PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

W R McClure

Publications and source records attributed to W R McClure.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Characterization of the closed complex intermediate formed during transcription initiation by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase.

We have carried out detailed DNase I footprinting studies of the closed complex formed on the phage lambda prmup-1 Delta265 promoter under reaction conditions such that the contribution of the open complex to the footprint was negligible. Detailed quantification shows that the closed complex detected has the same binding constant as that determined in kinetic studies. The footprinting pattern of the closed complex shows major differences from that of the open complex. Not only is it about 20 base pairs shorter, there are also many fewer positions being protected around and upstream of the -35 region. We have derived potential contact regions in the closed and open complexes based on the DNase I footprinting patterns, and confirmed the contact region for the open complex by hydroxyl radical footprinting. One important finding is that most of the essential contacts with the phosphate groups in the -35 region are formed during the isomerization step, a conclusion consistent with our kinetic data showing that this step is salt dependent on this promoter. In addition, we found that the derived contact regions for the closed and open complexes are offset by about three base pairs in the -35 region, which suggests a shift of the contact during isomerization. Finally, we found that the footprinting pattern of the complex formed at 4 degreesC has some similarities to as well as differences from the closed complex formed under standard transcription conditions.

Bacterial Proteins↗

Stimulation of open complex formation by nicks and apurinic sites suggests a role for nucleation of DNA melting in Escherichia coli promoter function.

We report the effects of depurination and prenicking at various positions of the phage lambda prmup-1Delta265 promoter DNA on the rate of open complex formation. We have found that depurination and prenicking at positions around the -10 region strongly stimulated the rate of open complex formation. Since nicking and depurination are known to destabilize DNA helical structure, our observations indicate that the instability of the -10 region is important for open complex formation. We further infer that (i) the nucleation of DNA melting, which occurs during the isomerization from the closed complex into the open complex, contributes to the rate of open complex formation; (ii) the nucleation of melting occurs around the -10 region; and (iii) the propagation of DNA melting from the nucleation region is not rate-limiting. In addition, we have found that depurination at several positions inhibited open complex formation. We used dimethyl sulfate modification protection studies to show that most of the guanine bases that are among these positions are in contact with RNA polymerase in the open complex.

Base Sequence↗

Changing the mechanism of transcriptional activation by phage lambda repressor.

The first steps of transcription initiation include binding of RNA polymerase to a promoter to form an inactive, unstable, closed complex (described by an equilibrium constant, K(B)) and isomerization of the closed complex to an active, stable, open complex (described by a forward rate constant, k(f)). lambda cI protein activates the PRM promoter by specifically increasing k(f). A positive control mutant, cI-pc2, is defective for activation because it fails to raise k(f). An Arg to His change in the sigma70 subunit of RNA polymerase was previously obtained as an allele-specific suppressor of cI-pc2. To elucidate how the mutant polymerase restores the activation function of the mutant activator, abortive initiation assays were performed, using purified cI proteins and RNA polymerase holoenzymes. The change in sigma does not significantly alter K(B) or k(f) in the absence of cI protein. As expected, cI-pc2 activates the mutant polymerase in the same way that wild-type cI activates the wild-type polymerase, by increasing k(f). An unexpected and novel finding is that the wild-type activator stimulates the mutant polymerase, but not wild-type polymerase, by increasing K(B).

Bacteriophage lambda↗

Antisense RNA control of gene expression in bacteriophage P22. I. Structures of sar RNA and its target, ant mRNA.

Sar RNA is an antisense RNA that is partly responsible for the negative regulation of antirepressor synthesis during development of bacteriophage P22 (Liao SM et al., 1987, Genes & Dev 1:197-203; Wu Th, Liao SM, McClure WR, Susskind MM, Genes & Dev 1:204-212). The structures of sar RNA and its target, ant mRNA, were probed using limited RNase digestion as a function of Mg2+ concentration. Sar RNA forms two hairpins that are present at all Mg2+ concentrations (Mg2+-independent hairpins). One of the hairpins contains three tandem U x U base pairs. Ant RNA forms three Mg2+-independent hairpins and one Mg2+-dependent hairpin. In addition, many nucleotides in sar RNA and ant RNA appear to be involved in tertiary interactions. The effects of RNA structure on the pairing reaction are considered in the accompanying paper (Schaefer KL, McClure WR, 1997, RNA 3:157-174).

