PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Wojciech Bulski

Publications and source records attributed to Wojciech Bulski.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Determinants of model of renarrowing after beta radiation for in-stent restenosis.

UNLABELLED: It is unknown whether model of renarrowing after beta-radiation for in-stent restenosis (ISR) is influenced by the type of geographic miss (GM). METHODS: In 166 ISR treated with Galileo, serial quantitative coronary angiographic analysis was done. Minimal lumen diameters and lengths were measured for (1) stent, (2) peri-stent subsegments subjected to angioplasty with/without irradiation, and (3) irradiation margins. GM was defined as: (Type 1) edge injury within the 32P source dose fall-off: 2.0 mm inside and outside the source end marker or (Type 2) overt, nonirradiated injury: beyond the outer 2.0-mm long dose fall-off zone. RESULTS: Restenosis rate was 28.3% at 8.9+/-4.5 months with 60% located exclusively outside the stent. Type 1 GM was present in 24.7% of proximal edges, whereas Type 2 in 18.1%. Respective percentages for distal edges were 23.5% and 15.7%. Regardless of presence and type of GM, significant late lumen loss occurred only outside the stent. However, the biggest late lumen loss at the proximal edge was induced by the Type 1 GM (0.65+/-0.79, p<0.001), while proximal Type 2 GM was not associated with edge renarrowing (-0.04+/-0.48, p=NS). Both reference lumen diameter and proximal Type 1 GM influenced restenosis independently (OR 0.47; 95%CI 0.24-0.90; p=0.023 and OR 2.46; 95%CI 1.12-5.40; p=0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of presence and type of geographic miss, late lumen loss after beta-radiation occurs only outside the stent. However, injury within the proximal 32P dose fall-off but not overt edge injury is associated with the biggest late lumen loss at the respective edge, triggering recurrent restenosis.

Aged↗

Effectiveness and determinants of the long-term beta intracoronary brachytherapy results.

BACKGROUND: Effectiveness evaluation and search for the factors determining long-term results of beta intracoronary brachytherapy (ICBT) are of a special importance in an upcoming era of drug-eluting stents usage for a wide range of clinical indications: de novo and in-stent restenosis lesions. METHODS: One hundred forty eight consecutive patients (59.6+/-9.6 years, 72% men) treated with beta ICBT for in-stent restenosis (ISR) or de novo lesions were studied. There were 135 ISR in 121 patients and 31 de novo lesions in 27 patients. Follow-up coronary angiography was performed in all patients after a mean of 8.9+/-4.5 months. Detailed qualitative and quantitative angiographic analysis of pre-, peri- and postprocedural as well as follow-up angiograms was performed. RESULTS: Forty five percent of patients treated for de novo lesions were diabetic. Thirty five percent of all targets were located in vessels with a reference vessel diameter <2.5 mm. Furthermore, 77% of ISR lesions were in Class 1 according to the Mehran classification. The mean length of an irradiated segment was 37.6 mm. The overall recurrent restenosis rate was 28.3%. Multivariate analysis revealed that the reference vessel diameter and the presence of edge injury within the proximal 32P source dose-fall off were the only independent predictors of recurrent restenosis after ICBT (OR 0.46; 95%CI 0.24-0.89; p=0.021 and OR 2.55; 95%CI 1.23-5.25; p=0.011, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Recurrent restenosis after beta intracoronary brachytherapy treatment is negatively associated with the target vessel size. Presence of edge injury within the proximal 32P source dose-fall increases the frequency of recurrent renarrowing after ICBT. Our results indicate that target vessel size should be taken into account in optimising interventional strategy for ISR treatment: drug eluting stents versus intracoronary brachytherapy. Avoidance of edge injury within the proximal 32P source dose fall-off is strongly recommended while ICBT application.

Aged↗

The effective dose (Deff) for electron beams.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Calculation of the effective dose and proposal of a dose specification method for the electron beams. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a homogenous water phantom the 3D dose distributions for electron beams of energy 6, 9, 12, 15, 18 and 21 MeV and beam size 10x10 cm were calculated. For a volume encompassed with 80, 85 and 90% isodose, the mean dose and the SD were calculated for each energy. Using the Brahme's formulae, the effective dose was calculated. RESULTS: The larger the minimum dose (value of the encompassing isodose), the larger the mean dose and the smaller the SD. The mean doses and SD to the volume encompassed with 80, 85 and 90% are in the range of 91-94%, and 5.1-6.2%, 93-96% and 4.2-4.6%, 94-96% and 3.0-3.2%, respectively. Thus the effective dose for the volume encompassed with 80, 85 and 90% are about 90, 93 and 95%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Taking into account the requirements regarding dose uniformity within the PTV and the sparing effect for normal tissue situated under the PTV, we propose to keep the 85% isodose as a minimum one and to prescribe the dose to the 90% isodose. The present method may be applied for single electron beams and typical cases.

