PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

William L Macias

Publications and source records attributed to William L Macias.

15 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Protein C concentrations in severe sepsis: an early directional change in plasma levels predicts outcome.

INTRODUCTION: Protein C, because of its central role in hemostasis, plays an integral role in the host response to infection. Protein C depletion, resulting from increased consumption, degradation, and/or decreased synthesis, is characteristic of sepsis and has been shown to predict morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study was to determine whether early directional changes in protein C levels correlate with outcome. METHODS: Patients in the Recombinant Human Activated Protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis (PROWESS) clinical trial were assessed and categorized by baseline protein C (n = 1574). Deficiency was categorized as: severe deficiency, protein C levels < or = 40% of normal protein C activity (n = 615, 39% of patients); deficient, protein C levels 41-80% of normal protein C activity (n = 764, 48.5% of patients); and normal, >80% of normal protein C activity (n = 195, 12.4% of patients). Logistic regression analysis of 28-day mortality for placebo patients was used to investigate whether baseline and day 1 protein C levels were independent risk factors for mortality. The impact of treatment with drotrecogin alfa (activated) (DrotAA) was also assessed. RESULTS: Protein C levels at baseline and day 1 were independent risk factors in placebo patients. If baseline protein C levels of severely deficient placebo patients remained < or = 40% at day 1 their odds of death increased (odds ratio = 2.75, P < 0.0001), while if levels improved to >40% by day 1 their risk of death decreased (odds ratio = 0.43, P = 0.03). If baseline protein C levels of placebo patients were >40% but decreased by > or = 10% on day 1, their risk of death increased (odds ratio = 1.87, P = 0.02). DrotAA treatment improved protein C levels by day 1 compared with placebo (P = 0.008) and reduced the risk of death in severely deficient (< or = 40%) patients at baseline. Treatment also decreased the number of severely protein C deficient (= 40%) patients and decreased the number of deficient (41-80%) patients and normal (>80%) patients who had a > or = 10% decrease in protein C levels by day 1. CONCLUSION: Baseline protein C levels were an independent predictor of sepsis outcome. Day 1 changes in protein C, regardless of baseline levels, were also predictive of outcome. The association of DrotAA treatment, increased protein C levels, and improved survival may partially explain the mechanism of action.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Drotrecogin alfa (activated) for adults with severe sepsis and a low risk of death.

BACKGROUND: In November 2001, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved drotrecogin alfa (activated) (DrotAA) for adults who had severe sepsis and a high risk of death. The FDA required a study to evaluate the efficacy of DrotAA for adults who had severe sepsis and a low risk of death. METHODS: We randomly assigned adult patients with severe sepsis and a low risk of death (defined by an Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation [APACHE II] score <25 or single-organ failure) to receive an intravenous infusion of placebo or DrotAA (24 microg per kilogram of body weight per hour) for 96 hours in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. The prospectively defined primary end point was death from any cause and was assessed 28 days after the start of the infusion. In-hospital mortality within 90 days after the start of the infusion was measured, and safety information was collected. RESULTS: Enrollment in the trial was terminated early because of a low likelihood of meeting the prospectively defined objective of demonstrating a significant reduction in the 28-day mortality rate with the use of DrotAA. The study enrolled 2640 patients and collected data on 2613 (1297 in the placebo group and 1316 in the DrotAA group) at the 28-day follow-up. There were no statistically significant differences between the placebo group and the DrotAA group in 28-day mortality (17.0 percent in the placebo group vs. 18.5 percent in the DrotAA group; P=0.34; relative risk, 1.08; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.92 to 1.28) or in in-hospital mortality (20.5 percent vs. 20.6 percent; P=0.98; relative risk, 1.00; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.86 to 1.16). The rate of serious bleeding was greater in the DrotAA group than in the placebo group during both the infusion (2.4 percent vs. 1.2 percent, P=0.02) and the 28-day study period (3.9 percent vs. 2.2 percent, P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The absence of a beneficial treatment effect, coupled with an increased incidence of serious bleeding complications, indicates that DrotAA should not be used in patients with severe sepsis who are at low risk for death, such as those with single-organ failure or an APACHE II score less than 25.

