PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

William Gerin

Publications and source records attributed to William Gerin.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Course of depressive symptoms and medication adherence after acute coronary syndromes: an electronic medication monitoring study.

OBJECTIVES: We tested whether improvements in depressive symptoms precede improved adherence to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). BACKGROUND: Depression is associated with medication nonadherence in patients with ACS, but it is unclear whether changes in depression impact on adherence. METHODS: Electronic medication monitoring was used to measure adherence to aspirin during a 3-month period in a consecutive cohort of 172 patients (25 to 85 years) recruited within 1 week of hospitalization for ACS. Depressive symptom severity was assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) during hospitalization and at 1 and 3 months after hospitalization. Adherence was defined as the percentage of days aspirin was taken as prescribed. RESULTS: Depression severity in hospital was associated with nonadherence in a gradient fashion: 15% of non-depressed patients (BDI score 0 to 4), 29% of mildly depressed patients (BDI score 10 to 16), and 37% of patients with moderately-to-severely depressive symptoms (BDI score >16) took aspirin less than 80% of the time (p = 0.03). A cross-lagged path analytic model revealed that improvements in depressive symptoms in the first month after the ACS were associated with improvements in adherence rates in the subsequent 2 months (standardized direct effect -0.32, p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis and treatment of depressive symptoms may improve medication adherence in patients after ACS.

Acute Disease↗

Persistent depressive symptoms lower aspirin adherence after acute coronary syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Even mild depressive symptoms during hospitalization are an independent risk factor for mortality after acute coronary syndromes (ACS). The mortality risk is highest for patients whose depressive symptoms persist after ACS. Low adherence to medications that reduce the risk of subsequent cardiac events may be one of the mechanisms underlying the relationship between persistent depression and risk of ACS recurrence. We compared electronically monitored adherence to aspirin in 3 groups of patients with ACS: persistently depressed, remittent depressed, and persistently nondepressed. METHODS: Using an electronic device stored in the cap of a pill bottle, we monitored aspirin adherence over a 3-month period in 165 consecutive patients recruited within 1 week of an ACS event. Depressive symptom severity was assessed by using the Beck Depression Inventory at baseline and at 3 months. Adherence was determined by the percentage of days aspirin was taken as prescribed. RESULTS: Among the patients, 10.5% of nondepressed patients, 9.8% of remittent depressed patients, and 42.1% of persistently depressed patients took aspirin < or of the time (P < .001). Examined a different way, the mean percentage of days that the correct aspirin dosage (1 pill per day for all patients) was taken was significantly lower in the persistently depressed patients (76.1%) than in the remittent depressed (87.4%) and persistently nondepressed (89.5%) patients (P < .01). Remittent depressed patients did not differ from nondepressed patients. Results remained unchanged after controlling for baseline depressive symptom severity and medical comorbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Poor medication adherence--a potentially modifiable behavior--may contribute to the high mortality risk observed in patients with persistent symptoms of depression after ACS.

Aged↗

The perseverative cognition hypothesis: a review of worry, prolonged stress-related physiological activation, and health.

Perseverative cognition, as manifested in worry and rumination, is a common response to stress, but biopsychological models of stress and health have largely ignored it. These models have generally focused on physiological activation that occurs during stress and have insufficiently addressed effects that occur in anticipation of, or following, stressful events. We argue that perseverative cognition moderates the health consequences of stressors because it can prolong stress-related affective and physiological activation, both in advance of and following stressors. We review evidence that worry, rumination, and anticipatory stress are associated with enhanced cardiovascular, endocrinological, immunological, and neurovisceral activity. The findings yield preliminary support for our hypothesis, suggesting that perseverative cognition might act directly on somatic disease via enhance activation via the cardiovascular, immune, endocrine, and neurovisceral systems.

Anxiety↗

Assessment of the white-coat effect.

