PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

W T Siu

Publications and source records attributed to W T Siu.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Endo-Lap OR: an innovative "minimally invasive operating room" design.

BACKGROUND: A newly constructed Endoscopic-Laparoscopic operating room (Endo-Lap OR) started to operate in our department in January 2005. A prospective study was conducted to evaluate its feasibility, efficacy, and safety, as well as the staff's satisfaction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2005 to September 2005, all patients undergoing operation in this Endo-Lap OR were included in the study. The patient's diagnosis, types of operating procedures, incidents of operating failure (either due to the hardware or the software of Endo-Lap OR) that led to a delay in the patient's transfer or that extended the total operating time were recorded. In addition, questionnaires regarding staff satisfaction with the new operating room were distributed to nurses, anesthetists, and surgeons. RESULTS: A total of 640 cases were included in the study period, 245 cases of open surgery, 282 cases of laparoscopic surgery, 82 cases of endoscopic surgery, 17 cases of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, and 14 cases of combined endoscopic-laparoscopic surgery. There were no reported incidents of operating failure related to hardware or software problems. The overall staff satisfaction was excellent. CONCLUSIONS: The integration of endoscopic and laparoscopic surgery into this newly constructed Endo-Lap OR is feasible and safe. The running of the operating room was smooth and it received a high level of acceptance and satisfaction from different staff members.

Architecture↗
PubMed2006

Laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct: 10-year experience of 174 patients from a single centre.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the role of laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct in the management of common bile duct stones. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Regional minimal access surgery training centre in Hong Kong. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct from 1995 to 2005. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic information, reasons for failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and open conversions, and operative morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 174 laparoscopic explorations of the common bile duct were performed. Indications for surgery (some overlapping) included: concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones (n=68, 39%) in young persons (<60 years), previously failed endoscopic extraction (n=59, 34%), large (>2 cm) or multiple common bile duct stones (n=40, 23%), and need for laparoscopic bypass to improve bile drainage (n=34, 20%). Mean patient age was 63 (standard deviation, 16) years and 103 were female. Altogether 156 choledochotomies and 18 transcystic duct explorations were performed, with 12 (7%) open conversions. The mean operating time was 129 (standard deviation, 57) minutes. Additional procedures included: 54 laparoscopic operative cholangiographies, 34 laparoscopic biliary bypasses, and 31 instances of adhesiolysis in patients with a history of open upper gastro-intestinal surgery. Complete stone clearance was achieved in 160 (92%) patients. Non-lethal complications occurred in 34 (20%) patients and one died of sepsis after a major bile leak. The mean postoperative stay was 9 (standard deviation, 9) days. Stone recurrence ensued in seven (4%) patients after a mean follow-up of 37 (standard deviation, 29) months. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct is highly successful and can achieve satisfactory ductal clearance even after unsuccessful endoscopic extraction and previous upper gastro-intestinal surgery. In skilled hands, for selected patients laparoscopic bypass can also achieve improved bile drainage.

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde↗
PubMed2005

Immediate preoperative laparoscopic staging for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