Bacteriophage P22↗

Antisense RNA control of gene expression in bacteriophage P22. II. Kinetic mechanism and cation specificity of the pairing reaction.

The bacteriophage P22 sar RNA-ant mRNA pairing reaction was characterized kinetically. The pairing reaction proceeds by a three-step pathway. First, reversible base pairs form between complementary hairpin loops in sar RNA and ant RNA (Kd = 270 nM). Next, stable duplex formation initiates between single-stranded nucleotides in sar RNA and ant RNA; the ant RNA nucleotides are at the bottom of a hairpin stem that is partially accessible. Concomitant unwinding of one sar RNA hairpin and the complementary ant RNA hairpin then occurs, to form a partially paired intermediate (k2 = 12 min(-1). Finally, a complete duplex forms after unwinding of the other sar RNA hairpin and the complementary ant RNA hairpin (k3 = 7 min(-1). Experiments with sar RNA sequence and length variants demonstrate that the precise structures of both sar RNA hairpins affect the kinetic parameters. The pairing reaction is Mg2+-dependent, and shows high specificity for the required cation. Maximal pairing rates are achieved when more than one Mg2+ ion is bound. The cation-dependence and specificity indicate a requirement for Mg2+-dependent tertiary structure.

Bacteriophage P22↗

Selective binding of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase to topoisomers of minicircles carrying the TAC16 and TAC17 promoters.

We have studied the effect of DNA supercoiling on open complex formation by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase at the TAC16 and TAC17 promoters. A two-dimensional gel retardation assay was used to measure the relative rate of association between RNA polymerase and the TAC promoters on individual topoisomers. Plasmid DNAs usually have several promoters that complicate the analysis of RNA polymerase binding to only one of them. We avoided this problem by using minicircles of DNA carrying only a single promoter. These were generated in vivo by the site-specific recombination system of bacteriophage lambda. Both the TAC16 and TAC17 promoters exhibited a biphasic response to negative supercoiling. Between superhelical densities of 0 and -0.04, increases in the negative linking difference favored binding. Beyond -0.04, either no effect on binding (TAC16) or a slight inhibition of binding (TAC17) was observed for increases in the negative linking difference. The unwinding at the rate-limiting step was calculated for both TAC promoters at moderate superhelical densities. This unwinding was found to be a fraction (about 20-30%) of the total unwinding measured by topoisomerase I relaxation (about one turn). In addition, the 1-base pair difference in spacer length between the TAC16 and TAC17 promoters resulted in different extents of activation and inhibition by negative supercoiling.

DNA Topoisomerases, Type I↗

Regulation of open complex formation at the Escherichia coli galactose operon promoters. Simultaneous interaction of RNA polymerase, gal repressor and CAP/cAMP.

The regulation of open complex formation at the Escherichia coli galactose operon promoters by galactose repressor and catabolite activator protein/cyclic AMP (CAP/cAMP) was investigated in DNA-binding and kinetic experiments performed in vitro. We found that gal repressor and CAP/cAMP bind to the gal regulatory region independently, resulting in simultaneous occupancy of the two gal operators and the CAP/cAMP binding site. Both CAP/cAMP and gal repressor altered the partitioning of RNA polymerase between the two overlapping gal promoters. Open complexes formed in the absence of added regulatory proteins were partitioned between gal P1 and P2 with occupancies of 25% and 75%, respectively. CAP/cAMP caused open complexes to be formed nearly exclusively at P1 (98% occupancy). gal repressor caused a co-ordinated, but incomplete, switch in promoter partitioning from P1 to P2 in both the absence and presence of CAP/cAMP. We measured the kinetic constants governing open complex formation and decay at the gal promoters in the absence and presence of gal repressor and CAP/cAMP. CAP/cAMP had the largest effect on the kinetics of open complex formation, resulting in a 30-fold increase in the apparent binding constant. We conclude that the regulation of open complex formation at the gal promoters does not result from competition between gal repressor, CAP/cAMP and RNA polymerase for binding at the gal operon regulatory region, but instead results from the interactions of the three proteins during the formation of a nucleoprotein complex on the gal DNA fragment. Finally, we present a kinetic model for the regulation of open complex formation at the gal operon.