BACKGROUND: A limitation of blood pressure measurements made in the physician's office is the transient elevation in pressure seen in many patients that does not appear to be linked to target organ damage or prognosis. This has been labeled the 'white-coat effect' (WCE), computed as the difference between blood pressure measurements taken by the physician and the ambulatory level or resting measures. It is unclear, however, which resting measure is most appropriate. The awake ambulatory blood pressure is the most widely used. However, while arguably the most useful measure for prediction of clinical outcomes, it is less appropriate for use as a resting measure, because it is influenced by many factors, including posture and physical activity level. Resting levels taken in the clinic may also be elevated, and will therefore underestimate the WCE. METHODS: We addressed this question by taking resting measures in a non-medical setting on the day before patients were seen at a Hypertension Clinic (day 1), and comparing these with resting measures taken on the following day, in the clinic before the patient saw the physician. RESULTS: As predicted, the day 1 resting levels were lower than those taken in the clinic prior to seeing the physician (P < 0.05 and P < 0.001 for systolic and diastolic pressures, respectively) in both normotensive and hypertensive patients. Using the day 1 resting levels, the estimated WCE for hypertensive patients was 5.3/6.9 mmHg (systolic/diastolic blood pressures), compared with estimates, using the clinic resting levels, of 0.3/0.5 mmHg. The pattern of changes was different in normotensive patients and hypertensive patients, with the physician pressures being slightly lower than day 1 pressures in the former, and substantially higher in the latter. Heart rate changes were similar and modest in both groups. CONCLUSION: The WCE may not just be limited to that narrow interval in which the patient actually sees the physician, but may generalize to the clinic setting, rendering a clinic 'resting' level invalid. While it is strongly positive in most hypertensive patients, it is frequently negative in normotensive patients. Our results suggest that improved methods of measuring blood pressure in the clinic setting are unlikely to resolve the confounding influence of the WCE, and that greater reliance will need to be placed on out-of-office monitoring.

Adolescent↗

Superiority of ambulatory to physician blood pressure is not an artifact of differential measurement reliability.

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory blood pressure is a better predictor of target organ damage and the risk of adverse cardiovascular events than office measurements. Whether this is due to the greater reliability owing to the larger number of measurements that are usually taken using ambulatory monitoring, or the greater validity of these measurements independent of the number, remains controversial. METHODS: We addressed this issue by comparing physician readings and ambulatory measurements as predictors of left ventricular mass index. The number of readings was controlled by using the average of three physician readings and randomly selecting three awake readings from a 24-h ambulatory recording. RESULTS: In a multiple regression analysis that included both the ambulatory and physician blood pressure measurements, only the ambulatory systolic measurements significantly predicted left ventricular mass index (B=0.37, t=3.11, P=0.002); the coefficient for physician's systolic measurements was essentially zero (B=-0.01, t=-0.26, NS). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the superiority of ambulatory blood pressure as a predictor of target organ damage, compared with physician measurements, cannot be adequately/fully explained by the impact of the larger number of measurements obtained with ambulatory monitoring.

Adolescent↗

Depression vulnerabilities in patients with different levels of depressive symptoms after acute coronary syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive, behavioral, and interpersonal vulnerabilities have been studied in patients fulfilling diagnostic criteria for major depression and dysthymia. The extent to which these vulnerabilities are present in cardiac patients with mild to moderate depressive symptoms--a risk factor for mortality--is unknown. Moreover, few studies have examined interrelations among depression vulnerabilities. METHODS: A consecutive cohort of 314 patients with acute coronary syndrome completed the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and measures of cognitive, behavioral, and interpersonal vulnerabilities (Dysfunctional Attitudes Scale, Pleasant Events Schedule for the Elderly, Dyadic Adjustment Scale, and an inventory of role transitions) within 1 week of hospital admission. Of the patients, 166 were classified as nondepressed (BDI score, 0-4), 91 as mildly depressed (BDI score, 10-16), and 57 as moderately to severely depressed (BDI score, >16). RESULTS: Compared with nondepressed patients, both mildly depressed and moderately to severely depressed patients exhibited higher mean levels of all vulnerabilities as well as a higher prevalence of more than one elevated vulnerability, defined by threshold scores. Vulnerabilities were only minimally interrelated (r = 0.01-0.25), and they were independently associated with mild and moderate depressive symptom status. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to show that cognitive, behavioral, and interpersonal depression vulnerabilities are uniquelyassociated with concurrent depressive symptoms. There appeared to be only modest overlap between vulnerabilities, supporting the idea that depression in medically ill patients is a multifaceted phenomenon, even in the presence of minimally elevated depressive symptoms. Longitudinal studies are required before causality and treatment implications can be addressed.

Alcoholism↗

Depressive symptoms are independently predictive of carotid atherosclerosis.

The investigators tested whether depressive symptoms were predictive of carotid atherosclerosis, a marker of coronary atherosclerosis. Healthy participants (n = 219) underwent the baseline assessment of cardiovascular risk factors, including self-reported depressive symptoms, and were assessed for carotid plaque at 10-year follow-up. Adjusting for baseline cardiovascular risk factors, participants with elevated depression scores at baseline were >2 times as likely as those with no depressive symptoms to have carotid plaque.

