, minimum doses at PTV1 were recalculated. These were 72, 71, and 74 Gy for 3D, BIM1, and BIM2, respectively. CONCLUSION: The BIM2 plan is a candidate class solution for dose escalation studies in centrally located Stage III NSCLC.

Algorithms↗