Skip to content

Biomedical subjects

Wattanaporn Abramowitz

Publications and source records attributed to Wattanaporn Abramowitz.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Pharmacokinetic study of memantine in healthy and renally impaired subjects.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of the Alzheimer's disease treatment memantine in subjects with normal and impaired renal function. METHODS: This was a single-center, single-dose, open-label study. Thirty-two subjects aged 18 to 80 years were assigned to 1 of 4 groups (8 subjects each) based on baseline creatinine clearance: normal renal function (>80 mL/min), mild renal impairment (50-80 mL/min), moderate renal impairment (30-49 mL/min), and severe renal impairment (5-29 mL/min). A single 20-mg memantine dose was administered under fasting conditions. Assessments included pharmacokinetic and safety measures. RESULTS: Thirty-one subjects completed the study. There were no relevant differences in maximum memantine plasma concentration between subjects with normal and impaired renal function of any severity. The mean area under the plasma concentration versus time curve extrapolated to infinity was similar between subjects with normal and mildly impaired renal function but increased by 60% (95% confidence interval [CI], 24%-97%) and 115% (95% CI, 77%-152%) in subjects with moderate and severe renal impairment, respectively. Simulations predicted steady-state maximum concentration values of 82 ng/mL (95% CI, 70-95 ng/mL), 85 ng/mL (95% CI, 70-101 ng/mL), and 128 ng/mL (95% CI, 109-147 ng/mL) in healthy subjects, those with mild renal impairment, and those with moderate renal impairment, respectively, for the recommended dosing regimen of 10 mg twice daily; for subjects with severe renal impairment, a steady-state maximum concentration value of 84 ng/mL (95% CI, 68-101 ng/mL) was predicted for a dosing regimen of 5 mg twice daily. CONCLUSION: On the basis of the predicted steady-state plasma concentrations with the use of the current dosing regimen of 10 mg twice daily, no dosage adjustments are needed for patients with mild or moderate renal impairment. A target dose of 5 mg twice daily is recommended in patients with severe renal impairment.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Investigation of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between memantine and glyburide/metformin in healthy young subjects: a single-center, multiple-dose, open-label study.

BACKGROUND: The high prevalence rates of both Alzheimer's disease (AD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus in the elderly population suggest that concomitant pharmacotherapy is likely. Given the renal tubular transport and extensive urinary excretion of memantine and metformin, it was of interest to assess the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction with glyburide/metformin. OBJECTIVE: The primary goal of this study was to determine whether an in vivo pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction exists between memantine (an uncompetitive, moderate-affinity, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist with fast blocking/unblocking kinetics that is available in the United States for moderate to severe AD) and glyburide/metformin (a combination pharmacotherapy formulation approved for glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus). METHODS: In this single-center, multiple-dose, open-label study, healthy adult subjects received a single oral dose of memantine hydrochloride (20 mg) on day 1. After a 14-day washout period, subjects were orally administered 1.25-mg glyburide/250-mg metformin BID with food for 6 days. On day 21, subjects were coadministered memantine (20 mg) and glyburide/metformin with food. Assessments included determination of pharmacokinetic parameters for memantine and the antidiabetic agents when administered alone and in combination, pharmacodynamic measurements of blood glucose levels, and analyses of tolerability. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 24 subjects (13 women, 11 men; 79.2% white) with a mean (SD) age of 26.1 (5.6) years and a mean (SD) weight of 69.5 (11.3) kg. Twenty-one subjects completed the study: 2 discontinued due to adverse events judged unrelated to study medication, and 1 withdrew consent. No significant pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interactions were observed between memantine and glyburide/metformin. Adverse events included dizziness (41.7% of patients) with memantine administration and gastrointestinal effects (nausea, 9.1 %; vomiting, 9.1%; abdominal cramps, 13.6%) with glyburide/metformin administration. CONCLUSIONS: No pharmacokinetic interactions between memantine and glyburide/metformin were detected in this study of healthy young volunteers. Memantine had no effect on the pharmacodynamic activities of glyburide and metformin, and the drug combination was well tolerated in this population.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Effect of azole antifungals ketoconazole and fluconazole on the pharmacokinetics of dexloxiglumide.

