PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

Weijia Chen

Publications and source records attributed to Weijia Chen.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

A Practical Workflow for Spatial Transcriptomics Data Analysis: From Data Acquisition to Advanced Analyses.

Spatial transcriptomics (ST) profiles genome-wide gene expression while preserving the two-dimensional spatial context of mRNA molecules within tissue sections, enabling studies of tissue architecture and microenvironment-associated biology. However, ST analysis remains challenging because data import, quality control, integration, deconvolution, spatial statistics, and visualization often require multiple software environments and reproducible parameter choices. This protocol presents a practical computational workflow for public ST datasets in R, beginning with data acquisition and software setup and proceeding through Seurat-based data loading, quality control, normalization, multi-sample integration, clustering, and spatially variable gene analysis. The workflow then applies complementary deconvolution strategies, including reference-guided SPOTlight analysis and unsupervised STdeconvolve topic modeling, followed by Giotto-based spatial cell-cell communication analysis and interactive region-of-interest (ROI) selection using a custom Python Dash application. By emphasizing script-based execution, explicit parameter rationales, expected outputs, and troubleshooting checkpoints, the protocol provides an adaptable framework for standard array-based ST datasets and related platforms after dataset- and platform-specific parameter evaluation.

Spatial Transcriptomics

Efficacy, tolerability, and threshold effect of atropine eye drops for myopia control: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.

Atropine is an emerging therapy for myopia, yet the optimal concentration for prescription remains uncertain. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov registry platforms. We included the randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that compared any dose of atropine against a placebo in myopic children. Among 3566 studies assessed, we identified 33 eligible RCTs involving 6301 children aged 4-18 years, with 10 different concentrations and a mean follow-up time of 19.5&#x202f;&#xb1;&#x202f;12.3 months. A nonlinear relationship was observed between atropine dosage and treatment efficacy (P&#x202f;<&#x202f;0.001). Compared to placebo groups, the mean differences in reducing annual spherical equivalent refraction progression for atropine concentrations of 0.01%, 0.02%, 0.03%, 0.04%, and 0.05% were 0.21 diopters (D) (95% CI, 0.13-0.28), 0.35 D (95% CI, 0.23-0.46), 0.42 D (95% CI, 0.28-0.56), 0.45 D (95% CI, 0.30-0.60), and 0.46 D (95% CI, 0.32-0.61) respectively For higher concentrations, the estimates were 0.49 D (95% CI, 0.34-0.63) for 0.1% and 0.99 D (95% CI, 0.66-1.31) for 1%, although these were based on fewer and smaller trials. Higher doses of atropine were associated with decreased amplitude of accommodation (P&#x202f;=&#x202f;0.02), increased pupil diameters (P&#x202f;=&#x202f;0.01) and a higher frequency of photophobia (P&#x202f;=&#x202f;0.02). Our findings suggest that the increase in treatment efficacy with higher concentrations may plateau beyond a certain range, and that the current practice of increasing atropine concentrations for children who show inadequate responses to lower doses should be confined to a specific concentration range. This analysis is limited by the number, design heterogeneity, and sample sizes of available trials for higher concentrations, and by the frequent lack of pre-intervention refractive history in included studies. Therefore, estimates-particularly for doses exceeding 0.1%-should be interpreted with caution.

Humans