PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

William M McClellan

Publications and source records attributed to William M McClellan.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

Predictors of improved HbA1c testing by primary care physicians.

Measurement of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) among patients with diabetes mellitus contributes to attaining control of blood glucose, which in turn is associated with fewer complications. Here, we seek to identify physician and county level characteristics that predict increased HbA1c testing among Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes who did not have testing in the baseline year. Physicians in counties with more people on Medicaid, or with fewer physicians per capita tended to have less improvement in HbA1c testing among Medicare beneficiaries over the three year study period.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

HIV intervention research for men who have sex with men: a 7-year update.

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to locate, characterize, and summarize effects of behavioral HIV prevention interventions for men who have sex with men (MSM). We found 54 interventions with 16,224 participants that were evaluated in 40 randomized trials and controlled observational studies with independent comparison groups. Formats included 26 small group interventions, 18 individual-level interventions, and 10 community-level interventions. Fifteen interventions focused on HIV-positive individuals including MSM. The 38 interventions that were compared with minimal or no HIV prevention interventions, reduced unprotected sex by 27% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 15-37%). The other 16 interventions reduced unprotected sex by 17% beyond changes observed in standard or other HIV prevention interventions (CI = 5-27%). Behavioral interventions reduce self-reported unprotected sex among MSM.

HIV Infections↗
PubMed2005

Diabetes management by residents in training in a municipal hospital primary care site (IPCAAD 2).

PURPOSE: Since diabetes is largely a primary care problem but we know little about management by residents in training--the primary care practitioners of the future--we examined surrogate outcomes reflective of their performance. METHODS: A seven-week observational study was conducted in a typical training site- a municipal hospital internal medicine resident "continuity" (primary care) clinic in a large, academic, university-affiliated training program. We evaluated control of glucose, blood pressure, and lipids; screening for proteinuria; and use of aspirin relative to national standards. RESULTS: Five hundred fifty-six (556) patients were 72% female and 97% African-American, with mean age 63 years, duration of diabetes 12 years, and BMI 34 kg/m2. Patients were managed largely with diet alone (22%) or oral agents alone (40%); 7% used oral agents and insulin in combination, and 30% insulin alone. Hemoglobin A1c (mean 8.2%) was above goal (<7.0%) in 61% of patients. Low density lipoprotein cholesterol (mean 128 mg/dL) was above goal (<100) in 76% of patients, but high density lipoprotein (mean 53 mg/dL) was at goal in 46%, and triglycerides (mean 138 mg/dL) were at goal in 85%. Diastolic pressure (mean 75 mm Hg) was at goal (<85) in 77% of patients, but systolic pressure (mean 143) was at goal (<130) in only 25% of patients. An average of only 53% of the patients had urine protein screening per 12 months, and use of aspirin was documented for only 39% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with type 2 diabetes in a typical internal medicine resident primary care clinic frequently do not achieve national standard of care goals. Since skills and attitudes developed in residency are likely to carry over into later practice, local diabetes educators may need to work with medical faculty to develop new interventions to improve postgraduate medical education in diabetes management.

