PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

W Stewart Hillis

Publications and source records attributed to W Stewart Hillis.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

BioSTAR Evaluation STudy (BEST): a prospective, multicenter, phase I clinical trial to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of the BioSTAR bioabsorbable septal repair implant for the closure of atrial-level shunts.

BACKGROUND: The use of permanent synthetic implants to close atrial septal defects (ASD) and patent foramen ovale (PFO) has a number of limitations, including late complications and the limiting of transeptal access to the left heart should it be required for the later treatment of acquired heart disease. BioSTAR is a novel, bioabsorbable, atrial septal repair implant. This phase I pilot study evaluates the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of BioSTAR for the first time in humans. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a prospective, open-label, multicenter clinical study in 58 patients aged 28 to 68 years who had a clinically significant ASD or PFO. Percutaneous shunt closure was undertaken with the BioSTAR septal repair implant. Successful device implantation was achieved in 57 (98%) of 58 patients. Closure at 30 days and 6 months, assessed by contrast transthoracic echocardiography, was 48 (92%) of 52 and 54 (96%) of 56, respectively. There was no evidence of a clinically significant response to the device. Transient atrial arrhythmia occurred in 5 patients after implantation. No major safety issues were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of BioSTAR for the closure of ASD and PFO in humans with a high rate of early and complete shunt closure. BioSTAR is a novel septal repair implant designed to provide biological closure of atrial-level defects using the patient's natural healing response. Because 90% to 95% of the implant is absorbed and replaced with healthy native tissue, future access to the left atrium may be achieved.

Absorbable Implants↗
PubMed2006

Hospital volume of throughput and periprocedural and medium-term adverse events after percutaneous coronary intervention: retrospective cohort study of all 17,417 procedures undertaken in Scotland, 1997-2003.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) hospital volume of throughput is associated with periprocedural and medium-term events, and whether any associations are independent of differences in case mix. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of all PCIs undertaken in Scottish National Health Service hospitals over a six-year period. METHODS: All PCIs in Scotland during 1997-2003 were examined. Linkage to administrative databases identified events over two years' follow up. The risk of events by hospital volume at 30 days and two years was compared by using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Of the 17,417 PCIs, 4900 (28%) were in low-volume hospitals and 3242 (19%) in high-volume hospitals. After adjustment for case mix, there were no significant differences in risk of death or myocardial infarction. Patients treated in high-volume hospitals were less likely to require emergency surgery (adjusted odds ratio 0.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07 to 0.54, p = 0.002). Over two years, patients in high-volume hospitals were less likely to undergo surgery (adjusted hazard ratio 0.52, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.75, p = 0.001), but this was offset by an increased likelihood of further PCI. There was no net difference in coronary revascularisation or in overall events. CONCLUSION: Death and myocardial infarction were infrequent complications of PCI and did not differ significantly by volume. Emergency surgery was less common in high-volume hospitals. Over two years, patients treated in high-volume centres were as likely to undergo some form of revascularisation but less likely to undergo surgery.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Transcatheter closure of a ventricular septal defect resulting from knife stabbing using the Amplatzer muscular VSD occluder.

We report for the first time the transcatheter closure of a traumatic ventricular septal defect (VSD) with the Amplatzer muscular VSD occluder in a 34-year-old man who had been stabbed through the heart. After his initial life-saving surgery to relieve tamponade, control bleeding, and repair the lacerated right ventricle, the risks and difficulties of subsequent open heart surgery were felt to favor transcatheter closure. We review other reports of transcatheter closure of traumatic VSD.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Areas of emerging interest in analgesia: cardiovascular complications.

Many people obtain symptomatic relief from acute, chronic, or recurring pain conditions by using an over-the-counter analgesic. As with the use of any drug, this involves achieving the appropriate balance between potential benefit and risk of harm. The adverse effects of aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract are widely appreciated. On the basis of their pharmacology, however, these drugs also have the potential for causing adverse effects in the cardiovascular system. This is particularly the case in certain overlapping populations (eg, the elderly or those with cardiac failure, hypertension, or renal impairment). And the size of the exposed populations and the fact they comprise people likely to require pain management because of concomitant illnesses make the cardiovascular implications of analgesic use potentially a more serious issue for public health than the more widely recognized GI complications of aspirin and NSAID use. This article discusses the impact on the cardiovascular system of different classes of analgesics (NSAIDs, the new cyclooxygenase-2-selective inhibitors [CSIs], and paracetamol) in terms of cardiac function, thrombotic and cardioprotective potential, and hypertension. It identifies patients at risk for analgesic-related cardiovascular adverse events, and considers their options for managing mild-to-moderate pain. Unlike that of the NSAIDs and CSIs, the pharmacology of paracetamol provides no signal for risk of cardiovascular adverse events, and paracetamol should, therefore, be considered as first-line therapy in patients with cardiovascular disease.

Acetaminophen↗