Biomedical subjects

Walter Hundt

Publications and source records attributed to Walter Hundt.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Value of PET/CT versus PET and CT performed as separate investigations in patients with Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the clinical benefit of combined [(18)F]FDG PET/CT in patients with malignant lymphoma as compared to separately performed PET and CT. METHODS: Overall, 100 patients with Hodgkin's disease (HD) or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) were included in this study. Co-registered PET/CT with [(18)F]FDG and contrast medium was performed in 50 consecutive patients with NHL (n=38) or HD (n=12) for initial staging (IS) (n=12) or re-treatment staging (RS) (n=38). Another 50 patients with NHL (n=32) or HD (n=18) underwent separate PET and CT investigations within a time frame of 10 days for IS (n=22) or RS (n=28). Lymphoma involvement was separately evaluated for seven different regions in each patient. Each patient had clinical follow-up evaluation for >6 months. PET and CT data were analysed separately as well as side-by-side or in fused mode. RESULTS: In the PET/CT group, region-based evaluation for lymphoma involvement suggested a sensitivity/specificity of 85%/91% for CT, 98%/99% for PET and 98%/99% for PET/CT. In the PET and CT group, region-based evaluation showed a sensitivity/specificity of 87%/80% for CT, 98%/99% for PET and 98%/100% for PET and CT read side by side. CONCLUSION: PET was superior to CT alone and was improved further by side-by-side reading of both examinations. However, no significant difference was observed between PET/CT and separate PET and CT imaging in patients with lymphoma.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Dose reduction in multislice computed tomography.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the attenuation-based on-line modulation of tube current on multislice computed tomography (CT) to explore the potential of this dose-saving technique. METHODS: Fifty-five patients with follow-up CT examinations were scanned without and with a CARE Dose (Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany). The applied dose, image noise, and subjective image quality were evaluated. The reduction in patient exposure was determined by obtaining the effective milliamperes per second for each reconstructed scan and the absolute dosage requirement for the whole scan. RESULTS: The dose reduction achieved by applying the attenuation-based on-line modulation of tube current was 29.4% +/- 3.1% (P=0.002) for all scans, 30.5% +/- 3.2% (P=0.002) for the thorax scans, 29.7% +/- 2.9% (P=0.002) for the abdomen scans, and 28.7% +/- 2.7% (P=0.003) for the thorax and abdomen scans together. No significant restrictions in image quality were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Remarkable dose reduction can be obtained using the attenuation-based on-line modulation of tube current on multislice CT without compromising image quality.

Aged↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Assessment of global left ventricular function: comparison of cardiac multidetector-row computed tomography with angiocardiography.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of left ventricular function using electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated multidetector row CT (MDCT) by using 3 different volumetric assessment methods in comparison to assessment of the left ventricular function by invasive ventriculography. METHODS: Thirty patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease underwent MDCT coronary angiography with retrospective ECG cardiac gating. Raw data were reconstructed at the end-diastolic and end-systolic periods of the heart cycle. To calculate the volumes of the left ventricle, 3 methods were applied: The 3-dimensional data set (3D), the geometric hemisphere cylinder (HC), and the geometric biplane ellipsoid (BE) methods. End-diastolic volumes (EDV), end-systolic volumes (ESV), the stroke volumes (SV), and ejection fractions (EF) were calculated. The left ventricular volumetric data from the 3 methods were compared with measurements from left ventriculography (LVG). RESULTS: The best results were obtained using the 3D method; EDV (r = 0.73), ESV (r = 0.88), and EF (r = 0.76) correlated well with the LVG data. The EDV volumes did not differ significantly between LVG and the 3D method (P = 0.24); however, ESV, SV, and EF differed significantly. The ESV were significantly overestimated (P < 0.01), leading to an underestimation of the SV (P < 0.01) and the EF (P < 0.01). The HC method resulted in the greatest overestimation of the volumes. The EDV and the ESV were 31.8 +/- 37.6% and 136.4 +/- 92.9% higher than the EDV and ESV volumes obtained by LVG. Bland-Altman analysis showed systematic overestimation of the ESV using the HC method. CONCLUSION: MDCT with retrospective cardiac ECG gating allows the calculation of left ventricular volumes to estimate systolic function. The 3D method had the highest correlation with LVG. However, the overestimation of the ESV is significant, which led to an underestimation of the SV and the EF.

Adult↗