PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

W Van Winkle

Publications and source records attributed to W Van Winkle.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

Effect of suture materials on healing skin wounds.

A systematic comparison has been made of six suture materials used as subcuticular closure of abdominal incisions in dogs. The effect on wound healing was measured by mechanical, biochemical, and histologic methods. No difference was demonstrated in wound breading strength among wounds closed with different suture materials up to 28 days postoperatively. At 70 days, wounds sutured with nonabsorbable sutures were weaker than those closed with absorbable sutures, but this difference probably was due to a much higher incidence of infection in wounds closed with nonabsorbable sutures. It was our observation that monofilament sutures were superior to multifilament sutures with regard to the incidence of wound infection. By five days, the rate of collagen synthesis in wounds was increased over that of normal skin and remained elevated throughout the 120 day observation period. Suture material had no effect on collagen synthesis. The rate of noncollagenous protein synthesis in the wound was not altered throughout the entire observation period and did not differ from that measured in normal skin. Catgut, both plain and chromic, produced only a mild cellular reaction in dogs after 21 days as contrasted with the intense inflammatory reaction reported by others in rats and rabbits. We observed neither plain nor chromic catgut was absorbed rapidly in dogs; intact sutures were frequently observed at 120 days. Polyglactin, a synthetic absorbable suture, produced a moderate tissue reaction and uniformly disappeared between the twenty-eighth and seventieth days. Silk and Mersilene showed the highest rate of wound infection and the most intense and prolonged tissue reaction. Prolene, a monofilament suture, produced only a mild to moderate tissue reaction. These results taken in conjunction with those of other investigators suggest a marked species difference in the reaction to suture materials, particularly catgut, and suggest caution in transferring these observations to human beings.

Animals

The effect of suture materials on healing wounds of the bladder.

The healing pattern of bladder tissue and its response to various suture materials were studied and compared with data reported previously on skin, stomach and colon wounds. Tensile strength, biochemical data and histologic reactions were used as parameters of wound healing measurement. The healing pattern of urinary bladder wounds resembles that observed for stomach and colon. However, wounds of the urinary bladder wall regain strength equal to unwounded bladder wall within 21 days, whereas wounds of stomach and colon do not achieve more than 70 per cent of unwounded tissue strength after 120 days. The rate of collagen synthesis in bladder wounds reaches a peak at five days and returns to that of normal unwounded tissue by 70 days. Colon and stomach wounds, on the other hand, showed elevated rates of collagen synthesis even at 120 days. As with colon and stomach, absorbable sutures appear to lower the strength of both the wound and unwounded tissue. However, in stomach and colon this effect is only observed during the first 21 days of healing; in the bladder it persists throughout the 120 day observation period. No histologic evidence of smooth muscle regeneration was seen in bladder wounds. Noncollagenous protein synthesis was not increased in the wound, also suggesting smooth muscle regeneration does not occur. Silk and Mersilene sutures produced the greatest tissue reaction; if the sutures were exposed in the lumen of the bladder, stone formation was observed. This was not observed with monofilament polypropylene sutures. Plain catgut produced the least tissue reaction, but both plain aions comparable with chromic catgut but were regularly absorbed between 28 and 70 days. Since the bladder is well healed by 21 days, polyglactin-910 may be an ideal suture for use in the bladder.

Absorption