AIMS: Dexloxiglumide is a new CCK(1) receptor antagonist under investigation for treatment of functional gastrointestinal disorders and is metabolized by CYP3A4 and CYP2C9. The objectives of these two separate randomized, two-period, two-treatment crossover studies were to investigate the effects of steady-state ketoconazole, a model CYP3A4 inhibitor (Study 1), and steady-state fluconazole, a model CYP2C9 inhibitor (Study 2), on the pharmacokinetics of dexloxiglumide in healthy subjects. METHODS: Plasma samples were analysed for dexloxiglumide and its primary metabolites: O-demethyl dexloxiglumide (ODM; Study 1 and 2) and dexloxiglumide carboxylic acid (DCA; Study 2). RESULTS: Following ketoconazole coadministration, dexloxiglumide C(max) increased by 32% (90% confidence intervals (CI) 112-154), with unchanged ODM C(max); AUC of dexloxiglumide and ODM increased by 36% (90% CI 124-140 and 128-142, respectively). No changes were observed in dexloxiglumide or ODM t((1/2)). Fluconazole coadministration caused a 77% increase (90% CI 154-204) in dexloxiglumide C(max), no change in ODM C(max) and a 32% decrease (90% CI 62-75) in DCA C(max). Fluconazole coadministration resulted in a 2.5-fold increase (90% CI 235-267) in dexloxiglumide AUC, 40% increase (90% CI 136-156) in ODM AUC and an 18% decrease (90% CI 82-94) in DCA AUC. The t((1/2)) of all three analytes increased by approximately 2-fold with fluconazole coadministration (P-value < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Ketoconazole caused a minimal increase while fluconazole caused a moderate increase in dexloxiglumide systemic exposure with no change in the adverse event profile of dexloxiglumide.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed2005

Effect of multiple-dose dexloxiglumide on the pharmacokinetics of oral contraceptives in healthy women.

This study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of dexloxiglumide, a selective cholecystokinin receptor antagonist, on the pharmacokinetics of a combination oral contraceptive (OC). A single-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-period crossover study was conducted in 24 healthy young female subjects who received Ortho Tri-Cyclen containing ethinyl estradiol (EE, 0.035 mg) and norgestimate (NE, 0.180 mg/0.215 mg/0.250 mg per 7-day phase, respectively) for 5 days (days 17-21) concurrently with either 200 mg dexloxiglumide (3 times a day on days 17-20, followed by a single dose on day 21) or matching placebo during 2 consecutive 28-day OC dosing cycles. Plasma was sampled up to 24 hours for the determination of EE, NE, and 17-deactyl norgestimate (17-DNE, a rapidly formed pharmacologically active metabolite of NE). The geometric mean ratios (GMRs, dexloxiglumide/placebo) of the plasma concentration-time curve over 24 hours with corresponding 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for EE and 17-DNE were 1.21 (1.17-1.26) and 0.92 (0.89-0.95), respectively. The GMRs (90% CI) of C(max) for EE and 17-DNE were 1.15 (1.09-1.20) and 0.93 (0.90-0.96), respectively. Coadministration of OC and dexloxiglumide was well tolerated and safe. Comparable systemic exposure of EE and 17-DNE in the presence and absence of dexloxiglumide suggests that dexloxiglumide treatment is unlikely to interfere with the safety and efficacy of oral contraceptives based on the analysis of the resulting pharmacokinetic profile.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Pharmacokinetic properties of combination oxycodone plus racemic ibuprofen: two randomized, open-label, crossover studies in healthy adult volunteers.

