Digitizing your hard-copy teaching file with inexpensive, commercially available software.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to W W Mayo-Smith.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Abdominal computed tomography (CT) is frequently performed to evaluate gastrointestinal pathologic conditions, and the majority of the gastrointestinal radiology literature has concentrated on the colon, stomach, and distal small bowel. In a description of CT findings of duodenal pathologic conditions, congenital, traumatic, inflammatory, and neoplastic diseases are presented. Congenital duodenal anomalies such as duplications and diverticula are usually asymptomatic, while annular pancreas and malrotation may manifest in the 1st decade of life. CT plays a vital role in the diagnosis of traumatic duodenal injury. Primary inflammatory processes of the duodenum such as ulcers and secondary involvement from pancreatitis can reliably be diagnosed at CT. Infectious diseases of the duodenum are difficult to diagnose, as the findings are not specific. While small bowel malignancies are relatively rare, lipoma, adenoma, and adenocarcinoma, as well as local extension from adjacent malignancies, can be diagnosed at CT. Careful CT technique and attention to the duodenum can result in reliable prospective diagnoses.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the addition of gadolinium-enhanced imaging to heavily T2-weighted MR imaging of the liver is valuable in differentiating hemangiomas from metastases. The T2 relaxation time was also included in our analysis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifty-one patients with 52 proven liver lesions (24 hemangiomas and 28 metastases) larger than 1 cm underwent MR imaging at 1.5 T with T2-weighted spin-echo (TR/TE, 3000/80, 160) and gadolinium chelate-enhanced dynamic T1-weighted gradient-recalled echo (80/2.6, 80) pulse sequences. Images were reviewed by observers who were unaware of the patients' clinical history; first, only T2-weighted images were reviewed and then T2-weighted plus dynamic images were reviewed together. The T2 relaxation times were calculated for each lesion. Diagnostic accuracy by each method was compared using receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: Mean T2 relaxation times were 76 +/- 26 msec for metastases and 133 +/- 25 msec for hemangiomas. The addition of dynamic scanning to the T2-weighted sequence made a statistically significant difference for only one observer (p = 0.03). However, it did not make a statistically significant contribution for either observer when compared with the T2 relaxation time. Although addition of the dynamic images resulted in correct diagnosis of six lesions, three lesions were misdiagnosed after having been correctly characterized on the T2-weighted images alone. CONCLUSION: When optimized T2-weighted images are obtained and the T2 relaxation time is calculated, routine use of gadolinium enhancement for differentiation of hemangiomas from metastases is unnecessary although dynamic scanning is valuable in selected cases.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the utility of adding computed tomographic (CT) liver windows to conventional soft-tissue windows for the detection of hepatic disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One of four radiologists experienced in abdominal imaging interpreted 1,175 consecutive abdominal CT scans from one institution. Hepatic images were first interpreted by using standard soft-tissue windows. The number of lesions and confidence in lesion detection were recorded. The liver-window images were then interpreted in conjunction with the soft-tissue-window images, and the number of lesions and confidence in detection were recorded again. The proportion of patients in whom additional lesions were found by using liver windows was determined. RESULTS: On soft-tissue-window and liver-window scans interpreted together, 869 (74%) patients had no hepatic lesions. Thirty-six (3.1%) patients had new lesions seen with the addition of liver windows. Twelve of these 36 patients had no lesions seen on soft-tissue-window scans. Twenty-six of the 36 patients with additional lesions seen had a history of neoplasm. There was a change in diagnosis in 1.7% of the patients with the addition of liver windows and a change in recommendation for follow-up in 0.85%. CONCLUSION: Routine interpretation of liver-window scans for all abdominal CT scans has limited added utility in detecting hepatic disease.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether an in-hospital transportable CT scanner can provide diagnostic brain images and to compare the quality of these images with those from a conventional fixed-platform CT scanner. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with known or suspected intracranial pathology underwent imaging on a transportable scanner and a fixed-platform scanner within 1 hr of each other. Images from each CT examination were evaluated independently by two neuroradiologists who were unaware of patient history. Conspicuousness of intracranial pathology and normal anatomy were rated on a 5-point scale (1 point, optimal; 5 points, poor or not visualized). Statistical comparisons were made using nonparametric tests. RESULTS: Seven CT scans were interpreted as showing normal findings and 20 scans revealed intracranial pathology on both CT scanners. Image quality was higher on the fixed scanner (average rating, 2.42 points; SE = .12) than on the transportable scanner (average rating, 3.10 points; SE = .12) (p = .001). Depiction of the cerebellum, midbrain, and supratentorial gray-white matter was better on the fixed scanner (p < .05). However, we found no significant differences in detection of intracranial pathology between scanners. Both radiologists found images from both scanners to be diagnostic in all 27 patients. CONCLUSION: Images of the brain on the transportable CT scanner were less clear than those on a fixed scanner. However, images from the transportable CT scanner were diagnostic in 27 consecutive patients. The implications of this finding are important for the provision of CT services for critically ill patients who cannot be transported to the radiology department.