Academic Medical Centers↗
PubMed2004

Outcomes and the quality of care for patients hospitalized with heart failure.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether process quality indicators derived from evidence-based guidelines for heart failure patients were associated with outcome indicators (hospital mortality and readmissions). DESIGN: A retrospective cohort-study among patients discharged with a primary or secondary International Classification of Disease, 10th revision (ICD-10) heart failure code from 1 January to 31 December 1999. SETTING: The study was implemented in three Swiss academic medical centers. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: Records of 1634 patients hospitalized with heart failure were abstracted. Demographic characteristics, risk factors, symptoms and findings at admission, and discharge characteristics were recorded. Main outcome measure. Process quality indicators were derived from evidence-based guidelines, related to appropriate management and treatment of heart failure patients. Hospital mortality was measured in a chart abstraction process. Thirty-day readmissions were calculated using administrative data from hospitals. RESULTS: Among the three hospitals, 1153 patients with heart failure were eligible for this study. Mean age was 75.3 years (standard deviation 12.7) and 45.7% of patients were female. Ventricular function (VF) was determined in 69% of patients. The adjusted odds-ratios (OR) for the VF not determined were 1.74 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-2.84] for hospital mortality and 0.75 (95% CI 0.47-1.18) for 30-day readmissions. Among patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and no contraindication to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), 54% were prescribed target-dose ACEI or angiotensin receptor blockers at discharge, 32% received ACEI at less then target dose, and 14% received no ACEI at discharge. Adjusted ORs (95% CI) for readmissions were 0.89 (0.28-2.84) for no ACEI and 1.17 (0.56-2.43) for less than target ACEI compared with target dose. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with heart failure, the determination of VF was associated with hospital mortality. However, process indicators derived from evidence-based guidelines were not related to early readmissions in three Swiss university hospitals.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

A randomized evaluation of two health care quality improvement program (HCQIP) interventions to improve the adequacy of hemodialysis care of ESRD patients: feedback alone versus intensive intervention.

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) Networks are quality improvement organizations that collect, analyze, and report information to clinicians and allied health providers about discrepancies between observed patterns of care of ESRD patients and what has been recommended by clinical practice guidelines. The Networks facilitate response to this information by assisting ESRD treatment centers to develop quality improvement programs to redress inadequate care. The authors evaluated this process of quality improvement by selecting 42 treatment centers in a single ESRD Network with the lowest facility-specific mean urea reduction ratio (URR). The treatment centers were randomly assigned to two intervention strategies: (1) feedback alone; (2) an intensive intervention that included feedback, workshops, distribution of educational materials and clinical practice guidelines, technical assistance with the development of quality improvement plans, and continued monitoring. The intensive intervention had greater improvement in the increased proportions of patients dialyzed with prescribed blood flow (P = 0.02) and documented review of prescription (P = 0.01). Furthermore, the mean center URR increased nearly 3% among intensive intervention centers (from 68.1 to 70.9) but only 0.09% among the feedback centers (68.2 to 69.1) (P = 0.002). Similarly, time on dialysis increased 7.5 min on average among patients in intervention centers but decreased 2 min for patients in comparison centers (P = 0.03). These results demonstrate that Network feedback, coupled with the intensive intervention, resulted in improvement in care that would otherwise not have occurred.

Feedback↗
PubMed2004

Medicare patients with cardiovascular disease have a high prevalence of chronic kidney disease and a high rate of progression to end-stage renal disease.

The risk of progression to ESRD among individuals with cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease (CKD) is not well defined. The purpose of this study was to describe the risk of ESRD among patients with cardiovascular disease. Charts were abstracted for randomly selected hospitalized Medicare beneficiaries with a diagnosis of either congestive heart failure (CHF) or acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The prevalence of CKD, based on the estimated modified diet in renal disease GFR of <60 ml/min per m2, was 60.4% of CHF patients and 51.7% of AMI patients. When compared with patients without CKD, the 30-d readmission rate was higher for CHF patients with CKD (odds ratio [OR], 1.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18 to 2.44) and for AMI patients with CKD (OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.17 to 2.70). CHF patients (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.15 to 2.30) and AMI patients (OR, 3.10; 95% CI, 1.98 to 4.84) with CKD were more likely to die during the year after discharge from the hospital. ESRD after discharge occurred in nine of 517 patients with AMI and 24 of 640 patients with CHF. CKD increased the risk of ESRD among CHF patients (OR, 34.5; 95% CI, 4.23 to 279.43) and AMI patients (0 and 3% for those without and with CKD, respectively). At discharge, 18% of AMI patients and 21% of CHF patients with CKD were discharged with a diagnosis of renal disease. CKD is highly prevalent among patients with cardiovascular disease and is associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes, including progression to ESRD. This study suggests that opportunities may exist to improve the detection of CKD in these patients who are hospitalized with cardiovascular disease.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2004

