Biomedical subjects

Wilfred Levin

Publications and source records attributed to Wilfred Levin.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

A prospective phase I-II trial of the cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor celecoxib in patients with carcinoma of the cervix with biomarker assessment of the tumor microenvironment.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the toxicity and effectiveness of celecoxib in combination with definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in women with locally advanced cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-one patients were accrued to a phase I-II trial of celecoxib 400 mg by mouth twice per day for 2 weeks before and during CRT. Tumor oxygenation (HP(5)) and interstitial fluid pressure (IFP) were measured before and 2 weeks after celecoxib administration alone. The median follow-up time was 2.7 years (range, 1.1-4.4 years). RESULTS: The most common acute G3/4 toxicities were hematologic (4/31, 12.9%) and gastrointestinal (5/31, 16.1%) largely attributed to chemotherapy. Late G3/4 toxicity was seen in 4 of 31 patients (13.7% actuarial risk at 2 yr), including fistulas in 3 patients (9.7%). Within the first year of follow-up, 25 of 31 patients (81%) achieved complete response (CR), of whom 20 remained in CR at last follow-up. After 2 weeks of celecoxib administration before CRT, the median IFP decreased slightly (median absolute, -4.6 mm Hg; p = 0.09; relative, -21%; p = 0.07), whereas HP(5) did not change significantly (absolute increase, 3.6%; p = 0.51; median relative increase, 11%; p = 0.27). No significant associations were seen between changes in HP(5) or IFP and response to treatment (p = 0.2, relative HP(5) change and p = 0.14, relative IFP change). CONCLUSIONS: Celecoxib in combination with definitive CRT is associated with acceptable acute toxicity, but higher than expected late complications. Celecoxib is associated with a modest reduction in the angiogenic biomarker IFP, but this does not correspond with tumor response.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Computerized tomographic simulation compared with clinical mark-up in palliative radiotherapy: a prospective study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of computed tomographic (CT) planning in comparison to clinical mark-up (CM) for palliative radiation of chest wall metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In patients treated with CM for chest wall bone metastases (without conventional simulation/fluoroscopy), two consecutive planning CT scans were acquired with and without an external marker to delineate the CM treatment field. The two sets of scans were fused for evaluation of clinical tumor volume (CTV) coverage by the CM technique. Under-coverage was defined as the proportion of CTV not covered by the CM 80% isodose. RESULTS: Twenty-one treatments (ribs 17, sternum 2, and scapula 2) formed the basis of our study. Due to technical reasons, comparable data between CM and CT plans were available for 19 treatments only. CM resulted in a mean CTV under-coverage of 36%. Eleven sites (58%) had an under-coverage of >20%. Mean volume of normal tissues receiving >/=80% of the dose was 5.4% in CM and 9.3% in CT plans (p = 0.017). Based on dose-volume histogram comparisons, CT planning resulted in a change of treatment technique from direct apposition to a tangential pair in 7 of 19 cases. CONCLUSIONS: CT planning demonstrated a 36% under-coverage of CTV with CM of ribs and chest wall metastases.

