PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Walter Senn

Publications and source records attributed to Walter Senn.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Hyperpolarization-activated current Ih disconnects somatic and dendritic spike initiation zones in layer V pyramidal neurons.

Layer V pyramidal cells of the somatosensory cortex operate with two spike initiation zones. Subthreshold depolarizations are strongly attenuated along the apical dendrite linking the somatic and distal dendritic spike initiation zones. Sodium action potentials, on the other hand, are actively back-propagating from the axon hillock into the apical tuft. There they can interact with local excitatory input leading to the generation of calcium action potentials. We investigated if and how back-propagating sodium action potentials alone, without concomitant excitatory dendritic input, can initiate calcium action potentials in the distal dendrite. In acute slices of the rat somatosensory cortex, layer V pyramidal cells were studied under current-clamp with simultaneous recordings from the soma and the apical dendrite. A train of four somatic action potentials had to reach high frequencies to induce calcium action potentials in the dendrite ("critical frequency," CF approximately 100 Hz). Depolarization in the dendrite reduced the CF, while hyperpolarization increased it. The CF depended on the presence of the hyperpolarization-activated current Ih: blockade with 20 microM 4-(N-ethyl-N-phenylamino)-1,2-dimethyl-6-(methylamino) pyridinium chloride (ZD7288) reduced the CF to 68% of control. If the neurons were stimulated with noisy current injections, leading to in-vivo-like irregular spiking, no calcium action potentials were induced in the dendrite. However, after Ih channel blockade, calcium action potentials were frequently seen. These data suggest that Ih prevents initiation of the dendritic calcium action potential by proximal input alone. Dendritic calcium action potentials may therefore represent a unique signature for coincident somatic and dendritic activation.

Action Potentials↗

Neocortical pyramidal cells respond as integrate-and-fire neurons to in vivo-like input currents.

In the intact brain neurons are constantly exposed to intense synaptic activity. This heavy barrage of excitatory and inhibitory inputs was recreated in vitro by injecting a noisy current, generated as an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process, into the soma of rat neocortical pyramidal cells. The response to such in vivo-like currents was studied systematically by analyzing the time development of the instantaneous spike frequency, and when possible, the stationary mean spike frequency as a function of both the mean and the variance of the input current. All cells responded with an in vivo-like action potential activity with stationary statistics that could be sustained throughout long stimulation intervals (tens of seconds), provided the frequencies were not too high. The temporal evolution of the response revealed the presence of mechanisms of fast and slow spike frequency adaptation, and a medium duration mechanism of facilitation. For strong input currents, the slow adaptation mechanism made the spike frequency response nonstationary. The minimal frequencies that caused strong slow adaptation (a decrease in the spike rate by more than 1 Hz/s), were in the range 30-80 Hz and depended on the pipette solution used. The stationary response function has been fitted by two simple models of integrate-and-fire neurons endowed with a frequency-dependent modification of the input current. This accounts for all the fast and slow mechanisms of adaptation and facilitation that determine the stationary response, and proved necessary to fit the model to the experimental data. The coefficient of variability of the interspike interval was also in part captured by the model neurons, by tuning the parameters of the model to match the mean spike frequencies only. We conclude that the integrate-and-fire model with spike-frequency-dependent adaptation/facilitation is an adequate model reduction of cortical cells when the mean spike-frequency response to in vivo-like currents with stationary statistics is considered.

Action Potentials↗

A synaptic explanation of suppression in visual cortex.

The responses of neurons in the primary visual cortex (V1) are suppressed by mask stimuli that do not elicit responses if presented alone. This suppression is widely believed to be mediated by intracortical inhibition. As an alternative, we propose that it can be explained by thalamocortical synaptic depression. This explanation correctly predicts that suppression is monocular, immune to cortical adaptation, and occurs for mask stimuli that elicit responses in the thalamus but not in the cortex. Depression also explains other phenomena previously ascribed to intracortical inhibition. It explains why responses saturate at high stimulus contrast, whereas selectivity for orientation and spatial frequency is invariant with contrast. It explains why transient responses to flashed stimuli are nonlinear, whereas spatial summation is primarily linear. These results suggest that the very first synapses into the cortex, and not the cortical network, may account for important response properties of V1 neurons.

Action Potentials↗

Beyond spike timing: the role of nonlinear plasticity and unreliable synapses.

Spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) strengthens synapses that are activated immediately before a postsynaptic spike, and weakens those that are activated after a spike. To prevent an uncontrolled growth of the synaptic strengths, weakening must dominate strengthening for uncorrelated spike times. However, this weight-normalization property would preclude Hebbian potentiation when the pre- and postsynaptic neurons are strongly active without specific spike-time correlations. We show that nonlinear STDP as inherent in the data of Markram et al. [(1997) Science 275:213-215] can preserve the benefits of both weight normalization and Hebbian plasticity, and hence can account for learning based on spike-time correlations and on mean firing rates. As examples we consider the moving-threshold property of the Bienenstock-Cooper-Munro rule, the development of direction-selective simple cells by changing short-term synaptic depression, and the joint adaptation of axonal and dendritic delays. Without threshold nonlinearity at low frequencies, the development of direction selectivity does not stabilize in a natural stimulation environment. Without synaptic unreliability there is no causal development of axonal and dendritic delays.

Action Potentials↗

Activity-dependent development of axonal and dendritic delays, or, why synaptic transmission should be unreliable.

Systematic temporal relations between single neuronal activities or population activities are ubiquitous in the brain. No experimental evidence, however, exists for a direct modification of neuronal delays during Hebbian-type stimulation protocols. We show that in fact an explicit delay adaptation is not needed if one assumes that the synaptic strengths are modified according to the recently observed temporally asymmetric learning rule with the downregulating branch dominating the upregulating branch. During development, slow, unbiased fluctuations in the transmission time, together with temporally correlated network activity, may control neural growth and implicitly induce drifts in the axonal delays and dendritic latencies. These delays and latencies become optimally tuned in the sense that the synaptic response tends to peak in the soma of the postsynaptic cell if this is most likely to fire. The nature of the selection process requires unreliable synapses in order to give successful synapses an evolutionary advantage over the others. The width of the learning function also determines the preferred dendritic delay and the preferred width of the postsynaptic response. Hence, it may implicitly determine whether a synaptic connection provides a precisely timed or a broadly tuned "contextual" signal.

Animals↗

Recruitment of reticulospinal neurones and steady locomotion in lamprey.

In lamprey, the supraspinal control of velocity is mainly accomplished by the reticulospinal (RS) system. During locomotion, RS neurones are rhythmically active with a cycle duration corresponding to the duration of the swim cycle. While the velocity of the muscular contraction wave changes as swimming velocity changes, the conduction velocity of RS axons remains constant. Thus, an action potential generated during a specific phase of the swim cycle will, depending on swimming velocity, provide input to a particular downstream segment during different phases of its rhythmic activity. In order to investigate the importance of this effect for the control of locomotion, the temporal and spatial characteristics of the propagation of the population of action potentials along RS axons in the spinal cord were investigated. The results suggest that if RS neurones are recruited independently of their sizes and conduction velocities, a phasic wave of action potentials in these fibers will reach some segments during the inhibited phase of their rhythmic activity. Such an input could hinder a smooth propagation of the contraction wave and disrupt swimming. In contrast, by recruiting successively larger and hence more rapidly conducting neurones for successively more rapid swimming, the phasic wave of action potentials may propagate with the same velocity as that of the muscular contraction wave. Under such conditions, reticulospinal activity would support and stabilise locomotion.

Journal Article↗