Electrons↗

Angiographic restenosis following intravascular beta-brachytherapy does not correlate with delivered dose: a study with dose volume histograms. Recurrence of in-stent restenosis after brachytherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Vascular brachytherapy reduces recurrence after treatment of in-stent restenosis. However, there are still failures. The aims of the study were to investigate the relationship between two distinct dose prescriptions and the calculated dose delivered versus binary angiographic restenosis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifty-five lesions in 47 patients underwent catheter-based beta-brachytherapy with a (32)P source. Doses delivered were calculated using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) measurements. Patients randomly received 20 Gy either at 1 mm beyond mean reference lumen or 1 mm beyond mean reference external elastic membrane. Using subsequent off-line volumetric IVUS measurements, dose volume histograms (DVHs) for the adventitia were determined. RESULTS: There were 13 restenotic lesions including four total occlusions. All recurrences localized within stented segment. The frequency of restenosis was similar between dosimetry groups (20% vs. 28%; P=.5). DVH calculations were similar in restenotic versus restenosis-free lesions. However, postprocedural IVUS minimal lumen area was significantly smaller for lesions that recurred (5.03+/-1.19 mm(2) vs. 6.13+/-1.7 mm(2); P=.042). CONCLUSIONS: Calculated cumulative doses delivered to the tissues do not correlate with clinical outcome. However, an adequate lumen may be important to accommodate even a small amount of recurrent intimal hyperplasia to limit restenosis and need for target lesion revascularization.

Aged↗

Optimization of dose prescription protocol and its impact on delivered dose and vascular response after beta-radiation for in-stent restenosis. A randomized trial with serial volumetric intravascular ultrasound and dose volume histograms.

AIM: The incidence of restenosis within stented segment after intravascular brachytherapy with recommended dose prescription protocols is up to 25%. Therefore, we designed a randomized trial comparing recommended dose prescription protocol with dosing adjusted for the source-to-target distance. METHODS: Fifty-one in-stent restenosis (ISR) lesions in 48 patients underwent centered source beta-irradiation with serial intravascular ultrasound. Patients randomly received 20 Gy at 1 mm either beyond lumen surface [n=25, standard group (S)] or external elastic membrane [n=26, dosing-adjusted (DA) group]. Minimum dose absorbed by 90% of adventitia (DV(90%Adv)) was calculated. RESULTS: DV(90%Adv) was higher for the DA group than for the S group (21.63+/-5.67 vs. 12.05+/-4.88 Gy, P<.001). After 8.9+/-4.5 months there was complete lumen preservation in DA vs. lumen decrease subsequent to neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) in S group (0.10+/-1.20 vs. -0.61+/-1.29 mm3/mm, P<.05). Vessel volume increased significantly in the DA group and was unchanged in S group (+1.73, P=.002 vs. 0.14 mm3/mm, P=NS). DV(90%Adv) correlated inversely with NIH volume and positively with vessel volume change (r=-.405, P=.007 and r=.363, P=.017, respectively). CONCLUSION: For beta-irradiation of ISR, dosing adjusted for the source-to-target distance leads to significant increase in target delivered doses, which is associated with complete NIH inhibition and induction of positive vessel remodeling.

Brachytherapy↗

Acute lumen overdilation improves outcome after brachytherapy of in-stent restenosis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to test the impact of acute lumen overdilation on neointimal hyperplasia and late lumen size after vascular brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis (ISR). METHODS: Forty-seven ISR lesions located in 47 coronary arteries in 44 consecutive patients underwent beta brachytherapy with serial intravascular ultrasound studies. Vessel, lumen, and stent cross-sectional area were measured at 1-mm steps. Based on an interpolated reference cross-sectional area, each cross section was assessed as overdilated (lumen cross-sectional area>interpolated reference cross-sectional area) or not overdilated (lumen cross-sectional area <interpolated reference cross-sectional area). RESULTS: Overall, 502 sections were overdilated and 673 sections were not. Overdilated sections had a larger final lumen cross-sectional area (8.02+/-1.98 vs. 6.90+/-2.23 mm2, P<.001) and more recurrent neointimal hyperplasia (1.59+/-2.17 vs. 0.31+/-1.79 mm2, P<.001), but a smaller follow-up area stenosis (-1.03+/-32.99% vs. 22.15+/-20.75%, P<.001). This was especially true in smaller arteries (angiographic reference<3.0 mm) where larger follow-up lumen cross-sectional area and a corresponding smaller area stenosis were present (5.38+/-1.98 vs. 4.84+/-1.88 mm2 and 6.90+/-31.57% vs. 28.61+/-21.86%, P<.01 and P<.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Especially in small arteries, the strategy of acute lumen overdilation during balloon angioplasty prior to beta vascular brachytherapy treatment of ISR lesions has a favorable long-term result.

Angioplasty, Balloon↗

The "shielding" effect of the guide wire during coronary brachytherapy with P-32 source.

Intracoronary beta irradiation (use of beta radiation for intracoronary irradiation) is an effective method in reducing neointimal proliferation after successful angioplasty and stent implantation. However, long-term results may be influenced by absolute dose and by the homogeneity in dose distribution. In our study, we investigated dose perturbation due to the presence of a conventional guide wire during irradiation. The Galileo III centering catheter and P-32 beta source were used. The 55 MD GAF Chromic foil was positioned within a phantom made of PMMA. The dose distribution at cylindrical surfaces has been assessed using GAF Chromic dosimetric foil MD55 (Nuclear Associates, USA). Our study demonstrated the significant dose reduction of 46% in the most "shaded" area. The dose reduction to 80% or less occupy the 60 degrees sector. This phenomenon can cause progression of late restenosis. In conclusion, the results suggest that technical improvements in centering catheter construction should be made to eliminate the "shielding" effect of the guide wire.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