APACHE↗
PubMed2005

Lack of evidence for qualitative treatment by disease severity interactions in clinical studies of severe sepsis.

INTRODUCTION: The design of clinical trials of interventions aimed at reducing mortality in patients with severe sepsis assumes that the relative treatment effect of the intervention is independent of the patients' risk for death. We reviewed published data from phase III clinical studies of severe sepsis to determine whether a relationship exists between risk for death and the relative benefit of the investigational agent. Such an interaction might warrant a change in the assumptions that underlie current trial designs. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of published phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled trials in adult patients with sepsis, severe sepsis, or septic shock up to November 2004. All studies enrolled patients with known or suspected infection, evidence of a systemic response to the infection, and one or more organ dysfunctions resulting from the systemic response. RESULTS: Twenty-two publications, investigating 17 molecular entities, fulfilled criteria for phase III or equivalent studies aimed at reducing mortality in adult patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. Three studies achieved the prospectively defined primary end-point of a statistically significant reduction in 28-day all-cause mortality. The control group mortality rates for these studies were 31%, 43% and 61%, indicating that the beneficial effects of adjunct therapies could be demonstrated over a wide range of illness severity. Analysis of subgroup data from failed studies provided no evidence that the efficacy of the therapeutics being investigated varied by baseline placebo mortality rates. Among all studies, interventions with anticoagulant activity or anti-inflammatory activity did not appear to be harmful in patients with evidence of less coagulopathy or less inflammation. CONCLUSION: Our review of published clinical data does not support the hypothesis that mortality risk of the population studied alters the relative treatment effect associated with anti-inflammatory or other agents used to treat severe sepsis. Clinical studies in severe sepsis should continue to enroll patients over a wide range of disease severity, as long as patients enrolled have evidence of sepsis-induced organ dysfunction(s), patients are at an appreciable risk for death (e.g. as evidenced by admission to an intensive care unit), and the potential for benefit outweighs the potential for harm.

APACHE↗
PubMed2005

New insights into the protein C pathway: potential implications for the biological activities of drotrecogin alfa (activated).