The development of improved imaging technology, specifically development of helical CT and improvement in ultrasound, has revolutionized the work-up of patients with abdominal pain. It is important to remember that the type of examination performed depends on the suspected clinical diagnosis. In particular, the CT exam prescription by the radiologist varies significantly depending on the type of pathology suspected. The route of the administration of gastrointestinal contrast (oral or per rectum), the use of intravenous contrast, slice collimation, the field of view and other parameters can significantly improve the accuracy of the study. Thus, accurate communication with the examining physician is critical. When used properly, radiologic examinations can significantly impact on patient care and management.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate pancreatic enhancement with low-dose mangafodipir trisodium (5 mumol/kg) using three different T1-weighted pulse sequences. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients, six of whom had proven focal pancreatic tumors, underwent T1-weighted gradient-recalled echo imaging, spin-echo imaging, and fat-suppressed spin-echo imaging before and 30 min after injection of 5 mumol/kg of mangafodipir trisodium. Region-of-interest measurements were obtained in the pancreas before and after contrast enhancement. Signal-to-noise ratios were calculated in all 15 patients. Contrast-to-noise ratios were calculated in the six patients with pancreatic tumors. RESULTS: The signal-to-noise ratios of the pancreas increased after injection of mangafodipir trisodium on all three T1-weighted pulse sequences (p < .001). Enhanced fat-suppressed sequences (29 +/- 7.7) and gradient-recalled echo sequences (29 +/- 9.6) had the highest signal-to-noise ratios. Contrast-to-noise ratios between normal pancreatic tissue and pancreatic tumor also increased after contrast administration (p < .05) and were highest on the fat-suppressed (-9.6 +/- 4.0) pulse sequence. CONCLUSION: Mangafodipir trisodium produced marked pancreatic enhancement at a dose of 5 mumol/kg for all three T1-weighted pulse sequences. The enhanced T1-weighted spin-echo fat-suppressed sequence showed the highest signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios.
AIM: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of MR imaging in differentiating phaeochromocytoma from other adrenal lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-seven adrenal masses (65 patients) including 17 phaeochromocytomas were imaged using T2-weighted pulse sequences on 0.6 T and 1.5 T GE MR units. The adrenal lesions were qualitatively assessed by three observers and divided into three categories (benign adenomas, malignant lesions and phaeochromocytomas) based on lesion signal intensity relative to liver and cerebrospinal fluid. RESULTS: Eleven phaeochromocytomas (65%) were correctly identified while the remaining six (35%) were misclassified, five as malignant lesions and one as a benign adenoma, because of atypical low signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images. Conversely, six non-phaeochromocytomas (three benign adenomas, two adrenal carcinomas and one metastasis) were wrongly classified as phaeochromocytomas because of very high lesion signal intensity. The sensitivity of MR imaging for diagnosing phaeochromocytoma was 64.7%, specificity 88.0%, positive predictive value 64.7% and negative predictive value 88.0%. CONCLUSION: There is considerable overlap between the MR appearance of phaeochromocytoma and other adrenal lesions. A phaeochromocytoma cannot be excluded on the basis of a lack of high signal intensity on T2-weighted MR imaging.