W-C Witzleb | PubMed Health

PubMed2005

[Resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip].

Currently, an increase in resurfacing arthroplasty in the treatment of hip osteoarthritis--especially in young adults--can be observed. New bearing technologies (mainly metal-on-metal surfaces) show better tribologic results than historical designs (e.g. the Wagner cup). At present, it is unclear whether these modifications and a definitively low dislocation rate--due to the large head diameter--can be supported by further good clinical results. The quantity as well as the quality of the available investigations prevents a definite opinion at the moment. Appropriate clinical studies with documented radiographic follow-up are necessary to compare the outcome of these new implants with standard techniques.

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip↗

PubMed2004

[Hip resurfacing arthroplasty].

In comparison to stemmed total hip replacements, hip resurfacing offers advantages especially in joint stability and amount of femoral bone resection. After the poor results achieved with this concept that were mainly caused by failure of the materials used, reintroduction of the metal-on-metal bearing initiated a renaissance. This bearing, the cementless cup, and the improved surgical technique led to better short- to medium-term results. Revision and complication rates are now comparable to conventional total hip replacements. The functional capacity of the method is higher. Because long-term results are not available, however, questions remain, for instance, the consequences of the higher metal ion serum concentrations or the impossibility of changing the inlay when femoral revision becomes necessary.

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[Functional results after surface replacement of the hip: comparison between dysplasia and idiopathic osteoarthritis].

AIM: To determine if there are differences in function after resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip in patients with primary osteoarthritis compared to patients with secondary osteoarthritis due to developmental dysplasia of the hip. METHOD: In a controlled prospective study of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) we included all patients with primary osteoarthritis (n = 54, average age 48.4 years) and osteoarthritis due to high grade dysplasia (Eftekhar B, n = 34, average age 55.8 years). Standardized clinical (Harris hip score) and radiographic examinations were performed 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months and then every year after the operation. RESULTS: All patients could be followed up to 1.5 years (1-4 years) after surgery. The average Harris hip score improved to 82-95 points in both groups 3 months postoperatively. Statistically significant differences could be found in the subscales "function" and "limp", where patients with dysplastic hips showed somewhat lower results after 6 (function) to 12 weeks (limp) postoperatively. This is probably attributable to extended non-weight-bearing after acetabular reconstruction in these cases, as the difference disappeared with full weight-bearing. Radiographically determined neck-shaft angles are slightly higher in dysplastic hips (142 degrees versus 135 degrees ), but we did not recognize any significant differences in implant positioning. CONCLUSION: The short- to mid-term results showed no clinically relevant functional differences after surface replacement in patients with primary osteoarthritis of the hip and patients with secondary osteoarthritis due to higher grade dysplasia. Long-term observation is necessary, however, to determine if these positive functional results are reflected by appropriate radiographic survival.

Adult↗