BACKGROUND: Conventional preoperative staging for esophageal carcinoma could be inaccurate. Laparoscopy has been applied for the staging of various upper gastrointestinal malignancies. It can identify peritoneal and liver deposits not shown by imaging, and could reduce the number of nontherapeutic laparotomies. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic staging for the management of squamous cell carcinoma involving the mid and distal esophagus. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed for all patients with esophageal cancer evaluated for surgical resection from January 1998 to January 2004. Laparoscopy was performed for all the patients with mid and distal esophageal cancer immediately before open gastric mobilization. The efficacy of laparoscopy for the management of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus was evaluated. RESULTS: Among the 63 patients with potentially resectable disease shown on conventional imaging, 54 (84%) underwent esophagectomy with curative intent after laparoscopic staging. Seven patients (11%) underwent laparoscopy alone because of abdominal metastases (n = 5) or other medical conditions (n = 2) that precluded esophagectomy. Two patients (3%) had exploratory right thoracotomy without esophagectomy despite normal laparoscopic findings. The sensitivity and specificity of laparoscopic staging were 100% in this series of patients (100% sensitivity and specificity means no false-positives or -negatives). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic staging is valuable for the management of patients with mid and distal squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Patients with metastatic disease and those with prohibitive surgical risk can thus avoid unnecessary laparotomy and be offered other treatment methods.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Laparoscopy versus open left lateral segmentectomy for recurrent pyogenic cholangitis.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent pyogenic cholangitis (RPC) is a common disease in Southeast Asia. Its classical presentation is repeated attacks of cholangitis with multiple recurrences of bile duct stones. The stones are commonly located in the left lateral segments (2 and 3) and therefore complete clearance is difficult to achieve by either endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or surgical exploration of the common bile duct. The definitive treatment usually involves resection of the stone-harboring segments. The recent advent in laparoscopic surgery has shown that hand-assisted laparoscopic segmentectomy is a safe and feasible, alternative. This study aimed to compare hand-assisted laparoscopic segmentectomy with open segmentectomy in patients with recurrent, RPC. METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed a prospectively maintained database of both open and laparoscopic treatments for RPC in a single center between 1994 and 2004. During this period, patients with RPC and left intrahepatic (segments 2 and 3) ductal stones not amendable to endoscopic treatment were recruited for analysis. Patients with concomitant gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones were offered left lateral segmentectomy with cholecystectomy and exploration of the common bile duct. Selected patients would have choledochoduodenostomy drainage during the same operation. The operations were performed via either the hand-assisted laparoscopic approach or the open approach using an ultrasonic surgical aspirator. The two cohorts were compared with respect to perioperative parameters to determine whether there would be any advantage in attempting hand-assisted laparoscopic segmentectomy. RESULTS: During the study period from 1994 to 2004, 17 patients underwent left lateral segmentectomy for RPC. Of the 17 patients, 10 had hand-assisted laparoscopic resections, and 7 underwent open resections. All open resections were performed before 1999. Despite the small number of patients and potential type 2 error, there were no differences in age, sex distribution, number of cholangitic attacks, sessions of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography before surgery, or number of previous operation between the two groups. The median operating time was shorter in the open group (232.5 vs 150 min; p = 0.007), whereas the median blood loss was similar (350 vs 400 ml; p = 0.551). The median postoperative stay was 8 days for hand-assisted laparoscopic group versus 14 days for the open group. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.019). There was one open conversion in the hand-assisted laparoscopic group because of intraoperative bleeding from the left hepatic vein. Postoperative complication rates were lower in hand-assisted laparoscopic group, but the difference was not statistically significant (20% vs 57%; p = 126). The intramuscular pethidine requirement again was less in hand-assisted laparoscopic group (0 vs 600 mg; p = 0.002). There was no operative mortality in either group of patients. No recurrent cholangitis was noted in either groups during the median follow-up period of more than 3 years. CONCLUSION: This study not only confirmed the feasibility of hand-assisted laparoscopic segmentectomy for recurrent pyogenic cholangitis, but also showed that this treatment approach is associated with less pain and shorter hospital stay. However, hand-assisted laparoscopic segmentectomy is a lengthier operation and technically more challenging. Nevertheless, the authors believe that with more experience and further improvement of ancillary technology, this procedure can become a standard treatment for recurrent pyogenic cholangitis in selected cases.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Acute gastric volvulus: an unusual cause of gastric outlet obstruction.

Gastric outlet obstruction initiated by acute gastric volvulus is rare but potentially fatal. An unusual case of intrathoracic acute gastric volvulus complicated by distal stomach and transverse colon herniation into retrocardial space is reported. Prompt clinical diagnosis was followed by emergency laparoscopic de-rotation and gastropexy.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2004

Laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct in difficult choledocholithiasis.

BACKGROUND: This review investigated the role played by laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct (LECBD) in the management of difficult choledocholithiasis. METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed a prospective database of LECBD for difficult choledocholithiasis during the period 1995 to 2003. RESULTS: Of the 97 LECBDs performed in the authors' center from 1995 to 2003, 25 were performed for difficult choledocholithiasis. Difficult choledocholithiasis was defined as failure of endoscopic stone retrieval for the following reasons: access and cannulation difficulty, the difficult nature of common bile duct (CBD) stones, and the presence of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-related complications. There were seven unsuccessful cannulations because of previous gastrectomy (n = 5) and periampullary diverticulum (n = 2). Among the 18 patients with failed endoscopic extraction, there were 10 impacted stones, 2 incomplete stone clearances after multiple attempts, 2 type 2 Mirizzi syndromes, 1 proximal stent migration, 1 repeated post-ERCP pancreatitis, 1 situs inversus, and 1 stricture at the distal common bile duct. There were 14 male and 11 female patients with a mean age of 67.8 +/- 15 years. Initial presentations included cholangitis (n = 14, 56%), biliary colic (n = 3, 12%), jaundice/deranged liver function ( n = 5, 20%), cholecystitis (n = 2, 8%), and pancreatitis (n = 1, 4%). Regarding the approach for LECBD, there were 2 transcystic duct explorations and 23 choledochotomies. The mean operative time was 149.4 +/- 49.3 min, and there were three conversions (12%). The stone clearance rate was 100%, and no recurrence was detected during a mean follow-up period of 16.8 months. Five complications were encountered, which included bile leak (3 patients) and wound infection (2 patients). When the results were compared with the remaining 72 LECBDs for nondifficult stones during the same period, the complication rate, conversion rate, and rate of residual stones were similar despite a longer operation time (149.4 +/- 49.4 min vs 121.6 +/- 50.5 min). CONCLUSION: When ERCP is impossible or stone retrieval is incomplete, LECBD is the solution to difficult CBD stones.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Routine use of laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer was reported in 1990 but has not gained wide acceptance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer in routine clinical practice. METHODS: This was a prospective analysis of 172 patients who underwent laparoscopic repair of a perforated peptic ulcer between July 1997 and June 2003. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-two patients of mean age 54 (range 14-93) years had perforated peptic ulcer diagnosed by laparoscopy. There were 172 duodenal ulcers, 22 prepyloric and 13 non-juxtapyloric gastric ulcers. One hundred and sixty-five patients underwent omental patch closure of perforations; there were six Pólya gastrectomies and one ulcerectomy. Thirty-seven patients (21.5 per cent) required conversion to laparotomy. The mean operating time was 64.8 (range 14-180) min. The median postoperative requirement for intramuscular pethidine was one dose. The median postoperative hospital stay was 6 days. Complications occurred in 28 patients (16.3 per cent) resulting in three reoperations. Six patients with intra-abdominal collections were managed by percutaneous drainage. Two patients who underwent conversion developed a wound infection. Fourteen patients (8.1 per cent) died, 11 of whom were American Society of Anesthesiologists grade III and IV. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer is a safe emergency procedure in routine clinical practice for patients with perforated pyloroduodenal ulcer.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Laparoscopic choledochoduodenostomy: an effective drainage procedure for recurrent pyogenic cholangitis.

