PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

W S El Masry

Publications and source records attributed to W S El Masry.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

A multicenter international study on the Spinal Cord Independence Measure, version III: Rasch psychometric validation.

BACKGROUND: A third version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III), made up of three subscales, was formulated following comments by experts from several countries and Rasch analysis performed on the previous version. OBJECTIVE: To examine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of SCIM III using Rasch analysis. DESIGN: Multicenter cohort study. SETTING: Thirteen spinal cord units in six countries from North America, Europe, and the Middle-East. SUBJECTS: 425 patients with spinal cord lesions (SCL). INTERVENTIONS: SCIM III assessments by professional staff members. Rasch analysis of admission scores. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: SCIM III subscale match between the distribution of item difficulty grades and the patient ability measurements; reliability of patient ability measures; fit of data to Rasch model requirements; unidimensionality of each subscale; hierarchical ordering of categories within items; differential item functioning across classes of patients and across countries. RESULTS: Results supported the compatibility of the SCIM subscales with the stringent Rasch requirements. Average infit mean-square indices were 0.79-1.06; statistically distinct strata of abilities were 3 to 4; most thresholds between adjacent categories were properly ordered; item hierarchy was stable across most of the clinical subgroups and across countries. In a few items, however, misfit or category threshold disordering were found. CONCLUSIONS: The scores of each SCIM III subscale appear as a reliable and useful quantitative representation of a specific construct of independence after SCL. This justifies the use of SCIM in clinical research, including cross-cultural trials. The results also suggest that there is merit in further refining the scale.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2002

Management of immature heterotopic ossification (HO) of the hip.

A case of extensive heterotopic ossification involving the left hip in a 16 year old girl who sustained non traumatic spinal paralysis at T4 ASIA scale A. This case demonstrates the practical difficulties facing clinicians involved in the rehabilitation of this paraplegic patient who required intervention before full maturation of her left hip heterotopic ossification (HO). The patient was developing a rapidly progressive fixed scoliosis and severe difficulty in achieving a proper seating posture. In addition there was difficulty with the application of a suitable orthosis to try and limit the progression of scoliosis as a result of the HO. Discussants will comment on heterotopic ossification in general and the course of action in this particular case.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Treatment of severe double spinal cord injuries.

This is a case report describing an injury--sustained by a 25-year-old man during a car accident, and characterized by fracture dislocation of the spine at the level of C7 and T4 accompanied by pulmonary contusion. He had an incomplete spinal cord lesion at the level of C7 and a complete lesion at the level of T4 (T4 ASIA A). Imaging of the spine showed three column fractures with ventral spinal cord compression at both levels. Discussants of this case comment on the concept of acute treatment of severe double spinal cord injuries, and present their chosen way of management in this particular case.

Accidents, Traffic↗
PubMed2000

High dose methylprednisolone in the management of acute spinal cord injury - a systematic review from a clinical perspective.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic literature review for primary data using predefined inclusion, exclusion and validity criteria. Primary outcome measure was standardised neurological examination or neurological function. Secondary outcomes; acute mortality, early morbidity. OBJECTIVES: To access the literature available to clinicians systematically and evaluate the evidence for an effect of high dose methylprednisolone (MPSS) on neurological improvement following acute spinal cord injury (ACSI). METHODS: Information retrieval was based on Medline search (1966 through December 1999) using the strategy 'spinal cord injury' and 'methylprednisolone' (or 'dexamethasone') with no other restrictions. Primary data publications using high dose steroids given within 12 h following spinal cord injury and reporting outcome measures separately for steroid and non-steroid treated groups were selected. Evaluation followed the guides of Guyatt et al7 (for the Evidence Based Working Group in Canada). Studies with questionable validity were excluded. Level of evidence and treatment recommendation utilised the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination criteria.6 Experimental spinal cord injury studies on larger animals were included; small mammal experiments were considered beyond evaluation. RESULTS: Three clinical trials and six cohort study publications were found to satisfy the review criteria. The evidence they provide supports 'the recommendation that the manoeuvre (high dose methylpredisolone) be excluded from consideration as an intervention for the condition'10 (acute spinal cord injury). Twelve larger animal publications were detailed. Validity and the functional significance of results was of concern in many. The weight of evidence lay with those studies demonstrating no definite effect of MPSS on functional outcome. In cat experiments with higher level cord damage, deaths in the MPSS treated groups were notable. CONCLUSION: The evidence produced by this systematic review does not support the use of high dose methylprednisolone in acute spinal cord injury to improve neurological recovery. A deleterious effect on early mortality and morbidity cannot be excluded by this evidence.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1999

Randomized trial of sildenafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction in spinal cord injury. Sildenafil Study Group.