BACKGROUND: As part of ongoing studies to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and pharmacokinetic properties of combination oxycodone plus ibuprofen in the treatment of moderate to severe acute pain, 2 pharmacokinetic studies were conducted. OBJECTIVES: The goals of these studies were to compare the pharmacokinetic properties of monotherapy with oxycodone or ibuprofen with those of a tablet formulation of these 2 agents combined (study A), and to determine whether the absorption of the individual agents when given in the combination tablet was affected by the concomitant ingestion of food (study B). METHODS: Study A was a single-center, open-label, randomized, single-dose, 3-period, 3-way, crossover study. Healthy male subjects received oxycodone 5 mg, ibuprofen 400 mg, or a combination tablet containing both, after an overnight fast of > or =8 hours, on study days 1, 8, and 15. Study B was a single-center, open-label, randomized, single-dose, single-crossover study. Healthy volunteers received a tablet containing a combination of oxycodone 5 mg plus ibuprofen 400 mg after either an overnight fast of > or =8 hours or a standardized high-fat breakfast. Both studies included a washout period of > or =7 days between treatments. In both studies, the pharmacokinetic properties (C(max), T(max), t(1/2), AUC(0-4), AUC(0-1), and AUC(0-infinity)) of oxycodone and ibuprofen were derived from plasma drug concentrations. Analysis of variance was used to determine and compare pharmacokinetic properties. RESULTS: Twenty-four healthy, white, male subjects were included in study A (mean age, 26.0 years; mean body weight, 71.3 kg; mean height, 170.0 cm). Study B involved 12 subjects (11 men, 1 woman; mean age, 24.8 years; mean body weight, 77.2 kg; mean height, 181.4 cm). The pharmacokinetic properties of ibuprofen and oxycodone were not statistically different when administered alone or combined. Food intake did not affect the rate of oxycodone absorption (90% Cl of C(max) of fasted state vs fed state, 103-130), or the rate (90% Cl of C(max) of fasted state vs fed state, 72-95) or extent (90% Cl of AUC(0-infinity) of fasted state vs fed state, 88-102) of ibuprofen absorption. The extent of oxycodone absorption was slightly increased when the combination was given with food (90% Cl of AUC(0-infinity) of fasted state vs fed state, 115-127). CONCLUSIONS: The single-dose pharmacokinetic profiles of oxycodone and ibuprofen in these healthy volunteers were similar when these 2 drugs were given as monotherapy or in combination, suggesting bioequivalence. Food intake before administration of a single dose of the combination did not affect ibuprofen absorption but marginally increased the extent, but not the rate, of oxycodone absorption.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed2003

An evaluation of the potential for pharmacokinetic interaction between escitalopram and the cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor ritonavir.

BACKGROUND: Depression often coexists with a number of disease states, and patients with a diagnosis of depression often receive multiple medications. Thus, it is desirable to avoid coadministration of agents that have a potential for drug interactions in these patients. Although escitalopram and its metabolites are weak to negligible inhibitors of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 isozyme and are therefore unlikely to affect plasma concentrations of ritonavir (a CYP3A4 substrate and prototype CYP3A4 inhibitor), ritonavir may potentially affect plasma concentrations of escitalopram, as CYP3A4 is partially responsible for conversion of escitalopram to its major metabolite, S-demethylcitalopram (S-DCT). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the potential for pharmacokinetic interaction between escitalopram and ritonavir after concomitant administration of a single dose of each in healthy young subjects. METHODS: In this single-center, randomized, open-label, 3-way crossover study, subjects received each of the following: a single dose of escitalopram 20 mg, a single dose of ritonavir 600 mg, and single doses of both escitalopram 20 mg and ritonavir 600 mg. Blood was collected and plasma was analyzed for the pharmacokinetic parameters (maximum plasma concentration [C(max)], time to C(max) [T(max)], area under the plasma concentration-time curve, plasma elimination half-life, oral clearance, and apparent volume of distribution) of escitalopram, S-DCT, and ritonavir. RESULTS: Of 21 subjects (11 men, 10 women; mean [SD] age, 28.4 [4.4] years) who were enrolled, 18 completed the study. After concomitant administration of escitalopram and ritonavir, no statistically significant differences were noted in the pharmacokinetics of escitalopram, with the exception of apparent volume of distribution, which was reduced by approximately 10% (P < 0.001). The pharmacokinetics of S-DCT were unaffected by coadministration of ritonavir, with the exception of T(max), which was increased in the presence of ritonavir. The pharmacokinetic parameters of ritonavir were also unaffected by coadministration of escitalopram. CONCLUSION: In general, no pharmacokinetic interaction was observed between escitalopram and ritonavir in the present study.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Single-dose study to compare the pharmacokinetics of HFA flunisolide and CFC flunisolide.

The hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) formulation of the inhaled corticosteroid flunisolide is a modification of the original chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) formulation. HFA flunisolide replaces CFC with an HFA propellant and uses a built-in spacer in its pressurized metered-dose inhaler. The average HFA flunisolide particle size is 1.2 microm compared with 3.8 microm for the CFC formulation. The smaller particle size improves lung targeting, allowing a reduction in the HFA flunisolide dose relative to CFC flunisolide while maintaining comparable efficacy. In a study of 12 healthy men, pharmacokinetic parameters were determined after single doses of 1000 microg CFC flunisolide delivered without a spacer, 340 microg HFA flunisolide delivered through a spacer, and 516 microg HFA flunisolide delivered without a spacer. A standard noncompartmental analysis of the concentration data was performed and mean (+/- S.D.) pharmacokinetic values were reported. Peak plasma concentrations (observed C(max)) were similar for the three treatments. Area under the curve up to the time corresponding to the last measurable concentration (AUC(0)(-)(tlast)) was similar for the CFC and HFA flunisolide, plus spacer groups (4.4 +/- 1.6 ng x h/mL and 5.0+/- 4.2 ng x h/mL, respectively); however, AUC(0)(-)(tlast) for the HFA flunisolide without spacer group was comparatively lower than for the CFC group (3.5 +/- 1.6 ng x h/mL). Observed C(max) and AUC(0)(-)(tlast) for 6 beta-OH flunisolide, the first-pass metabolite of flunisolide and an indicator of oropharyngeal deposition, were significantly higher in the CFC flunisolide group than in either HFA flunisolide group.

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Multiple-dose proportionality study of flunisolide hydrofluoroalkane.

The hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) formulation of the inhaled corticosteroid flunisolide is a modification of the original chlorofluorocarbon formulation. HFA flunisolide substitutes an HFA for a chlorofluorocarbon propellant and uses a built-in spacer in its pressurized metered-dose inhaler. An open-label, randomized, three-way crossover, multiple-dose study evaluated the dose proportionality of three doses of flunisolide HFA. Twenty-one healthy volunteers received the following doses twice daily for 4.5 days: 85, 170, and 340 micrograms. Plasma levels of flunisolide and of the flunisolide metabolite 6 beta-OH flunisolide were measured after single- and multiple-dose administration. After a single dose, dose proportionality was observed across the three dose levels for peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) up to both the time corresponding to the last measurable concentration (AUC0-tau) and the time to infinity (AUC0-infinity). After multiple doses, dose proportionality was observed for both Cmax and AUC at the medium and high doses. Predose plasma levels of flunisolide measured on day 4 were below the limit of detection. The elimination half-life of flunisolide ranged from 0.95 to 1.34 hours. After both single and multiple doses, dose proportionality was observed in dose-adjusted Cmax and AUC0-infinity for the inactive 6 beta-OH metabolite. HFA flunisolide was well tolerated. The lack of accumulation after repeated administration of HFA flunisolide suggests that the systemic exposure of flunisolide is low, which is a safety goal for inhaled corticosteroids.

Administration, Inhalation↗