Disparity in outcomes for adult Native American hemodialysis patients? Findings from the ESRD Clinical Performance Measures Project, 1996 to 1999.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of information regarding the quality of care for Native American hemodialysis patients. Outcomes, including 1-year hospitalization and mortality, for adult Native American in-center hemodialysis patients selected for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) end-stage renal disease (ESRD) Clinical Performance Measures (CPM) Project were compared to those for white and black patients to determine if disparity in care existed for this group. METHODS: Clinical data were abstracted from medical records for the last quarters of 1995 to 1998 and linked to United States Renal Data System (USRDS) data files for data on comorbidities and 1-year hospitalization and mortality. Associations of race were tested by bivariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard modeling. RESULTS: Two percent (467 of 27876) of patients were Native American, 37% black, and 51% white. Native American, compared to black and white patients, were more likely to have diabetes mellitus as the cause of ESRD (72%, 37%, and 38%, respectively, P < 0.01). In multivariate analyses, Native American patients were more likely to achieve a mean urea reduction ratio (URR) > or = 65% compared to whites (referent) [hazards ratio (HR) (95% CI) 1.7 (1.3, 2.2)] and be dialyzed with an arteriovenous fistula [HR (95% CI) 1.7 (1.2, 2.5)]. They were as likely as Whites to achieve a mean hematocrit > or =33% and a mean serum albumin > or =4.0/3.7 g/dL. In multivariate analyses, Native Americans were no more likely to be hospitalized or die during the follow-up period than whites. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that adult Native American hemodialysis patients experience equivalent or better dialytic care and are no more likely to experience 1-year hospitalization or mortality compared to whites.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Diabetes is the strongest risk factor for lower-extremity amputation in new hemodialysis patients.

OBJECTIVE: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, especially those with diabetes, have an increased risk of nontraumatic lower-extremity amputation (LEA). The present study aims to examine the association of demographic and clinical variables with the risk of hospitalization for LEA among incident hemodialysis patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The study population consisted of incident hemodialysis patients from the study years 1996-1999 of the ESRD Core Indicator/Clinical Performance Measures (CPM) Project. Cox proportional hazard modeling was used to identify factors associated with LEA. RESULTS: Four percent (116 of 3,272) of noncensored incident patients had an LEA during the 12-month follow-up period. Factors associated with LEA included diabetes as the cause of ESRD or preexisting comorbidity (hazard ratio 6.4, 95% CI 3.4-12.0), cardiovascular comorbidity (1.8, 1.2-2.8), hemodialysis inadequacy (urea reduction ratio [URR] <58.5% (1.9, 1.1-3.3), and lower serum albumin level (1.6, 1.1-2.3). Among patients with diabetes, hemodialysis inadequacy and cardiovascular comorbidity were risk factors for LEA (2.6, 1.4-4.8, and 1.7, 1.1-2.6, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that diabetes is a potent risk factor for LEA in new hemodialysis patients. In ESRD patients with diabetes, a multipronged approach may reduce the rate of LEA. Potentially beneficial strategies include adherence to hemodialysis adequacy guidelines, aggressive treatment of cardiovascular comorbidities, and the utilization of LEA prevention strategies recommended for the general population of patients with diabetes.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Chronic kidney disease: issues and establishing programs and clinics for improved patient outcomes.

