PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

William S Dalton

Publications and source records attributed to William S Dalton.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Tumor microenvironment and drug resistance in hematologic malignancies.

Increasing evidence supports the role of the tumor microenvironment in conferring drug resistance as a major cause of relapse and incurability of cancers. The tumor microenvironment consists of normal stromal cells, extracellular matrix, and soluble factors such as cytokines and growth factors. Tumor-tumor cell interaction, tumor-stromal cell interaction, as well as tumor-ECM interaction, all contribute to direct cell contact mediated drug resistance. In addition, soluble factors produced in the tumor microenvironment provide further signals for tumor cell growth and survival. Environment mediated-drug resistance (EM-DR) could be considered as the totality of cell adhesion mediated drug resistance (CAM-DR) and soluble factor mediated drug resistance (SM-DR) produced by the tumor-host interaction. This review focuses on the EM-DR model system and signaling pathways involved in cell survival of hematological malignancies.

Cell Survival↗
PubMed2006

ABCG2 expression, function, and promoter methylation in human multiple myeloma.

We investigated the role of the breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2) in drug resistance in multiple myeloma (MM). Human MM cell lines, and MM patient plasma cells isolated from bone marrow, were evaluated for ABCG2 mRNA expression by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and ABCG2 protein, by Western blot analysis, immunofluorescence microscopy, and flow cytometry. ABCG2 function was determined by measuring topotecan and doxorubicin efflux using flow cytometry, in the presence and absence of the specific ABCG2 inhibitor, tryprostatin A. The methylation of the ABCG2 promoter was determined using bisulfite sequencing. We found that ABCG2 expression in myeloma cell lines increased after exposure to topotecan and doxorubicin, and was greater in logphase cells when compared with quiescent cells. Myeloma patients treated with topotecan had an increase in ABCG2 mRNA and protein expression after treatment with topotecan, and at relapse. Expression of ABCG2 is regulated, at least in part, by promoter methylation both in cell lines and in patient plasma cells. Demethylation of the promoter increased ABCG2 mRNA and protein expression. These findings suggest that ABCG2 is expressed and functional in human myeloma cells, regulated by promoter methylation, affected by cell density, up-regulated in response to chemotherapy, and may contribute to intrinsic drug resistance.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily G, Mem↗
PubMed2006

A randomized phase 2 study of lenalidomide therapy for patients with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.

This multicenter, open-label, randomized phase 2 study evaluated 2 dose regimens of lenalidomide for relapsed, refractory myeloma. Seventy patients were randomized to receive either 30 mg once-daily or 15 mg twice-daily oral lenalidomide for 21 days of every 28-day cycle. Patients with progressive or stable disease after 2 cycles received dexamethasone. Analysis of the first 70 patients showed increased grade 3/4 myelo-suppression in patients receiving 15 mg twice daily (41% versus 13%, P = .03). An additional 32 patients received 30 mg once daily. Responses were evaluated according to European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) criteria. Overall response rate (complete, partial, or minor) to lenalidomide alone was 25% (24% for once-daily and 29% for twice-daily lenalidomide). Median overall survival in 30-mg once-daily and twice-daily groups was 28 and 27 months, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 7.7 months on once-daily versus 3.9 months on twice-daily lenalidomide (P = .2). Dexamethasone was added in 68 patients and 29% responded. Time to first occurrence of clinically significant grade 3/4 myelosuppression was shorter in the twice-daily group (1.8 vs 5.5 months, P = .05). Significant peripheral neuropathy and deep vein thrombosis each occurred in only 3%. Lenalidomide is active and well tolerated in relapsed, refractory myeloma, with the 30-mg once-daily regimen providing the basis for future studies as monotherapy and with dexamethasone.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Cancer biomarkers--an invitation to the table.

The allure of the emerging genomic technologies in cancer is their ability to generate new biomarkers that predict how individual cancer patients will respond to various treatments. However, productive implementation of cancer biomarkers into patient care will require fundamental changes in how we consider approvals for cancer indications and how we track patient responses. Here we briefly describe ongoing efforts to identify and to validate cancer biomarkers, discuss the technological hurdles that lie ahead, and then focus on the more pressing political and cultural issues that, if left unheeded, could derail many of the anticipated benefits of biomarker research.