BACKGROUND: This article reports the technical aspects of laparoscopic choledochoduodenostomy (LCD) in patients with recurrent pyogenic cholangitis (RPC) and the perioperative results are also evaluated. This is a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database. METHODS: Twelve patients diagnosed to have RPC with the absence of intrahepatic stricture were selected for LCD during the period from 1995 to 2002. The majority of our patients had repeated attacks of cholangitis and had already undergone multiple sessions of endoscopic and operative lithotripsy. The LCD was performed using a five-port approach with the patient lying in the supine position. The stones were first cleared through the longitudinal supraduodenal choledochotomy followed by construction of a side-to-side diamond-shaped anastomosis of at least 15 mm between the bile duct and the first part of the duodenum using 2/0 monocryl in the single-layer method. RESULTS: During the period from 1995 to 2002, 12 patients with RPC underwent LCD. There were 3 male and 9 female patients with a mean age of 62 (40-77). The median operation time was 137.5 min (90-270) and the median postoperative stay was 7.5 days (5-20). All cases were successful using the laparoscopic approach. Average analgesic requirement post operation was 126 mg (50-200 mg) intramuscular pethidine. There was one postoperative bile leak, and this complication was settled by conservative measures. Upon a mean follow-up of 37.6 months (6-91), there was no recurrent attack of cholangitis or any evidence of sump syndrome in this group of patients. CONCLUSION: LCD is a safe and effective drainage procedure for patients with RPC. Complications are uncommon and postoperative results are promising.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open cholecystectomy in elderly patients with acute cholecystitis: retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To study the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in elderly patients by comparing the results with open cholecystectomy. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Regional hospital, Hong Kong. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Patients aged 75 years or older undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis between January 1994 and December 1999 were selected from the database. The comparison group comprised patients from the same age-group who underwent open cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis during the same period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Operating time, hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality. RESULTS. Thirty-one patients underwent laparoscopic surgery and 42 had open surgery. The demographic data and co-morbidities were comparable between the two groups. The postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter for patients undergoing laparoscopy (P=0.03). The overall morbidity rate was significantly lower for patients undergoing laparoscopy (P<0.05). There was, however, no statistical significant difference in the mortality rate. There was no major bile duct injury for patients in either group. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe procedure for acute cholecystitis in elderly patients, resulting in fewer complications and shorter hospital stay than open cholecystectomy.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2001

Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Hong Kong: patient acceptance.

The authors performed a prospective evaluation of 60 Hong Kong Chinese patients with symptomatic gallstones and gallbladder polyps undergoing outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a regional hospital in Hong Kong from March 1996 to May 1998 to determine the feasibility, satisfaction, and acceptance of this procedure among Chinese patients. Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I and II gallstones or polyps were selected. Exclusion criteria included 1) history of upper abdominal operations, attacks of acute cholecystitis, cholangitis, or pancreatitis; 2) abnormal liver function; and 3) ultrasonographic evidence of contracted gallbladder, thickened gallbladder wall, dilated common bile duct, or common bile duct stones. Patients discharged at 5:00 PM on the day of cholecystectomy were defined as having undergone outpatient procedure. Patients were asked about procedure acceptance, rated on a scale of 1 to 10 (best), using a standardized questionnaire 4 weeks after operation. The study included 21 men and 39 women with mean age of 40.5 years (range, 27-59). There were no conversions to open procedures in the series. There were 6 (10%) unanticipated postoperative hospital admissions; all patients were discharged on the first postoperative day. Another patient was readmitted 3 days after operation because of a common bile duct stone. Overall patient acceptance of outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy was good, with a mean score of 8.6 of 10. Thirteen patients (22%) expressed dissatisfaction with being discharged earlier than they had expected, and 9 (15%) would have preferred inpatient care. Forty-eight patients (80%) resumed full daily activities by the first postoperative day; the remaining 12 did so by the end of the first week. Among the 44 working patients, only 4 (9%) resumed full duty within the first postoperative week; 29 (66%) did so by the second week and the remaining 11 (25%) returned to work after the third week. By selecting appropriate subjects, outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy is feasible and highly accepted among Hong Kong Chinese patients. Approximately one quarter of the patients preferred a longer postoperative stay or inpatient care.

Adult↗