Base Sequence↗

Competing promoters in prokaryotic transcription.

Two (or more) bacterial promoters are often found in close proximity, and may compete for the binding of RNA polymerase. These competing promoters have interesting characteristics in vitro and analysis of the competition should be valuable to kinetic studies of more complex transcription systems.

Binding, Competitive↗

Searching for and predicting the activity of sites for DNA binding proteins: compilation and analysis of the binding sites for Escherichia coli integration host factor (IHF).

An analysis of the sequence information contained in a compilation of published binding sites for E. coli integration host factor (IHF) was performed. The sequences of twenty-seven IHF sites were aligned; the base occurrences at each position, the information content, and an extended consensus sequence were obtained for the IHF site. The base occurrences at each position of the IHF site were used with a program written for the Apple Macintosh computers in order to determine the similarity scores for published IHF sites. A linear correlation was found to exist between the logarithm of IHF binding and functional data (relative free energies) and similarity scores for two groups of IHF sites. The MacTargsearch program and its potential usefulness in searching for other sites and predicting their relative activities is discussed.

Bacterial Proteins↗

Bacteriophage P22 Mnt repressor. DNA binding and effects on transcription in vitro.

We have examined the binding of Mnt repressor to operator DNA in vitro and have determined how this binding affects the level of transcription from two nearby promoters, Pant and Pmnt. Mnt binds to a region of DNA that overlaps the startpoint of transcription of Pant and the -35 region of Pmnt. Mnt represses transcription in vitro from Pant and enhances transcription from Pmnt. Protection and interference experiments show that Mnt binds to a single, 17 base-pair operator site. The operator sequence and the protein-DNA contacts are symmetric. Mnt makes major groove contacts on both faces of the operator DNA. At pH 7.5, 200 mM-KCl, 22 degrees C, the Mnt tetramer binds operator with high affinity (Kd = 2.2 X 10(-11M) and the protein-DNA complex is quite stable (t1/2 = 48 min). Operator binding shows large dependencies on pH, salt concentration, and temperature.

Base Sequence↗

Interaction of the bacteriophage P22 Arc repressor with operator DNA.

Are repressor binds to a single, partially symmetric, 21 base-pair operator site that is centered between the -10 and -35 regions of the Pant promoter. Protection and interference experiments show that Arc makes contacts with the operator on one side of the DNA helix. Although Arc is a small protein (53 residues/subunit), it makes contacts that are farther from the center of the operator than those made by many larger repressors. These extended contacts include the phosphate groups at the ends of the 21 base-pair site. Under standard conditions (pH 7.5, 100 mM-KCl, 3 mM-MgCl2, 22 degrees C) half-maximal operator binding is observed at an Arc concentration of 2.5 X 10(-9) M and the protein-DNA complex is very stable (t1/2 approximately equal to 80 min).

DNA, Viral↗

Control of gene expression in bacteriophage P22 by a small antisense RNA. I. Characterization in vitro of the Psar promoter and the sar RNA transcript.

