PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

William H Isbister

Publications and source records attributed to William H Isbister.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Is palliative resection of the primary tumour, in the presence of advanced rectal cancer, a safe and useful technique for symptom control?

INTRODUCTION: At some time, every general surgeon will be faced with the task of trying to decide what to do with a patient who presents with rectal cancer and unresectable distant metastases. How safe is resectional surgery? What sort of palliation may be expected following resection of the primary tumour? In an attempt to answer these questions, the management and outcomes of all patients with rectal cancer and distant metastases, who were primarily referred to the colorectal unit at King Faisal Specialist Hospital were examined. METHODS: All patients who underwent primary surgery for rectal cancer in the presence of metastatic disease were identified. The charts of these patients were examined and their morbidity, mortality and survival were determined. RESULTS: Over an 8-year period 22 patients (average age 54 years) underwent rectal resectional surgery in the presence of metastatic disease. There were 13 men and nine women. The commonest complaint was rectal bleeding. All patients had chest radiographs. Pulmonary metastases were identified in four patients. Nineteen abdominal and pelvic computed tomography scans were performed and eight showed evidence of metastases. Skeletal radiographs in two patients showed evidence of bone metastasis. At operation, intraperitoneal metastases were found in 18 patients. Nine of these were not identified preoperatively. Six patients underwent abdomino-perineal resection, nine anterior resection and seven a Hartmann's procedure. Eight patients developed a significant postoperative complication and one died 42 days after surgery. The mean length of hospital stay was 18.6 days. Nine patients received preoperative radiotherapy. Four patients had palliative radiotherapy, two for bony, one for liver and one for peritoneal metastases. Patients were followed up for a mean of 1.1 years. During follow up, 11 returned to the emergency room on 24 occasions. Two patients required readmission. No patient had further rectal bleeding. The mean survival was 1.3 years. CONCLUSION: Patients with rectal cancer and unresectable distant metastases can be successfully palliated by resection of the primary tumour with low morbidity and mortality. The early involvement of a palliative care team facilitates patient management and helps patients enjoy what remains of the rest of their lives at home, in comfort and with good symptom control.

Female↗

POSSUM: a re-evaluation in patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer. The Physiological and Operative Severity Score for Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity.

BACKGROUND: The problem of directly comparing morbidity and mortality rates between institutions without some sort of adjustment for case mix is well documented. Scoring systems have been developed to allow comparisons to be made. The Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM) is one such system. It was designed to predict operative mortality and morbidity in differing settings and to be independent of case mix. The present study examines the use of POSSUM in colorectal practice in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: Patients referred to King Faisal Specialist Hospital between 1990 and 1998 for primary management of an histologically proven rectal cancer were identified. POSSUM mortality and morbidity scores and Portsmouth-Physiological and Operative Severity Score (P-POSSUM) mortality scores were calculated separately for each patient, and predicted rates were compared with observed rates in the patients studied. RESULTS: There were 70 men (mean age: 55.6 years; range: 25-87) and 75 women (mean age: 52.8 years; range: 26-84). One hundred and six patients underwent 'curative' surgery. Abdominoperineal resection was the most frequently performed procedure. Major anastomotic leakage following anterior resection occurred in two of fifty patients. One patient developed a pulmonary embolism but no patient developed postoperative myocardial infarction. Two patients died. The median and mean physiological and operative severity scores were 13 (range: 12-37) and 17 (range: 8-37) and 14.68 and 18.36, respectively. The overall POSSUM-predicted (using median scores) morbidity and mortality rates were 35.4% and 6.7%. The P-POSSUM-predicted (using mean scores) mortality rate was 3.5%. Observed morbidity and mortality rates were 54.5% and 1.4%. CONCLUSION: POSSUM failed to predict outcomes accurately in patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer in Saudi Arabia. P-POSSUM also overpredicted mortality but to a lesser extent. Patient's 'wellness' and the previously identified inability of POSSUM to accurately predict death in low-risk populations may explain these findings. Care must be exercised in using the POSSUM formulae for risk adjustment in different settings.

Adult↗

Audit of definitive colorectal surgery in patients with early and advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The role of surgery in patients with advanced colorectal cancer may be questioned in the era of specialized intensive palliative care. Should patients with advanced disease be advised against surgery because of the risks of the surgery itself? In this study, the perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing definitive surgery for early (Dukes' stages A, B and C) and advanced colorectal cancer (stage D) were examined. METHODS: All patients undergoing definitive surgery for colorectal cancer during a 15-year period were identified. Details of tumour site and stage, surgery performed, perioperative complications and postoperative mortality were compared. RESULTS: A total of 374 patients underwent definitive surgery. There were 193 men, a male : female ratio of 1:0.9. Seventy-one patients had advanced disease. There were no differences between the early and advanced groups in perioperative requirements for either blood or total parenteral nutrition. In the advanced group, more operations were performed as emergencies than in the early group (32.4 vs 17.5%; P < 0.01) and more patients presented with bowel obstruction in the advanced group (23.9 vs 10.2%; P < 0.01). There were no site differences between the early and advanced groups and no differences between the operations performed except that endo-anal destruction was not performed in advanced patients. There were no differences in perioperative morbidity or mortality in the groups studied. CONCLUSION: Resection rates, operation type and postoperative morbidity and mortality were similar in patients with both early and advanced colorectal cancers. In terms of perioperative outcome, the presence of advanced cancer, per se, should not, therefore, be a justification to decline surgery.

Colectomy↗