The spectrum of chronic kidney disease (CKD) extends from the point at which there is slight kidney damage, but normal function, to the point at which patients require either a renal transplant or renal replacement therapy to survive. Epidemiological studies suggest there are approximately 20,000,000 patients with various stages of CKD. These patients have many comorbidities, including cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes, anemia, nutritional and metabolic derangements, and fluid overload. Unfortunately, evidence shows that current CKD care in the United States is suboptimal, and late referral to a nephrologist is often the rule and not the exception. Roles of primary care physicians (PCPs) and nephrologists in the care of patients with CKD remain undefined. Several studies have suggested that care provided by multidisciplinary nephrology teams can improve patient outcomes. Currently, there are published evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for anemia management, nutritional therapy, and vascular access placement, with other CKD guidelines under development. The intent of this review includes providing compelling evidence for earlier screening, identification, and management of patients with CKD; showing that current CKD care is suboptimal; encouraging the development of multidisciplinary teams that provide collaborative care to patients with CKD, suggesting roles for PCPs and nephrologists in the care of these patients; describing CKD initiatives from national organizations; and providing a comprehensive checklist that can guide the development of CKD clinics and programs.

Comorbidity↗
PubMed2003

Developing clinical performance measures based on the Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative Clinical Practice Guidelines: process, outcomes, and implications.

BACKGROUND: The National Kidney Foundation-Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative (NKF-DOQI) Clinical Practice Guidelines established a widely accepted set of recommendations for high-quality dialysis care. To enhance the End-Stage Renal Disease Core Indicators Project, an ongoing effort to assess and improve dialysis care in the United States, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) commissioned a project to develop clinical performance measures (CPMs) based on the NKF-DOQI guidelines. METHODS: The CMS contracted with Qualis Health, a private nonprofit organization serving as a Medicare Quality Improvement Organization, to facilitate a 9-month project to develop dialysis CPMs with the participation of a broad range of stakeholders from the renal community. Work groups were established to develop CPMs addressing 4 areas: hemodialysis adequacy, peritoneal dialysis adequacy, vascular access management, and anemia management. The NKF-DOQI guidelines were prioritized based on the strength of the evidence supporting the guidelines, the feasibility of developing performance measures, and the significance of the areas addressed to the quality of care delivered to dialysis patients. Expert panels developed data specifications, sampling approaches, data-collection tools, and analytic strategies. RESULTS: Sixteen CPMs were developed based on 22 of 114 NKF-DOQI guidelines. After establishing reliability through field-testing of data-collection instruments, the CPMs were applied to a sample of 8,838 randomly selected hemodialysis patients and 1,650 randomly selected adult peritoneal dialysis patients in summer 1999. CONCLUSION: The development of CPMs based on the NKF-DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for dialysis care was accomplished in a timely and effective manner by engaging a broad range of stakeholders and technical experts. The CPMs are important tools to assess and improve the quality of dialysis care in the United States. Few comparable efforts exist in other fields of medicine.

Allied Health Occupations↗
PubMed2003

Improved diabetes care by primary care physicians: results of a group-randomized evaluation of the Medicare Health Care Quality Improvement Program (HCQIP).