It has been hypothesized that the protein C pathway is a pivotal link between the inflammation and coagulation cascades. The demonstration that a survival benefit is associated with administration of drotrecogin alfa (activated) (recombinant human activated protein C [APC]) in severe sepsis patients has provided new insights into the protein C pathway. APC was originally identified based on its antithrombotic properties, which result from the inhibition of activated Factors V and VIII. In the early 1990s, any potential anti-inflammatory properties of APC were thought to relate primarily to its inhibition of thrombin generation. However, the mid-1990s saw the identification of the endothelial protein C receptor (EPCR), which has subsequently been shown to be neither endothelial specific nor protein C specific, but has a primary function as a cofactor for enhancing the generation of APC or behaving as an APC receptor. Thus, the potential biologic activities of APC can be classed into two categories related either to the limiting of thrombin generation or to cellular effects initiated by binding to the EPCR. Intracellular signaling initiated by binding of APC to its receptor appears to be mediated by interaction with an adjacent protease-activated receptor (PAR), or by indirect activation of the sphingosine 1-phosphate pathway. Based mostly on in vitro studies, binding of APC to its receptor on endothelial cells leads to a decrease in thrombin-induced endothelial permeability injury, while such binding on blood cells, epithelial cells, and neurons has been shown to inhibit chemotaxis, be anti-apoptotic, and be neuroprotective, respectively. In the Recombinant Human Activated Protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis (PROWESS) study, drotrecogin alfa (activated) was associated with improved cardiovascular function, respiratory function, and a prevention of hematologic dysfunction. This article discusses the way in which the interactions of APC may alter the microcirculation.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Dynamic evolution of coagulopathy in the first day of severe sepsis: relationship with mortality and organ failure.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether changes in coagulation biomarkers during the first day of severe sepsis correlate with progression from single to multiple organ failure and subsequent death. DESIGN: Analysis of secondary endpoints in a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, multinational clinical trial (PROWESS). SETTING: The study involved 164 medical centers. PATIENTS: A total of 840 patients who met criteria for severe sepsis and were randomized to receive placebo plus supportive care. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Coagulation biomarkers, prothrombin time, antithrombin activity, and D-dimer and protein C levels were measured, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment was performed daily. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified baseline antithrombin activity <54% and changes in prothrombin time, D-dimer, and antithrombin activity during the first calendar day after the onset of the first sepsis-induced organ dysfunction (i.e., the first day of severe sepsis, day 1) as predictive of 28-day mortality (p < or = .01). A composite coagulopathy score was determined using points for predetermined levels of change from baseline to day 1. The composite coagulopathy score correlated with progression from single to multiple organ failure (p = .0007), time to resolution of organ failure (p = .0004), and 28-day mortality (p < .0001). Combining the composite coagulopathy score with the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score improved ability to identify patients who would progress to multiple organ failure (area under receiver operating characteristic curve 0.61 APACHE II vs. 0.65 APACHE II + composite coagulopathy score) and who would die (area under receiver operating characteristic curve 0.69 APACHE II vs. 0.74 APACHE II + composite coagulopathy score). CONCLUSIONS: Continuation or worsening of coagulopathy during the first day of severe sepsis was associated with increased development of new organ failure and 28-day mortality. These results further suggest that coagulation abnormalities contribute to organ failure and death.

APACHE↗
PubMed2005

Early changes in organ function predict eventual survival in severe sepsis.

OBJECTIVE: Early identification and treatment of severe sepsis can significantly reduce mortality rate. We hypothesized that a risk prediction model based on early (baseline to day 1 of study) response to standard care should be significantly related to 28-day survival. DESIGN: Analysis of organ dysfunction data from two placebo-controlled severe sepsis trials (PROWESS and secretory phospholipase A2 inhibitor trials). SETTING: Research laboratory. PATIENTS: The placebo arms of two randomized, double-blind sepsis trials were combined (n = 1036). These patients met criteria for severe sepsis and received supportive standard intensive care and fluid resuscitation. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores were calculated daily using the most aberrant physiologic or laboratory variables. Baseline and post-baseline SOFA scores categorized as improved, unchanged, or worsened were used in regression analyses correlating organ dysfunction changes with 28-day mortality. Improvement in cardiovascular (p = .0010), renal (p < .0001), or respiratory (p = .0469) function from baseline to day 1 was significantly related to survival. Odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) associated with improved vs. worsened respiratory, cardiovascular, or renal function before start of day 1 were 0.56 (0.35-0.91), 0.33 (0.18-0.59), and 0.30 (0.17-0.52), respectively. Continued improvement in cardiovascular function before start of day 2 and start of day 3 was associated with further improvement in survival (p <. 0001), with odds ratios of 0.15 (0.06-0.39) and 0.11 (0.04-0.31) for patients who improved compared with those who worsened. No other organ system was retained in the model, and improvement beyond day 1 in any other organ function did not add to the model's predictive power. CONCLUSIONS: These analyses suggest that outcomes for patients with severe sepsis are closely related to early (baseline to day 1 here) improvement, or lack thereof, in organ function. Also, clinical improvement on subsequent days may have little additional impact on the likelihood of survival.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Severe protein C deficiency predicts early death in severe sepsis.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the relationship between measures of baseline disease severity and survival time in patients with severe sepsis. DATA SOURCE: A retrospective evaluation of the placebo group from a large placebo-controlled phase III clinical trial (PROWESS) comprising a total of 840 patients with severe sepsis from 164 medical centers. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data collected included baseline demographics and disease severity measurements, baseline protein C and interleukin-6 levels, 28-day and in-hospital survival rates, and cause of death to 28 days. The survival curve for the placebo patients can be divided into three segments during which the rate of death seemed to be different: the rapid alpha phase (day 0 to day 5), the beta phase (day 6 through day 15), and the gamma phase (day 16 to day 28). The risk of death during each phase was statistically significantly different. More patients died of refractory shock during the alpha phase than in the beta and gamma phases, whereas more patients died of respiratory failure during the beta and gamma phases than during the alpha phase. Multiple organ failure was a frequent cause of death during all phases. Protein C levels at the start of each time interval were highly predictive of outcome within that phase, with continued protein C deficiency being associated with mortality. Patients who died during either the alpha or beta phases had higher interleukin-6 levels at baseline than those who died later or who eventually survived. CONCLUSIONS: The rate and cause of death for patients with severe sepsis differs during the 28-day postdiagnosis period. Severe protein C deficiency (<40% of the level of protein C in pooled normal human plasma) and high interleukin-6 levels were associated with early death that resulted predominantly from refractory shock and multiple organ dysfunction.

