Biomedical subjects

Wen Chien Hsi

Publications and source records attributed to Wen Chien Hsi.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Performance of magnetic field-guided navigation system for interventional neurosurgical and cardiac procedures.

A hospital-based magnetic guidance system (MGS) was installed to assist a physician in navigating catheters and guide wires during interventional cardiac and neurosurgical procedures. The objective of this study is to examine the performance of this magnetic field-guided navigation system. Our results show that the system's radiological imaging components produce images with quality similar to that produced by other modern fluoroscopic devices. The system's magnetic navigation components also deflect the wire and catheter tips toward the intended direction. The physician, however, will have to oversteer the wire or catheter when defining the steering angle during the procedure. The MGS could be clinically useful in device navigation deflection and vessel access.

Cardiac Surgical Procedures↗

PubMed2005

Surface optimization technique for MammoSite breast brachytherapy applicator.

PURPOSE: We present a technique to optimize the dwell times and positions of a high-dose-rate (192)Ir source using the MammoSite breast brachytherapy applicator. The surface optimization method used multiple dwell positions and optimization points to conform the 100% isodose line to the surface of the planning target volume (PTV). METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study population consisted of 20 patients treated using the MammoSite device between October 2002 and February 2004. Treatment was delivered in 10 fractions of 3.4 Gy/fraction, twice daily, with a minimum of 6 h between fractions. The treatment of each patient was planned using three optimization techniques. The dosimetric characteristics of the single-point, six-point, and surface optimization techniques were compared. RESULTS: The surface optimization technique increased the PTV coverage compared with the single- and six-point methods (mean percentage of PTV receiving 100% of the prescription dose was 94%, 85%, and 91%, respectively). The surface method, single-point, and six-point method had a mean dose homogeneity index of 0.62, 0.68, and 0.63 and a mean full width at half maximum value of 189, 190, and 192 cGy/fraction, respectively. CONCLUSION: The surface technique provided greater coverage of the PTV than did the single- and six-point methods. Using the FWHM method, the surface, single-, and six-point techniques resulted in equivalent dose homogeneity.

Brachytherapy↗

PubMed2004

Treatment volume and dose optimization of MammoSite breast brachytherapy applicator.

PURPOSE: Limited information has been reported on the dosimetry achieved with the MammoSite breast brachytherapy applicator. We present our results regarding the volume of treatment and a comparison of a single prescription point, single dwell position optimization technique with a six prescription point, multiple dwell position method. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between October 14, 2002 and February 28, 2003, 21 patients with early-stage breast cancer were treated using the MammoSite device. The treatment was delivered in 10 fractions of 3.4 Gy/fraction, b.i.d., with a minimum of 6 hours between the daily fractions. CT of the lumpectomy cavity was obtained both with and without the inflated balloon. A planning target volume was constructed using a three-dimensional planning system. A three-dimensional expansion of the balloon surface was performed using the chest wall and skin as limiting structures. The volume of the inflated balloon was removed from this volume, and the volume of tissue treated in each patient was determined. A sequential expansion in 1-mm increments around the empty lumpectomy cavity was performed until the closest equivalent volume to the planning target volume was obtained. The treatment for the patients in this study was planned using both a single prescription point, single dwell position optimization technique and a six-prescription point, multiple dwell position technique. The single prescription point method has been described in a previous publication. The six-prescription point method used six points placed 1 cm from the balloon surface. Four points are in a plane transverse to the balloon axis perpendicular to the axis of the catheter, and two points are placed along the axis of the catheter. The prescription points along the catheter axis are used to compensate for the decreased dose coverage owing to anisotropy dose distribution of the source. The Nucletron HDR Plato Brachytherapy planning system was used to optimize the source positions and dwell times. RESULTS: The volume of breast tissue treated by the MammoSite device was equal to the volume encompassed by a mean 1.6-cm (SD, 0.1) margin around the empty lumpectomy cavity. Compared with the single prescription point optimization method, the six prescription point method provided better dose coverage, with a mean percentage of volume receiving 90% of the prescription dose of 97.2% (SD = 2.1) vs. 89.5% (SD = 4.6) for the single-point method. The mean percentage of volume receiving 100% of the prescription dose was 88.9% (SD = 3.3) for the six-point method vs. 77.6% (SD = 6.1) for the single-point method. However, compared with the single-point method, the six-point optimization method resulted in treatment that was less uniform, with a mean dose homogeneity index of 0.62 (SD =.07) vs. 0.66 (SD =.08) for the single-point method. CONCLUSION: The volume of normal breast tissue treated by the MammoSite device is comparable to other methods of interstitial brachytherapy that treat a 1-2-cm margin of tissue around the excision cavity. The six-prescription point, multiple dwell position method improved dose coverage with a slight decrease in dose homogeneity. The six-point method offers greater reliability of dose coverage compared with the single-point method by providing an increased number of reference points.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Cosmetic outcome and incidence of infection with the MammoSite breast brachytherapy applicator.

We present our results regarding the cosmetic outcome achieved and the rate of infection using the MammoSite breast brachytherapy applicator to treat patients with partial breast irradiation. In addition, factors associated with cosmetic outcome and infection are analyzed. The study population consisted of 30 patients with early stage breast cancer treated using the MammoSite device from October 28, 2002, to February 13, 2004. Cosmetic outcome was analyzed for its association with the following parameters: volume of the balloon, balloon-to-skin distance, maximal skin point dose per fraction, V100 (percent of volume that received 100% of the prescription dose), V150 (percent of volume that received 150% of the prescription dose), and V200 (percent of volume that received 200% of the prescription dose). The occurrence of infection at the time of treatment and during follow-up was also recorded. At a median follow-up of 13 months (range 1-16 months), 53.3% of the patients (16/30) were reported to have an excellent cosmetic outcome and 40.0% (12/30) had a good cosmetic outcome. Excellent cosmetic outcome was associated with a greater mean balloon-to-skin distance compared to those who achieved a good cosmetic outcome (1.5 cm versus 1.2 cm) (p = 0.164). The mean V100, V150, and V200 of those in the excellent cosmetic outcome group were 92.1%, 34.5%, and 7.6% versus 93.0%, 34.7%, and 7.6% in the good cosmetic outcome group (p = 0.642, 0.926, and 0.853), The mean balloon volumes were 47.7 cm3 and 56.9 cm3, respectively (p = 0.063) in the excellent and good outcome groups. The mean maximal skin doses per fraction in the excellent and good outcome groups were 354.8 cGy and 422.3 cGy (p = 0.286), respectively. Infection occurred in 13.3% of the patients (4/30). An excellent or good cosmetic outcome was achieved in 93.3% of patients and infection occurred in 13.3% of patients treated with the MammoSite breast brachytherapy applicator. Excellent cosmetic outcome was associated with a greater balloon-to-skin distance, lower maximal skin dose per fraction, and smaller mean balloon volume; however, the results did not reach statistical significance.

Adult↗