Adult↗

Sustained blood pressure increase after an acute stressor: the effects of the 11 September 2001 attack on the New York City World Trade Center.

BACKGROUND: Effects of catastrophic stress on blood pressure are well documented, but usually few measurements were taken before the event occurred, and the people studied were directly involved or geographically close to the disaster. The impact of the 11 September 2001 (9/11) attacks in New York City had far greater reach, and has been sustained by subsequent events. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that, after the 9/11 attacks, blood pressures in the population affected would be increased compared with that in both the preceding months and the same period during the previous year. METHODS: We used data available from a current study of blood pressure in four sites in the USA that enabled us to examine them from two perspectives: a mixed (within and between groups) analysis that tested the overall differences in blood pressure before and after 9/11, and a within-subjects model to examine the more focused issue of individual change in blood pressure after 9/11. The blood pressures of 427 hypertensive individuals were telemonitored at four sites. An additional 101 patients had been monitored at two sites during the same period in the previous year. RESULTS: Mean systolic blood pressure was significantly greater during the 2 months after 9/11, across the four sites, compared with that assessed during the previous 2 months (range of observed differences 1.7-3.8 mmHg). At the two sites for which data were available for the same period in the year 2000, there was also a significant effect for the same period during the preceding year for systolic blood pressure. However, at both these sites the effect at 2000 was significantly smaller than the effect at 2001. Blood pressure also generally increased among those individuals in whom monitoring overlapped the 9/11 event. CONCLUSION: The World Trade Center attacks produced a substantial and sustained increase in blood pressure that appears to be independent of seasonal effects, and which has important implications for morbidity and financial burden. The ubiquitous continuing reference to the events in the news reports may contribute to the sustained effects.

Blood Pressure↗

Anxiety and outcome expectations predict the white-coat effect.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether elevated clinic blood pressure compared with daytime ambulatory blood pressure, referred to as the white-coat effect, is associated with anxiety and increased blood pressure expectancy in the doctor's office. METHODS: The 24-h ambulatory blood pressure measurements and physicians' blood pressure measurements were obtained in 226 normotensive and hypertensive study participants. Anxiety levels were assessed multiple times during the clinic visit using a Visual Analog Scale. Participants' expectations regarding the clinic visit were assessed using a six-item scale (Expectations of Outcomes Scale). The white-coat effect was computed as the difference between the mean clinic blood pressure and the mean daytime ambulatory blood pressure. Multiple regression analysis was performed to examine the association between anxiety, outcome expectations and the white-coat effect, adjusting for age, sex, and ambulatory blood pressure level. RESULTS: As predicted, outcome expectations and anxiety during the clinic visit were significantly associated with the white-coat effect. Results of the regression analysis indicated that only expectancy had an independent effect on the systolic white-coat effect; however, both anxiety and expectancy had independent effects on the diastolic white-coat effect. CONCLUSION: Our results provide empirical support to the hypothesis that anxiety and blood pressure expectancy may elevate clinic blood pressure.

Adolescent↗

Music can facilitate blood pressure recovery from stress.

OBJECTIVES: Interventions that reduce the magnitude of cardiovascular responses to stress are justified, at least in part, by the notion that exaggerated responses to stress can damage the cardiovascular system. Recent data suggest that it is worthwhile to explore, in addition to the magnitude of the cardiovascular responses during stress (reactivity), the factors that affect the return to baseline levels after the stressor has ended (recovery). This experiment examined the effect of listening to music on cardiovascular recovery. DESIGN AND METHOD: Participants (N = 75) performed a challenging three-minute mental arithmetic task and then were assigned randomly to sit in silence or to listen to one of several styles of music: classical, jazz or pop. RESULTS: Participants who listened to classical music had significantly lower post-task systolic blood pressure levels (M = 2.1 mmHg above pre-stress baseline) than did participants who heard no music (M = 10.8 mmHg). Other musical styles did not produce significantly better recovery than silence. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that listening to music may serve to improve cardiovascular recovery from stress, although not all music selections are effective.

Adult↗

Perceived racism and blood pressure: a review of the literature and conceptual and methodological critique.