Cause of Death↗
PubMed2004

Sources of variability on the estimate of treatment effect in the PROWESS trial: implications for the design and conduct of future studies in severe sepsis.

OBJECTIVE: To elucidate sources of variability in the estimate of treatment effects in a successful phase 3 trial in severe sepsis and to assess their implications on the design of future clinical trials. DESIGN: Retrospective evaluation of prospectively defined subgroups from a large phase 3, placebo-controlled clinical trial (PROWESS). SETTING: The study involved 164 medical centers. PATIENTS: Patients were 1,690 patients with severe sepsis. INTERVENTIONS: Drotrecogin alfa (activated) (Xigris) 24 microg/kg/hr for 96 hrs, or placebo. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: All prospectively defined subgroups were examined to identify treatment effects that potentially differed across subgroup strata (assessed by Breslow-Day p < .10). Potential interactions were identified for subgroups defined by a) presence vs. absence of a significant protocol violation (p = .07); b) original vs. amended protocol (p = .08); and c) Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II quartile at baseline (p = .09). No treatment benefit was observed in patients having a protocol violation, regardless of type. There appeared to be less treatment effect in patients enrolled under the original vs. amended protocol. The risk ratio exceeded 1.0 for patients in the lowest APACHE II score quartile. A highly significant correlation was observed between the sequence of enrollment at a site, the frequency of protocol violations, and the observed treatment effect. As enrollment increased, frequency of protocol violations decreased (p < .0001) and the treatment effect improved. The correlation between the sequence of enrollment and improvement in treatment effect remained even after removal of patients with protocol violations. Removal of the first block of patients at each site from the analysis reduced the extent of interaction by protocol version and APACHE II score. CONCLUSIONS: A learning curve appeared to be present within the PROWESS trial such that the ability to demonstrate efficacy improved with increasing site experience. This potential learning curve may have implications for design of future trials. Investigational sites may need to require a minimum level of protocol-specific experience to appropriately implement a given trial. This experience should be an important consideration in designing trials and analysis plans. Diligence by coordinating centers, site investigators, study coordinators, and sponsors is necessary to ensure that the protocol is executed as designed such that a treatment benefit, if present, will be evident.

APACHE↗
PubMed2004

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in children with severe sepsis.

