PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

W S Rilling

Publications and source records attributed to W S Rilling.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Lessons learned in adopting endovascular techniques for treating abdominal aortic aneurysm.

HYPOTHESIS: Endovascular exclusion of abdominal aortic and common iliac aneurysms can be performed safely, and in the short term represents a feasible alternative to traditional, open aneurysm repair. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients were treated with endovascular grafts for 39 abdominal aortic and 2 common iliac artery aneurysms. RESULTS: All devices were successfully deployed. The size of the abdominal aortic aneurysms varied from 4.9 to 11.9 cm (average, 6.13 cm). The median procedure time was 195 minutes. There was one iliac artery rupture, which required celiotomy for repair. The hospital stay varied from 2 to 39 days (average, 6.7 days). The perioperative mortality rate was 2.4%. Sixteen patients (39%) had groin wound complications. Ten patients (24%) had evidence of contrast (endoleak) within the aneurysm sac on completion of the procedure. There were no obvious direct leaks from either the point of proximal or distal fixation. Seven of these endoleaks have resolved spontaneously. Two patients required additional procedures in the postoperative period to treat endoleak. The final patient has evidence of persistent endoleak on 3-month surveillance computed tomography scan. Major late problems occurred in 3 patients. CONCLUSION: Patients with large abdominal aortic aneurysms and considerable cardiac comorbidity can safely undergo endovascular aneurysm repair. Femoral groin wound complications resulting in prolonged hospitalization remain the major cause of perioperative morbidity. In contradistinction to open aneurysm repair, long-term surveillance is essential to detect migration of the device and identify flow within the residual aneurysm sac-complications that could lead to aneurysm rupture following endovascular repair.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Hepatocellular carcinoma: multimodality management.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma is one of the most common tumors worldwide. Surgical resection has been the standard treatment but can only be applied to a small percentage of patients. In recent years, several other treatment options, including ablative procedures and transplantation, have been used in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: For 6 years, 110 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma were managed at the Medical College of Wisconsin. Fifty-five patients received only chemotherapy (n = 5) or palliative treatment (n = 50) because of advanced cirrhosis (P <.03) or tumor. Thirty-one patients had tumor ablation with percutaneous ethanol injection, cryoablation, radiofrequency ablation, or arterial chemoembolization. Twenty-eight patients underwent surgical resection (n = 18) or hepatic transplantation (n = 10). Relatively more patients (38%; P <.001) were treated with ablation in the second period of the study (1998-2000). RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality was 3% with ablation and 0% with resection. Median survival was 6 months with no treatment, 27 months with ablation (P <.001), and 35 months with resection (P <.001). Patients who underwent liver transplantation had the longest median survival (53 months). A multivariate analysis suggested that treatment modality (ablation or resection; P <.001) and Child-Pugh classification (P <.01) were the most important factors predicting outcome. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma requires multidisciplinary expertise and that ablation and operation can be performed safely. Outcome is influenced most by treatment modality and Child-Pugh classification. Patients in Child-Pugh classes A and B should be treated with ablation, surgical resection, or liver transplantation.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Helical computed tomography of the normal thoracic outlet.

PURPOSE: This study was performed to determine the detailed anatomy of the thoracic outlet in normal subjects using helical computed tomography (CT), with particular attention to vascular compression with arm movement. METHODS: Ten volunteers underwent detailed clinical evaluation and helical CT scanning of the upper thorax and neck with the arm in a neutral position and with the arm abducted 90 degrees or greater and externally rotated. Anterior scalene-clavicle distance (SC), costoclavicular distance (CC), and vessel diameters were measured with electronic calipers in each position. Comparisons were made with Student's t test. RESULTS: With abduction the SC decreased from 18.4 +/- 3.9 mm to 5.2 +/- 2.4 mm (p < 0.001), and the CC decreased from 12.6 +/- 2.7 mm to 6.3 +/- 3.3 mm (p = 0.005). At these same anatomic planes, the vein diameter decreased from 11.0 +/- 1.6 mm at the neutral position to 5.1 +/- 1.5 mm (p < 0.001) and from 16.1 +/- 3.0 mm to 7.4 +/- 2.6 mm with the arm abducted (p < 0.001). The artery diameter changed from 6.6 +/- 0.8 mm to 6.2 +/- 0.5 mm (p = 0.08) and from 7.2 +/- 0.8 mm to 6.0 +/- 0.5 mm (p = 0.001) with arm movement. CONCLUSIONS: Both the distances between the anterior scalene muscle and the clavicle and between the clavicle and the first rib are significantly reduced with abduction of the upper extremity. Venous compression is universal at both the SC and CC spaces in normal subjects with this maneuver. Arterial narrowing occurs less frequently and appears to be minor. Minor changes in these thoracic outlet dimensions (SC/CC) may produce venous compression without movement.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Renal transplant evaluation with MR angiography and MR imaging.

Magnetic resonance (MR) angiography is a widely used, noninvasive tool for evaluating the aorta and its branches. It is particularly useful in renal transplant recipients because it provides anatomic detail of the transplant artery without nephrotoxic effects. Volume rendering is underutilized in MR angiography, but this technique affords high-quality three-dimensional MR angiograms, especially in cases of tortuous or complex vascular anatomy. An imaging protocol was developed that includes gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the transplant renal artery with volume rendering and multiplanar reformation postprocessing techniques. Axial T2-weighted and contrast material-enhanced T1-weighted MR images are also obtained to examine the renal parenchyma itself and to evaluate for hydronephrosis or peritransplant fluid collections. This imaging protocol allows rapid global assessment of the renal transplant arterial system, renal parenchyma, and peritransplant region. It can also help detect or exclude many of the various causes of renal transplant dysfunction (eg, stenosis or occlusion of a transplant vessel, peritransplant fluid collections, ureteral obstruction). Conventional angiography can thus be avoided in patients with normal findings and reserved for those with MR angiographic evidence of stenosis.

Adult↗