Bone Neoplasms↗

PubMed2005

Treatment of radiation proctitis with hyperbaric oxygen.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiation proctitis is a potential complication following pelvic radiation therapy. There are no standard treatments and treatment outcomes are unpredictable. We report our experience with the use of hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT) for radiation proctitis cases refractory to standard medical or laser therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During the period 2000-2004, 10 patients with radiation proctitis were treated with HBOT (three males and seven females; mean age of 65). The median follow-up period was 25 months (range 6-43 months). Patient symptoms were retrospectively scored prior to, and following HBOT, based on the LENT-SOMA scale. RESULTS: Prior to treatment, three patients had Grade 3 toxicity (i.e. requiring blood transfusions) and seven had Grade 2 toxicity with dominant symptoms of rectal pain and/or diarrhoea. HBOT was well tolerated and 9 of the 10 patients completed a full HBOT treatment program. Rectal bleeding completely stopped in four of nine symptomatic patients and improved in three others. Rectal pain completely remitted in three of five symptomatic patients. Diarrhea remitted completely in one of five patients and improved in three others. Of the 10 patients treated, only two did not respond to HBOT. CONCLUSIONS: Significant improvement of rectal bleeding, diarrhea and rectal pain is possible using HBOT. HBOT should be offered to patients who fail conventional treatments for radiation proctitis.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Consolidative abdominopelvic radiotherapy after surgery and carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility and morbidity of sequential cytoreductive surgery, carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy, and consolidative abdominopelvic radiotherapy (APRT) in ovarian cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1998 and 2000, 29 patients with optimally cytoreduced epithelial ovarian cancer were treated with carboplatin (135 mg/m2) and paclitaxel (area under the curve [AUC] of 6) followed by APRT in a prospective protocol. All patients were clinically, radiographically, and biochemically (CA-125) free of disease at the completion of chemotherapy. Abdominopelvic radiotherapy was delivered using 6 MV anterior-posterior photon fields to encompass the peritoneal cavity. Median follow-up was 4 years. RESULTS: Two patients experienced Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity during APRT; 6 patients, Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia; and 3 patients, Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia. Overall, 10 patients had Grade 3 or 4 acute toxicity. All of the acute side effects resolved after treatment was completed, and there were no serious consequences such as sepsis or hemorrhage. Abdominopelvic radiotherapy was abandoned prematurely in 3 patients. Late side effects were seen in 5 patients, including 1 small bowel obstruction, 2 symptomatic sacral insufficiency fractures, 1 case of severe dyspareunia, and 1 case of prolonged fatigue. All resolved with supportive management. The 4-year actuarial disease-free survival was 57%, and the overall survival was 92%. Eleven of 12 patients who relapsed received salvage chemotherapy, which was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominopelvic radiotherapy after optimal surgery and carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy is associated with an acceptable risk of acute and late side effects and does not limit subsequent salvage chemotherapy. Consolidative APRT warrants further investigation as a means of improving the outcome of patients with ovarian cancer.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Pretreatment proliferation parameters do not add predictive power to clinical factors in cervical cancer treated with definitive radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: To examine the prognostic value of tumor proliferation measurements in women with carcinoma of the uterine cervix. We report an update of a prospective study focusing on whether pretreatment proliferation parameters are associated with clinical outcome, relative to other established clinical factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and one patients were recruited into the study from years 1991 to 1999. The LI for in vivo bromodeoxyuridine incorporation by the tumor and the potential doubling time (T(pot)) were determined by flow cytometry (fc). LI and its staining pattern were also assessed by immunohistochemistry (ih) using tissue sections. Apoptosis was assessed histologically using morphological criteria. Patients were treated with definitive radiation therapy. RESULTS: A successful fc measurement for LI-fc and T(pot) was possible in 95 patients (94%). The median/mean LI-fc was 6.6/7.6% (range 1.4-36.1%), and for LI-ih, 10.8/11.5%. To date, 43 patients have died of disease, and the median follow-up for alive patients is 6.2 years (range 1.3-9.3 years). Among 88 patients who completely responded to treatment, 40 patients have relapsed (14 pelvic, 23 distant, and 3 pelvic and distant). In univariate analysis, the significant factors for adverse disease-free survival were large tumor size (P = 0.0001), low hemoglobin (P = 0.001), pelvic lymph node status (P = 0.004), stage (P = 0.013), and overall treatment time (P = 0.0008). In multivariate analysis, only tumor size, pelvic lymph node status, and overall treatment time remained significant for disease-free survival. LI-fc, LI-ih, T(pot), ploidy, pattern of bromodeoxyuridine staining, and apoptosis were not significantly associated with clinical outcome in univariate or multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: These mature data indicate that none of the pretreatment proliferation parameters have prognostic significance in the radical radiotherapy of carcinoma of the uterine cervix, despite the significance of overall treatment time for treatment outcome.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2003

The success of data collection in the palliative setting--telephone or clinic follow-up?