The characterization in vitro of a newly discovered promoter (Psar) in the bacteriophage P22 immI region is described. Psar is located within the ant gene and is directed toward the major immI promoter, Pant. The entire intercistronic region between the P22 arc and ant genes (69 bp) is transcribed. The initiation and termination of sar (small antisense regulatory) RNA transcription are unusual. Frequent abortive initiation occurs in the presence of all four NTPs; RNA products 3-13 nucleotides in length are produced in about 15- to 25-fold larger numbers than full-length transcripts. Termination of sar RNA synthesis occurs after transcription of the first and second Ts of a TTTA sequence following a region of hyphenated dyad symmetry. The effects of convergent transcription between Pant and Psar were investigated on linear and supercoiled templates. Active transcription from Pant interferes with full-length transcription from Psar; several factors that interfere with Pant initiation (e.g., Pant down-mutation, Mnt repressor protein, Arc repressor protein) result in indirect activation of sar RNA synthesis. The sar RNA pairs rapidly with ant mRNA to form a stable stoichiometric complex. The location and properties of Psar suggest an important regulatory function for sar RNA as a negative effector of ant expression. The results of Wu et al. (this issue) support this suggestion.

Base Sequence↗

Control of gene expression in bacteriophage P22 by a small antisense RNA. II. Characterization of mutants defective in repression.

Phage P22 produces antirepressor protein early after infection from a transcript initiated at the Pant promoter. After the first few minutes of infection, transcription from Pant is repressed by a protein encoded by the arc gene. Antirepressor is not produced late in infection, even though the antirepressor gene, ant, is transcribed from the late operon promoter Plate. We describe the isolation of P22 mutants that synthesize antirepressor from the Plate transcript. The mutations inactivate a promoter Psar, which lies within the ant coding sequence and directs the synthesis of sar RNA, a small antisense regulatory RNA complementary to the ant ribosome binding site. Characterization of the Psar down-mutants shows that transcription from Psar interferes with synthesis of antirepressor from both the Plate and Pant transcripts. Since sar RNA represses synthesis of antirepressor in trans, we propose that sar RNA base-pairs with ant mRNA to inhibit antirepressor synthesis at a post-transcriptional level. The role and importance of sar RNA in P22 biology are discussed.

Gene Expression Regulation↗

Analysis of the occurrence of promoter-sites in DNA.

We show that the occurrence and homology score (1) of promoter-sites in DNA depends upon the base composition of the DNA. We used simple probability theory to calculate the mean homology score expected for all promoter-sites that had a specific match in the canonical hexamers. By using the square root of this mean score as a measure of significance, we objectively classify all promoter-sites which are reported. We tested the theoretical approach in two ways. First, we used the program (PROMSEARCH) to analyze approximately 150,000 base pairs of random sequence DNA with different base compositions and we found excellent agreement with the theoretical predictions. Our second test was the analysis of a number of sequences drawn from the GENBANK DNA sequence database. We have analyzed 20 bacterial and bacteriophage sequences, which consisted of at least one operon, for promoter-sites. We found no absolute preference for promoter-sites within noncoding regions. We show the results of analyzing the phages lambda, T7 and fd, and the E. coli lac operon. The major known promoters in these sequences were all found correctly. We discuss the question of the location of a number of minor promoter-sites and show how PROMSEARCH can be used to help identify the correct location of the promoter. This approach can be applied to the search for any DNA site and should allow greater objectivity when comparing DNA sequences for meaningful subsequences.

Bacteriophage lambda↗

Functional and physical characterization of transcription initiation complexes in the bacteriophage lambda OR region.

We have used transcriptional activity assays and DNase I footprinting techniques to examine in vitro the binding of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase and lambda repressor protein to the bacteriophage lambda rightward promoter-operator region. For the lambda PR promoter, the activity and physical binding results determined at several repressor concentrations correlated very well. Good agreement was also found for repression of PRM, which occurred at higher repressor concentrations; however, our results indicate that at low repressor concentrations, RNA polymerase can physically occupy PRM in a transcriptionally inactive form. These inactive complexes formed with a binding constant similar to that previously measured for "closed complexes" at PRM. A kinetic study of PR open complex formation on an OR2-template in the presence of lambda repressor showed that decreased initiation frequency from this promoter was due largely to a decrease in KB. The kinetically determined inhibition constant for repressor (Ki = 4 nM) was similar to the dissociation constant (Kd approximately 2 nM) determined from the footprinting studies.

