PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

W Seigel

Publications and source records attributed to W Seigel.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Update on adolescent health care in pediatric practice.

PURPOSE: To determine current adolescent health care practices of pediatricians and evaluate whether changes have taken place during the past decade. METHODS: A questionnaire completed by 101 pediatricians in 1985 was abbreviated and adapted by Committee on Youth of Chapter 2, District II of the American Academy of Pediatrics and sent to 1,633 members of the Chapter in June 1993. RESULTS: Forty-three percent of the 436 respondents in 1993 were female, 43% < or = 40 years of age and 53% were in private practice. Most accept new patients > or = 16 years of age (76%), continue to see patients > or = 19 years of age (63%), and interview adolescents without their parents (86%). Although between one-third and two-thirds of respondents report having equipment for gynecologic examinations, most indicate they are "not entirely comfortable" treating adolescent issues and therefore refer to others for management. Between one-quarter and one-half indicate they are "very interested" in learning more about adolescent issues and an additional 40-50% are "somewhat interested." Obstacles to providing adolescent care include: "image as a baby doctor" (65%), fear that parents would object (61%), no separate hours (57%), difficulty in providing confidential care (56%), and difficulty in charging appropriate fees (47%). Females and younger pediatricians are more comfortable with some aspects of gynecologic care and more likely to be satisfied with the adolescent care they are providing. There were few differences between responses in 1993 and 1995. CONCLUSIONS: Few of the pediatricians surveyed provide comprehensive care to adolescent patients. Future policy decisions and medical education must respond to these realities in pediatric practice.

Adolescent↗

Practice-based research: opportunities and obstacles.

Renewed interest in practice-based research reflects growing realization of the limitations of research from a hospital perspective. Practice-based pediatric research promises to broaden the range and severity of conditions commonly studied, to enhance the study of the natural history of disease and of normal development, to provide normal controls and standards, and to facilitate recruitment of adequate sample sizes. Cohort, incidence, and health services research will be promoted by the development of patients registries. The Chicago area Pediatric Practice Research Group is a research consortium of 81 practitioners in 27 office practices. Formed in 1984, it receives logistic and financial support from Children's Memorial Hospital, with which it is affiliated. The Pediatric Practice Research Group has undertaken six studies, most with outside funding. During these studies, some unifying characteristics of practice-based research have emerged. These include the need to tailor study protocols to individual practice characteristics and routines and the critical role of office staff in the conduct of research. Features can be identified that make specific studies more or less intrusive into office functioning. It has proved feasible to obtain data of high quality and reproducibility despite geographically scattered data collection sites. This review of Pediatric Practice Research Group activities and experience is intended to open an exchange of ideas with others interested in practice-based research.

Humans↗