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1C) measurements in patients with diabetes mellitus contribute to glycemic control, and, therefore to lower diabetic complication rates. Determine if an intervention that includes claims-based feedback about patterns of HbA1C measurement results in more frequent monitoring of HbA1C in diabetic Medicare beneficiaries. SUBJECTS: Primary care physicians in a single Southern state treating Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes mellitus. METHODS: A group-randomized evaluation of an intervention that included claims-based feedback about patterns of HbA1C measurement, educational materials, and practice aids. RESULTS: Rates for each quality indicator increased from 1996 to 1998 for both the intervention and comparison groups, although increases were larger for intervention counties. HbA1C testing rates increased in intervention counties 16.8% compared to 13.0% in the comparison counties, an absolute difference of 4.0% (95% CI, 0.7 to 7.3). Differences for other indicators were small, although positive and favoring the intervention, and lacked statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Physician interventions that included practice-level feedback about monitoring of glycemic control successfully led to improved care of diabetic Medicare beneficiaries.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Differences in intermediate outcomes for Asian and non-Asian adult hemodialysis patients in the United States.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of information regarding the clinical experience of Asian hemodialysis patients. This paper describes intermediate outcomes for adult Asian hemodialysis patients compared to Caucasians and African Americans. METHODS: Dialysis facility staff abstracted clinical information on a national random sample of adult hemodialysis patients from October through December 2000. Associations of race with intermediate outcomes were tested by bivariate analyses and multivariable logistic regression modeling. RESULTS: A total of 429 patients were identified as Asian, 4403 as Caucasians, and 3103 as African Americans. Asian and Caucasian patients were older than African Americans [mean 63.2 (+/-15.6), 63.9 (+/-15.2), and 57.7 (+/-14.7) years, P < 0.001], and had fewer years on dialysis [mean 3.5 (+/-3.8), 3.1 (+/-3.8), and 4.1 (+/-4.1) years, P < 0.001]. Ninety three percent of Asians, 87% of Caucasians, and 84% of African Americans had a mean Kt/V > or =1.2 (P < 0.001). In addition, 36% of Asians, 32% of Caucasians, and 26% of African Americans had an arteriovenous (AV) fistula as their vascular access (P < 0.001). Hemoglobin profiles were only slightly different among the three racial groups. More Asians and African Americans had a mean serum albumin > or =4.0/3.7 g/dL compared to Caucasians (33% and 31% compared to 27%, respectively, P < 0.001). In the final multivariable logistic regression model, Asians were twice as likely to have a mean Kt/V > or =1.2 compared to Caucasians (the referent group) [odds ratio (OR) (95% CI) 2.10 (1.33, 3.32), P < 0.01]. They experienced similar intermediate outcomes for vascular access, anemia management, and serum albumin compared to the majority racial group. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that adult hemodialysis Asian patients experience similar or better intermediate outcomes compared to the majority racial group. Further study is needed to determine if these results are associated with improved survival and less morbidity in this minority group.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Renal insufficiency and anemia are independent risk factors for death among patients with acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) increases risk of death among patients with coronary artery disease. Mortality risks associated with CKD among patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) are not well defined. Anemia is associated with increased mortality in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients and may also increase risk among patients with CVD. METHODS: A random sample of patients admitted to the hospital in a single southern state with a principal diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (ICD-9 codes 410.xx) were followed up after hospital discharge. RESULTS: CKD was found in 60% of the cohort. Hematocrit of >or=40 was found in 46% of the patients; 26.0% had a hematocrit between 36% and 39%, 21.8% between 30% and 35%, and 5.9% had a hematocrit of less than 30%. The 1-year death rates among individuals with and without CKD were 31.7% and 10.4% respectively [odds ratio (OR) = 4.00 (2.34, 6.91)]. The mortality at one year was 18.6% for individuals with a hematocrit greater than or equal to 40%; 23.5% (OR = 1.35; 95% CI = 0.78, 2.32) for hematocrit 36% to 39%; 30.7% (OR = 1.94; 95% CI = 1.12, 3.34) for hematocrit between 30% and 35%; and 35.8% (OR = 3.16; 95% CI = 1.35, 7.40) for those with a hematocrit less than 30% (chi2 for trend was 12.2, P = 0.007). Both hematocrit and serum creatinine were independently associated with increased risk of death during follow-up after controlling for other patient risk factors. CONCLUSION: CKD and decreasing hematocrit were frequent among older patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction and are independent predictors of subsequent risk of death.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Readmissions and the quality of care in patients hospitalized with heart failure.

OBJECTIVES: Clinical practice guidelines based on the results of randomized clinical trials recommend that patients with heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) be treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) at doses shown to reduce mortality and readmission. This study examined the relationship between ACEI use at discharge and readmission among patients with heart failure due to LVSD. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were abstracted from the medical records of 2943 randomly selected patients hospitalized for heart failure in 50 hospitals. The outcome of interest was the number of readmissions occurring up to 21 months after discharge. Six-hundred and eleven patients were eligible for analysis. Compared with patients discharged at a recommended ACEI dose, patients not prescribed an ACEI at discharge had an adjusted rate ratio of readmission (RR) of 1.74 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.22-2.48], while patients prescribed an ACEI at less than a recommended dose had an RR of 1.24 (95% CI 0.91-1.69) (P = 0.005 for the trend). CONCLUSION: Our results show that ACEI use at discharge in patients with LVSD is associated with decreased rate of readmission. These findings suggest that compliance with the ACEI prescribing recommendations listed in clinical practice guidelines for patients with heart failure due to LVSD confers benefit.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Survival advantage for adult Hispanic hemodialysis patients? Findings from the end-stage renal disease clinical performance measures project.