Racial disparities in health, including elevated rates of hypertension (HT) among Blacks, are widely recognized and a matter of serious concern. Researchers have hypothesized that social stress, and in particular exposure to racism, may account for some of the between-group differences in the prevalence of HT and a portion of the within-group variations in risk for HT. However, there have been surprisingly few empirical studies of the relationship between perceived racism and blood pressure (BP) or cardiovascular reactivity (CVR), a possible marker of mechanisms culminating in cardiovascular disease. This article reviews published literature investigating the relationship of perceived racism to HT-related variables, including self-reported history of HT, BP level, or CVR. Strengths and weaknesses of the existing research are discussed to permit the identification of research areas that may elucidate the biopsychosocial mechanisms potentially linking racism to HT. We hope to encourage investigators to invest in research on the health effects of racism because a sound and detailed knowledge base in this area is necessary to address racial disparities in health.

Black or African American↗

Behavioral cardiology --has its time finally arrived?

Traditional cardiology has taken a mechanistic approach to heart disease. But the new discipline of behavioral cardiology takes a broader view, concluding that heart disease is not inevitable, but develops largely from unhealthy lifestyles, such as smoking, overeating and physical inactivity, and from psychosocial stress. Physical inactivity and excessive caloric intake are also responsible for the epidemic of obesity, which is associated with a dramatic increase in the prevalence of diabetes. This increase in the incidence of diabetes may, in turn, reverse the recent decline of cardiovascular deaths in the US. A variety of psychosocial stressors have been implicated in the development of cardiovascular disease. These include occupational stress, anxiety, social isolation, hostility, anger, and type A behavior. There is clearly some overlap between these stressors, all of which may affect the heart adversely. Both the lifestyle and psychosocial factors can be altered by behavioral treatment, in which the patient and the practitioner work together. Unfortunately, various barriers can impair the successful implementation of behavioral treatment. These barriers include poor compliance by the patient, lack of skill in providing effective interventions by the health care provider, and lack of incentives within the health care system, particularly reimbursement.

Behavior Therapy↗

Heightened psychobiological reactivity to laboratory stressors in healthy women at familial risk for breast cancer.

This study examined the possibility that reactivity to acute stressors may be altered among women facing the chronic stress of being at familial risk for breast cancer. Sixteen healthy women with histories of breast cancer in their families (Risk Group) and 32 women at normal risk (Comparison Group) were exposed to 15 min of classic laboratory stressors. Seventeen women at normal risk were randomly assigned to nonstressful tasks (manipulation check). Self-reported distress, natural killer cell activity (NKCA), and NK cell numbers (percentage of CD3-CD16/56+ lymphocytes) were assessed before and after the tasks. Cardiovascular activity was assessed throughout the session. The tasks elicited increases in distress, heart rate, NKCA, and NK cells numbers in both experimental groups. Supporting study hypotheses, the Risk Group had larger increases in distress, heart rate, NKCA, and NK cell numbers. These findings raise the possibility that the chronic stress associated with familial cancer risk may have negative health consequences through changes in psychobiological reactivity.

Adult↗

What is the white-coat effect and how should it be measured?

The white coat effect is conceived as a measure of the blood pressure response to a clinic visit, but there is no agreement as to exactly how it should be defined. The most widely used definition is the difference between the average clinic and daytime ambulatory blood pressures, but other methods that have been used include the difference between clinic and home pressures, measurements using ambulatory blood pressures only, clinic measurements only, and laboratory (reactivity) testing. Few studies have compared the different methods, but the reactivity method has reported bigger changes of blood pressure and heart rate than the others. The effect tends to be greater in older than younger patients, in women than in men, but is present to a greater or lesser degree in almost all hypertensive patients. It is diminished but not obliterated by drug treatment. It is not closely related to overall blood pressure variability, and does not predict cardiovascular risk. The white coat effect appears to be idiosyncratic to the clinic setting.

Antihypertensive Agents↗

Limitations of current validation protocols for home blood pressure monitors for individual patients.

BACKGROUND: Automatic blood pressure monitoring conducted at home is increasingly used in the diagnosis and management of hypertension. We assessed the adequacy of existing British Hypertension Society (BHS) and Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) validation standards for automatic blood pressure monitoring devices. SUBJECT AND METHODS: A theoretical study and an empirical test are presented to estimate the proportion of persons for whom a blood pressure monitor validated according to existing BHS and AAMI standards would be inaccurate. RESULTS: The results suggest that a major limitation of both protocols is the lack of attention given to the number of individual patients for whom a monitor may be inaccurate. A blood pressure monitor that meets the AAMI and BHS validation criteria may report blood pressures in error by more than 5 mmHg for more than half of the people. CONCLUSIONS: A validation standard that does not take account of the person-effects on error will lead to a substantial proportion of persons using self-monitors that are systematically inaccurate for that person.

Blood Pressure Determination↗