Biomedical subjects

William I Segars

Publications and source records attributed to William I Segars.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2004

Presence of Enterococcus faecalis in broiler litter and wild bird feces for bacterial source tracking.

When Enterococcus faecalis is isolated from fresh feces, its host range appears to be limited to humans and birds. Although E. faecalis is found in human sewage, the extent to which the bacterium is found in broiler litter and in the feces of wild birds is unclear. These results have implications for bacterial source tracking. We determined if media designed for the isolation of fecal enterococci affected this host range, and if E. faecalis was routinely found in broiler litter and in the feces of wild birds. Of five different isolation media, none affected the isolation of E. faecalis. Enterococcus faecalis was routinely found in fresh broiler feces (522 of 1092 isolates; 48%), but rarely in broiler litter (12 of 1452 isolates; <2%). Therefore, broiler litter selects against this bacterium, and broiler litter is an unlikely environmental source of this bacterium. The presence of E. faecalis in eight wild bird species was highly variable. Unless the fecal loading rate from migratory or resident wild birds is high, water samples collected during baseflow conditions with high numbers of E. faecalis may indicate human fecal contamination.

Animal Husbandry↗

PubMed2003

Deer diet affects ribotype diversity of Escherichia coli for bacterial source tracking.

Ribotyping is one of a number of genotypic methods for bacterial source tracking. This method requires a host origin database of one bacterial species be established in order to identify environmental isolates. Researchers establishing these databases have observed considerable ribotype diversity within a specific bacterial species. One source of this diversity may be diet. We determined the effect of diet on ribotype diversity for Escherichia coli in penned and wild deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in a 13-ha forested watershed. A total of 298 E. coli isolates was obtained, 100 from penned deer, 100 from wild deer, and 98 from the stream in the watershed to which all deer had access. The wild deer had significantly more ribotypes (35) than the penned deer (11 ribotypes, p = 0.05). This result suggests that diet affected ribotype diversity, and that a host origin database for bacterial source tracking should contain bacterial isolates from wild rather than from captive animals. Also, 42 of 98 (42.9%) environmental isolates matched penned and wild deer ribotypes. If bacterial source tracking determines that fecal contamination is predominantly from wildlife, then it may be unnecessary to monitor these watersheds because control over wildlife is difficult.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Geographic variability of Escherichia coli ribotypes from animals in Idaho and Georgia.

Several genotypic methods have been developed for determining the host origin of fecal bacteria in contaminated waters. Some of these methods rely on a host origin database to identify environmental isolates. It is not well understood to what degree these host origin isolates are geographically variable (i.e., cosmopolitan or endemic). This is important because a geographically limited host origin database may or may not be universally applicable. The objective of our study was to use one genotypic method, ribotyping, to determine the geographic variability of the fecal bacterium, Escherichia coli, from one location in Idaho and three locations in Georgia for cattle (Bos taurus), horse (Equus caballus), swine (Sus scrofa), and chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus). A total of 568 fecal E. coli isolates from Kimberly, ID (125 isolates), Athens, GA (210 isolates), Brunswick, GA (102 isolates), and Tifton, GA (131 isolates), yielded 213 ribotypes. The percentage of ribotype sharing within an animal species increased with decreased distance between geographic locations for cattle and horses, but not for swine and chicken. When the E. coli ribotypes among the four host species were compared at one location, the percent of unshared ribotypes was 86, 89, 81, and 79% for Kimberly, Athens, Brunswick, and Tifton, respectively. These data suggest that there is good ribotype separation among host animal species at each location. The ability to match environmental isolates to a host origin database may depend on a large number of environmental and host origin isolates that ideally are not geographically separated.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Potential of Enterococcus faecalis as a human fecal indicator for microbial source tracking.

Regulatory agencies are interested in a fecal indicator bacterium with a host range limited to humans because human fecal contamination represents the greatest hazard to humans, yet is a relatively easy nonpoint source to remedy. Watersheds with human fecal contamination could be given first priority for cleanup. A fecal indicator bacterium with a host range limited to humans and a few other warm-blooded animal species would also simplify microbial source tracking because only a few animal species would be required for any host origin database. The literature suggests that the fecal indicator bacterium Enterococcus faecalis has a limited host range. On this basis, we selected this bacterium for study. Of 583 fecal streptococcal isolates obtained on Enterococcosel agar from Canada goose, cattle, deer, dog, human, chicken, and swine, 392 were considered presumptive enterococci and were subsequently speciated with the API 20 Strep system. Of these isolates, 22 were Ent. durans (5.6%), 61 were Ent. faecalis (15.6%), 98 were Ent. faecium (25.0%), 86 were Ent. gallinarum (21.9%), and 125 were unidentified (31.9%). The host range of the Ent. faecalis isolates was limited to dogs, humans, and chickens. Media were developed to isolate and identify Ent. faecalis quickly from fecal samples and this scheme eliminated Ent. faecalis isolates from dogs. When the remaining Ent. faecalis isolates were ribotyped, it was possible to differentiate clearly among the isolates from human and chicken. It may be that combining the potentially limited host range of Ent. faecalis with ribotyping is useful for prioritizing watersheds with fecal contamination.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Targeted sampling protocol as prelude to bacterial source tracking with Enterococcus faecalis.

Recent studies suggest that host origin databases for bacterial source tracking (BST) must contain a large number of isolates because bacterial subspecies change with geography and time. A new targeted sampling protocol was developed as a prelude to BST to minimize these changes. The research was conducted on the Sapelo River, a tidal river on the Georgia coast. A general sampling of the river showed fecal enterococcal numbers ranging from <10 (below the limit of detection) to 990 colony-forming units (CFU) per 100 mL. Locations with high enterococcal numbers were combined with local knowledge to determine targeted sampling sites. Fecal enterococcal numbers around one site ranged from <10 to 24,000 CFU per 100 mL. Bacterial source tracking was conducted to determine if a wastewater treatment facility at the site was responsible for this contamination. The fecal indicator bacterium was Enterococcus faecalis. Ribotyping, automated with a RiboPrinter (DuPont Qualicon, Wilmington, DE), was the BST method. Thirty-seven ribotypes were observed among 83 Ent. faecalis isolates obtained from the Sapelo River and the wastewater lagoon. Sixteen ribotypes were associated with either the river or the lagoon, and only five ribotypes (14%) were shared. Nevertheless, these five ribotypes represented 39 of the 83 Ent. faecalis isolates, almost a majority (47%). These results suggest that the fecal contamination in the river came from the wastewater treatment facility. As a prelude to BST, targeted sampling minimized subspecies changes with geography and time, and eliminated the need for a permanent host origin database by restricting BST to a small geographic area and requiring sampling to be completed in one day.

Animals↗