One-year follow-up mortality in Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients and its association with intermediate outcomes of dialytic care were examined utilizing the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services' (CMS) ESRD Clinical Performance Measures (CPM) Project and administrative data. Demographic and clinical information was collected on a national random sample of adult in-center hemodialysis (HD) patients for the period of October through December, 1998. Patients were categorized as Hispanic, non-Hispanic White, or non-Hispanic Black. Of 8336 patients 994 (12%) were identified as Hispanic, 3618 (43%) as non-Hispanic White, and 3111 (37%) as non-Hispanic Black. The adjusted 12-mo mortality risk (99% CI) for Hispanics was 0.76 (0.60 to 0.96; P < 0.01) and for non-Hispanic Blacks 0.66 (0.56 to 0.78, P < 0.001) compared with non-Hispanic Whites (referent). Similar 12-mo mortality risks were noted in the groups with diabetes mellitus or hypertension as the causes of ESRD and among patients > or = 65 yr. After controlling for demographic and geographic variables, Hispanics compared with the referent group, non-Hispanic Whites, were more likely to have a mean serum albumin > or = 4.0/3.7 g/dL (BCG/BCP) (1.5 [1.2 to 1.7]; P < 0.001) and as likely to have a mean Kt/V > or = 1.2, mean hemoglobin > or = 11 g/dL, and an arteriovenous fistula as their vascular access. These data suggest that adult Hispanic HD patients have a 12-mo survival intermediate to non-Hispanic Blacks and non-Hispanic Whites and experience equivalent or better intermediate outcomes of dialytic care compared with non-Hispanic Whites.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Screening for chronic kidney disease: unresolved issues.

End-stage renal disease is epidemic in the United States. As a measure to control this epidemic, it has been recommended that individuals who are at risk for CKD be tested for undetected kidney disease during routine health care encounters. There are generally accepted criteria against which screening recommendations for CKD control and prevention programs should be judged. If detection strategies are to be adopted for the screening of kidney disease, then CKD must represent a significant public health problem, be characterized by a clear natural history with a detectable asymptomatic period, outcomes should be improved by early treatment, and acceptable screening tests should be available. Health systems must provide adequate and appropriate follow-up medical care for individuals with newly detected CKD. Finally, the cost-effectiveness of screening needs to be demonstrated and the effectiveness of screening as a means of achieving reductions in CKD should be proven in randomized trials.

Chronic Disease↗
PubMed2003

Risk factors for progressive chronic kidney disease.

The occurrence of chronic kidney disease and subsequent rate of loss of renal function are highly variable among individuals with the same underlying cause of renal injury or degree of functional impairment. Individual variability of risk is typical of complex diseases and reflects the multifactorial nature of the biologic mechanisms that are involved in the underlying disease process. The utility of the risk factor concept in developing CKD prevention and control strategies includes identifying individuals at high risk for the occurrence and progression of CKD, defining at-risk populations, elucidating potential targets for intervention, and generating explanatory hypotheses for the variable risk of CKD noted in different populations. Future application of the risk factor concept in the prevention and control of CKD will entail developing multivariate prediction equations; using spatial and temporal, as well as personal, characteristics, to define at-risk populations; identifying biomarkers for complex risk factors like race; and translating this information into testable interventions. This should include active extension of our current understanding of health care, social, and economic risk factors at both the individual and the community level.

Adolescent↗