PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

W R Ledoux

Publications and source records attributed to W R Ledoux.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1990

Shear bond strength of four orthodontic bonding systems.

Recently new orthodontic bonding systems have been developed for attachment of brackets to the etched facial surfaces of teeth. Two of these new systems use bonding agents that contain solvents. It is claimed that this improves the polymerization of the unfilled resin primer and may increase bond strength. A new light-cured restorative enamel/dentin-bonding agent has also recently been introduced. Its value in orthodontic bonding has not been determined. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the shear bond strengths of the three new bonding systems and to compare these with a conventional orthodontic bonding system. Forty-eight enamel specimens were prepared with 600-grit silicone carbide paper, acid etched with 37% phosphoric acid, and assigned to four enamel-bonding treatment groups: (A) Saga sealant; (B) Maximum Cure; (C) Scotchbond-2; and (D) Concise enamel bond. After enamel priming, the specimens were bonded to Concise orthodontic bonding resin. The bonded specimens were thermocycled (15 degrees C to 45 degrees C) and then stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 7 days. Shear bond strength was tested with an Instron testing machine at a strain rate of 0.02 in/min. The mean shear bond strengths and standard deviations reported in MN/m2 were (A) 20.34 (5.37); (B) 25.33 (5.96); (C) 14.59 (5.25); and (D) 20.13 (4.98). The mean shear bond strengths for groups A, B, and D were significantly greater (p less than 0.05) than that for group C. The addition of solvents to the new orthodontic bonding systems does not appear to have a clinically significant effect. The new restorative bonding resin does not provide comparable enamel bond strengths.

Composite Resins↗
PubMed1990

Shear bond strength of ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel.

The recent introduction of ceramic orthodontic brackets has generated interest among orthodontists. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the in vitro shear bond strengths to enamel of four ceramic orthodontic brackets and one stainless steel bracket in trials with two separate acid-etching times for enamel. Eighty extracted human central incisors were prepared for bonding to Starfire, Allure, Transcend, Quasar, and stainless steel (in the control group) orthodontic bracket systems. Enamel etching times of 15 seconds and 60 seconds were used. There was a total of 10 groups. After acid etching, one coat of low-viscosity bonding agent was applied and the brackets were bonded to etched enamel with Concise orthodontic bonding resin. The bonded test specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 14 days, after which they were thermocycled for 500 cycles (5 degrees C to 60 degrees C). The bonds were stressed to failure in an Instron machine at a crosshead speed of 0.02 inch per minute. The shear bond strengths were calculated and Weibull analysis was used to obtain a shape factor (the slope of the straight line and a measure of predictability) and the characteristic level (the 63.2% bond strength value of median rank on the strength line) for each group. Predictability and high bond strength, along with other factors, are important in the clinical selection of a bracket system. When either predictability or bond strength was considered independently, several bracket systems, coupled with a particular etch time, had either high predictability or high bond strength. The highest predictability and the highest bond strength were both found with the Allure bracket system.

Acid Etching, Dental↗
PubMed1989

A bond strength study of luted castable ceramic restorations.

Accurate intracoronal castings can be produced using a castable ceramic--DICOR--for which there is a need to identify a suitable luting cement. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the bond strength of three glass-ionomer luting cements and one resin cement to treated and untreated DICOR, enamel, and dentin surfaces. Forty "cerammed" DICOR specimens were assigned to four groups: (1-3) grit-blasting and bonding to each of the three glass-ionomer cements; and (4) acid-etching, silane coating, and bonding to the resin cement. Seventy enamel specimens were assigned to seven groups: (1-3) no etching and bonding to each of the glass-ionomer cements; (4-7) acid-etching and bonding to the glass-ionomer cements and the resin cement. Seventy dentin specimens were assigned to seven groups: (1-4) bonding to each of the three glass-ionomer cements and the resin cement; (5-7) polyacrylic acid preconditioning and bonding to each of the three glass-ionomer cements. The mean resin cement bond strengths (MN/m2) to DICOR (9.4) and to etched enamel (10.7) were significantly greater (p less than 0.01) than those of the glass-ionomer cements (DICOR, 0.8-1.2; enamel, 0.4-0.9). Preconditioning of enamel and dentin significantly increased (p less than 0.05) the bond strengths to the glass-ionomer cements. The mean bond strength of the resin cement to untreated dentin (4.3) was significantly higher (p less than 0.05) than the glass-ionomer bond strengths to untreated dentin (1.0-1.7) and to preconditioned dentin (2.1-3.3). The high bond strengths achieved with the resin cement are encouraging. Selected surface treatment of DICOR, enamel, and dentin prior to luting should be clinically useful.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed1988

Orthodontic bonding to porcelain--bond strength and refinishing.

Glazed porcelain surfaces are not amenable to resin penetration for orthodontic bonding. The aims of this study were to evaluate (1) the bond strengths of two orthodontic composite materials to treated porcelain surfaces, (2) the effect of thermocycling, and (3) the porcelain surfaces after refinishing. Sixty glazed porcelain disks were assigned to three surface treatment groups: Silane (S), roughening and silane (RS), and roughening (R). The acid-etched enamel surfaces of 20 extracted teeth served as a control group. Ten specimens in each group were bonded with either Concise or System 1. They were stored in water at 37 degrees C or thermocycled 8 degrees to 45 degrees C. Shear bond strength was tested with an Instron testing machine (0.05 cm/min). Analysis of variance showed that the four surface treatment groups and the two composite materials produced significantly different bond strengths (P less than 0.01 and P less than 0.05, respectively). The effect of thermocycling was not significant (P greater than 0.05). Acid-etched enamel/Concise produced the highest mean bond strength (17.4 MN/m2). This was significantly greater (P less than 0.05) than the mean bond strengths of S/Concise (11.1), RS/System 1 (8.6), RS/Concise (8.1), and enamel/System 1 (7.8). The latter four mean bond strengths in turn were significantly greater (P less than 0.05) than S/System 1 (2.5), R/Concise (2.1), and R/System 1 (1.8). Of the four refinishing systems evaluated, all produced smooth surfaces but were unable to reproduce a glazed appearance. Roughening of porcelain and the silane treatment achieve bond strengths that should be clinically successful.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adhesives↗
PubMed1987

Managing orthodontic data on a small computer.

A literature survey of file management, relational database management, and network/hierarchical database management systems led to selection of dBASE III to manage patient records on an IBM PC in the Department of Orthodontics at the Louisiana State University School of Dentistry. The versatility of this system's internal language enables ad hoc analysis of clinical and personal data to meet both anticipated and unanticipated management and scientific needs.

Computers↗