Academies and Institutes↗
PubMed2006

Phase III study of PSC-833 (valspodar) in combination with vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (valspodar/VAD) versus VAD alone in patients with recurring or refractory multiple myeloma (E1A95): a trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

BACKGROUND: Preliminary studies have shown valspodar (PSC-833: Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ) to be a potent inhibitor of multidrug resistance (MDR), one cause of resistance to chemotherapy. An international randomized control study (Phase III) evaluated the use of vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (VAD) with (n = 46) and without (n = 48) valspodar in the treatment of patients with recurring or refractory multiple myeloma. METHODS: Patients with documented recurrence or refractory myeloma were stratified based on prior treatment exposure and creatinine and randomized. Because of interaction of valspodar with vincristine and doxorubicin, the doses of these drugs were reduced compared with the VAD-alone arm, and the doxorubicin was further reduced in the last 15 patients when given with valspodar based on pharmacokinetic and toxicity studies. RESULTS: There were no complete or near-complete responses. There were 29% partial responses (PRs) in the VAD-alone arm and 44% with valspodar (P = 0.2). Median progression-free survival was 7 months with VAD alone and 4.9 months with valspodar (P = 0.50). Subjective response was 19% with VAD alone and 17% with valspodar (P = 1.0). Median survival with VAD alone was 18.5 months and 15.3 with the addition of valspodar (P = 0.055). Toxicity of Grade 3 or greater was higher (P < 0.0001) in the valspodar arm (89%) compared with the VAD-alone arm (58%). The reduction of doxorubicin dose reduced toxicity but not significantly (P = 0.11). CONCLUSION: The addition of the MDR-modulating agent valspodar to VAD did not improve treatment outcome. Toxicity was increased in the valspodar-treated group compared with VAD alone.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2006

Cell adhesion to fibronectin (CAM-DR) influences acquired mitoxantrone resistance in U937 cells.

Cell adhesion to fibronectin is known to confer a temporally related cell adhesion-mediated drug resistance (CAM-DR). However, it is unknown whether cell adhesion during drug selection influences the more permanent form of acquired drug resistance. To examine this question, we compared the acquisition of mitoxantrone resistance in U937 cells adhered to fibronectin versus cells selected in a traditional suspension culture. Our data show that acquired drug resistance levels of resistance to mitoxantrone are 2- to 3-fold greater for cells adhered to fibronectin compared with cells in suspension culture. We also compared mechanism(s) of resistance associated with drug selection in suspension versus fibronectin-adherent cultures. Drug resistance in both suspension and fibronectin-adhered cultures correlated with reduced drug-induced DNA damage and diminished topoisomerase II levels and activity; however, mechanisms regulating topoisomerase II levels differed depending on culture conditions. In suspension cultures, a reduction in topoisomerase IIbeta levels was detected at both RNA and protein levels. Furthermore, the decreased expression of topoisomerase IIbeta mRNA levels correlated with decreased expression of NF-YA. In contrast, in spite of no changes in NF-YA or topoisomerase IIbeta RNA expression, topoisomerase IIbeta protein levels were decreased in fibronectin-adherent, drug-resistant cells. In addition, topoisomerase IIalpha protein levels (but not RNA levels) were reduced in drug resistance cells selected on fibronectin; however, no change in topoisomerase IIalpha was observed in cells selected with mitoxantrone in suspension culture. Taken together, our results suggest that the development of drug resistance models must consider interactions with the microenvironment to identify clinically relevant targets and mechanisms associated with acquired drug resistance.

Cell Adhesion↗
PubMed2006

Tipifarnib and bortezomib are synergistic and overcome cell adhesion-mediated drug resistance in multiple myeloma and acute myeloid leukemia.

It has been established in preclinical models of multiple myeloma and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) that the bone marrow microenvironment provides protection from chemotherapy- and death receptor-mediated apoptosis. This form of resistance, termed de novo drug resistance, occurs independent of chronic exposure to cancer-related therapies and likely promotes the development of multidrug resistance. Consequently, it is of major interest to identify compounds or drug combinations that can overcome environment-mediated resistance. In this study, we investigated the activity of tipifarnib (Zarnestra, formerly R115777) combined with bortezomib (Velcade, formerly PS-341) in microenvironment models of multiple myeloma and AML. The combination proved to be synergistic in multiple myeloma and AML cell lines treated in suspension culture. Even in tumor cells relatively resistant to tipifarnib, combined activity was maintained. Tipifarnib and bortezomib were also effective when multiple myeloma and AML cells were adhered to fibronectin, providing evidence that the combination overcomes cell adhesion-mediated drug resistance (CAM-DR). Of importance, activation of the endoplasmic reticulum stress response was enhanced and correlated with apoptosis and reversal of CAM-DR. Multiple myeloma and AML cells cocultured with bone marrow stromal cells also remained sensitive, although stromal-adhered tumor cells were partially protected (relative to cells in suspension or fibronectin adhered). Evaluation of the combination using a transwell apparatus revealed that stromal cells produce a protective soluble factor. Investigations are under way to identify the cytokines and/or growth factors involved. In summary, our study provides the preclinical rationale for trials testing the tipifarnib and bortezomib combination in patients with multiple myeloma and AML.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2005