Assessment of outcomes is essential in order to improve available palliative treatments. Collecting follow-up information can be a challenging task in the palliative setting. We compared the effectiveness of data collection by telephone contact and clinic visit in 112 patients with brain metastases treated with whole-brain radiotherapy. The first 56 patients (group A) were followed by telephone only. The second 56 patients (group B) were asked to attend an outpatient clinic appointment 4 weeks after radiotherapy. Successful contact was defined as obtaining data at week 4. Patients in the two groups did not differ significantly with regard to age, sex, performance status, primary site, number of brain metastases, or the treatment given. The proportions of patients with successful follow-up contact at week 4 were 45% and 61% in groups A and B, respectively ( P = 0.09). The quality of the collected data did not differ significantly between the two groups. The side effects and responses to therapy were similar. However, there were significantly more patients with a reduced dose of dexamethasone among the successful contacts in group B, which probably reflected the better condition of the patients coming back to clinic at week 4. In conclusion, there was a trend towards more successful data collection in our clinic follow-up. Some of the observed outcome data suggest that the two methods of follow-up might be reaching different populations of patients; considering this and the high attrition rate, a combined follow-up strategy of clinic and telephone contacts might be the best strategy.

Ambulatory Care↗

PubMed2003

Late radiation-related fibrosis: pathogenesis, manifestations, and current management.

Radiation-induced fibrosis (RIF) represents one of the most common long-term adverse effects of curative radiotherapy. Current cancer treatment approaches, involving more intensive radiotherapy regimens, used in combination with systemic agents, will likely be associated with a higher incidence and greater degree of damage to normal tissues, especially RIF. Traditionally, the development of fibrosis after radiation therapy has been considered static and irreversible. Contemporary understanding recognizes RIF as a continuum of responses mediated by molecular pathways that may be amenable to interventions. Preliminary evidence suggests that pharmacological or other interventions may be possible to reverse the manifestation of the injury and restore function to tissues. A variety of strategies have been tested for the management of RIF, although formal trials of these therapies that permit treatment comparisons are unavailable at this time. It is critical that we formally evaluate new management approaches for RIF with larger patient accrual. To this end, it is also important to develop a means of registering its occurrence for outcome analysis and to refer these patients to colleagues familiar with optimal management and enrollment in clinical trials.

Humans↗

PubMed2002

Stage II endometrial carcinoma: prognostic factors and risk classification in 170 patients.

PURPOSE: Factors affecting outcome in patients with surgicopathologic Stage II endometrial cancer are poorly defined. The purpose of this study was to determine prognostic factors in a series of patients treated according to standardized protocols at a single institution. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred and seventy patients referred to Princess Margaret Hospital after hysterectomy between 1984 and 1995 were retrospectively reviewed. One hundred and twenty patients received postoperative external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy, 18 received external beam radiotherapy alone, five received brachytherapy alone, and 27 had no radiotherapy. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 5.1 years, overall and disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years was 77% and 68%, respectively, and 24% of patients had relapsed. Significant independent adverse factors for DFS included age >65 (p = 0.0001), FIGO Stage IIB (p = 0.02), and capillary-lymphatic space (CLS) involvement (p = 0.0007). Prognostic factors for relapse were age (p = 0.0008), histologic grade (p = 0.01), and CLS (p = 0.01). A prognostic model based on the number of adverse prognostic factors (0-3) revealed that the 5-year survival rates for the four groups were as follows: 0%-85%, 1%-77%, 2%-55%, and 3%-11%. Combining the groups with 0 or 1 adverse factors resulted in a three-group variable that was strongly related to DFS (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patient age, stage, and CLS were significant factors for DFS, and age, grade, and CLS predicted time to relapse in Stage II endometrial cancer. A prognostic model for DFS using these factors can provide clinically meaningful outcome predictions.

Adult↗