PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Watze de Wolf

Publications and source records attributed to Watze de Wolf.

4 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

A rule-based screening environmental risk assessment tool derived from EUSES.

Within the context and scope of the forthcoming European Union chemical regulations (REACH), there is a need to be able to prioritise the chemicals for evaluation. Therefore, a simple, pragmatic and adequately conservative approach for the identification of substances of very low or no immediate concern at an early stage is presented. The fundamental principles and basic concepts are derived from the EU Technical Guidance Document and EUSES, and are translated into an easy-to-use rule-based system. For this development, the effect on risk characterisation ratios (RCRs) of the key environmental parameters in EUSES was quantified (taking into account several standardised chemical release scenarios). Using statistical analysis, ranges were identified for each key parameter, within which the end result of the assessment was not significantly affected. This information was then translated into a lookup table from which environmental risk characterisation ratios can be directly read as a function of a few parameters.

Environmental Monitoring↗
PubMed2005

Mode of action and aquatic exposure thresholds of no concern.

Threshold concepts of toxicological concern are based on the possibility of establishing an exposure threshold value for chemicals below which no significant risk is to be expected. The objective of the present study is to address environmental thresholds of no toxicological concern for freshwater systems (ETNCaq) for organic chemicals. We analyzed environmental toxicological databases (acute and chronic endpoints) and substance hazard assessments. Lowest numbers and 95th-percentile values were derived using data stratification based on mode of action (MOA; 1 = inert chemicals; 2 = less inert chemicals; 3 = reactive chemicals; 4 = specifically acting chemicals). The ETNCaq values were derived by multiplying the lowest 95th percentile values with appropriate application factors; ETNCaq,MOA1-3 is approximately 0.1 microg/L. A preliminary analysis with complete MOA stratification of the databases shows that in the case of MOA1 or MOA2, the ETNCaq value could be even higher than 0.1 microg/L. A significantly lower ETNCaq,MOA4 value was observed based on the long-term toxicity information in the European Centre for the Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals database. Application of the ETNCaq value in a tiered risk-assessment scheme may help chemical producers to set data-generation priorities and to refine or reduce animal use. It also may help to inform downstream users concerning the relative risk associated with their specific uses and be of value in putting environmental monitoring data into a risk-assessment perspective.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Removal of fragrance materials during U.S. and European wastewater treatment.

The concentrations and removals of 16 fragrance materials (EMs) were measured in 17 U.S. and European wastewater treatment plants between 1997 and 2000 and were compared to predicted values. The average FM profile and concentrations in U.S. and European influent were similar. The average FM profile in primary effluent was similar to the average influent profile; however, the concentration of FMs was reduced by 14.6-50.6% in primary effluent. The average FM profile in final effluent was significantly different from the primary effluent profile and was a function of the design of the wastewater treatment plant. In general, the removal of sorptive, nonbiodegradable FMs was correlated with the removal of total suspended solids in the plant, while the removal of nonsorptive, biodegradable FMs was correlated with 5-day Biological Oxidation Demand removal in the plant. The overall plant removal (primary + secondary treatment) of FMs ranged from 87.8 to 99.9% for activated sludge plants, 58.6-99.8% for carousel plants, 88.9-99.9% for oxidation ditch plants, 71.3-98.6% for trickling filter plants, 80.8-99.9% for a rotating biological contactor plant, and 96.7-99.9% for lagoons. The average concentration of FMs in final effluent ranged from the limit of quantitation (1-3 ng/L) to 8 microg/L. Measured FM removal and concentrations were compared to predicted values, which were based on industry volume, per capita water use, octanol-water partition coefficient, and biodegradability.

Adsorption↗