Bacteriophage lambda↗

Kinetics of open complex formation between Escherichia coli RNA polymerase and the lac UV5 promoter. Evidence for a sequential mechanism involving three steps.

The forward and reverse kinetics of open complex formation between Escherichia coli RNA polymerase and the lac UV5 promoter have been studied in the temperature range of 15-42 degrees C. The standard two-step model, involving the formation of a closed intermediate, RPc, followed by an isomerization that leads to the active complex RPo, could not account for the present data. The promoter-enzyme lifetime measurements showed an inverse temperature dependence (apparent activation energy, -35 kcal/mol). A third step, which is very temperature dependent and which is very rapid at 37 degrees C, was postulated to involve the unstacking of DNA base pairs that immediately precedes open complex formation. Evidence for incorporating a new binary complex, RPi, in the pathway was provided by experiments that distinguished between stably bound species and active promoter after temperature-jump perturbations. These experiments allowed measurement of the rate of reequilibration between the stably bound species and determination of the corresponding equilibrium constant. They indicated that the third step became rate limiting below 20 degrees C; this prediction was checked by an analysis of the forward kinetics. A quantitative evaluation of the parameters involved in this three-step model is provided. Similar experiments were performed on a negatively supercoiled template: in this case the third equilibrium was driven toward formation of the open complex even at low temperature, and the corresponding step was not rate limiting.

DNA-Directed RNA Polymerases↗

Characterization in vitro of the effect of spacer length on the activity of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase at the TAC promoter.

We describe the characterization in vitro of three hybrid trp-lacUV5 (TAC) promoters, which have perfect homology to the -10 and -35 Escherichia coli promoter consensus hexamer sequences, but which differ in the distance between the -10 and -35 regions. The three promoters, TAC16, TAC17, and TAC18 have spacings of 16, 17, and 18 base pairs, respectively. We have measured KB and k2, the constants that describe the formation of open complexes, on these three promoters. We have also measured their relative strengths on supercoiled plasmid DNA. Our results show that these are the strongest promoters that have been characterized in vitro so far and confirm the hypothesis that the consensus promoter sequence is "best." We find the TAC17 promoter (KBk2 = 8.4 X 10(7) M-1 s-1) to be stronger than either the TAC16 (KBk2 approximately 1.5 X 10(7) M-1 s-1) or TAC18 (KBk2 approximately 3.5 X 10(7) M-1 s-1) promoters, a result that is in agreement with other findings on the effect of spacer length. The choice of start point for transcription is affected by spacer length. Transcription from all the promoters was stimulated at moderate concentrations of salt (less than 150 mM) and persisted at high salt concentrations (300 mM).

Base Sequence↗

IS10 transposition is regulated by DNA adenine methylation.

We show that dam- mutants are a major class of E. coli mutants with increased IS10 activity. IS10 has two dam methylation sites, one within the transposase promoter and one within the inner terminus where transposase presumably binds. Absence of methylation results in increased activity of both promoter and terminus, and completely accounts for increased transposition in dam- strains. Transposition of Tn903 and Tn5 are also increased in dam- strains, probably for analogous reasons. Transposition is also increased when IS10 is hemimethylated. One hemimethylated species is much more active than the other and is estimated to be at least 1000 times more active than a fully methylated element. Evidence is presented that the promoter and inner terminus of IS10 are coordinately activated in a dam-dependent fashion, presumably because they are hemimethylated at the same time. Thus, in dam+ strains, IS10 will transpose preferentially when DNA is hemimethylated. We suggest specifically that IS10 transposition may preferentially occur immediately after passage of a chromosomal replication fork.

Adenine↗