What do doctors find meaningful about their work?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to William T Branch.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
African Americans have an increased burden of both diabetes and diabetes complications. Since many patients have high glucose levels novel interventions are needed, especially for urban patients with limited resources. In the Grady Diabetes Clinic in Atlanta, a stepped care strategy improves metabolic control. However, most diabetes patients do not receive specialized care. We will attempt to translate diabetes clinic approaches to the primary care setting by implementing a novel partnership between specialists and generalists. We hypothesize that endocrinologist-supported strategies aimed at providers will result in effective diabetes management in primary care sites, and the Improving Primary Care of African Americans with Diabetes project will test this hypothesis in a major randomized, controlled trial involving over 2000 patients. Physicians in Grady Medical Clinic units will receive (1) usual care, (2) computerized reminders that recommend individualized changes in therapy and/or (3) directed discussion by endocrinologists providing feedback on performance. We will measure outcomes related to both microvascular disease (HbA1c, which reflects average glucose levels over an approximately 2-month period) and macrovascular disease (blood pressure and lipids) and assess provider performance as well. We will compare two readily generalizable program interventions that should delineate approaches effective in a primary care setting as needed to improve care and prevent complications in urban African Americans with type 2 diabetes.
BACKGROUND: We sought to identity the choices and the methods used by ambulatory teachers in a qualitative study, using teacher-intern-patient role plays to improve ambulatory teaching. METHODS: We used repeated performances of a scripted role play; during each iteration, field notes were taken by the authors. Insights garnered at each iteration were incorporated into the next version of the role play. After 9 iterations, no further insights into outpatient teaching were forthcoming, and our observations were included into a qualitative study. RESULTS: The sequence of steps and major choices to be made in an outpatient teaching encounter were delineated. The goals of the initial opening phase were defined as setting a learning climate, gathering information about the case, and assessing the learner's level of knowledge. Alternatives posed for setting up the second phase of the interaction with the patient included the choice of being a role model or being a "coach." Three-way conversations between patient, learner, and teacher were described in this phase of the encounter. In the final or summary phase of the encounter, we described the choices between giving a "general rule" for learning, and/or exploring higher-level issues, such as patient-doctor communication skills, medical ethics, or feedback for the learner. CONCLUSIONS: The sequence of steps involved in an outpatient teaching encounter, were defined, and the major choices to be made in the encounter were described.
Feedback and reflection are two basic teaching methods used in clinical settings. In this article, the authors explore the distinctions between, and the potential impact of, feedback and reflection in clinical teaching. Feedback is the heart of medical education; different teaching encounters call for different types of feedback. Although most clinicians are familiar with the principles of giving feedback, many clinicians probably do not recognize the many opportunities presented to them for using feedback as a teaching tool. Reflection in medicine-the consideration of the larger context, the meaning, and the implications of an experience and action-allows the assimilation and reordering of concepts, skills, knowledge, and values into pre-existing knowledge structures. When used well, reflection will promote the growth of the individual. While feedback is not used often enough, reflection is probably used even less.