Characterization of a R115777-resistant human multiple myeloma cell line with cross-resistance to PS-341.

The farnesyl transferase inhibitor R115777 has been found to have clinical activity in diverse hematopoietic tumors. Clinical efficacy, however, does not correlate with Ras mutation status or inhibition of farnesyl transferase. To further elucidate the mechanisms by which R115777 induces apoptosis and to investigate drug resistance, we have identified and characterized a R115777-resistant human myeloma cell line. 8226/R5 cells were found to be at least 50 times more resistant to R115777 compared with the parent cell line 8226/S. K-Ras remained prenylated in both resistant and sensitive cells after R115777 treatment; however, HDJ-2 farnesylation was inhibited in both lines, implying that farnesyl transferase (the drug target) has not been mutated. Whereas many 8226 lines that acquire drug resistance have elevated expression of P-glycoprotein, we found that P-glycoprotein expression is not increased in the 8226/R5 line and intracellular accumulation of R115777 was not reduced. In fact, 8226/R5 cells were insensitive to a diverse group of antitumor agents including PS-341, and multidrug resistance did not correlate with the expression of heat shock proteins. Comparison of gene expression profiles between resistant and sensitive cells revealed expression changes in several genes involved in myeloma survival and drug resistance. Future experiments will attempt to identify genes that are directly linked to the resistant phenotype. Identification of molecules associated with R115777 and PS-341 resistance is clinically relevant because both compounds are being tested in solid tumors and hematopoietic malignancies.

Boronic Acids↗
PubMed2005

Bortezomib or high-dose dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma.

BACKGROUND: This study compared bortezomib with high-dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma who had received one to three previous therapies. METHODS: We randomly assigned 669 patients with relapsed myeloma to receive either an intravenous bolus of bortezomib (1.3 mg per square meter of body-surface area) on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 for eight three-week cycles, followed by treatment on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 for three five-week cycles, or high-dose dexamethasone (40 mg orally) on days 1 through 4, 9 through 12, and 17 through 20 for four five-week cycles, followed by treatment on days 1 through 4 for five four-week cycles. Patients who were assigned to receive dexamethasone were permitted to cross over to receive bortezomib in a companion study after disease progression. RESULTS: Patients treated with bortezomib had higher response rates, a longer time to progression (the primary end point), and a longer survival than patients treated with dexamethasone. The combined complete and partial response rates were 38 percent for bortezomib and 18 percent for dexamethasone (P<0.001), and the complete response rates were 6 percent and less than 1 percent, respectively (P<0.001). Median times to progression in the bortezomib and dexamethasone groups were 6.22 months (189 days) and 3.49 months (106 days), respectively (hazard ratio, 0.55; P<0.001). The one-year survival rate was 80 percent among patients taking bortezomib and 66 percent among patients taking dexamethasone (P=0.003), and the hazard ratio for overall survival with bortezomib was 0.57 (P=0.001). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were reported in 75 percent of patients treated with bortezomib and in 60 percent of those treated with dexamethasone. CONCLUSIONS: Bortezomib is superior to high-dose dexamethasone for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma who have had a relapse after one to three previous therapies.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Phase I study of a novel taxane BMS-188797 in adult patients with solid malignancies.