OBJECTIVE: In a phase 3 trial, recombinant human activated protein C (drotrecogin alfa [activated]) significantly reduced mortality in adult patients with severe sepsis. We have now performed a preliminary analysis of the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in pediatric patients with severe sepsis. DESIGN AND SETTING: Open-label, nonrandomized, sequential, 2-part study conducted in 11 medical centers in the United States and United Kingdom. PATIENTS: Eighty-three pediatric patients with severe sepsis aged term newborn (>or=38 weeks' gestation) to <18 years old. INTERVENTION: In part 1, drotrecogin alfa (activated) was administered as escalating doses of 6, 12, 24, and 36 micro g/kg per hour for 6 hours for each patient (n = 21). In part 2, drotrecogin alfa (activated) was infused at a rate of 24 micro g/kg per hour for 96 hours in 62 patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Plasma clearance, plasma concentration, D-dimer, protein C, and antithrombin levels were measured, and adverse events were monitored. RESULTS: The trial enrolled 83 pediatric patients with severe sepsis, aged term newborn (>or=38 weeks' gestation) to <18 years. In part 1, a dose of 24 micro g/kg per hour produced steady-state plasma concentrations of activated protein C similar to those attained in equivalently dosed adult severe sepsis patients. For all pediatric patients dosed at 24 micro g/kg per hour, the median weight-normalized clearance was 0.45 L/hour/kg and the median steady-state concentration was 51.3 ng/mL. The mean plasma half-life was 30 minutes. Weight-normalized clearance in pediatric and adult patients did not differ significantly with age or weight. D-dimer levels decreased 26% from baseline to end of infusion. Baseline levels of protein C and antithrombin increased 79% and 24%, respectively, over the 96-hour treatment period in part 2. The incidence of serious bleeding during infusion and during the entire study period was 2.4% and 4.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric patients with severe sepsis manifest sepsis-induced coagulopathy including protein C deficiency comparable to that seen in adults with severe sepsis. The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamic effects, and safety profile of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in pediatric patients are similar to those previously published for adult patients. A large, phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled study is ongoing to confirm these results and formally assess the safety and efficacy of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in children.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Safety assessment of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in the treatment of adult patients with severe sepsis.

INTRODUCTION: Drotrecogin alfa (activated; recombinant activated protein C) was shown to reduce 28-day all-cause mortality in patients with severe sepsis and to have an acceptable safety profile in 1690 patients studied in the F1K-MC-EVAD (PROWESS) trial. We analyzed all available data on the safety of treatment with drotrecogin alfa (activated) in 2786 adult patients with severe sepsis enrolled in all phase 2 and 3 clinical trials, and in an estimated 3991 patients receiving the drug in commercial use. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Mortality and safety analyses were performed on all available data from adult severe sepsis patients enrolled in seven clinical trials as of 12 April 2002. Trial-specific safety data and spontaneously reported serious adverse events from commercial use were extracted from a pharmacovigilance database. RESULTS: The 28-day mortality rate for all adult patients who received active treatment in all clinical trials was 25.3% (704/2786). Serious bleeding events during the infusion period and 28-day study period occurred in 2.8% (79/2786) and 5.3% (148/2786) of patients, respectively. Of bleeding events during the infusion period, 43% (34/79) were procedure-related. Fatal serious bleeding events during the infusion period occurred in 0.4% (12/2786) of cases. Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) events during the infusion period and 28-day study period occurred in 0.6% (16/2786) and 1.1% (32/2786) of patients, respectively. Ten out of the 16 ICH events occurring during the study drug infusion period were associated with severe thrombocytopenia (<or= 30000/mm3) and/or meningitis. Serious bleeding and ICH events spontaneously reported from commercial use (n = 3991) occurred in 0.9% and 0.2% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Drotrecogin alfa (activated) significantly reduces mortality in severe sepsis. The efficacy and safety profiles of drotrecogin alfa (activated) have remained consistent over the conduct of multiple clinical trials. The most important serious adverse event associated with drotrecogin alfa (activated) treatment is bleeding. Additional clinical experience indicates that invasive procedures are associated with a substantial percentage of serious bleeding events, particularly those occurring at the start of infusion of the drug. Severe thrombocytopenia (for all serious bleeding events, including ICH) and meningitis (for ICH only) may be risk factors for serious bleeding. However, patients with severe thrombocytopenia and/or meningitis may be at greater risk for bleeding or ICH in the absence of drug therapy.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Drotrecogin alfa (activated) administration across clinically important subgroups of patients with severe sepsis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of drotrecogin alfa (activated) therapy, a recombinant human activated protein C, across clinically relevant subpopulations in a randomized, phase 3, placebo-controlled study of patients with severe sepsis (recombinant human activated protein C worldwide evaluation in severe sepsis [PROWESS]). DESIGN: Univariate and multivariable analysis of prospectively defined subgroups from the PROWESS study. SETTING: A total of 164 medical centers in 11 countries. PATIENTS: A total of 1,690 patients with severe sepsis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We report observed 28-day mortality rates for drotrecogin alfa (activated) and placebo patients for subgroups prospectively defined by demographic data, surgical status, type and site of infection, and clinical and biochemical measures of disease severity. We performed subgroup analyses to explore the consistency of the mortality benefit observed in the overall population and performed tests for both quantitative and qualitative interactions. To examine the magnitude of the treatment benefit with drotrecogin alfa (activated) across the underlying predicted risk of mortality spectrum, we used stepwise logistic regression on PROWESS placebo patients to generate a predicted risk of mortality model that simultaneously included many clinical and biochemical markers of mortality risk. Because drotrecogin alfa (activated) has anticoagulant properties, we also present analyses of bleeding and thrombotic events. Actual mortality rates were lower with drotrecogin alfa (activated) compared with placebo for nearly all prospectively defined subgroups. Both univariate and multivariable regression analyses showed a consistent relative risk reduction in 28-day mortality rates for drotrecogin alfa (activated). Larger absolute risk reductions were found with drotrecogin alfa (activated) in patients with a higher baseline predicted risk of mortality, and actual mortality rates were lower with drotrecogin alfa (activated) in all subgroups defined by disease severity measures where a > or = 20% placebo mortality was observed. Although discriminatory power was limited by few observed events, the increased absolute risk of experiencing a serious bleeding event with treatment did not seem to vary according to the baseline predicted risk of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of drotrecogin alfa (activated) to patients with severe sepsis was associated with a significant survival benefit that tended to increase with higher baseline likelihood of death. Current data suggest that the increased risk of bleeding does not vary according to likelihood of death.

