PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

W T Reich

Publications and source records attributed to W T Reich.

14 recordsLinked to original sources

The care-based ethic of Nazi medicine and the moral importance of what we care about.

This article reports on an inquiry into ideas used to justify the shift of medical ethos in Germany prior to and during the Nazi era, specifically the principles of care advocated by Erwin Liek and Karl Kotschau, the era's most influential medical theorists, who argued that commitments to care of individual sick persons (Fursorge) had to give way to a preventive care that respects emerging needs of the entire society (Vorsoge). The article examines both the socio-cultural factors that shaped, and the far-reaching effects of, this manipulation of care. It argues that we should be attentive to the meaning and requirements of the care revealed in this debate, the ancient Greek idea of care as a concerned moral option.

Cultural Characteristics↗

The word "bioethics": its birth and the legacies of those who shaped it.

Extensive historical sleuthing reveals that the word "bioethics" and the field of study it names experienced, in 1970/1971, a "bilocated birth" in Madison, Wisconsin, and in Washington, D.C. Van Rensselaer Potter, at the University of Wisconsin first coined the term; and André Hellegers, at Georgetown University, at the very least, latched onto the already-existing word "bioethics" and first used it in an institutional way to designate the focused area of inquiry that became an academic field of learning and a movement regarding public policy and the life sciences. A further comparison of the Potter and the Hellegers/Georgetown understandings of bioethics and the relative acceptance of the two views will appear in the March 1995 issue of this journal.

Bioethics↗

Moral absurdities in critical-care medicine: commentary on a parable.

A dominant characteristic of critical-care medicine today is the emergence of powerful institutions functioning within a framework of a noncoherent set of values and philosophical perspectives. Anyone who would assign a significant role to the philosophy of medicine for today's era must not simply account for the quandaries of critical-care medicine, but also attend to the antecedent values, conflicts, and absurdities that form the ethical issues, as well as the models of ethical response (market ethos, professional ethos, etc.) that indicate which moral principles might be relevant. These considerations form the new agenda for the philosophy of critical-care medicine. This broad philosophical task is an urgent one, for critical-care medicine is rapidly molding the moral dimensions of all of medicine.

Ambulances↗