Biomedical subjects

William Becker

Publications and source records attributed to William Becker.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2002

Clinical and histologic findings for microimplants placed in one stage and loaded for three months: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Implants are placed in either one or two stages. There is an absence of histologic human evidence relating to implant integration after loading. PURPOSE: The purpose of this case report was to present clinical and histologic findings for smooth-surfaced titanium turned microimplants placed in one stage and loaded after healing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five one-piece microimplants were placed in a fully edentulous mandible. Three microimplants (tests) were placed in one stage and extended through the keratinized mucosa for 3 mm. Two additional microimplants (controls) were placed even with the mucosa. After 3 months of healing, three test implants were loaded for an additional 3 months. At this time, three loaded implants and one control were removed en bloc. RESULTS: Histologic and histometric evaluations were made. For all specimens, there was excellent bone-to-implant contact. The loaded implants had from two to four exposed threads. Using marginal bone levels as the reference, the highest percentage of bone-to-implant contact was noted with the unloaded control implant (92.2%). One nonaxially loaded implant had 66.9% bone-to-implant contact, whereas the axially loaded implants (n = 2) had 77.8% bone-to-implant contact. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of this case report, smooth-surfaced, titanium threaded microimplants placed in one stage and loaded for 3 months demonstrated excellent osseointegration, with varying bone-to-implant contact. The amount of bone-to-implant contact may be related to axial implant loading.

Bone Remodeling↗

PubMed2002

Effect of barrier membranes and autologous bone grafts on ridge width preservation around implants.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of barrier membranes and autologous bone grafts on the preservation of ridge width around implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-one patients were chosen from a database of case series; treatment assignment was based on clinical judgment. The patients received a total of 76 implants: 34 implants with guided tissue regeneration procedures, 27 with autologous bone grafts, and 15 without ridge preservation procedures (control group). RESULTS: The ridge width around the 76 implants decreased an average of 1.4 mm (95% CI, -1.9 to -1.1 mm). Implants placed with autologous bone grafts or membranes tended to have worse outcomes. When compared to the no augmentation group, implants placed with guided tissue regeneration and autologous bone grafts resulted in 0.1 mm of additional bone loss (95% CI, -1.7 to -1.5 mm; p < .93) and 0.8 mm of additional bone loss (95% CI, -2.3 to 0.7 mm; p < .28), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Autologous graft procedures or barrier membranes do not appear to improve crestal ridge preservation around implants.

Aged↗

PubMed2001

Editorial: Dedicated to the Memory of Marshall R. Urist.

BACKGROUND: Previous experimental studies have shown a higher degree of bone-implant contact for surface-enlarged implants compared with machined implants. Yet, there is insufficient evidence that such implants show higher stability and an increased survival rate. PURPOSE: The purpose of this investigation was to study the integration and stability of grit-blasted implants with retention elements on the implant neck, with and without marginal bone defects, compared with machined implants without retention elements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After tooth extraction of the mandibular premolars in six dogs, two grit-blasted, partly microthreaded Astra Tech implants and one standard Brånemark implant were bilaterally placed in each dog. On one side, 3 yen 3 mm large buccal defects were created, to expose three to four implant threads. The contralateral side served as control, and no defects were made. The animals were sacrificed after 4 months of healing. Implant stability was measured using resonance frequency analysis at implant installation and after 4 months of healing. Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation was made after 4 months of healing. RESULTS: Resonance frequency analysis indicated that all implants in the test and control groups were osseointegrated after 4 months, with a tendency toward higher implant stability for the Astra Tech implants. There was a statistically significant higher increase in resonance frequency for the Astra test implants compared with their corresponding controls. Histology and histomorphometry showed well-integrated implants with varying degrees of bone repair at the defect sites. The greater bone-implant contact for the Astra implants was statistically significant. No significant difference between the implants in amount of bone filling the threads was recorded. CONCLUSIONS: The Astra Tech implants tested showed a higher degree of bone-implant contact and higher level of bone regenerated at defect sites compared with the Brånemark implants. Resonance frequency analysis demonstrated a significantly higher increase in the Astra test implants compared with their control groups than did the Brånemark test implants versus their controls.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2001

Editorial.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Journal Article↗