Erectile dysfunction is a common complication of spinal cord injury. This double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover study assessed the efficacy and safety of oral sildenafil in men with erectile dysfunction caused by traumatic spinal cord injury. A total of 178 men (mean age, 38 years) received placebo or sildenafil 1 hour before sexual activity for 6 weeks; after a 2-week washout period, the men received the alternate treatment for 6 weeks. The 50-mg starting dose could be adjusted to 100 or 25 mg based on efficacy and tolerability. Efficacy was assessed by using global efficacy questions, the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), and a patient log of erectile activity. Of 143 men with residual erectile function at baseline, 111 (78%) reported improved erections and preferred sildenafil to placebo. For all men (including those who reported no residual erectile function at baseline), 127 of 168 (76%) reported improved erections and preferred sildenafil to placebo. For all men, 132 of 166 (80%) reported that sildenafil improved sexual intercourse compared with 17 of 166 men (10%) reporting improvement with placebo. IIEF questions assessing the ability to achieve and maintain erections and satisfaction with sexual intercourse demonstrated significant improvement with sildenafil. Sildenafil was well tolerated, with a low rate of discontinuation because of treatment-related adverse events (2% vs 1% for placebo). Oral sildenafil is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for erectile dysfunction caused by spinal cord injury.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1999

Ascending myelopathy in the early stage of spinal cord injury.

A 30-year-old healthy woman was involved in a road traffic accident. She sustained a fracture dislocation of T11/12 with a complete Frankel A paraplegia below T11. She had no associated injuries. High Dose Methylprednisolone was administered according to the NASCIS III protocol (48 h) together with low molecular weight Heparin and gastroprotected medication. Complete transection of the spinal cord and an anterior haematoma from T11 to T12 were confirmed on X rays, CT's and MRI scans. Posterior surgical stabilisation was performed using Isola instrumentation, starting 8 h post injury. Her post surgical period was uneventful except for some episodes of low blood pressure (85/60 mmHg) from which she had no symptoms. On the 12th post operative day, while in the physiotherapy department, she complained of right scapular pain. This occurred every time she was sat up and was associated with paraesthesia of both upper limbs. Two days later she deteriorated neurologically and her level ascended initially to T8 and then to T3. MRI of the spine with and without gadolinium showed spinal cord oedema between C3 and T1. There was no evidence of haemorrhage or syringomyelia. The authors discussed this case making different hypotheses. They are mainly the following: (1) Gradually ascending ischaemia due to a vascular disorder; (2) Double spinal trauma; (3) Ischaemia related to repeated hypotensive episodes; (4) Low grade intramedullary tumour; and (5) Thrombus of the Radicularis Magna artery. The case has been recognised as being very rare and interesting. In the conclusions, the presenting author stresses the importance of adopting MRI-compatible instrumentation for the surgical stabilisation of the spine, and careful monitoring of blood pressure during the acute phase of spinal cord injury. Dr Aito agrees with Mr El Masry about the opportunity of forming a group of clinicians in order to discuss protocols to cope with this devastating complication.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Validation of the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor score and the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (NASCIS) motor score.

STUDY DESIGN: In this study the motor scores of 62 consecutive acute spinal cord-injured patients were retrospectively reviewed. OBJECTIVE: The reliability of the American Spinal Injury Association and National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study motor scores, compared with the conventional motor scores, was retrospectively assessed. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The reliability of the American Spinal Injury Association and National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study scores has not as yet been confirmed. METHODS: Sixty-two consecutive adult patients admitted within 7 days of acute spinal cord injury between April, 1983, and September, 1992, were evaluated. The motor deficit percentage and the motor recovery percentage of each of the American Spinal Injury Association and the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study motor scores were compared with those of the conventional motor score. From the initial and final motor score, the motor deficit percentage and motor recovery percentage were calculated. There were 38 patients with cervical and thoracic lesions, 12 patients with dorso-lumbar lesions, and 12 patients with lower lumbar lesions. The average follow-up period was 41 months. RESULTS: Both the American Spinal Injury Association motor score and the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study motor score were representative of the conventional motor score for the evaluation of the motor deficit percentage and the motor recovery percentage in all levels (P < 0.0001). The differences in all correlation coefficients between the American Spinal Injury Association motor score and the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study motor score were not statistically significant in all levels and in every group. CONCLUSIONS: The American Spinal Injury Association and National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study motor scores can both be used for the neurological quantification of motor deficit and motor recovery.

Adolescent↗