APACHE↗
PubMed2002

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in patients with severe sepsis.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to characterize the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drotrecogin alfa (activated) (recombinant human activated protein C) in patients with severe sepsis. METHODS: Patients (N = 1690) in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial received a 96-hour infusion of placebo (n = 840) or drotrecogin alfa (activated) (n = 850), 24 microg x kg(-1) x h(-1). Plasma samples from 680 patients were collected for pharmacokinetic assessment. Pharmacodynamic effects on activated partial thromboplastin time, D-dimer, protein C, and interleukin 6 were analyzed by drotrecogin alfa (activated) steady-state plasma concentration (C(ss)) quartile. RESULTS: Transient endogenous activated protein C concentrations above 10 ng/mL were observed in 11 placebo-treated patients (3.3%). In drotrecogin alfa (activated)-treated patients, the median C(ss) was 44.9 ng/mL and the median plasma clearance (CL(p)) was 40.1 L/h. C(ss) was reached within 2 hours after the infusion was started. Plasma concentrations were below the assay quantitation limit of 10 ng/mL within 2 hours after the infusion was stopped in 92% of patients. CL(p) increased with increasing body weight, so infusion rates should be based on predose body weight. Mean CL(p) associated with age, sex, or baseline hepatic or renal function differed by less than 30% from the mean CL(p) in all patients and resided within the interquartile range of CL(p) in all patients. Dose adjustment is not required on the basis of these factors alone or in combination. No correlation was detected between C(ss) quartile and bleeding risk or the magnitudes of effect on biomarkers of coagulopathy (D-dimers and protein C) and inflammation (interleukin 6). CONCLUSIONS: Plasma concentrations of drotrecogin alfa (activated) attain steady state rapidly after the infusion is started and decline rapidly after the infusion is stopped. The infusion rate should be based on predose body weight and not on any other demographic or baseline clinical covariate.

Adult↗