PURPOSE: Preclinical studies show that BMS-188797 has a broad spectrum of antitumor activity in in vitro cytotoxicity assays and tumor xenograft models. We did a phase I trial designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose and the pharmacokinetics of BMS-188797 when administered i.v. MATERIALS AND METHODS: BMS-188797 was administered i.v. over 60 minutes once every 21 days to 51 patients. The initial dose cohort of 3.75 mg/m(2) was set at approximately one third the lethal dose in dogs. Doses were subsequently escalated in cohorts according to a modified Fibonacci design. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients received a total of 160 cycles of therapy. The dose-limiting toxicity of febrile neutropenia occurred in two patients at the 200 mg/m(2) cohort. Moderate to severe sensory neuropathy occurred in 12 patients (24%). Four radiographic partial responses based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors occurred: two in subjects with breast cancer, one in a subject with non-small cell lung cancer, and one in a subject with renal cell carcinoma. The duration of the partial responses observed were 24.1 months (renal cell carcinoma), 5.7 and 4.3 months (breast cancer), and 4.5 months (non-small cell lung cancer). Pharmacokinetics appear linear at doses through 110 mg/m(2) but not at higher doses. CONCLUSION: The dose-limiting toxicity in this single-agent study of BMS-188797 was febrile neutropenia. The recommended phase II dose of BMS-188797 as a single agent is 175 mg/m(2) i.v. for 1 hour administered every 3 weeks.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

The FA/BRCA pathway is involved in melphalan-induced DNA interstrand cross-link repair and accounts for melphalan resistance in multiple myeloma cells.

Melphalan, a DNA cross-linker, is one of the most widely used and effective drugs in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). In this report, we demonstrate that enhanced interstrand cross-link (ICL) repair via the Fanconi anemia (FA)/BRCA pathway contributes to acquired drug resistance in melphalan-resistant myeloma cell lines, and disruption of this pathway reverses drug resistance. Using the alkaline comet assay (single-cell gel electrophoresis), we observed that melphalan-resistant cells have reduced ICL formation and enhanced ICL repair compared with melphalan-sensitive cells. Cell-cycle studies demonstrated that enhanced ICL repair released cells from melphalan-induced cell-cycle delay. Using siRNA to knock down FANCF in 8226/LR5 and U266/LR6 drug-resistant cells demonstrated a direct relationship between ICL repair capacity and drug sensitivity. Overexpression of FANCF in 8226/S and U266/S drug-sensitive cells partially reproduced the drug-resistant phenotype. These data show that enhanced DNA repair via the Fanconi anemia/BRCA pathway is involved in acquired melphalan resistance. Our findings provide for a new target to enhance response to DNA cross-linking agents in cancer treatment.

Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating↗
PubMed2004

The cytoplasmic trafficking of DNA topoisomerase IIalpha correlates with etoposide resistance in human myeloma cells.

In this study we have investigated the role of topoisomerase (topo) IIalpha trafficking in cellular drug resistance. To accomplish this, it was necessary to separate the influence of cell cycle, drug uptake, topo protein levels, and enzyme trafficking on drug sensitivity. Thus, we developed a cell model (called accelerated plateau) using human myeloma H929 cells that reproducibly translocates topo IIalpha to the cytoplasm. Compared to log-phase cells, the cytoplasmic redistribution of topo IIalpha in plateau-phase cells correlated with a 10-fold resistance to VP-16 and a 40-60% reduction in the number of drug-induced double-strand DNA breaks. In addition, 7-fold more VP-16 was necessary to achieve 50% topo IIalpha band depletion, suggesting that there are fewer drug-induced topo-DNA complexes formed in quiescent cells than in log-phase cells. The total cellular amount of topo IIalpha and topo IIbeta protein in log- and plateau-phase cells was similar as determined by Western blot analysis. There was a 25% reduction in S-phase cell number in plateau cells (determined by bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation), while there was no significant difference in the equilibrium concentrations of [(3)H]-VP-16 when log cells were compared with plateau cells. Furthermore, the nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio of topo IIalpha is increased 58-fold in accelerated-plateau H929 cells treated with leptomycin B (LMB) when compared to untreated cells. It appears that the nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling of topo IIalpha, which decreases the amount of nuclear target enzyme, is a major mechanism of drug resistance to topo II inhibitors in plateau-phase myeloma cells.

Antibiotics, Antineoplastic↗
PubMed2004

Farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib is well tolerated, induces stabilization of disease, and inhibits farnesylation and oncogenic/tumor survival pathways in patients with advanced multiple myeloma.

Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) with mutated RAS are less likely to respond to chemotherapy and have a shortened survival. Therefore, targeting RAS farnesylation may be a novel approach to treatment of MM. We evaluated the activity and tolerability of the farnesyltransferase (FTase) inhibitor tipifarnib (Zarnestra) in a phase 2 trial as well as its ability to inhibit protein farnesylation and oncogenic pathways in patients with relapsed MM. Forty-three patients (median age, 62 years [range, 33-82 years]) with a median of 4 (range, 1-6) chemotherapy regimens entered the study. Tipifarnib, 300 mg orally twice daily, was administered for 3 weeks every 4 weeks. The most common toxicity was fatigue occurring in 66% of patients. Other toxicities included diarrhea, nausea, neuropathy, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. Sixty-four percent of the patients had disease stabilization. Treatment with tipifarnib suppressed FTase (but not geranylgeranyltransferase I) in bone marrow and peripheral blood mononuclear cells and also inhibited the farnesylation of HDJ-2 in unfractionated mononuclear cells and purified myeloma cells. Inhibition of farnesylation did not correlate with disease stabilization. Finally, tipifarnib decreased the levels of phosphorylated Akt and STAT3 (signal transducer and activator of transcription 3) but not Erk1/2 (extracellular signal regulated kinase 1 and 2) in bone marrow cells. We conclude that tipifarnib is tolerable, can induce disease stabilization, and can inhibit farnesylation and oncogenic/tumor survival pathways.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Targeting the bone marrow microenvironment in hematologic malignancies.

Unicellular drug-resistant models have been critical in elucidating intrinsic drug-resistant mechanisms; however, these models do not consider resistance mechanisms that may be elicited by extrinsic influences such as the tumor microenvironment. We propose that specific niches within the tumor microenvironment may provide a sanctuary for subpopulations of tumor cells to evade or circumvent drug-induced death and that this may represent a form of de novo drug resistance. We have found that elements of the bone marrow microenvironment, including extracellular matrices and normal stromal elements, protect malignant cells, including leukemia and myeloma cells, from drug-induced cell death. This extrinsic form of drug resistance may allow cells to survive initial drug treatment and thereby acquire a more complex, intrinsic drug-resistant phenotype. Focusing on this form of de novo drug resistance may ultimately prevent the emergence of acquired drug resistance and enhance drug therapy for hematologic malignancies.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2004

The proteasome.

The proteasome is an abundant multicatalytic enzyme complex present in the cytoplasm and nucleus of all eukaryotic cells. The primary function of the proteasome is to degrade proteins. While it was once thought to act primarily as a cellular "garbage disposal" that removed damaged or misfolded proteins from cells, the proteasome is now known to also remove various short-lived proteins that regulate the cell cycle, cell growth, and differentiation. By regulating the turnover of these proteins via timely degradation and recycling, the proteasome plays a critical role in the maintenance of cellular homeostasis. Substrates of the proteasome include cell-cycle regulators, signaling molecules, tumor suppressors, transcription factors, and antiapoptotic proteins; over 80% of all cellular proteins are recycled through the proteasome. This article discusses the structure and function of the proteasome, and its role in malignant cells and as a therapeutic target.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Discovery, Development, and clinical applications of bortezomib.

Proteasome inhibition is a novel, targeted approach in cancer therapy. Both natural and synthetic proteasome inhibitors selectively penetrate cancer cells, disrupting the orderly destruction of key regulatory proteins involved in tumorigenesis and metastasis. Disrupting the orderly destruction of regulatory proteins causes an imbalance of these proteins within the cell, which interferes with the systematic activation of signaling pathways required to maintain tumor cell growth and survival; therefore, cellular replication is inhibited and apoptosis ensues. Bortezomib (PS-341, Velcade), the first proteasome inhibitor evaluated in human clinical trials, has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for use in patients with refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma. Preclinical study results show that bortezomib suppresses tumor cell growth, induces apoptosis, overcomes resistance to standard chemotherapy agents and radiation therapy, and inhibits angiogenesis. Phase I study results established the antitumor activity of bortezomib, administered alone or in combination with standard chemotherapy agents, in patients with advanced hematologic malignancies or solid tumors, usually without additive toxicities. The results of phase II studies further supported the antitumor activity of bortezomib in patients with refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma; less impressive results were observed in patients with stage IV renal cell cancer. Studies evaluating bortezomib in earlier stages of multiple myeloma, including first-line therapy, are under way. Evidence suggests that certain prognostic factors, such as older age and bone marrow containing more than 50% plasma cells, may be useful in predicting response and survival time in multiple myeloma patients receiving bortezomib. Further studies of bortezomib are needed to establish its full spectrum of activity, the ideal regimens for various tumor types, and clinically useful prognostic indicators that predict successful outcomes.

Animals↗