PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

William Gardner

Publications and source records attributed to William Gardner.

20 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Race, quality of depression care, and recovery from major depression in a primary care setting.

Racial variations in the use of effective medical care and subsequent clinical outcomes have been identified for many medical conditions. Still, it is unclear whether racial variations in care and clinical outcomes exist for depressed primary care patients. Primary care patients presenting for routine treatment were screened for major depression as part of a study to disseminate a depression treatment guideline. Primary care physicians (PCPs) were informed of their patients' depression via an electronic medical record system and asked whether they agreed with the diagnosis. Treatment patterns and depressive symptoms over the following six-months were assessed by chart review and the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, respectively. Over a 20-month period, 8,944 African-American and Caucasian patients aged 18-64 were approached for screening. African-Americans were less likely to agree to undergo screening than Caucasians (83% vs. 88%; P<.0001), but those doing so were more likely to report mood symptoms (26% vs. 15%; P<.001). 204 patients, including 52 African-Americans (25%), met protocol-eligibility criteria and completed a baseline interview. Baseline sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and PCPs' agreement rate with the depression diagnosis were similar. Although PCPs were less likely to counsel their African-American than Caucasian patients for depression (P=.03), this difference resolved after adjusting for education level, employment, and insurance status and we found no other variations in the depression care provided or in clinical outcomes by race. We found little racial variation in either process measures or clinical outcomes for depression in our sample of African-American and Caucasian primary care patients.

Adolescent↗

Primary care clinicians' use of standardized tools to assess child psychosocial problems.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Children's psychosocial problems are prevalent but often inaccurately diagnosed. This study investigated primary care clinicians' (PCCs) use of standardized tools for psychosocial problems among children in whom they reported finding a problem. METHODS: The data consisted of 21 065 unique visits by children ages 4 to 15 years in 204 practices. Parents completed questionnaires before seeing the PCCs, who completed a survey after the visit. This analysis included 3934 children who were recognized by PCCs as having one or more psychosocial problems. The primary outcome was the PCCs' usage of a tool to assess child psychosocial problems. RESULTS: PCCs used a tool in 20.2% of visits where a psychosocial problem was recognized, whereas 50% of PCCs never used such tools. Tools were less likely to be used by female PCCs and family practitioners and were less likely to be used with girls and African American children. Tools were more frequently used with children with attention problems, during visits for psychosocial problems, and when the PCC knew about the problem before the visits. CONCLUSIONS: PCCs use standardized tools infrequently to screen for, confirm, or monitor psychosocial problems.

Adolescent↗